Polarization density: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 05:3805:38, 8 December 2023‎ 97.115.120.114 talk‎ 24,062 bytes −9‎ ascii superscript 3 (alt 252) wouldn't work, just made it to the power of n, so i just said meters cubed undo
curprev 05:3205:32, 8 December 2023‎ 97.115.120.114 talk‎ 24,071 bytes +11‎ Me again, just added some more detail on same section xD undo
curprev 05:2805:28, 8 December 2023‎ 97.115.120.114 talk‎ 24,060 bytes +5‎ Just fixed some phrasing that was a bit confusing concerning the units of electric dipole moments. I'm gonna do this more, Wikipedia has some amazing info on science and math, but we math nerds are notorious for our sub par communication skills. I'll help where I can :D undo

curprev 21:5721:57, 4 September 2023‎ 96.227.223.203 talk‎ 23,940 bytes +94‎ →‎Definition: Add clearer explanation from ChatGPT undo

curprev 20:5220:52, 28 August 2023‎ Lklundin talk contribs‎ m 23,846 bytes +28‎ →‎Crystalline materials: ce source: author-link=Nicola Spaldin undo
curprev 08:0108:01, 28 August 2023‎ WikiCleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 23,818 bytes −1‎ v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tag: WPCleaner

curprev 00:3700:37, 6 July 2022‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 23,799 bytes +53‎ Alter: pages, url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: s2cid, bibcode, arxiv. Formatted dashes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 195/283 undo

curprev 09:2309:23, 26 March 2022‎ ZI Jony talk contribs‎ m 23,746 bytes −4‎ v2.04b - Fix errors for CW project (Heading hierarchy) undo Tag: WPCleaner

curprev 17:0517:05, 23 March 2022‎ Cippo1987 talk contribs‎ 23,750 bytes −48‎ →‎Polarization ambiguity[dubious – discuss]: There were some errors and misinterpretation of role of phase transitions undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 00:5800:58, 14 May 2021‎ OlliverWithDoubleL talk contribs‎ m 23,206 bytes +110‎ added short description undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

curprev 19:2419:24, 7 May 2021‎ OAbot talk contribs‎ m 23,096 bytes +20‎ Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot. undo

curprev 05:2305:23, 5 January 2021‎ Putsari talk contribs‎ 23,076 bytes +48‎ Commons category inline undo

curprev 03:1603:16, 28 November 2020‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 23,028 bytes +47‎ Alter: journal, pages. Add: issue, doi, author pars. 1-1. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Headbomb | via #UCB_toolbar undo

curprev 19:1119:11, 19 November 2020‎ Ponor talk contribs‎ m 22,981 bytes −27‎ Undid revision 987593119 by 190.188.138.142 (talk)again, good faith edit, but bold=vector undo Tag: Undo
curprev 19:0919:09, 19 November 2020‎ Ponor talk contribs‎ m 23,008 bytes −35‎ Undid revision 987606450 by Leanbarba (talk)good faith edit, but bold already means vectors undo Tag: Undo

curprev 22:2822:28, 25 September 2020‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 22,981 bytes +20‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Dubious}} undo
curprev 22:0822:08, 25 September 2020‎ Interferometrist talk contribs‎ 22,961 bytes +11‎ →‎Polarization ambiguity: I don't think this is really a valid section. As far as I can tell, an "ambiguity" ONLY exists when there are permanent fields AND when an ambiguity over whether charges are "free" or "bound." But the entire preceding article doesn't mention permanent polarization, only P=χE = bulk polarization, so permanent fields not included in earlier analysis so no such ambiguity arises. And people usually agree on which electrons are "free", though not fundamental. undo