Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania/Assessment: Difference between revisions
Thisisbossi (talk | contribs) →Requesting an assessment or re-assessment: reassessed 2 articles ;; provided comment on Erie, Pennsylvania talk page |
m →Requesting an assessment or re-assessment: remove answered request |
||
(39 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject Pennsylvania}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of [[:Category:Pennsylvania articles by quality]], [[:Category:Pennsylvania articles by importance]], [[:Category:Pennsylvania articles needing attention]], [[:Category:Pennsylvania past collaborations]], and [[:Category:Pennsylvania past selected articles]]. The quality and importance ratings serve as the foundation for an [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pennsylvania articles by quality|automatically generated worklist]]. There is also [[:Category:Non-article Pennsylvania pages]]) for things like redirect pages, templates, categories, images, etc. |
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject Pennsylvania}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of [[:Category:Pennsylvania articles by quality]], [[:Category:Pennsylvania articles by importance]], [[:Category:Pennsylvania articles needing attention]], [[:Category:Pennsylvania past collaborations]], and [[:Category:Pennsylvania past selected articles]]. The quality and importance ratings serve as the foundation for an [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pennsylvania articles by quality|automatically generated worklist]]. There is also [[:Category:Non-article Pennsylvania pages]]) for things like redirect pages, templates, categories, images, etc. |
||
==Current article status== |
|||
{{articles by quality|topic=Pennsylvania|project=Pennsylvania}} |
|||
{{articles by importance|topic=Pennsylvania|project=Pennsylvania}} |
|||
== Frequently asked questions == |
== Frequently asked questions == |
||
Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
* '''FA''' (adds articles to [[:Category:FA-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
* '''FA''' (adds articles to [[:Category:FA-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
||
* '''FL''' (adds articles to [[:Category:FL-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
|||
* '''A''' (adds articles to [[:Category:A-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
* '''A''' (adds articles to [[:Category:A-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
||
* '''GA''' (adds articles to [[:Category:GA-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
* '''GA''' (adds articles to [[:Category:GA-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
||
* '''B''' (adds articles to [[:Category:B-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
* '''B''' (adds articles to [[:Category:B-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
||
* '''List''' (adds articles to [[:Category:List-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
|||
* '''Start''' (adds articles to [[:Category:Start-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
* '''Start''' (adds articles to [[:Category:Start-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
||
* '''Stub''' (adds articles to [[:Category:Stub-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
* '''Stub''' (adds articles to [[:Category:Stub-Class Pennsylvania articles]]) |
||
Line 59: | Line 65: | ||
''Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated. Rate international region/country-specific articles from the prespective of someone from that region.'' |
''Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated. Rate international region/country-specific articles from the prespective of someone from that region.'' |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
{| valign="top" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="1" |
|||
|+ '''Article importance grading scheme''' |
|+ '''Article importance grading scheme''' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Label |
|||
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 | Label |
|||
! Criteria |
|||
! Examples |
|||
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 width = "25%" | Examples |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{Top-Class}} |
| {{Top-Class}} |
||
| Subject is a "core" or "key" topic for Pennsylvania, or is generally notable to people other than students of |
| Subject is a "core" or "key" topic for Pennsylvania, or is generally notable to people other than students of Pennsylvania. They define and determine the subject of the Pennsylvania WikiProject. |
||
| [[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]] |
| [[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 84: | Line 90: | ||
=== Requesting an assessment or re-assessment=== |
=== Requesting an assessment or re-assessment=== |
||
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject |
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania/Peer review|peer review department]] instead. |
||
# ''Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM'' |
# ''Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM'' |
||
# [[Like this]] (and put "(re-)assessment request" in your edit summary of this assessment page), leave reasons if a reassessment. |
# [[Like this]] (and put "(re-)assessment request" in your edit summary of this assessment page), leave reasons if a reassessment. |
||
# <s>[[Temple University]]</s> <sub><i>assessed by [[Special:Contributions/155.247.181.20|155.247.181.20]] on 7 November 2006.</i></sub> |
|||
* [[New Beaver Field]]: Made a lot of changes to the page would love to see if it is out of stub yet. [[User:NoahRiffe|NoahRiffe]] ([[User talk:NoahRiffe|talk]]) 19:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
# <s>[[Allentown, Pennsylvania]]</s> <sub><i>assessed by [[User:Thisisbossi|Thisisbossi]] on 3 December 2006.</i></sub> |
|||
# <s>[[Battle of White Marsh]]</s> <sub><i>assessed by [[User:Thisisbossi|Thisisbossi]] on 3 December 2006.</i></sub> |
|||
==Assessment Log== |
|||
# <s>[[Locust Lake State Park]]</s> <sub><i>assessed by [[User:Thisisbossi|Thisisbossi]] on 3 December 2006.</i></sub> |
|||
:''The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.'' |
|||
# <s>[[History of Pittsburgh]]</s> <sub><i>assessed by [[User:Thisisbossi|Thisisbossi]] on 28 December 2006.</i></sub> |
|||
# [[Erie, Pennsylvania]] <sub> |
|||
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold. |
|||
# <s>[[Chambersburg, Pennsylvania]]</s> <sub><i>assessed by [[User:Thisisbossi|Thisisbossi]] on 27 March 2007.</i></sub> |
|||
# <s>[[Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority]]</s> <sub><i>assessed by [[User:Thisisbossi|Thisisbossi]] on 27 March 2007.</i></sub> |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pennsylvania articles by quality log}} |
Latest revision as of 22:25, 9 April 2023
Pennsylvania articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 9 | 43 | 43 | 97 | ||
FL | 4 | 9 | 11 | 24 | |||
A | 5 | 1 | 6 | ||||
GA | 2 | 21 | 90 | 336 | 1 | 450 | |
B | 13 | 188 | 742 | 920 | 42 | 1,905 | |
C | 8 | 165 | 673 | 3,696 | 70 | 4,612 | |
Start | 11 | 67 | 3,310 | 21,687 | 1 | 114 | 25,190 |
Stub | 1 | 80 | 5,963 | 1 | 41 | 6,086 | |
List | 16 | 84 | 488 | 9 | 12 | 609 | |
Category | 1 | 2 | 6,706 | 6,709 | |||
Disambig | 2 | 262 | 264 | ||||
File | 355 | 355 | |||||
Portal | 99 | 99 | |||||
Project | 2 | 34 | 36 | ||||
Redirect | 2 | 33 | 659 | 1,155 | 1,849 | ||
Template | 1 | 1 | 774 | 776 | |||
NA | 1 | 7 | 3 | 11 | |||
Other | 40 | 40 | |||||
Assessed | 36 | 474 | 5,071 | 33,818 | 9,439 | 280 | 49,118 |
Unassessed | 3 | 1 | 207 | 211 | |||
Total | 36 | 474 | 5,071 | 33,821 | 9,440 | 487 | 49,329 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 187,529 | Ω = 4.89 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Pennsylvania! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Pennsylvania articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Pennsylvania}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Pennsylvania articles by quality, Category:Pennsylvania articles by importance, Category:Pennsylvania articles needing attention, Category:Pennsylvania past collaborations, and Category:Pennsylvania past selected articles. The quality and importance ratings serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. There is also Category:Non-article Pennsylvania pages) for things like redirect pages, templates, categories, images, etc.
Current article status
[edit]FA | A | GA | B | C | Start | Stub | FL | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | File | Portal | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? | Total |
97 | 6 | 450 | 1,905 | 4,612 | 25,190 | 6,085 | 24 | 609 | 6,709 | 264 | 41 | 355 | 99 | 36 | 1,849 | 776 | 28 | 211 | 49,346 |
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total |
36 | 474 | 5,073 | 33,826 | 9,451 | 487 | 49,347 |
Frequently asked questions
[edit]- How can I get my article rated?
- As a member of the WikiProject Pennsylvania, you can do it yourself. If you're unsure, list it in the requesting an assessment section below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of WikiProject Pennsylvania is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- Where can I get more comments about my article?
- Contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania who will handle it or assign the issue to someone. You may also list it for a Peer review.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- Relist it as a request or contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department, or to contact the Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania directly.
Instructions
[edit]An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Pennsylvania}} project banner on its talk page. You can learn the syntax by looking at the talk pages in edit mode and by reading the info below.
This is the rating syntax (ratings and dates are samples, change to what applies to the article in question):
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania}}
- displays the default banner, showing the project info and only ??? for the quality and importance parameters.
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=FA|importance=Top}}
- all assessed articles should have quality and importance filled in. Leaving the other parameters off does not hurt anything.
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=Start|importance=Mid|attention=yes}}
- if an article needs immediate attention, add the attention tag and please leave talk notes as to why. "yes" is the only valid parameter here. If it doesn't need attention, leave the parameter off.
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=B|importance=High|attention=yes|past-selected=[[July]] [[2006]]|past-collaboration=[[April]] [[2006]]}}
- if an article has been the SATM or COTM, these tags get added in this format. This is the actual project tag of Philmont Scout Ranch.
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article Pennsylvania pages). This means "non-article", NOT non-applicalbe.
Articles for which a valid class and/or importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Pennsylvania articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Pennsylvania articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Pennsylvania articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Pennsylvania articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Pennsylvania articles)
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.
Quality scale
[edit]Note: A B-class article should have at least one reference.
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance scale
[edit]The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of military history. Importance does not equate to quality; a featured article could rate 'mid' on importance.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated. Rate international region/country-specific articles from the prespective of someone from that region.
Label | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is a "core" or "key" topic for Pennsylvania, or is generally notable to people other than students of Pennsylvania. They define and determine the subject of the Pennsylvania WikiProject. | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
High | Subject is notable in a significant and important way within the field of Pennsylvania, but not necessarily outside it. | Johnstown Flood |
Mid | Subject contributes to the total subject of the Pennsylvania WikiProject. Subject may not necessarily be famous. | Johnstown Inclined Plane |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within the field of Pennsylvania, and may have been included primarily to achieve comprehensive coverage of another topic. | Wawa Food Markets |
Requesting an assessment or re-assessment
[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead.
- Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM
- Like this (and put "(re-)assessment request" in your edit summary of this assessment page), leave reasons if a reassessment.
- New Beaver Field: Made a lot of changes to the page would love to see if it is out of stub yet. NoahRiffe (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Assessment Log
[edit]- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
September 14, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Joseph Dempsey (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Karen E. Taylor (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Katie Wright (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Kellams Bridge (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Pepper pot soup (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Category:Geography of Pennsylvania by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- LGBTQ rights in Pennsylvania (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Lists of National Register of Historic Places in Pennsylvania by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:National Register of Historic Places in Pennsylvania by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Organizations based in Pennsylvania by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]September 13, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Philadelphia Pepper Pot renamed to Pepper pot soup.
Reassessed
[edit]- John William Wallace (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Katie Kauffman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Mary Queen of Peace Catholic Church (Pottsville, Pennsylvania) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Benjamin Franklin Shumard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Historic house museums of the Pennsylvania Germans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Kathryn Wentzel Lumley (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Pepper pot soup (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- William Tecumseh Barks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]September 12, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Kathleen Parker (politician) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Kathryn Wentzel Lumley Aviation Center (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Kingdom Coaster (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Kings Family Restaurants (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Little Brokenstraw Creek (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Little Conneauttee Creek (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Little Sandy Creek (Redbank Creek tributary) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Little Saw Mill Run Railroad (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Little Wheeling Creek (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Lucknow, Pennsylvania (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Ludwigs Corner, Pennsylvania (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Trevena, Inc. (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Template:Casualties of the September 11 attacks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Delta Sigma Iota (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Harriet Parmet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Kathy Parker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Meetinghouse (restaurant) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Philly AIDS Thrift at Giovanni's Room (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert Lowry House (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
September 11, 2024
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- Draft:Jake Ewald (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- McKinley, Pennsylvania (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Phoenixville station (Pennsylvania Railroad) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ryan Lackey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Immortal Disfigurement (talk) removed.
September 10, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Jacob L. Devers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to A-Class. (rev · t)
- SS United States (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Veolia Water Technologies & Solutions (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- 1983 SEPTA Regional Rail strike (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Albert McCay (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- David Simonich (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Jacob Druckman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- James Kinsey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Judith Shea (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Lawrence Townsend (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert L. Barchi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- William Welsh (actor) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
September 9, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Alfred Packer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Lytle family (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Owen Roberts (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Stephanie Nyombayire (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- 2024 Penn Quakers football team (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Arthur McKenzie Dodson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Baauer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Barbara Handman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Bill Barron (musician) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Charles Armstrong (rower) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Duke Worne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Erin Donohue (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Francis Henry Taylor (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Geoffrey Mason (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- George Eiferman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- H. R. McMaster (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Harry Lott (rower) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- James Juvenal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Joe Hohenstein (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- John Ernest (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- John Exley (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- John McClintock (theologian) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- John William Wallace (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Joseph Dempsey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Louis J. Mordell (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Michael Gleason (rower) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Nedrick Young (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ohio River Flood of 1937 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Ralph Morgan (basketball) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert Espeseth (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert J. McCloskey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ron Richardson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Sydney Boehm (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
September 8, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Brandywine order of battle renamed to Order of battle at the Battle of Brandywine.
- Germantown order of battle renamed to Order of battle at the Battle of Germantown.
- Draft:Llanerch Public School renamed to Llanerch Public School.
- Matt Osborne renamed to Matt Borne.
Reassessed
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- Joseph Boggs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Matt Borne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Order of battle at the Battle of Brandywine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Order of battle at the Battle of Germantown (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)