McDonnell v. United States: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 05:1905:19, 15 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 10,007 bytes +98‎ noting which Menendez case is being referenced and adding 'see also' to Supreme Court's ethics section undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 18:4318:43, 23 January 2024‎ Drummingman talk contribs‎ m 9,909 bytes −4‎ Reverted edits by 108.188.158.103 (talk) to last revision by Ser Amantio di Nicolao: nonconstructive edits undo Tags: Rollback SWViewer [1.6]
curprev 18:4218:42, 23 January 2024‎ 108.188.158.103 talk‎ 9,913 bytes +7‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 18:4218:42, 23 January 2024‎ 108.188.158.103 talk‎ 9,906 bytes −3‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 06:5106:51, 11 September 2023‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 9,871 bytes +1‎ Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 1188/1511 undo

curprev 02:1402:14, 11 August 2023‎ Lorick7 talk contribs‎ 9,835 bytes +17‎ Added U.S. Reports page number in first sentence of Wikipedia entry and in the infobox. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 14:4014:40, 19 June 2023‎ B talk contribs‎ 8,292 bytes −38‎ Jack Smith did not convict him. A jury did. It is probably appropriate to show who the prosecutor was somewhere ... but just namedropping him doesn't seem to make sense undo Tag: Manual revert

curprev 20:2520:25, 17 June 2023‎ 2601:8c0:1:4a0:7857:8e77:5da2:7cad talk‎ 8,330 bytes −26‎ removed politically charged language undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
curprev 00:0000:00, 17 June 2023‎ 2600:1702:2e70:7990:3158:d2af:cbfa:81ca talk‎ 8,356 bytes +64‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted

curprev 15:0015:00, 11 June 2023‎ B talk contribs‎ 8,292 bytes −407‎ →‎Case background: Removing uncited claim per WP:BLP. I'm pretty sure this is false - he was not prosecuted by the state because he didn't break a state law. It had nothing to do with the attorney general being a Republican. undo
curprev 14:5814:58, 11 June 2023‎ B talk contribs‎ 8,699 bytes −16‎ →‎Case background: Kickbacks are illegal. He did not receive kickbacks and was not accused of receiving kickbacks. He was accused of "acceptance of $175,000 in loans, gifts, and other benefits from Virginia businessman Jonnie Williams" per the Supreme Court ruling. undo
curprev 14:5414:54, 11 June 2023‎ B talk contribs‎ 8,715 bytes −11‎ The Supreme Court link is a dead link. I couldn't find it on supremecourt.gov, but here it is from Cornell undo