Tughlaq dynasty: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 14:1614:16, 24 July 2024‎ Curious man123 talk contribs‎ 76,402 bytes −10‎ Unsourced country Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 15:1915:19, 23 June 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 76,412 bytes −844‎ →‎History: Sockpuppet edit(mydust). It contradicts the main article of the bahmani sultanate. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 15:1215:12, 23 June 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 77,256 bytes −49‎ →‎History: Once again just like in the main page of the Delhi sultanate, the citations here don’t actually mention khokhars in the page numbers listed. Per the citations listed in the battle of Saraswati and Lahrawat articles, the army was mixed. It included khokhars, Mongols, Turks, Afghans, ETC. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 18:1218:12, 21 June 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 77,305 bytes −856‎ →‎Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq: Nearly 3 days without a response on the talk page so it’s safe to say this is free to go. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 01:5701:57, 19 June 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 78,161 bytes 0‎ →‎Origin: Fixed page number, I somehow switched that around Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 23:0723:07, 18 June 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 78,161 bytes +102‎ Added content Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 10:1610:16, 18 June 2024‎ Malik-Al-Hind talk contribs‎ 78,059 bytes −9‎ →‎Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq: Fixed Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 10:1210:12, 18 June 2024‎ Malik-Al-Hind talk contribs‎ 78,068 bytes +865‎ Actually I did check the reference, it says exactly what it quotes. You can check it in the search bar. While the reference name is certainly wrong and I will fix it. Tags: Manual revert Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 08:4508:45, 18 June 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 77,203 bytes −865‎ →‎Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq: This source seems completely unavailable online. Per guidelines there should at least be a ISBN number, but the one listed here leads to a completely different book written by John F richards. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 08:0608:06, 3 June 2024‎ CtrlFreak578 talk contribs‎ 78,064 bytes +50‎ No edit summary

curprev 19:2719:27, 7 May 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 77,149 bytes −641‎ See talk page. Haven’t gotten a response yet but if there are any concerns check there.
curprev 19:2019:20, 7 May 2024‎ ImperialAficionado talk contribs‎ 77,790 bytes −706‎ Reverted 1 edit by ImperialAficionado (talk): I don't think that was a good decision. Tags: Twinkle Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 19:1719:17, 7 May 2024‎ ImperialAficionado talk contribs‎ 78,496 bytes +706‎ Adding flag Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 20:5620:56, 3 May 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 77,152 bytes −641‎ Undid revision 1222088075 by Malik-Al-Hind (talk) That’s just a definition that you made up. The term “Dynastic” is not mentioned anywhere, nor does it mean what you think it means. The biggest issue however I see, is that non of the sources support the assertion that the tughlaq emperors spoke punjabi. It merely states that one scholar created a war ballad in the language. Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 20:2420:24, 3 May 2024‎ Malik-Al-Hind talk contribs‎ 77,793 bytes +641‎ Dynastic simply means here that the Tughlaq emperors spoke it besides persian. WP:RS is provided for them here as well. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 08:1308:13, 3 May 2024‎ Someguywhosbored talk contribs‎ 77,152 bytes −641‎ What does dynastic mean in this scenario? Furthermore, the existence of a piece of poetry written by one court scholar does not make it a common language. Tag: Reverted

curprev 12:1312:13, 30 April 2024‎ Prakashs27 talk contribs‎ 77,690 bytes +78‎ ghiyath al-din's reign start and nasir-ud-din mahmud shah's reign end

curprev 22:0522:05, 24 April 2024‎ Flemmish Nietzsche talk contribs‎ 77,612 bytes +40‎ Standardization of article use prior to "Tughlaq"
curprev 02:4502:45, 24 April 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 77,572 bytes +247‎ Alter: url, template type, pages. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: publisher, date, isbn, title, authors 1-1. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. Formatted dashes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar

curprev 00:3200:32, 21 April 2024‎ Flemmish Nietzsche talk contribs‎ 77,325 bytes +95‎ Cleanup in downfall section

curprev 01:2101:21, 20 April 2024‎ Akshunwar talk contribs‎ 77,230 bytes +109‎ Another citation, this one has been used in many other Wikipedia pages. Tag: Visual edit
curprev 01:0701:07, 20 April 2024‎ Akshunwar talk contribs‎ 77,121 bytes −12‎ Fixed my citation, sorry. Tag: Visual edit
curprev 01:0601:06, 20 April 2024‎ Akshunwar talk contribs‎ 77,133 bytes +274‎ Showing how Tughluq's spoke and wrote in Punjabi. The sources I listed show Khusrau Khan writing the earliest known Punjabi "Var"/Poem for Ghazi Malik (Tughluq), showing that the Sultan literally knew how to read/write in Punjabi at least, same goes for Firoz Shah, etc... Tag: Visual edit

curprev 09:4809:48, 16 April 2024‎ Malik-Al-Hind talk contribs‎ 76,294 bytes +267‎ Urdu was the language of elites as per the cited source who later carried this language to Deccan when Muhammad Ibn Tughlaq was shifting his capital. Although I have not included it in "official" language. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit