Wikipedia

Colombia: Revision history

View logs for this page (view filter log)
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

27 August 2024

26 August 2024

12 August 2024

9 August 2024

7 August 2024

25 July 2024

21 July 2024

16 July 2024

15 July 2024

14 July 2024

25 June 2024

19 June 2024

14 June 2024

11 June 2024

10 June 2024

  • curprev 20:1520:15, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 302,151 bytes +699‎ Ok, so I examined each of the sources. I’ll tell you why the 2010 one is more accurate than the other ones in the talk page because I noticed some flaws with the other ones and how they made theirs,also the 2010 one focuses solely on Columbia where as the other ones focus on other countries and Latin America in general it’s better to go with the one that focuses on solely Columbia in this case Tags: Manual revert Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 05:2205:22, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 301,452 bytes −4,249‎ That is because I was not aware of the name of the section nor was I aware about the inclusion of it until you made the edit. It is clear that genetic studies like that should be added not in the main country page which is supposed to be an overview of the nation but rather to one that specifically focuses on the subject, this case being Race and ethnicity in Colombia however you keep on insisting and reverting the removal Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:2005:20, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 305,701 bytes +4,249‎ You say that there cannot be genetic sources when there was an old source from 2010 there for a long time, but you do not eliminate it, you eliminate the sources of important portals such as PLOS of 2016 and 2018. Then you say that the sampled population is small, so I put one of more than 1,600 Colombians and even then you say that it should not go there. Can you explain me? It is simply your whim to put an old and also unfounded source on top of other much more complete studies with better inf Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:1405:14, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 301,452 bytes −4,249‎ And this is why I am telling you. ADD IT TO ANOTHER PAGE. There shall be no ethnographical study in a page of a country because there is conflicting evidence it’s best to not add it here and to a different page I don’t know what you don’t understand Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:1205:12, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 305,701 bytes +4,249‎ You were reported for use of rampant vandalism. Higher ranking users will observe the discussion and make a response. Wikipedia is a page that is responsible for improving every day and updating sources year after year, the use of vandalism IS NOT ALLOWED. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:0705:07, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 301,452 bytes −4,249‎ There is absolutely no need for it here how about you stop the vandalism Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:0605:06, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 305,701 bytes +4,249‎ No edit summary Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:0505:05, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 301,452 bytes −4,249‎ No there has not you are just placing it wherever you feel like it there are Wikipedia pages for these specific things in the first place this is supposed to be an overview of a nation not an ethnographic study of it if you want to have it placed here so bad then use. Race and ethnicity in Colombia where you can specify on the information and get more specific Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:0205:02, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 305,701 bytes +4,249‎ There has been a circular diagram established for years in the ethnography section. Last warning ElMexicanotres! Stop vandalism of this page or you will be reported. You cannot continue maintaining genetic studies from the 1990s and 2000s, eliminating more recent exact and precise studies at the Latin American level. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 05:0005:00, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ m 301,452 bytes −4,249‎ Undid revision 1228237868 by Jhoan Batipse (talk) Theres a Wikipedia page for this, use Race and ethnicity in Colombia this is just a general overview of ethnic groups Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 04:5904:59, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 305,701 bytes +4,249‎ No edit summary Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 04:5804:58, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 301,452 bytes −4,249‎ →‎Ethnic groups: There is no need for talking about genetics in the ethnic group category I have no idea why it was placed here in the first place since there are Wikipedia pages for this stuff Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 04:5604:56, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 305,701 bytes +1,119‎ 1,659 samples for Colombia: Admixture in Latin America: Geographic Structure, Phenotypic Diversity and Self-Perception of Ancestry Based on 7,342 Individuals (2014 year). They include ancestry, eye color, hair color, hair shape, malanin, among others. Countries evaluated: Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Peru, Mexico. User ElMexicanotres please do not continue deleting detailed and accurate information from the 1990s and 2000s. Wikipedia updates information closer to the current date every year. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
  • curprev 04:5304:53, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 304,582 bytes +1,569‎ No edit summary Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 04:5204:52, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 303,013 bytes −1,569‎ →‎Ethnic groups: I don’t care about the barometro thing, I am saying the total number of samples in the sources are less than 200 but for the other one from American Journal of Anthropology it used nearly 10 times as many samples than both combined and it’s not much older there is no reason to replace it with ones that only have 100 people at most it’s better just to keep this one as it is right now Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 04:3904:39, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 304,582 bytes +2,431‎ The ones you have are very old (2010) with samples from 2000 to 2007 and barometer has no information (being a projection magazine, not genetics), meanwhile we put more recent ones, therefore more effective because they are samples, they are not projections made by Plos . Do not continue deleting the 2016 and 2018 sources or I will report you to others. You already have several complaints of vandalism. Thank you Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 04:1904:19, 10 June 2024‎ ElMexicanotres talk contribs‎ 302,151 bytes −2,431‎ I looked at the articles and it says on the one you put that only has 96 samples for columbia but the other one that was there before has 1737 samples, so I believe we should use that one instead Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 03:5903:59, 10 June 2024‎ Jhoan Batipse talk contribs‎ 304,582 bytes +966‎ No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombia"