-
Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size
Authors:
Gemma Team,
Morgane Riviere,
Shreya Pathak,
Pier Giuseppe Sessa,
Cassidy Hardin,
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Léonard Hussenot,
Thomas Mesnard,
Bobak Shahriari,
Alexandre Ramé,
Johan Ferret,
Peter Liu,
Pouya Tafti,
Abe Friesen,
Michelle Casbon,
Sabela Ramos,
Ravin Kumar,
Charline Le Lan,
Sammy Jerome,
Anton Tsitsulin,
Nino Vieillard,
Piotr Stanczyk,
Sertan Girgin,
Nikola Momchev,
Matt Hoffman
, et al. (172 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this work, we introduce Gemma 2, a new addition to the Gemma family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models, ranging in scale from 2 billion to 27 billion parameters. In this new version, we apply several known technical modifications to the Transformer architecture, such as interleaving local-global attentions (Beltagy et al., 2020a) and group-query attention (Ainslie et al., 2023). We al…
▽ More
In this work, we introduce Gemma 2, a new addition to the Gemma family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models, ranging in scale from 2 billion to 27 billion parameters. In this new version, we apply several known technical modifications to the Transformer architecture, such as interleaving local-global attentions (Beltagy et al., 2020a) and group-query attention (Ainslie et al., 2023). We also train the 2B and 9B models with knowledge distillation (Hinton et al., 2015) instead of next token prediction. The resulting models deliver the best performance for their size, and even offer competitive alternatives to models that are 2-3 times bigger. We release all our models to the community.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2024; v1 submitted 31 July, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
RecurrentGemma: Moving Past Transformers for Efficient Open Language Models
Authors:
Aleksandar Botev,
Soham De,
Samuel L Smith,
Anushan Fernando,
George-Cristian Muraru,
Ruba Haroun,
Leonard Berrada,
Razvan Pascanu,
Pier Giuseppe Sessa,
Robert Dadashi,
Léonard Hussenot,
Johan Ferret,
Sertan Girgin,
Olivier Bachem,
Alek Andreev,
Kathleen Kenealy,
Thomas Mesnard,
Cassidy Hardin,
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Shreya Pathak,
Laurent Sifre,
Morgane Rivière,
Mihir Sanjay Kale,
Juliette Love,
Pouya Tafti
, et al. (37 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We introduce RecurrentGemma, an open language model which uses Google's novel Griffin architecture. Griffin combines linear recurrences with local attention to achieve excellent performance on language. It has a fixed-sized state, which reduces memory use and enables efficient inference on long sequences. We provide a pre-trained model with 2B non-embedding parameters, and an instruction tuned var…
▽ More
We introduce RecurrentGemma, an open language model which uses Google's novel Griffin architecture. Griffin combines linear recurrences with local attention to achieve excellent performance on language. It has a fixed-sized state, which reduces memory use and enables efficient inference on long sequences. We provide a pre-trained model with 2B non-embedding parameters, and an instruction tuned variant. Both models achieve comparable performance to Gemma-2B despite being trained on fewer tokens.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology
Authors:
Gemma Team,
Thomas Mesnard,
Cassidy Hardin,
Robert Dadashi,
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Shreya Pathak,
Laurent Sifre,
Morgane Rivière,
Mihir Sanjay Kale,
Juliette Love,
Pouya Tafti,
Léonard Hussenot,
Pier Giuseppe Sessa,
Aakanksha Chowdhery,
Adam Roberts,
Aditya Barua,
Alex Botev,
Alex Castro-Ros,
Ambrose Slone,
Amélie Héliou,
Andrea Tacchetti,
Anna Bulanova,
Antonia Paterson,
Beth Tsai,
Bobak Shahriari
, et al. (83 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work introduces Gemma, a family of lightweight, state-of-the art open models built from the research and technology used to create Gemini models. Gemma models demonstrate strong performance across academic benchmarks for language understanding, reasoning, and safety. We release two sizes of models (2 billion and 7 billion parameters), and provide both pretrained and fine-tuned checkpoints. Ge…
▽ More
This work introduces Gemma, a family of lightweight, state-of-the art open models built from the research and technology used to create Gemini models. Gemma models demonstrate strong performance across academic benchmarks for language understanding, reasoning, and safety. We release two sizes of models (2 billion and 7 billion parameters), and provide both pretrained and fine-tuned checkpoints. Gemma outperforms similarly sized open models on 11 out of 18 text-based tasks, and we present comprehensive evaluations of safety and responsibility aspects of the models, alongside a detailed description of model development. We believe the responsible release of LLMs is critical for improving the safety of frontier models, and for enabling the next wave of LLM innovations.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2024; v1 submitted 13 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models
Authors:
Gemini Team,
Rohan Anil,
Sebastian Borgeaud,
Jean-Baptiste Alayrac,
Jiahui Yu,
Radu Soricut,
Johan Schalkwyk,
Andrew M. Dai,
Anja Hauth,
Katie Millican,
David Silver,
Melvin Johnson,
Ioannis Antonoglou,
Julian Schrittwieser,
Amelia Glaese,
Jilin Chen,
Emily Pitler,
Timothy Lillicrap,
Angeliki Lazaridou,
Orhan Firat,
James Molloy,
Michael Isard,
Paul R. Barham,
Tom Hennigan,
Benjamin Lee
, et al. (1325 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This report introduces a new family of multimodal models, Gemini, that exhibit remarkable capabilities across image, audio, video, and text understanding. The Gemini family consists of Ultra, Pro, and Nano sizes, suitable for applications ranging from complex reasoning tasks to on-device memory-constrained use-cases. Evaluation on a broad range of benchmarks shows that our most-capable Gemini Ultr…
▽ More
This report introduces a new family of multimodal models, Gemini, that exhibit remarkable capabilities across image, audio, video, and text understanding. The Gemini family consists of Ultra, Pro, and Nano sizes, suitable for applications ranging from complex reasoning tasks to on-device memory-constrained use-cases. Evaluation on a broad range of benchmarks shows that our most-capable Gemini Ultra model advances the state of the art in 30 of 32 of these benchmarks - notably being the first model to achieve human-expert performance on the well-studied exam benchmark MMLU, and improving the state of the art in every one of the 20 multimodal benchmarks we examined. We believe that the new capabilities of the Gemini family in cross-modal reasoning and language understanding will enable a wide variety of use cases. We discuss our approach toward post-training and deploying Gemini models responsibly to users through services including Gemini, Gemini Advanced, Google AI Studio, and Cloud Vertex AI.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2024; v1 submitted 18 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Skill Rating for Generative Models
Authors:
Catherine Olsson,
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Tom Brown,
Augustus Odena,
Ian Goodfellow
Abstract:
We explore a new way to evaluate generative models using insights from evaluation of competitive games between human players. We show experimentally that tournaments between generators and discriminators provide an effective way to evaluate generative models. We introduce two methods for summarizing tournament outcomes: tournament win rate and skill rating. Evaluations are useful in different cont…
▽ More
We explore a new way to evaluate generative models using insights from evaluation of competitive games between human players. We show experimentally that tournaments between generators and discriminators provide an effective way to evaluate generative models. We introduce two methods for summarizing tournament outcomes: tournament win rate and skill rating. Evaluations are useful in different contexts, including monitoring the progress of a single model as it learns during the training process, and comparing the capabilities of two different fully trained models. We show that a tournament consisting of a single model playing against past and future versions of itself produces a useful measure of training progress. A tournament containing multiple separate models (using different seeds, hyperparameters, and architectures) provides a useful relative comparison between different trained GANs. Tournament-based rating methods are conceptually distinct from numerous previous categories of approaches to evaluation of generative models, and have complementary advantages and disadvantages.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Towards Mixed Optimization for Reinforcement Learning with Program Synthesis
Authors:
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Kumar Krishna Agrawal,
Rishabh Singh
Abstract:
Deep reinforcement learning has led to several recent breakthroughs, though the learned policies are often based on black-box neural networks. This makes them difficult to interpret and to impose desired specification constraints during learning. We present an iterative framework, MORL, for improving the learned policies using program synthesis. Concretely, we propose to use synthesis techniques t…
▽ More
Deep reinforcement learning has led to several recent breakthroughs, though the learned policies are often based on black-box neural networks. This makes them difficult to interpret and to impose desired specification constraints during learning. We present an iterative framework, MORL, for improving the learned policies using program synthesis. Concretely, we propose to use synthesis techniques to obtain a symbolic representation of the learned policy, which can then be debugged manually or automatically using program repair. After the repair step, we use behavior cloning to obtain the policy corresponding to the repaired program, which is then further improved using gradient descent. This process continues until the learned policy satisfies desired constraints. We instantiate MORL for the simple CartPole problem and show that the programmatic representation allows for high-level modifications that in turn lead to improved learning of the policies.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2018; v1 submitted 1 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
The Mirage of Action-Dependent Baselines in Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
George Tucker,
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Shixiang Gu,
Richard E. Turner,
Zoubin Ghahramani,
Sergey Levine
Abstract:
Policy gradient methods are a widely used class of model-free reinforcement learning algorithms where a state-dependent baseline is used to reduce gradient estimator variance. Several recent papers extend the baseline to depend on both the state and action and suggest that this significantly reduces variance and improves sample efficiency without introducing bias into the gradient estimates. To be…
▽ More
Policy gradient methods are a widely used class of model-free reinforcement learning algorithms where a state-dependent baseline is used to reduce gradient estimator variance. Several recent papers extend the baseline to depend on both the state and action and suggest that this significantly reduces variance and improves sample efficiency without introducing bias into the gradient estimates. To better understand this development, we decompose the variance of the policy gradient estimator and numerically show that learned state-action-dependent baselines do not in fact reduce variance over a state-dependent baseline in commonly tested benchmark domains. We confirm this unexpected result by reviewing the open-source code accompanying these prior papers, and show that subtle implementation decisions cause deviations from the methods presented in the papers and explain the source of the previously observed empirical gains. Furthermore, the variance decomposition highlights areas for improvement, which we demonstrate by illustrating a simple change to the typical value function parameterization that can significantly improve performance.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2018; v1 submitted 27 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Deep API Programmer: Learning to Program with APIs
Authors:
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Rishabh Singh,
Abdel-rahman Mohamed,
Pushmeet Kohli
Abstract:
We present DAPIP, a Programming-By-Example system that learns to program with APIs to perform data transformation tasks. We design a domain-specific language (DSL) that allows for arbitrary concatenations of API outputs and constant strings. The DSL consists of three family of APIs: regular expression-based APIs, lookup APIs, and transformation APIs. We then present a novel neural synthesis algori…
▽ More
We present DAPIP, a Programming-By-Example system that learns to program with APIs to perform data transformation tasks. We design a domain-specific language (DSL) that allows for arbitrary concatenations of API outputs and constant strings. The DSL consists of three family of APIs: regular expression-based APIs, lookup APIs, and transformation APIs. We then present a novel neural synthesis algorithm to search for programs in the DSL that are consistent with a given set of examples. The search algorithm uses recently introduced neural architectures to encode input-output examples and to model the program search in the DSL. We show that synthesis algorithm outperforms baseline methods for synthesizing programs on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
RobustFill: Neural Program Learning under Noisy I/O
Authors:
Jacob Devlin,
Jonathan Uesato,
Surya Bhupatiraju,
Rishabh Singh,
Abdel-rahman Mohamed,
Pushmeet Kohli
Abstract:
The problem of automatically generating a computer program from some specification has been studied since the early days of AI. Recently, two competing approaches for automatic program learning have received significant attention: (1) neural program synthesis, where a neural network is conditioned on input/output (I/O) examples and learns to generate a program, and (2) neural program induction, wh…
▽ More
The problem of automatically generating a computer program from some specification has been studied since the early days of AI. Recently, two competing approaches for automatic program learning have received significant attention: (1) neural program synthesis, where a neural network is conditioned on input/output (I/O) examples and learns to generate a program, and (2) neural program induction, where a neural network generates new outputs directly using a latent program representation.
Here, for the first time, we directly compare both approaches on a large-scale, real-world learning task. We additionally contrast to rule-based program synthesis, which uses hand-crafted semantics to guide the program generation. Our neural models use a modified attention RNN to allow encoding of variable-sized sets of I/O pairs. Our best synthesis model achieves 92% accuracy on a real-world test set, compared to the 34% accuracy of the previous best neural synthesis approach. The synthesis model also outperforms a comparable induction model on this task, but we more importantly demonstrate that the strength of each approach is highly dependent on the evaluation metric and end-user application. Finally, we show that we can train our neural models to remain very robust to the type of noise expected in real-world data (e.g., typos), while a highly-engineered rule-based system fails entirely.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.