Jump to content

Atmea: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MHI may take minority stake in Areva
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 4/34
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Nuclear reactor design}}
'''Atmea''' is a [[joint venture]] between [[Mitsubishi Heavy Industries]] (MHI) and [[Areva]] that develops, markets, licenses and sells the ATMEA1 reactor, a new generation III+, medium-power [[pressurized water reactor]] (PWR). The company is headquartered in Paris.<ref>{{cite web|title=Key facts and figures|url=http://www.atmea-sas.com/EN/home-306/atmea-offering-unique-assests-and-experience-through-its-parent-companies.html|publisher=ATMEA|accessdate=24 May 2015}}</ref>
'''Atmea''' was a [[joint venture]] between [[Mitsubishi Heavy Industries]] (MHI) and [[EDF Group]] set up in 2006 to develop, market, license and sell the ATMEA1 reactor, a new generation III+, medium-power [[pressurized water reactor]] (PWR). The company was headquartered in Paris. The joint venture was abandoned in 2019.


== History ==
== History ==
A [[memorandum of understanding]] between the two companies effectively creating the entity was signed 19 October 2006 and the name of the joint venture was announced on 3 September 2007.<ref>{{cite web|title=Areva and Mitsubishi create Atmea joint venture|url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/newsarticle.aspx?id=13980|website=World Nuclear News|publisher=WNN|accessdate=25 May 2015}}</ref> The European Commission cleared the joint venture in October 2007 on the grounds that the activities of Areva and MHI are geographically complementary and Atmea was unlikely to strengthen the competitiveness of each parent company.<ref>{{cite news|title=Atmea joint venture gets EC approval|url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/newsarticle.aspx?id=14308&LangType=2057|accessdate=24 May 2015|work=World Nuclear News|publisher=WNN|date=30 October 2007}}</ref>
A [[memorandum of understanding]] between AREVA and MHI effectively creating the entity was signed 19 October 2006 and the name of the joint venture was announced on 3 September 2007.<ref name=wnn030907>{{cite news|title=Areva and Mitsubishi create Atmea joint venture|url= http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Areva-and-Mitsubishi-create-Atmea-joint-venture | work =World Nuclear News | date = 2007-09-03 |access-date=25 May 2015}}</ref> The European Commission cleared the joint venture in October 2007 on the grounds that the activities of Areva and MHI were geographically complementary and Atmea was unlikely to strengthen the competitiveness of each parent company.<ref>{{cite news|title=Atmea joint venture gets EC approval|url= http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/industry/Atmea_joint_venture_gets_EC_approval-301007.shtml|access-date=24 May 2015|work=World Nuclear News|date=30 October 2007}}</ref>


The completion of the French nuclear industry reorganisation under EDF leadership in 2018 also led to a renewed partnership within ATMEA. ATMEA was initially formed as a joint venture between AREVA NP and MHI to develop the next-generation AT-MEA1 reactor. Under the new structure, there was a fifty-fifty ownership of ATMEA between EDF and MHI, along with a special share owned by Framatome. This would reinforce the Franco/Japanese new nuclear power offering to many countries recognizing the key role of nuclear energy in the transition towards low-carbon power generation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mhi.com/news/story/1801052101.html|title = Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, LTD. Global Website &#124; MHI Completes Investment into France's Framatome (Formerly "New NP")| date=5 January 2018 }}</ref>
Following financial difficulties at Areva, MHI announced in 2015 it will make a proposal to take a minority ownership stake in Areva.<ref name=wnn-20151106>{{cite news |url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/C-MHI-prepares-bid-for-stake-in-Arevas-reactor-business-0611154.html |title=MHI prepares bid for stake in Areva's reactor business |publisher=World Nuclear News |date=6 November 2015 |accessdate=12 November 2015}}</ref>


The joint development was abandoned in 2019, following the similar fate of the French-Japanese [[ASTRID (reactor)|ASTRID]] fast reactor design the same year.<ref name=energyintel-20200415>{{cite news |url=https://www.energyintel.com/0000017b-a7da-de4c-a17b-e7da62f30000 |title=Corporate: Atmea1 Abandoned as French-Japanese Cooperation Withers |website=Energy Intelligence |date=15 April 2020 |access-date=27 October 2021}}</ref>
== Governance ==
Andreas Goebel is the Atmea Company’s President and CEO. Satoshi Utsumi is the company’s Deputy CEO.<ref>{{cite web|title=ATMEA General Management|url=http://www.atmea-sas.com/EN/home-310/atmea-ensuring-a-strong-management.html|website=ATMEA}}</ref>


== The ATMEA1 reactor ==
== The ATMEA1 reactor ==
The ATMEA1 reactor is a 1100 MWe [[Generation III reactors#Generation III+ reactors|generation III+]] [[pressurized water reactor]] with three coolant loops and a thermal power level of 3,150 MWth.<ref name=IAEA>{{cite web|title=Status report 99|url=https://aris.iaea.org/sites/..%5CPDF%5CATMEA1.pdf|publisher=IAEA|accessdate=24 May 2015}}</ref> The design has high thermal efficiency (typically 10% higher than currently operating reactors), a 60-year service life and a load-following capability.<ref name="IAEA" /> The reactor can be set to a 12- to 24 month operational cycle.<ref>{{cite news|title=The ATMEA1 Reactor|url=http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurethe-atmea1-reactor/|accessdate=24 May 2015|work=Nuclear Engineering International|publisher=NEI|date=20 April 2012}}</ref>
The ATMEA1 reactor design was an about 1200 MWe [[Generation III reactors#Generation III+ reactors|generation III+]] [[pressurized water reactor]] with three coolant loops and a thermal power level of 3,150 MWth.<ref name=IAEA>{{cite web|title=Status report 99|url=https://aris.iaea.org/sites/..%5CPDF%5CATMEA1.pdf|publisher=IAEA|access-date=24 May 2015}}</ref> The design has high thermal efficiency (typically 10% higher than currently operating reactors), a 60-year service life and a load-following capability.<ref name="IAEA" /> The reactor can be set to a 12- to 24 month operational cycle.<ref>{{cite news|title=The ATMEA1 Reactor|url=http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurethe-atmea1-reactor/|access-date=24 May 2015|work=Nuclear Engineering International|publisher=NEI|date=20 April 2012}}</ref>


The ATMEA1 reactor’s systems and components were previously developed by AREVA and MHI for the [[EPR (nuclear reactor)|EPR]] and [[Mitsubishi APWR|APWR]], including steam generators with axial economizer and TT690 tubes, advanced accumulators and reactor internals with Heavy Neutron Reflector.<ref name="IAEA" />
The ATMEA1 reactor's systems and components were previously developed by AREVA and MHI for the [[EPR (nuclear reactor)|EPR]] and [[Mitsubishi APWR|APWR]] respectively, including steam generators with axial economizer and TT690 tubes, advanced accumulators and reactor internals with Heavy Neutron Reflector.<ref name="IAEA" />


The ATMEA1 safety features include three redundant trains of emergency core cooling systems and a core-melt retention system.<ref name="IAEA" />
The ATMEA1 safety features include three redundant trains of emergency core cooling systems and a core-melt retention system.<ref name="IAEA" />


With a power output of 1100 Mwe, the ATMEA1, is targeted to attract new-entry countries looking to develop nuclear power.<ref>{{cite web|title=Our projects|url=http://www.atmea-sas.com/EN/home-457/our-offer-and-projects-nbsp-fitting-customers-need-in-every-aspect.html|publisher=ATMEA|accessdate=24 May 2015}}</ref> In comparison, Mitsubishi's APWR is slated to have a power of 1700 MWe<ref>{{cite web|title=Mitsubishi Nuclear Technologies and Global Partnerships|url=http://www.iaea.org/NuclearPower/Downloadable/Meetings/2013/2013-02-11-02-14-TM-INIG/14.yamamoto.pdf|publisher=Mitsubishi|accessdate=24 May 2015}}</ref> while Areva's European Pressurized Reactor currently under construction will have an output of 1600 Mwe.
With a power output of about 1200 Mwe, the ATMEA1, was targeted to attract new-entry countries looking to develop nuclear power.<ref>{{cite web|title=Our projects|url=http://www.atmea-sas.com/EN/home-457/our-offer-and-projects-nbsp-fitting-customers-need-in-every-aspect.html|publisher=ATMEA|access-date=24 May 2015|archive-date=25 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150525014054/http://www.atmea-sas.com/EN/home-457/our-offer-and-projects-nbsp-fitting-customers-need-in-every-aspect.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> In comparison, Mitsubishi's APWR was slated to have a power of 1700 MWe<ref>{{cite web|title=Mitsubishi Nuclear Technologies and Global Partnerships|url=http://www.iaea.org/NuclearPower/Downloadable/Meetings/2013/2013-02-11-02-14-TM-INIG/14.yamamoto.pdf|publisher=Mitsubishi|access-date=24 May 2015}}</ref> while Areva's [[European Pressurized Reactor]] has an output of 1600 Mwe.


==Compliance==
==Compliance==
In 2013, the [[Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission]] (CNSC) released a pre-project design review of the ATMEA1 reactor and found the design compliant with CNSC regulatory requirements and expectations for new nuclear power plants in Canada.<ref>{{cite book|title=Phase 1 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of ATMEA’s ATMEA1 Reactor|date=June 2013|publisher=Canada Nuclear Safety Commission|url=http://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/pdfs/vendor-licensing/ATMEA-Phase-1-Executive_Summary-eng.pdf}}</ref>
In 2013, the [[Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission]] (CNSC) released a pre-project design review of the ATMEA1 reactor and found the design compliant with CNSC regulatory requirements and expectations for new nuclear power plants in Canada.<ref>{{cite book|title=Phase 1 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of ATMEA's ATMEA1 Reactor|date=June 2013|publisher=Canada Nuclear Safety Commission|url=http://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/pdfs/vendor-licensing/ATMEA-Phase-1-Executive_Summary-eng.pdf}}</ref>


In 2012 the French Nuclear Safety Authority, ([[Autorité de sûreté nucléaire]] or ASN), released a report finding the safety options and design choice of the ATMEA1 satisfactory and in compliance with French regulations.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASN issues a positive opinion on the safety options for the ATMEA1 reactor project|url=http://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr/Information/News-releases/ATMEA1-reactor-project|publisher=French Nuclear Safety Authority|accessdate=24 May 2015}}</ref>
In 2012 the French Nuclear Safety Authority, ([[Autorité de sûreté nucléaire]] or ASN), released a report finding the safety options and design choice of the ATMEA1 satisfactory and in compliance with French regulations.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASN issues a positive opinion on the safety options for the ATMEA1 reactor project|url=http://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr/Information/News-releases/ATMEA1-reactor-project|publisher=French Nuclear Safety Authority|access-date=24 May 2015}}</ref>


On 7 July 2008 the [[International Atomic Energy Agency]] (IAEA) completed the review of the conceptual safety design features for the ATMEA1.<ref name="IAEA" /> The report concluded that the ATMEA1 conceptual design addresses the IAEA’s fundamental safety principles and key design and safety assessment requirements.<ref name=NucNet>{{cite news|title=IAEA Completes Conceptual Safety Review Of Atmea-1 Reactor Design|url=http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2008/07/07/iaea-completes-conceptual-safety-review-of-atmea-1-reactor-design|work=The Communications Network for Nuclear Energy and Ionising Radiation|publisher=NucNet|date=7 July 2008}}</ref>
On 7 July 2008 the [[International Atomic Energy Agency]] (IAEA) completed the review of the conceptual safety design features for the ATMEA1.<ref name="IAEA" /> The report concluded that the ATMEA1 conceptual design addresses the IAEA's fundamental safety principles and key design and safety assessment requirements.<ref name=NucNet>{{cite news|title=IAEA Completes Conceptual Safety Review Of Atmea-1 Reactor Design|url=http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2008/07/07/iaea-completes-conceptual-safety-review-of-atmea-1-reactor-design|work=The Communications Network for Nuclear Energy and Ionising Radiation|publisher=NucNet|date=7 July 2008}}</ref>


==Planned construction==
==Planned construction==
On 3 May 2013, Turkish prime minister [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]] and his Japanese counterpart [[Shinzo Abe]], signed a US$22 billion deal for the construction of the [[Sinop Nuclear Power Plant]] in Turkey. Plans for the 4800 MWe plant were ratified by Turkey’s government in April 2015.<ref>{{cite news|title=Turkey Prepares to Host First ATMEA 1 Nuclear Reactors|url=http://www.powermag.com/turkey-prepares-to-host-first-atmea-1-nuclear-reactors/|accessdate=24 May 2015|work=PowerMag|publisher=Electric Power}}</ref> Ownership of the plant will be split between a consortium of Japan’s [[Mitsubishi Heavy Industries]] (MHI) and [[Itochu]], and France’s [[Areva]] and [[GDF Suez]] with 65%, and Turkey’s state-run power producer EUAS with 35%.<ref>{{cite news|title=Turkey Breaks Ground for First Nuclear Power Plant|url=http://insights.globalspec.com/article/839/turkey-breaks-ground-for-first-nuclear-power-plant|accessdate=24 May 2015|work=IHS Engineering 360|publisher=IHS|date=16 April 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Turkey ratifies agreement for new plant at Sinop|url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Turkey-ratifies-agreement-for-new-plant-at-Sinop-02041502.html|work=World Nuclear News|publisher=WNN|date=2 April 2015}}</ref> The plant will comprise four ATMEA1 reactors. Construction is planned to begin in 2017, with the first unit in operation by 2023.<ref>{{cite news|title=Japanese companies aim to fund 30% of Turkish nuclear project|url=http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Deals/2-Japanese-companies-aim-to-fund-30-of-Turkish-nuclear-project|accessdate=9 June 2015|work=Nikkei Asian Review|agency=Nikkei|date=8 June 2015}}</ref>
On 3 May 2013, Turkish prime minister [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]] and his Japanese counterpart [[Shinzo Abe]], signed an outline US$22 billion deal for the construction of the [[Sinop Nuclear Power Plant]] in Turkey. Plans for the 4400 MWe plant were ratified by Turkey's government in April 2015.<ref>{{cite news|title=Turkey Prepares to Host First ATMEA 1 Nuclear Reactors|url=http://www.powermag.com/turkey-prepares-to-host-first-atmea-1-nuclear-reactors/|access-date=24 May 2015|work=PowerMag|publisher=Electric Power}}</ref> Ownership of the plant would be split between a consortium of Japan's [[Mitsubishi Heavy Industries]] (MHI) and [[Itochu]], and France's [[Areva]] and [[GDF Suez]] with 51%, and Turkey's state-run power producer EUAS with 49%.<ref>{{cite news|title=Turkey Breaks Ground for First Nuclear Power Plant|url=http://insights.globalspec.com/article/839/turkey-breaks-ground-for-first-nuclear-power-plant|access-date=24 May 2015|work=IHS Engineering 360|publisher=IHS|date=16 April 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Turkey ratifies agreement for new plant at Sinop|url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Turkey-ratifies-agreement-for-new-plant-at-Sinop-02041502.html|work=World Nuclear News|publisher=WNN|date=2 April 2015}}</ref> The plant would comprise four ATMEA1 reactors. As of 2015, subject to final agreement, construction was planned to begin in 2017, with the first unit to be in operation by 2023.<ref>{{cite news|title=Japanese companies aim to fund 30% of Turkish nuclear project|url=http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Deals/2-Japanese-companies-aim-to-fund-30-of-Turkish-nuclear-project|access-date=9 June 2015|work=Nikkei Asian Review|agency=Nikkei|date=8 June 2015}}</ref>


In 2018 an Environmental Impact Assessment application was submitted to the Environment and Urban Planning Ministry. Location and construction licenses were still to be obtained from the Turkey Atomic Energy Agency.<ref name=dailysabah-20180114>{{cite news |url=https://www.dailysabah.com/energy/2018/01/15/eia-application-file-for-sinop-nuclear-power-plant-submitted |title=EIA application file for Sinop nuclear power plant submitted |newspaper=Daily Sabah |date=14 January 2018 |access-date=7 February 2018}}</ref>
==Other activities==
Mitsubishi provided forgings for the Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant that Areva is currently constructing in Finland.<ref>{{cite web|title=Olkiluoto 3 - Finland|url=http://www.areva.com/EN/operations-2389/finland-olkiluoto-3.html#tab=tab5|publisher=Areva|accessdate=24 May 2015}}</ref>


In April 2018, [[The Nikkei|''Nikkei'']] reported that Itochu would withdraw from the project, while MHI and other investors were continuing the feasibility study through the summer of 2018.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/Itochu-pulls-out-of-nuclear-plant-project-in-Turkey|title=Itochu pulls out of nuclear plant project in Turkey |last=Hayashi|first=Eiki |date=2018-04-24|website=Nikkei Asian Review |language=en-GB |access-date=2018-07-26}}</ref> The remaining members of the Japanese consortium abandoned the project in December 2018 after a failure to reach agreement with the Turkish government on financing terms.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Japan-to-scrap-Turkey-nuclear-project|title=Japan to scrap Turkey nuclear project|last=Tsuji|first=Takashi|date=2018-12-04|website=Nikkei Asian Review|language=en-GB|access-date=2018-12-03}}</ref> Construction costs had almost doubled to about $44 billion, because of [[Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster|post-Fukushima]] safety improvements and the fall in the value of the [[Turkish lira]].<ref name=nei-20181206>{{cite news |url=https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newsjapan-looks-to-cancel-turkish-project-6887714 |title=Japan looks to cancel Turkish project |publisher=Nuclear Engineering International |date=6 December 2018 |access-date=11 December 2018}}</ref>
Areva is building two EPRs at the Taishan site in Guangdong province, China. It signed a strategic agreement with China National Nuclear Corporation in March 2014.


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Nuclear power in Japan]]
*[[Nuclear power in Japan]]
*[[Nuclear power in France]]


==References==
==References==
Line 40: Line 40:


==External links==
==External links==
*[http://www.mhi-ir.jp/english/new/sec1/200709030011.html Mitsubishi press release]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070928005048/http://www.mhi-ir.jp/english/new/sec1/200709030011.html Mitsubishi press release]
*[http://www.arevagroup.com/servlet/cp_mhi_03092007-c-PressRelease-cid-1188570341649-en.html Areva press release]
*[http://www.arevagroup.com/servlet/cp_mhi_03092007-c-PressRelease-cid-1188570341649-en.html Areva press release]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}


{{Mitsubishi Heavy Industries}}
{{Mitsubishi Heavy Industries}}


[[Category:Companies of Japan]]
[[Category:Areva]]
[[Category:Mitsubishi Heavy Industries]]
[[Category:Mitsubishi Heavy Industries]]
[[Category:Nuclear technology companies]]
[[Category:Nuclear technology companies of France]]
[[Category:Nuclear energy in Japan]]
[[Category:Nuclear power reactor types]]
[[Category:Nuclear power reactor types]]
[[Category:Pressurized water reactors]]
[[Category:Pressurized water reactors]]

Latest revision as of 03:54, 16 November 2023

Atmea was a joint venture between Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and EDF Group set up in 2006 to develop, market, license and sell the ATMEA1 reactor, a new generation III+, medium-power pressurized water reactor (PWR). The company was headquartered in Paris. The joint venture was abandoned in 2019.

History

[edit]

A memorandum of understanding between AREVA and MHI effectively creating the entity was signed 19 October 2006 and the name of the joint venture was announced on 3 September 2007.[1] The European Commission cleared the joint venture in October 2007 on the grounds that the activities of Areva and MHI were geographically complementary and Atmea was unlikely to strengthen the competitiveness of each parent company.[2]

The completion of the French nuclear industry reorganisation under EDF leadership in 2018 also led to a renewed partnership within ATMEA. ATMEA was initially formed as a joint venture between AREVA NP and MHI to develop the next-generation AT-MEA1 reactor. Under the new structure, there was a fifty-fifty ownership of ATMEA between EDF and MHI, along with a special share owned by Framatome. This would reinforce the Franco/Japanese new nuclear power offering to many countries recognizing the key role of nuclear energy in the transition towards low-carbon power generation.[3]

The joint development was abandoned in 2019, following the similar fate of the French-Japanese ASTRID fast reactor design the same year.[4]

The ATMEA1 reactor

[edit]

The ATMEA1 reactor design was an about 1200 MWe generation III+ pressurized water reactor with three coolant loops and a thermal power level of 3,150 MWth.[5] The design has high thermal efficiency (typically 10% higher than currently operating reactors), a 60-year service life and a load-following capability.[5] The reactor can be set to a 12- to 24 month operational cycle.[6]

The ATMEA1 reactor's systems and components were previously developed by AREVA and MHI for the EPR and APWR respectively, including steam generators with axial economizer and TT690 tubes, advanced accumulators and reactor internals with Heavy Neutron Reflector.[5]

The ATMEA1 safety features include three redundant trains of emergency core cooling systems and a core-melt retention system.[5]

With a power output of about 1200 Mwe, the ATMEA1, was targeted to attract new-entry countries looking to develop nuclear power.[7] In comparison, Mitsubishi's APWR was slated to have a power of 1700 MWe[8] while Areva's European Pressurized Reactor has an output of 1600 Mwe.

Compliance

[edit]

In 2013, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) released a pre-project design review of the ATMEA1 reactor and found the design compliant with CNSC regulatory requirements and expectations for new nuclear power plants in Canada.[9]

In 2012 the French Nuclear Safety Authority, (Autorité de sûreté nucléaire or ASN), released a report finding the safety options and design choice of the ATMEA1 satisfactory and in compliance with French regulations.[10]

On 7 July 2008 the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) completed the review of the conceptual safety design features for the ATMEA1.[5] The report concluded that the ATMEA1 conceptual design addresses the IAEA's fundamental safety principles and key design and safety assessment requirements.[11]

Planned construction

[edit]

On 3 May 2013, Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe, signed an outline US$22 billion deal for the construction of the Sinop Nuclear Power Plant in Turkey. Plans for the 4400 MWe plant were ratified by Turkey's government in April 2015.[12] Ownership of the plant would be split between a consortium of Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Itochu, and France's Areva and GDF Suez with 51%, and Turkey's state-run power producer EUAS with 49%.[13][14] The plant would comprise four ATMEA1 reactors. As of 2015, subject to final agreement, construction was planned to begin in 2017, with the first unit to be in operation by 2023.[15]

In 2018 an Environmental Impact Assessment application was submitted to the Environment and Urban Planning Ministry. Location and construction licenses were still to be obtained from the Turkey Atomic Energy Agency.[16]

In April 2018, Nikkei reported that Itochu would withdraw from the project, while MHI and other investors were continuing the feasibility study through the summer of 2018.[17] The remaining members of the Japanese consortium abandoned the project in December 2018 after a failure to reach agreement with the Turkish government on financing terms.[18] Construction costs had almost doubled to about $44 billion, because of post-Fukushima safety improvements and the fall in the value of the Turkish lira.[19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Areva and Mitsubishi create Atmea joint venture". World Nuclear News. 2007-09-03. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  2. ^ "Atmea joint venture gets EC approval". World Nuclear News. 30 October 2007. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  3. ^ "Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, LTD. Global Website | MHI Completes Investment into France's Framatome (Formerly "New NP")". 5 January 2018.
  4. ^ "Corporate: Atmea1 Abandoned as French-Japanese Cooperation Withers". Energy Intelligence. 15 April 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
  5. ^ a b c d e "Status report 99" (PDF). IAEA. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  6. ^ "The ATMEA1 Reactor". Nuclear Engineering International. NEI. 20 April 2012. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  7. ^ "Our projects". ATMEA. Archived from the original on 25 May 2015. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  8. ^ "Mitsubishi Nuclear Technologies and Global Partnerships" (PDF). Mitsubishi. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  9. ^ Phase 1 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of ATMEA's ATMEA1 Reactor (PDF). Canada Nuclear Safety Commission. June 2013.
  10. ^ "ASN issues a positive opinion on the safety options for the ATMEA1 reactor project". French Nuclear Safety Authority. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  11. ^ "IAEA Completes Conceptual Safety Review Of Atmea-1 Reactor Design". The Communications Network for Nuclear Energy and Ionising Radiation. NucNet. 7 July 2008.
  12. ^ "Turkey Prepares to Host First ATMEA 1 Nuclear Reactors". PowerMag. Electric Power. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  13. ^ "Turkey Breaks Ground for First Nuclear Power Plant". IHS Engineering 360. IHS. 16 April 2015. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  14. ^ "Turkey ratifies agreement for new plant at Sinop". World Nuclear News. WNN. 2 April 2015.
  15. ^ "Japanese companies aim to fund 30% of Turkish nuclear project". Nikkei Asian Review. Nikkei. 8 June 2015. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  16. ^ "EIA application file for Sinop nuclear power plant submitted". Daily Sabah. 14 January 2018. Retrieved 7 February 2018.
  17. ^ Hayashi, Eiki (2018-04-24). "Itochu pulls out of nuclear plant project in Turkey". Nikkei Asian Review. Retrieved 2018-07-26.
  18. ^ Tsuji, Takashi (2018-12-04). "Japan to scrap Turkey nuclear project". Nikkei Asian Review. Retrieved 2018-12-03.
  19. ^ "Japan looks to cancel Turkish project". Nuclear Engineering International. 6 December 2018. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
[edit]