Homotopy theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎CW complex: mention CW approximation
Tag: harv-error
Line 43:
Another important result is the approximation theorem. First, the [[homotopy category]] of spaces is the category where an object is a space but a morphism is the homotopy class of a map. Then
 
{{math_theorem|name=[[CW approximation]]|math_statement=<ref>{{harvnb|May|loc=Ch. 10., § 5}}</ref> There exist a functor (called the CW approximation functor)
:<math>\Theta : \operatorname{Ho}(\textrm{spaces}) \to \operatorname{Ho}(\textrm{CW})</math>
from the homotopy category of spaces to the homotopy category of CW complexes as well as a natural transformation
:<math>\theta : i \circ \Theta \to \operatorname{Id},</math>
where <math>i : \operatorname{Ho}(\textrm{CW}) \hookrightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(\textrm{spaces})</math>, such that each <math>\theta_X : i(\Theta(X)) \to X</math> is a weak homotopy equivalence.}}
 
ThereSimilar arestatements also similar approximation theoremshold for pairs and triads.<ref>{{harvnb|May|loc=Ch. 10., § 6}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|May|loc=Ch. 10., § 7}}</ref>}}
 
The above theorem justifies a common habit of working only with CW complexes. For example, given a space <math>X</math>, one can just define the homology of <math>X</math> to the homology of the CW approximation of <math>X</math>.
 
=== Cofibration and fibration ===