2020 Korean YouTube backdoor advertising controversy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Beginning of the controversy: Korean/Japanese reference formatting and minor fixes, removed: {{!}} 세상을 깨우는 재미진 목소리
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Undisclosed advertising by Korean YouTubers}}
<noinclude>{{User:RMCD bot/subject notice|1=2020 Korean YouTube backdoor advertising controversy|2=Talk:YouTuber back advertisement controversy in Korea in 2020#Requested move 22 June 2021}}
The '''2020 Korean YouTube backdoor advertising controversy''' refers to the practice of undisclosed or 'backdoor' advertising by Korean [[YouTube]]rs and [[Internet celebrity|internet celebrities]], involving the promotion of products without the disclosure of a [[Sponsor (commercial)|paid partnership]] with the suppliers of these products. The discovery of this practice led to widespread controversy and the eventual involvement of the South Korean [[Fair Trade Commission (South Korea)|Fair Trade Commission]], which imposed strict regulations on [[social media]] providers in a major crackdown. The incident also prompted calls for similar regulation in other countries, such as the United States and Japan.
</noinclude>{{Copy edit|for=semantics and overall word choice, since largely written by non-native English speakers|date=June 2021}}
== The beginningBeginning of the controversy ==
[[YouTube]] back [[Advertising|advertisements]] are false advertisements in which celebrities and [[List of YouTubers|YouTubers]] introduce products as if they were purchased even though they received advertisement fees from companies. This is because subscribers trust more of the reviews they have purchased and used rather than publicly paid and publicized advertisements.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=김송이|date=2020-08-06|title='내돈내산' 제품이라더니 결국엔 '협찬'… 유튜브 달구는 '뒷광고' 논란|trans-title=It’s a product that I bought with my money, and eventually “sponsor”… "YouTube's back advertisement" controversy|url=https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/08/05/2020080503551.html|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-11-02|website=조선비즈|language=korean}}</ref>
[[File:180331 Kang Min-kyung at Incheon International Airport (2) (cropped).jpg|thumb| Kang Min-kyung at [[Incheon International Airport]]]]
== The beginning of the controversy ==
TheOn back advertisement controversy started with stylist Han Hye-yeon (한혜연). On15 July 15th2020, a media called Dispatch, investigateda celebrities'Korean YouTubemedia back advertisementsorganisation, thereported resultthat beingprominent thatKorean manyinternet celebrities such as Han Hye-yeon (한혜연), and [[Kang Min-kyung|Kang Min-kyung (강민경)]] were receivinginvolved in the process of undisclosed or 'backdoor' advertising, where products were promoted without informingthe disclosure theirof a paid viewerspartnership.<ref>{{Cite web|lastlast1=기자|firstfirst1=김지호,지호 송수민|last2=송 |first2=수민|date=2020-07-15|title=[단독] "내돈내산? 남돈내산!"…강민경·한혜연, 유튜브 장사의 실체|trans-title=[Exclusive] "I gave my money and I bought it? Like I bought it with other money!"... Kang Min-kyung and Han Hye-yeon, the reality of YouTube business.|url=https://www.dispatch.co.kr/2091447|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200722011214/https://www.dispatch.co.kr/2091447 |archive-date=2020-07-22 |access-date=2020-10-28|website=디스패치|language=korean}}</ref> Kang She, who produced a video titled "I gave my money and bought it,<nowiki>''</nowiki>Min-kyung was heardrevealed to have receivedbeen promoting products worth tens of thousands of dollars which were featured in several videos without disclosingrevealing that these videos were sponsored.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=한상범상범|date=2020-08-19|title='대국민 사기극' 뒷광고의 세계|trans-title=The world of the back advertisement for “People"People's Scam”Scam"|url=http://www.ilyosisa.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=221177|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200918104319/http://www.ilyosisa.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=221177 |archive-date=2020-09-18 |access-date=2020-09-28|website=일요시사|language=korean}}</ref> HoweverBoth figures later publicly apologised for their actions<ref>{{Cite web|last=최 |first=보란|date=2020-07-17|title=한혜연, it고개 was숙여 controversial사과 because"혼란 드려 죄송...질타 마음에 새기겠다"(공식)|trans-title=Han Hye-yeon bows his head and apologizes "Sorry for the confusion... I'll keep it didin notmind displayfor paidcriticism" advertisements(Official)|url=https://www.ytn.co.kr/_sn/0117_202007171212292882|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200917181304/https://www.ytn.co.kr/_sn/0117_202007171212292882 on|archive-date=2020-09-17 YouTube|access-date=2020-09-29|website=[[YTN]]|language=korean}}</ref><ref>{{Cite videosweb|date=2020-07-17|title=강민경, PPL 논란 사과 {{!}} 보그 코리아 (Vogue Korea)|trans-title=Kang Min-kyung, PPL apologizes for controversy.|url=http://www.vogue.co.kr/2020/07/17/%ea%b0%95%eb%af%bc%ea%b2%bd-ppl-%eb%85%bc%eb%9e%80-%ec%82%ac%ea%b3%bc/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806092717/http://www.vogue.co.kr/2020/07/17/%EA%B0%95%EB%AF%BC%EA%B2%BD-ppl-%EB%85%BC%EB%9E%80-%EC%82%AC%EA%B3%BC/ |archive-date=2020-08-06 |access-date=2020-09-29|website=Vogue Korea|language=korean}}</ref> following major controversy.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=고재완재완|date=2020-07-16|title='내돈내산'의 역습…강민경X한혜연 PPL논란→비난으로 끝내선 안되는 이유|trans-title=Kang Min-kyung X Han Hye-yeon PPL controversy → The reason why criticism should not end|url=https://sports.chosun.com/news/ntype.htm?id=202007170100161160010864&servicedate=20200716|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211101033925/https://sports.chosun.com/news/ntype.htm?id=202007170100161160010864&servicedate=20200716 |archive-date=2021-11-01 |access-date=2020-11-02|website=스포츠조선[[Sports Chosun]]|language=korean}}</ref>
[[File:180331 Kang Min-kyung at Incheon International Airport (2) (cropped).jpg|thumb| Kang Min-kyung at Incheon International Airport]]
The back advertisement controversy started with stylist Han Hye-yeon (한혜연). On July 15th, a media called Dispatch investigated celebrities' YouTube back advertisements, the result being that many celebrities such as Han Hye-yeon (한혜연), [[Kang Min-kyung|Kang Min-kyung (강민경)]] were receiving products without informing their viewers.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=김지호, 송수민|date=2020-07-15|title=[단독] "내돈내산? 남돈내산!"…강민경·한혜연, 유튜브 장사의 실체|trans-title=[Exclusive] "I gave my money and I bought it? Like I bought it with other money!"... Kang Min-kyung and Han Hye-yeon, the reality of YouTube business.|url=https://www.dispatch.co.kr/2091447|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-28|website=디스패치|language=korean}}</ref> She, who produced a video titled "I gave my money and bought it,<nowiki>''</nowiki> was heard to have received products worth tens of thousands of dollars which were featured in several videos without disclosing that these videos were sponsored.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=한상범|date=2020-08-19|title='대국민 사기극' 뒷광고의 세계|trans-title=The world of the back advertisement for “People's Scam”|url=http://www.ilyosisa.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=221177|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-28|website=일요시사|language=korean}}</ref> However, it was controversial because it did not display paid advertisements on YouTube videos.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=고재완|date=2020-07-16|title='내돈내산'의 역습…강민경X한혜연 PPL논란→비난으로 끝내선 안되는 이유|trans-title=Kang Min-kyung X Han Hye-yeon PPL controversy → The reason why criticism should not end|url=https://sports.chosun.com/news/ntype.htm?id=202007170100161160010864&servicedate=20200716|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-11-02|website=스포츠조선|language=korean}}</ref>
On July 17th, two days after the controversy was reported, Han Hye-yeon (한혜연) posted a video of an apology for the hidden advertisement controversy on YouTube.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=최보란|date=2020-07-17|title=한혜연, 고개 숙여 사과 "혼란 드려 죄송...질타 마음에 새기겠다"(공식)|trans-title=Han Hye-yeon bows his head and apologizes "Sorry for the confusion... I'll keep it in mind for criticism" (Official)|url=https://www.ytn.co.kr/_sn/0117_202007171212292882|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-29|website=YTN|language=korean}}</ref>
 
Subsequently, prominent figures such as singer Kang Min-gyeong (강민경) was also found to have been included products on some of her videos without disclosing that they were sponsored. Two days after the controversy, on July 17th, Kang Min-kyung left a post on Instagram and apologized.<ref>{{CiteYouTuber web|last=에디터|first=오기쁨|date=2020-07-17|title=강민경,'Charm PPLPD' 논란(참피디) 사과also {{!}}revealed 보그their 코리아involvement (Voguein Korea)|trans-title=Kangthis Min-kyung, PPL apologizes for controversypractice.|url=http://www.vogue.co.kr/2020/07/17/%ea%b0%95%eb%af%bc%ea%b2%bd-ppl-%eb%85%bc%eb%9e%80-%ec%82%ac%ea%b3%bc/|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-29|website=Vogue Korea|language=korean}}</ref>The Inlatter addition,would onalso Julypublicly 21st,reveal YouTuberthat 'Charmseveral PD'(참피디)other revealedprominent severalKorean YouTubers who were receivingsimilarly productsinvolved, withoutwhich informingserved theirto viewersgreatly inincrease histhe video.scale The controversy overof the hidden advertisements spread from entertainers to YouTuberscontroversy.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=김민지민지|date=2020-08-08|title=유튜브 뒷광고가 도대체 뭐길래?|trans-title=What is the YouTube back ad?|url=http://biz.heraldcorp.com/view.php?ud=20200808000017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200810021824/http://biz.heraldcorp.com/view.php?ud=20200808000017 |archive-date=2020-08-10 |access-date=2020-11-02|website=헤럴드경제|language=korean}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=김현덕현덕|date=2020-07-21|title="참PD 입니다. 유튜버 광고 생태계에 대해 폭로하겠습니다"|trans-title=This is Charm PD. I will expose the YouTube advertising system.|url=https://www.wikitree.co.kr/articles/554223|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-28|website=위키트리 {{!}} 세상을 깨우는 재미진 목소리|language=korean}}</ref></blockquote>
 
== TheImpact result ofon YouTubers related to the back advertisement ==
 
YouTubers such as [[mukbang]] food reviewers Tzuyang (쯔양), Embro (엠브로), Moon Bok-hee (문복희), and Hamji (햄지) publicly apologised for their actions by admitting to their use of undisclosed advertising.<ref>{{Cite web|last=김 |first=자아|date=2020-08-05|title=참피디 '뒷광고 폭로'에…수백만 유튜버들 줄줄이 '사과'|trans-title=Charm PD's 'back advertisement exposure'... Millions of YouTubers line up'Apologized'|url=https://news.mt.co.kr/mtview.php?no=2020080514151393611|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809093819/https://news.mt.co.kr/mtview.php?no=2020080514151393611 |archive-date=2020-08-09 |access-date=2020-09-29|website=Money Today|language=korean}}</ref> However, this failed to improve public opinion, and led to significant losses in popularity among those involved,<ref>{{Cite web|last=정 |first=지원|date=5 August 2020|title="믿을 놈 하나 없네" 문복희,나름,쯔양,상윤쓰, 뒷광고 논란에 '여론 철퇴'|trans-title="There is no one to believe" 'criticism of public opinion' in controversy behind advertisement|url=http://www.joynews24.com/view/1287917|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201027054823/http://www.joynews24.com/view/1287917 |archive-date=2020-10-27 |access-date=2020-09-29|website=joynews24|language=korean}}</ref> with one YouTuber losing 96% of their viewership in a month.<ref>{{Cite web|last=노 |first=윤주|date=|title=구독자·조회수 급락한 유튜버들…9월부터 뒷광고 사라질까?|trans-title=YouTubers who have plunged in subscribers and views... Will back advertisements disappear from September?|url=https://decenter.kr/NewsView/1Z6Q9ZT0OP|access-date=2020-09-29|website=Decenter|language=korean}}</ref> Some YouTubers stopped uploading videos altogether, and announced their retirement from YouTube as a result of the controversy.<ref>{{Cite web|last=성 |first=소의|date=14 August 2020|title=꺼지지 않는 '뒷광고' 논란... 업계 떠나는 유튜버들|trans-title=Controversy about'back advertisement' that never ends... YouTubers leaving the industry|url=http://www.polinews.co.kr/news/article.html?no=471842|access-date=2020-11-04|website=폴리뉴스|language=korean}}</ref>
Food reviewing YouTubers such as Tzuyang (쯔양), Embro (엠브로), Moon Bok-hee (문복희), and Hamji (햄지) posted an apology every day and admitted they've also performed 'back advertisements' on several on their videos. On August 4th, a video titled "I'll tell you about the advertising issue" was posted on Tzuyang's (쯔양) YouTube channel, the video containing an apology stating, "There are some videos that have not been marked with advertisements," and "I am sorry for being ignorant in the beginning." Hamji, who has 3.7 million subscribers, posted an apology regarding the controversy over the hidden advertisements through the YouTube channel community on August 3, confirming that the videos that were advertisements were missing, and said that she edited the video by entering 'paid advertisement' in the more information section of the video. One day after, YouTuber Moon Bok-hee, who has 4.7 million subscribers, apologized through her YouTube channel community, saying, "There is some dishonest part of displaying advertisements." Moon Bok-hee announced that she had omitted the advertisement by marking the advertisement as a sponsor or by providing different information in 'More' and 'Comment' sections of their channel. On the 5th, Mbro posted a post on his YouTube channel saying, "I apologize for the back advertisement." He has been vaguely displaying advertisements through 'more' and 'comment'. In response, Ambro admitted to his fault, saying, "I deceived the viewer." Other exposed YouTubers posted apology videos.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=김자아|date=2020-08-05|title=참피디 '뒷광고 폭로'에…수백만 유튜버들 줄줄이 '사과'|trans-title=Charm PD's 'back advertisement exposure'... Millions of YouTubers line up'Apologized'|url=https://news.mt.co.kr/mtview.php?no=2020080514151393611|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-29|website=머니투데이|language=korean}}</ref>
However, their subscribers showed a cold reaction to the hidden advertisements in some of their videos. Most of the YouTubers all at once added comments to several of their videos, clarifying that it was a paid advertisement, and tried to correct the situation, but public opinion did not subside.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=정지원|date=|title="믿을 놈 하나 없네" 문복희,나름,쯔양,상윤쓰, 뒷광고 논란에 '여론 철퇴'|trans-title="There is no one to believe" 'criticism of public opinion' in controversy behind advertisement|url=http://www.joynews24.com/view/1287917|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-29|website=joynews24|language=korean}}</ref>
 
== Legal regulation ==
The number of subscribers for YouTubers affected by the controversy who have continued broadcasting have decreased significantly. In the case of Mukbang YouTuber A, on August 3rd, before the controversy, their highest number of subscribers reached 4.7 million. However, after the controversy, 370,000 subscribers left by the 25th. Mukbang YouTuber B, who boasted 1.69 million subscribers, had their subscribers decreased to 1.25 million. On August 6th, just after the controversy, the number of views recorded 1.95 million, an increase of 1.32 million compared to the previous month, but on the 25th, it was only 32,489, a 96% decrease from the previous year. Although the number of subscribers remains unchanged, there are cases where the number of views has plummeted. YouTuber C had 3.77 million subscribers on August 4th, but the number of subscribers on the 25th increased to 3.9 million. However, the number of views fell sharply. On the 2nd, before the controversy, when Mr. C uploaded a new video, the number of views increased by 39% to 5.16 million. On the 24th, after the controversy, even though a new video was posted, it was only 3.71 million, a 4% increase from the previous year.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=노윤주|date=|title=구독자·조회수 급락한 유튜버들…9월부터 뒷광고 사라질까?|trans-title=YouTubers who have plunged in subscribers and views... Will back advertisements disappear from September?|url=https://decenter.kr/NewsView/1Z6Q9ZT0OP|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-29|website=Decenter|language=korean}}</ref>
 
SomeThe YouTubersgrowing quitscale broadcastingof the controversy led to the official involvement of the South Korean Fair Trade Commission (FTC).<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=성소의지혜|date=2020-09-24|title=꺼지지인플루언서, 않는공정위 만나 '뒷광고' 논란... 업계 떠나는근절 유튜버들약속|trans-title=ControversyInfluencer about'backmeets advertisement'Fair thatTrade neverCommission ends...and YouTuberspromises leavingto theeradicate industry'back advertisements'|url=http://www.polinewsinews24.co.krcom/newsview/article.html?no=4718421302217|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201014032313/http://inews24.com/view/1302217 |archive-date=2020-10-14 |access-date=2020-11-04|website=폴리뉴스inews24|language=korean}}</ref> On MookbangAugust YouTuber24 Tzuyang2020, whoChairman hasof 2.68the millionFTC subscribers,Cho announcedSeong-wook hermet retirement,with saying,prominent “Iindividuals willand notinternet becelebrities doingat anythe moreChamber broadcastingof activities”Commerce dueand toIndustry in the controversy[[Jung regardingDistrict, hidden advertisements. On theSeoul|Jung morningDistrict]] of the 6thSeoul, Tzuyangwhich postedresulted ain videothe andimplementation aof poststrict sayingregulations 'Ion willsocial finishmedia theplatforms YouTube broadcast' through her(including YouTube) broadcast.in Tzuyangorder recentlyto apologizedcrack fordown several times when controversy overon the “backpractice advertisement”of that'backdoor' didadvertising.<ref notname=":3">{{Cite markweb|last=강 it|first=종민|date=2020-09-24|title='뒷광고' even논란 though it유튜버 was만난 broadcast조성욱 using"적응 advertising기간 expenses이후 and sponsorship products arose. She also said,엄정 집행"I|trans-title=Jo willSung-wook nevermeets comeYouTuber after'back", sayingadvertisement' thatcontroversy she"Strict waslaw tiredenforcement ofafter theadaptation comment culture spreading false informationperiod"|url=https://www.newsis.com/view/?id=NISX20200924_0001178211|access-date=2020-09-29|website=[[Newsis]]|language=korean}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=기자|first=김진선요훈|date=2020-0809-0628|title=유튜브 뒤흔든 '뒷광고'…"앞으로 논란,유료 먹방광고 유튜버정확히 쯔양 '방송활동 안하겠다, 악플에 지쳐'표기"|trans-title=YouTube'Backback advertisement' controversy,... eating"In YouTuber Ziyang(쯔양)'I will notthe broadcastfuture, Ipaid amadvertisements tiredare ofaccurately bad comments'marked"|url=https://wwwscience.sedailyytn.comco.kr/NewsViewprogram/1Z6H2J6VVD/GL0106|url-statusprogram_view.php?s_mcd=live|archive-url=|archive-date0082&key=202009281653335141|access-date=2020-09-29|website=서울경제YTN 사이언스|language=korean}}</ref> These regulations did not immediately come into effect, but were instead enforced after a certain period of time, in order to allow affected individuals time to comply.<ref name=":0" />
 
The regulations required internet celebrities to clearly disclose instances of advertising and paid sponsorships as well as associated payments, and prohibited ambiguous phrases such as 'experience group' and 'thanks to'. Contravention of these regulations would be met by significant legal and financial penalties, including up to two years in prison and fines of up to 150 million won. Although these laws were typically applied to business owners, internet celebrities were considered as such and were therefore subject to the same treatment under South Korean law.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=차 |first=지연|date=2020-08-12|title=9월부터 유튜브 '뒷광고' 금지…공정위 "계도기간 후 처벌"|trans-title=YouTube'back advertisement' banned from September... Fair Trade Commission "penalties after the transition period"|url=https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20200811153200002|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812164454/https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20200811153200002 |archive-date=2020-08-12 |access-date=2020-11-04|website=[[Yonhap News Agency]]|language=korean}}</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" />
== Aftermath ==
 
== ExamplesImpact fromon other countries ==
As the controversy grew, the government met with YouTubers and held a meeting to prevent hidden advertisements.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=윤지혜|date=2020-09-24|title=인플루언서, 공정위 만나 '뒷광고' 근절 약속|trans-title=Influencer meets Fair Trade Commission and promises to eradicate'back advertisement'|url=http://www.inews24.com/view/1302217|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-11-04|website=inews24|language=korean}}</ref> The [[Fair Trade Commission (South Korea)|Fair Trade Commission]], YouTubers and MCN companies attended there. On August 24, 2020, Chairman of the Fair Trade Commission, Cho Seong-wook, met with the MCN industry and influencers at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Jung-gu, Seoul, and held a 'Conversation to Prevent Unfair Advertising on Social Network Service (SNS)'. This event was set up to ensure that the MCN industry and influencers expressed their will to comply with the issue of 'back advertisement (unfair advertisement on SNS)' and that they would not repeat the same controversy.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=강종민|date=2020-09-24|title='뒷광고' 논란 후 유튜버 만난 조성욱 "적응 기간 이후 법 엄정 집행"|trans-title=Jo Sung-wook meets YouTuber after'back advertisement' controversy "Strict law enforcement after adaptation period"|url=https://www.newsis.com/view/?id=NISX20200924_0001178211|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-29|website=newsis|language=korean}}</ref>
 
WhenThe thestrict controversyresponse overby the backSouth advertisingKorean ofFTC influencersprompted arosecalls abroad,for eachsimilar countrymeasures began taking action to end such activities. In the United Statesabroad, as the controversy over the “back advertisement” of influencers continues, there is a discussion that not only advertisers but also platforms should be punished. [[Rohit Chopra]], a standing member ofwith the [[Federal Trade Commission]] of the United States, issuedissuing a statement in February that2021 "wecalling needfor tothe createimplementation aof billsimilar that will hold social media platforms and advertisers that are benefiting enormously from influencer marketingregulations."<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|lastlast1=기자|firstfirst1=하선영,선영 장주영|last2=장 |first2=주영|date=2020-08-13|title='뒷광고' 유튜버만 잘못? 미국, 플랫폼도 처벌 추진|trans-title=Only'back advertisement' YouTubers are wrong? U.S. platforms also push for penalties|url=https://news.joins.com/article/23847455|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812180625/https://news.joins.com/article/23847455 |archive-date=2020-08-12 |access-date=2020-10-29|website=중앙일보[[JoongAng Ilbo]]|language=korean}}</ref> AccordingLegislative tobodies thein legislativeJapan investigationand officeFrance ofpassed thesimilar [[Nationalmeasures, Diet]]with offenders in Japan,France thefacing focuspenalties isof onup self-regulation,to suchtwo asyears makingin guidelinesprison inand thefines privateof sectorup to 300,000 euros.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=박광연광연|date=2020-08-11|title=유튜브 '뒷광고' 뿌리 뽑기…자진 시정 우선, 규제 입법 추진|trans-title=Rooting YouTube'back advertisements'... Prioritize voluntary correction, promote regulatory legislation|url=http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=202008111635001&code=920100|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-29|website=경향신문[[Kyunghyang Shinmun]]|language=korean}}</ref> In France, influencers who advertise behind the scenes are also fined up to two years in prison or 300,000 euros, while in Belgium, the authorities can forcibly delete advertising videos without advertising marks, along with fines up to 80,000 euros.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|last=기자|first=고은이은이|date=2020-08-28|title=규제 사각지대 '뒷광고' 논란|trans-title=Controversy over regulatory blind spot'back advertisement'|url=https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2020082886411|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200828184106/https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2020082886411 |archive-date=2020-08-28 |access-date=2020-10-29|website=한국경제|language=korean}}</ref>
The Fair Trade Commission issued guidelines related to back advertisements. In accordance with the revision of the guidelines for reviewing display advertisements on recommendation guarantees, etc., advertisement display guidelines for postings and posted videos have been applied not only to power bloggers, but also to Instagram and YouTube influencers <ref>{{Cite web|last=IT 칼럼니스트|first=이요훈|date=2020-09-28|title=유튜브 뒤흔든 '뒷광고'…"앞으로 유료 광고 정확히 표기"|trans-title=YouTube'back advertisement' controversy... "In the future, paid advertisements are accurately marked"|url=https://science.ytn.co.kr/program/program_view.php?s_mcd=0082&key=202009281653335141|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-09-29|website=YTN 사이언스|language=korean}}</ref> In addition, it was announced that rather than immediately entering into regulation, after a certain period of guidance, the management and supervision would be conducted through a separate monitoring manpower. An official of the Fair Trade Commission said on September 12, "There are many cases of unintentional violations of the law because they do not know the contents of the revised guidelines for review." He said, “We plan to have a period of instruction first.” He added, "However, if there is a case that repeatedly violates the law or suspects intentionality even after sufficiently promoting it, we will punish it." The revised bill contains content that requires social media influencers to clearly disclose phrases such as 'received sponsorship' and 'this is an advertisement' when posting content such as product reviews and so on. In accordance with the amendment, influencers should write down the content that they 'received economically' when uploading content in a location where consumers can easily find it, using an appropriate font size and color. Ambiguous phrases such as 'experience group' and 'Thanks to' are prohibited. YouTube content should include a phrase at the beginning or end of the post title or video to indicate that it has received an economic price. On Instagram, you must display the content of the economic consideration in the picture. When the photo and the body are linked so that consumers can easily recognize it, they can be displayed in the first part of the body or the first hashtag. In addition, a penalty of 2% or less or 500 million won or less of related sales or revenue is imposed on businesses that advertise unfairly. If the prosecution measures are taken, they could face up to two years in prison or a fine of up to 150 million won. The term 'business owner' here usually means an advertiser who requested an advertisement, but the Fair Trade Commission believes that it is possible to punish influencers who have earned considerable profits as 'business owners.' <ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=차지연|date=2020-08-12|title=9월부터 유튜브 '뒷광고' 금지…공정위 "계도기간 후 처벌"|trans-title=YouTube'back advertisement' banned from September... Fair Trade Commission "penalties after the transition period"|url=https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20200811153200002|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-11-04|website=연합뉴스|language=korean}}</ref>
 
== Examples from other countries ==
 
When the controversy over the back advertising of influencers arose abroad, each country began taking action to end such activities. In the United States, as the controversy over the “back advertisement” of influencers continues, there is a discussion that not only advertisers but also platforms should be punished. [[Rohit Chopra]], a standing member of the [[Federal Trade Commission]] of the United States, issued a statement in February that "we need to create a bill that will hold social media platforms and advertisers that are benefiting enormously from influencer marketing."<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=하선영, 장주영|date=2020-08-13|title='뒷광고' 유튜버만 잘못? 미국, 플랫폼도 처벌 추진|trans-title=Only'back advertisement' YouTubers are wrong? U.S. platforms also push for penalties|url=https://news.joins.com/article/23847455|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-29|website=중앙일보|language=korean}}</ref> According to the legislative investigation office of the [[National Diet]] in Japan, the focus is on self-regulation, such as making guidelines in the private sector.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=박광연|date=2020-08-11|title=유튜브 '뒷광고' 뿌리 뽑기…자진 시정 우선, 규제 입법 추진|trans-title=Rooting YouTube'back advertisements'... Prioritize voluntary correction, promote regulatory legislation|url=http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=202008111635001&code=920100|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-29|website=경향신문|language=korean}}</ref> In France, influencers who advertise behind the scenes are also fined up to two years in prison or 300,000 euros, while in Belgium, the authorities can forcibly delete advertising videos without advertising marks, along with fines up to 80,000 euros.<ref>{{Cite web|last=기자|first=고은이|date=2020-08-28|title=규제 사각지대 '뒷광고' 논란|trans-title=Controversy over regulatory blind spot'back advertisement'|url=https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2020082886411|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-29|website=한국경제|language=korean}}</ref>
 
== References ==
Line 34 ⟶ 27:
{{YouTube navbox}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Korean YouTube backdoor advertising controversy, 2020}}
[[Category:YouTube]]
[[Category:YouTube2020 channelscontroversies]]
[[Category:2020s YouTube controversies]]
[[Category:Advertisements]]
[[Category:Controversies in South Korea]]
[[Category:Ethically disputed business practices]]
[[Category:Internet in South Korea]]