US District Court for the District of Columbia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,208
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, A WASHINGTON D.C. CORPORATION v. XYZ DEFENDANTS
as 1:2024cv02565
Defendant:
XYZ DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, A WASHINGTON D.C. CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
PV Law LLP v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
PV Law LLP
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
PATEL v. GEORGETOWN SOFTWARE HOUSE, INC.
as 1:2024cv02535
Plaintiff:
DINESH PATEL
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN SOFTWARE HOUSE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv02430
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv02431
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
OPPENHEIMER v. OPAPELEO CORP.
as 1:2024cv02427
Defendant:
OPAPELEO CORP.
Plaintiff:
DAVID GORDON OPPENHEIMER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ROADGET BUSINESS PTE. LTD. v. PDD HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02402
Defendant:
WHALECO, INC., PDD HOLDINGS INC. and DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
ROADGET BUSINESS PTE. LTD.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
RDK NY INC v. THE DAILY CALLER, INC.
as 1:2024cv02336
Defendant:
DAILY CALLER, INC.
Plaintiff:
RDK NY INC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
TALIA v. DAILY CALLER, INC.
as 1:2024cv02339
Defendant:
DAILY CALLER, INC.
Plaintiff:
BEN-ORA JANE TALIA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
GASTMAN v. STOWERS et al
as 1:2024cv02269
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and CORY STOWERS
Plaintiff:
ROGER GASTMAN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
