Jump to content

David Pannick, Baron Pannick: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Added post-nominal template.
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
|relatives =
|relatives =
|signature =
|signature =
|website = [http://www.blackstonechambers.com]
|website = [http://www.blackstonechambers.com Blackstone Chambers]
|footnotes =
|footnotes =
}}
}}
'''David Philip Pannick, Baron Pannick''', {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|KC}} (born 7 March 1956) is a British [[barrister]] and a [[crossbencher]] in the [[House of Lords]]. He practises mainly in the areas of [[public law]] and human rights. He has argued cases before the [[Supreme Court of the United Kingdom]], the [[Appellate Committee of the House of Lords]], the [[European Court of Justice]], and the [[European Court of Human Rights]].
'''David Philip Pannick, Baron Pannick''', {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|KC}} (born 7 March 1956) is a British [[barrister]] and a [[crossbencher]] in the [[House of Lords]]. He practises mainly in the areas of [[public law]] and human rights. He has argued cases before the [[Supreme Court of the United Kingdom]], the [[Judicial functions of the House of Lords|Appellate Committee of the House of Lords]], the [[European Court of Justice]], and the [[European Court of Human Rights]].


==Early life and education==
==Early life and education==
David Philip Pannick was born on 7 March 1956 in [[Metropolitan Borough of Islington|Islington]], London, England, to Maurice and Rita Pannick.<ref name=UKWW>{{cite book|url=https://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-29998|title=Pannick|accessdate=21 October 2019|publisher=A & C Black|doi=10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U29998|isbn=978-0-19-954088-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.findmypast.co.uk/search/results?firstname=david&firstname_variants=true&lastname=pannick&sourcecountry=great%20britain&yearofbirth=1956&yearofbirth_offset=0|title=England & Wales Births 1837-2006|publisher=Findmypast|accessdate=21 October 2019}}</ref> Having won a scholarship, he was educated at [[Bancroft's School]], an [[Independent school (United Kingdom)|independent school]] in [[Woodford Green]], London.<ref name="RubinsteinJolles2011">{{cite book|first1=W.|last1=Rubinstein|first2=Michael A.|last2=Jolles|title=The Palgrave Dictionary of Anglo-Jewish History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=spOxzrifZjcC&pg=PT1441|date=27 January 2011|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK|isbn=978-0-230-30466-6|page=1441}}</ref><ref name=JC>{{cite news|url=https://www.thejc.com/determined-and-experienced-the-lawyer-who-makes-challenging-brexit-look-easy-1.428961|work=The Jewish Chronicle|first=Joshua|last=Rozenberg|title=David Pannick: the lawyer who makes challenging Brexit look easy|date=9 December 2016}}</ref> He studied law at [[Hertford College, Oxford]], from which he graduated with a [[Bachelor of Arts]] (BA) and a [[postgraduate]] [[Bachelor of Civil Law]] (BCL) degree: as per tradition, his BA was promoted to a [[Master of Arts (Oxbridge)|Master of Arts]] (MA) degree.<ref name="WW 22">{{cite web |title=Pannick, Baron, (David Philip Pannick) (born 7 March 1956) |url=http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whoswho/U29998 |website=[[Who's Who 2022]] |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=2 September 2022 |language=en |date=1 December 2021}}</ref>
David Philip Pannick was born on 7 March 1956 in [[Metropolitan Borough of Islington|Islington]], London, England, to Maurice and Rita Pannick.<ref name=UKWW>{{cite book|url=https://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-29998|title=Pannick|accessdate=21 October 2019|publisher=A & C Black|doi=10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U29998|isbn=978-0-19-954088-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.findmypast.co.uk/search/results?firstname=david&firstname_variants=true&lastname=pannick&sourcecountry=great%20britain&yearofbirth=1956&yearofbirth_offset=0|title=England & Wales Births 1837-2006|publisher=Findmypast|accessdate=21 October 2019}}</ref> Having won a scholarship, he was educated at [[Bancroft's School]], a [[Private schools in the United Kingdom|private school]] in [[Woodford Green]], London.<ref name="RubinsteinJolles2011">{{cite book|first1=W.|last1=Rubinstein|first2=Michael A.|last2=Jolles|title=The Palgrave Dictionary of Anglo-Jewish History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=spOxzrifZjcC&pg=PT1441|date=27 January 2011|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK|isbn=978-0-230-30466-6|page=1441}}</ref><ref name=JC>{{cite news|url=https://www.thejc.com/determined-and-experienced-the-lawyer-who-makes-challenging-brexit-look-easy-1.428961|work=The Jewish Chronicle|first=Joshua|last=Rozenberg|title=David Pannick: the lawyer who makes challenging Brexit look easy|date=9 December 2016}}</ref> He studied law at [[Hertford College, Oxford]], from which he graduated with a [[Bachelor of Arts]] (BA) and a [[Postgraduate education|postgraduate]] Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL) degree: as per tradition, his BA was promoted to a [[Master of Arts (Oxford, Cambridge, and Dublin)|Master of Arts]] (MA) degree.<ref name="WW 22">{{cite web |title=Pannick, Baron, (David Philip Pannick) (born 7 March 1956) |url=http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whoswho/U29998 |website=[[Who's Who 2022]] |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=2 September 2022 |language=en |date=1 December 2021}}</ref>


==Career==
==Career==
He was called to the Bar at [[Gray's Inn]] in 1979, and was one of the panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown (Common Law) from 1988 to 1992, when he was appointed [[Queen's Counsel]],<ref name="Silk">{{London Gazette|issue=52909|pages=7629–7630|date=1 May 1992}}</ref> as the title was known during the reign of [[Elizabeth II]]. He was also appointed a [[Recorder (judge)|Recorder]] on the [[South Eastern Circuit]] in 1995,<ref name="Recorder">{{London Gazette|issue=53942|page=1439|date=1 February 1995}}</ref> and a deputy [[High Court judge (England and Wales)|High Court judge]] in 1998. He stopped sitting as a judge in 2005.<ref name="WW 22" />
He was called to the Bar at [[Gray's Inn]] in 1979, and was one of the panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown (Common Law) from 1988 to 1992, when he was appointed [[King's Counsel|Queen's Counsel]],<ref name="Silk">{{London Gazette|issue=52909|pages=7629–7630|date=1 May 1992}}</ref> as the title was known during the reign of [[Elizabeth II]]. He was also appointed a [[Recorder (judge)|Recorder]] on the [[Circuit Court (Ireland)|South Eastern Circuit]] in 1995,<ref name="Recorder">{{London Gazette|issue=53942|page=1439|date=1 February 1995}}</ref> and a deputy [[High Court judge (England and Wales)|High Court judge]] in 1998. He stopped sitting as a judge in 2005.<ref name="WW 22" />


Pannick has appeared in the courts of [[Hong Kong]], [[Brunei]], [[Gibraltar]], [[Trinidad]], the [[British Virgin Islands]], [[Bermuda]] and the [[Cayman Islands]]. He appeared in 100 cases{{fact|date=December 2016}} before the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords before its jurisdiction was transferred to the new Supreme Court in October 2009.
Pannick has appeared in the courts of [[Hong Kong]], [[Brunei]], [[Gibraltar]], [[Trinidad]], the [[British Virgin Islands]], [[Bermuda]] and the [[Cayman Islands]]. He appeared in 100 cases{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} before the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords before its jurisdiction was transferred to the new Supreme Court in October 2009.


===As an academic===
===As an academic===
He was elected as an examination fellow of [[All Souls College, Oxford]], in 1978.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.asc.ox.ac.uk/person/48?m1=3&m2=0|title=All Souls College Oxford|website=www.asc.ox.ac.uk|access-date=2018-02-17}}</ref> He became an honorary fellow of Hertford College, Oxford, in September 2004. He has written on legal matters for ''[[The Times]]'', and was co-author with the late [[Anthony Lester, Baron Lester of Herne Hill|Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC]] of ''Human Rights Law and Practice'' (1st edition 1999; 2nd edition 2004, 3rd edition 2009).
Pannick was elected as an examination fellow of [[All Souls College, Oxford]], in 1978.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.asc.ox.ac.uk/person/48?m1=3&m2=0|last=All Souls College Oxford|title=Lord [David] Pannick|date=2023|access-date=29 December 2023}}</ref> He became an honorary fellow of Hertford College, Oxford, in September 2004. He has written on legal matters for ''[[The Times]]'', and was co-author with [[Anthony Lester, Baron Lester of Herne Hill|Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC]] of ''Human Rights Law and Practice'' (1st edition 1999; 2nd edition 2004, 3rd edition 2009).


===Peerage===
===Peerage===
On 29 September 2008, the [[House of Lords Appointments Commission]] announced that Pannick had been nominated for a [[life peer]]age as a [[crossbencher]].<ref name="Lords appointments">[http://www.lordsappointments.gov.uk/news/080929_report.aspx House of Lords Appointments Commission publishes 2007–08 report and announces two new non party political peers], House of Lords Appointments Commission. Retrieved 2 October 2008.</ref><ref>{{London Gazette|issue=58848 |page=15551|date=10 October 2008}}</ref> His title was [[London Gazette|gazetted]] as '''Baron Pannick''',<!-- NB his title is simply the Baron Pannick, the remaining part is the "territorial designation" which is not used in normal address--> of [[Radlett]] in the county of [[Hertfordshire]], dated 3 November 2008.<ref>{{London Gazette|issue=58875|page=17167|date=6 November 2008}}</ref>
On 29 September 2008, the [[House of Lords Appointments Commission]] announced that Pannick had been nominated for a [[life peer]]age as a [[crossbencher]].<ref name="Lords appointments">[http://www.lordsappointments.gov.uk/news/080929_report.aspx House of Lords Appointments Commission publishes 2007–08 report and announces two new non party political peers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090903113858/http://www.lordsappointments.gov.uk/news/080929_report.aspx |date=3 September 2009 }}, House of Lords Appointments Commission. Retrieved 2 October 2008.</ref><ref>{{London Gazette|issue=58848 |page=15551 |date=10 October 2008}}</ref> His title was [[The London Gazette|gazetted]] as '''Baron Pannick''',<!-- NB his title is simply the Baron Pannick, the remaining part is the "territorial designation" which is not used in normal address--> of [[Radlett]] in the county of [[Hertfordshire]], dated 3 November 2008.<ref>{{London Gazette|issue=58875|page=17167|date=6 November 2008}}</ref>


==Noted cases==
==Noted cases==
In the 1980s Pannick appeared for the Sunday Times in the ''[[Spycatcher]]'' case. He acted for the gay servicemen who established in the European Court of Human Rights in 1999 a finding of unlawful dismissal because of his sexual orientation; represented [[Camelot Group|Camelot PLC]] in the High Court in 2000 and established that the [[National Lottery Commission]] had treated it unfairly in rejecting its application to renew its licence to run the National Lottery; acted for the [[League Against Cruel Sports]] in defending a challenge to the validity of the [[Hunting Act 2004]]; represented a woman who established that she was entitled to be prescribed with the breast cancer drug [[Herceptin]]; and was briefed by the [[Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]] in its claim to [[state immunity]] against claims of [[torture]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd060614/jones.pdf|title=Jones v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia|accessdate=2 October 2018}}</ref>
In the 1980s Pannick appeared for ''The Sunday Times'' in the ''[[Spycatcher]]'' case. He acted for the gay servicemen who established in the European Court of Human Rights in 1999 a finding of unlawful dismissal because of their sexual orientation; represented [[Camelot Group|Camelot PLC]] in the High Court in 2000 and established that the [[National Lottery Commission]] had treated it unfairly in rejecting its application to renew its licence to run the National Lottery; acted for the [[League Against Cruel Sports]] in defending a challenge to the validity of the [[Hunting Act 2004]]; represented a woman who established that she was entitled to be prescribed with the breast cancer drug [[Herceptin]]; and was briefed by the [[Saudi Arabia|Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]] in its claim to [[state immunity]] against allegations of [[torture]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd060614/jones.pdf|title=Jones v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia|accessdate=2 October 2018}}</ref>


In 2007, Pannick appeared for [[BBC]] director-general [[Mark Thompson (television executive)|Mark Thompson]] when an attempt was made to prosecute the BBC for blasphemy for broadcasting ''[[Jerry Springer: The Opera]]''.<ref name="Springer">{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/05/njerry105.xml|title=News}}{{dead link|date=July 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> In July 2008, he represented the [[British Olympic Committee]] in successfully resisting in the High Court the claim by athlete [[Dwain Chambers]] about the refusal to select him for the Beijing Olympics because of the earlier finding of doping.<ref>[https://archive.today/20120912163052/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/article-23517730-drugs-cheat-dwain-chambers-banned-from-beijing-olympics.do Drugs cheat Dwain Chambers banned from Beijing Olympics]</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/dec/13/dwain-chambers-david-millar-boa|title=BOA bylaw appeal puts David Millar and Dwain Chambers on hold to April|first=Owen|last=Gibson|date=13 December 2011|work=The Guardian}}</ref> Later that year he represented [[Debbie Purdy]] in the Appellate Committee of the Lords (the last judgement given in the [[House of Lords]]) to establish the duty of the [[Director of Public Prosecutions]] to publish guidelines on prosecuting for assisting a suicide.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7644094.stm|title=Health – MS patient's suicide aid dilemma|work=BBC News}}</ref>
In 2007, Pannick appeared for [[BBC]] director-general [[Mark Thompson (media executive)|Mark Thompson]] when an attempt was made to prosecute the BBC for blasphemy for broadcasting ''[[Jerry Springer: The Opera]]''.<ref name="Springer">{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/05/njerry105.xml|title=News}}{{dead link|date=July 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> In July 2008, he represented the [[British Olympic Association|British Olympic Committee]] in successfully resisting in the High Court the claim by athlete [[Dwain Chambers]] about the refusal to select him for the Beijing Olympics because of the earlier finding of doping.<ref>[https://archive.today/20120912163052/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/article-23517730-drugs-cheat-dwain-chambers-banned-from-beijing-olympics.do Drugs cheat Dwain Chambers banned from Beijing Olympics]</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/dec/13/dwain-chambers-david-millar-boa|title=BOA bylaw appeal puts David Millar and Dwain Chambers on hold to April|first=Owen|last=Gibson|date=13 December 2011|work=The Guardian}}</ref> Later that year he represented [[Debbie Purdy]] in the Appellate Committee of the Lords (the last judgement given in the [[House of Lords]]) to establish the duty of the [[Director of Public Prosecutions]] to publish guidelines on prosecuting for assisting a suicide.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7644094.stm|title=Health – MS patient's suicide aid dilemma|publisher=BBC News}}</ref>


More recently Pannick acted for AF, a man subject to a control order, establishing that the [[Home Secretary]] had a duty to inform him of the essence of the case against him. He represented the Crown in the Supreme Court in establishing in 2010 that MPs accused of [[MPs' expenses scandal|dishonestly claiming expenses]] were not entitled to the benefit of [[parliamentary privilege]]. In January 2011, he represented [[Mosley v United Kingdom|Max Mosley]] before the European Court of Human Rights in his claim that the right to privacy obliged the United Kingdom to impose duties on newspapers to give prior notice of a publication invading privacy so the subject could seek an [[injunction]]. He appeared for a school ([[JFS (school)|JFS]]) in the first hearing before the new Supreme Court on 2 October 2009, [[R (E) v Governing Body of JFS|about the school's admissions policy]].<ref>{{citation |url=https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0136-judgment.pdf|title=R (on the application of E) (Respondent) v Governing Body of JFS and the Admissions Appeal Panel of JFS (Appellants) and others|accessdate=30 September 2018}}</ref> In 2011 and 2012, Pannick also represented the [[Government of Hong Kong]] in ''[[Vallejos v. Commissioner of Registration]]'', a case in which a [[foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong|foreign domestic helper]] sought judicial review to determine whether it was constitutional for the government to deny her the [[right of abode in Hong Kong|right of abode]] in the territory.<ref>{{citation |url=http://www.chinadailyapac.com/article/sar-govt-appeal-right-abode-ruling|periodical=China Daily|first1=Andrea |last1=Deng|last2=Li|first2=Likui|last3=Ming|first3=Yeung|date=1 October 2011|title=SAR govt to appeal right of abode ruling |accessdate=21 February 2012}}</ref>
More recently Pannick acted for AF, a man subject to a control order, establishing that the [[Home Secretary]] had a duty to inform him of the essence of the case against him. He represented the Crown in the Supreme Court in establishing in 2010 that MPs accused of [[United Kingdom parliamentary expenses scandal|dishonestly claiming expenses]] were not entitled to the benefit of [[parliamentary privilege]]. In January 2011, he represented [[Mosley v United Kingdom|Max Mosley]] before the European Court of Human Rights in his claim that the right to privacy obliged the United Kingdom to impose duties on newspapers to give prior notice of a publication invading privacy so the subject could seek an [[injunction]]. He appeared for a school ([[JFS (school)|JFS]]) in the first hearing before the new Supreme Court on 2 October 2009, [[R (E) v Governing Body of JFS|about the school's admissions policy]].<ref>{{citation |url=https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0136-judgment.pdf|title=R (on the application of E) (Respondent) v Governing Body of JFS and the Admissions Appeal Panel of JFS (Appellants) and others |accessdate=30 September 2018}}.</ref> In 2011 and 2012, Pannick also represented the [[Government of Hong Kong]] in ''[[Vallejos v Commissioner of Registration]]'', a case in which a [[foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong|foreign domestic helper]] sought judicial review to determine whether it was constitutional for the government to deny her the [[right of abode in Hong Kong|right of abode]] in the territory.<ref>{{citation |url=http://www.chinadailyapac.com/article/sar-govt-appeal-right-abode-ruling |periodical=China Daily |first1=Andrea |last1=Deng |last2=Li |first2=Likui |last3=Ming |first3=Yeung |date=1 October 2011 |title=SAR govt to appeal right of abode ruling |accessdate=21 February 2012 }}{{Dead link|date=January 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}.</ref>


In October 2016, he co-wrote a legal opinion commissioned by businessman [[Philip Green]] to challenge the conclusions of a parliamentary inquiry which criticised Green's conduct over the collapse of retailer [[British Home Stores]].<ref>{{citation |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/green-hires-qc-to-fight-claim-of-plundering-bhs-l97rf6blr |periodical=The Times |title=Philip Green hires QC to fight claim of 'plundering' BHS |first=Oliver |last=Shah |accessdate=2 October 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/706ff310-9481-11e6-a1dc-bdf38d484582|work=Financial Times|date=18 October 2016|last=Vandevelde|first=Mark|title=Philip Green hits back at MPs over BHS demise}}</ref>
In October 2016, he co-wrote a legal opinion commissioned by businessman [[Philip Green]] to challenge the conclusions of a parliamentary inquiry which criticised Green's conduct over the collapse of retailer [[British Home Stores]].<ref>{{citation |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/green-hires-qc-to-fight-claim-of-plundering-bhs-l97rf6blr |periodical=The Times |title=Philip Green hires QC to fight claim of 'plundering' BHS |first=Oliver |last=Shah |accessdate=2 October 2018}}.</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/706ff310-9481-11e6-a1dc-bdf38d484582|work=Financial Times|date=18 October 2016|last=Vandevelde|first=Mark|title=Philip Green hits back at MPs over BHS demise}}</ref>


Also in 2016, Pannick successfully represented [[Gina Miller]] in ''[[R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union]],'' an action against the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union on whether approval by Parliament was required before the Prime Minister could initiate proceedings under Article 50 of the [[Treaty of the European Union]] to take the UK out of the [[European Union]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/r-miller-v-secretary-of-state-for-exiting-the-european-union-accessible|title=R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union }}</ref>
Also in 2016, Pannick successfully represented [[Gina Miller]] in ''[[R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union]]'', an action against the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union on whether approval by Parliament was required before the Prime Minister could initiate proceedings under Article 50 of the [[Maastricht Treaty|Treaty of the European Union]] to take the UK out of the [[European Union]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/r-miller-v-secretary-of-state-for-exiting-the-european-union-accessible|title=R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union|access-date=4 November 2016|archive-date=5 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161105032146/https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/r-miller-v-secretary-of-state-for-exiting-the-european-union-accessible/|url-status=dead}}</ref>


Pannick successfully led the team working on behalf of Gina Miller in ''R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent)'',<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2019-0192.html|title=R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) - The Supreme Court|last=Court|first=The Supreme|website=www.supremecourt.uk|access-date=2019-09-24}}</ref> arguing against the legality of the Government's [[2019 British prorogation controversy|prorogation of Parliament in September 2019]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Supreme Court: Parliament suspended 'to stop MPs frustrating PM', judges told |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49722087 |work=BBC News |accessdate=17 September 2019 |date=17 September 2019}}</ref> In the ruling on the morning of 24 September 2019, the UK supreme court unanimously judged that the Prime Minister [[Boris Johnson]] had given unlawful advice to the Queen.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49810680|title=In full: Court statement on 'unlawful' suspension|date=2019-09-24|access-date=2019-09-24|language=en-GB}}</ref>
Pannick successfully led the team working on behalf of [[Gina Miller]] in ''R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent)'',<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2019-0192.html|last=The Supreme Court|title=R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) – The Supreme Court|date=24 September 2019|access-date=29 December 2023}}</ref> arguing against the legality of the Government's [[2019 British prorogation controversy|prorogation of Parliament in September 2019]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Supreme Court: Parliament suspended 'to stop MPs frustrating PM', judges told |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49722087 |publisher=BBC News |accessdate=17 September 2019 |date=17 September 2019}}</ref> In the ruling on the morning of 24 September 2019, the UK supreme court unanimously judged that the Prime Minister [[Boris Johnson]] had given unlawful advice to the Queen.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49810680|title=In full: Court statement on 'unlawful' suspension|date=2019-09-24|access-date=2019-09-24|language=en-GB}}</ref>


In November 2020, Pannick appeared on behalf of [[Shamima Begum]] in the Supreme Court in ''[[Begum v Home Secretary]]'', judicial review proceedings brought against the then [[Home Secretary]] [[Sajid Javid]]’s decision not to allow her to return to Britain for legal proceedings regarding the removal of her [[British citizen|British citizenship]].<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Bowcott|first1=Owen|last2=Sabbagh|first2=Dan|date=23 November 2020|title=Shamima Begum still a national security threat, UK supreme court told|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/23/shamima-begum-still-national-security-threat-supreme-court|access-date=24 November 2020}}</ref><ref>[https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2020-0156-judgment.pdf R (on the application of Begum) (Appellant) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Respondent) R (on the application of Begum) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) Begum (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant)] <nowiki>[2021]</nowiki> UKSC 7 26 February 2021</ref>
In November 2020, Pannick appeared on behalf of [[Shamima Begum]] in the Supreme Court in ''[[Begum v Home Secretary]]'', judicial review proceedings brought against the then [[Home Secretary]] [[Sajid Javid]]'s decision not to allow her to return to Britain for legal proceedings regarding the removal of her [[British nationality law|British citizen]]ship.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Bowcott|first1=Owen|last2=Sabbagh|first2=Dan|date=23 November 2020|title=Shamima Begum still a national security threat, UK supreme court told|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/23/shamima-begum-still-national-security-threat-supreme-court|access-date=24 November 2020}}</ref><ref>[https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2020-0156-judgment.pdf R (on the application of Begum) (Appellant) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Respondent) R (on the application of Begum) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) Begum (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant)] <nowiki>[2021]</nowiki> UKSC 7 26 February 2021.</ref>

In March 2023, Pannick advised former Prime Minister [[Boris Johnson]] in his assessment by the House of Commons Privileges Committee of whether he knowingly misled the House in relation to his statements around the 'Partygate' scandal.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/20/who-is-lord-pannick-boris-johnsons-partygate-barrister | title=Who is Lord Pannick, Boris Johnson's Partygate barrister? | newspaper=The Guardian | date=20 March 2023 | last1=Adu | first1=Aletha }}</ref>

=== Small house policy ===
Pannick represented the [[Heung Yee Kuk]] village organisation in [[Hong Kong]], in a court case to defend the [[Small House Policy|small house policy]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2021-10-12 |title=Powerful rural body defends Hong Kong small-house policy, takes aim at 'busybody' |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/3152119/powerful-rural-body-defends-hong-kong-small-house-policy-top-court |access-date=2022-11-10 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref> The controversial policy allows male villagers, but not female villagers, the right to build their own house on government land in the [[New Territories]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-10-11 |title=Hong Kong court battle over controversial small-house policy reaches end stage |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3151903/hong-kongs-law-does-not-protect-exclusive-right-male |access-date=2022-11-10 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref> Pannick challenged [[Martin Lee]], the "Father of Democracy", who represented the plaintiffs.<ref name=":0" /> Lee said that "Hong Kong has been waiting for so many years for someone to challenge this policy."<ref name=":0" /> However, Pannick argued that the plaintiff, [[Kwok Cheuk-kin]], was "simply a busybody."<ref name=":0" />


==Publications==
==Publications==
Line 68: Line 73:


==Personal life==
==Personal life==
He married Denise Sloam in 1978. The couple had two sons and one daughter. She died of cancer in 1999. Pannick married Israeli-born lawyer Nathalie Trager-Lewis in 2003. The couple have two daughters and a son.<ref name=UKWW/><ref name=JC/><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/lawreports/joshuarozenberg/3098209/Popular-Pannick-picked-as-peoples-peer.html|title=Popular Pannick picked as peoples' peer|work=The Daily Telegraph|date=29 September 2008|accessdate=20 October 2019|first=Joshua|last=Rozenberg}}</ref> He is Jewish.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/lawyers-acting-on-brexit-subjected-to-anti-semitic-abuse/|work=Jewish News|date=19 July 2016|accessdate=21 October 2019|title=Lawyers acting on Brexit subjected to anti-Semitic abuse|first=Stephen|last=Oryszczuk}}</ref>
He married Denise Sloam in 1978. The couple had two sons and one daughter. She died of cancer in 1999. Pannick married lawyer Nathalie Trager-Lewis in 2003. The couple have two daughters and a son.<ref name=UKWW/><ref name=JC/><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/lawreports/joshuarozenberg/3098209/Popular-Pannick-picked-as-peoples-peer.html|title=Popular Pannick picked as peoples' peer|work=The Daily Telegraph|date=29 September 2008|accessdate=20 October 2019|first=Joshua|last=Rozenberg}}</ref> He is Jewish.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/lawyers-acting-on-brexit-subjected-to-anti-semitic-abuse/|work=Jewish News|date=19 July 2016|accessdate=21 October 2019|title=Lawyers acting on Brexit subjected to anti-Semitic abuse|first=Stephen|last=Oryszczuk}}</ref>


== Hamlyn lecture ==
== Hamlyn lecture ==
In 2021, he delivered the [[Hamlyn Lectures | Hamlyn lecture series]] on the subject of Advocacy.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Pannick|first=David|title=Why we should celebrate our tradition of oral advocacy|language=en|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/why-we-should-celebrate-our-tradition-of-oral-advocacy-2kjslgbpt|access-date=2021-12-20|issn=0140-0460}}</ref>
In 2021, he delivered the [[Hamlyn Lectures|Hamlyn lecture series]] on the subject of Advocacy.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Pannick |first=David |title=Why we should celebrate our tradition of oral advocacy |newspaper=[[The Times]] |language=en |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/why-we-should-celebrate-our-tradition-of-oral-advocacy-2kjslgbpt|access-date=2021-12-20 |issn=0140-0460}}</ref>


== References ==
== References ==
Line 78: Line 83:
== External links ==
== External links ==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160321194433/http://www.blackstonechambers.com/people/barristers/lord_pannick_qc.html Professional biography] at Blackstone Chambers
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160321194433/http://www.blackstonechambers.com/people/barristers/lord_pannick_qc.html Professional biography] at Blackstone Chambers
* [http://www.bookfinder.com/author/david-pannick/ Bookfinder.com, Books by David Pannick, KC]
* [http://www.bookfinder.com/author/david-pannick/ AbeBooks, Books by David Pannick, KC]


{{s-start}}
{{s-start}}
Line 97: Line 102:
[[Category:Alumni of Hertford College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Alumni of Hertford College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Members of Gray's Inn]]
[[Category:Members of Gray's Inn]]
[[Category:English Queen's Counsel]]
[[Category:English King's Counsel]]
[[Category:Peers recommended by the House of Lords Appointments Commission]]
[[Category:People's peers]]
[[Category:Crossbench life peers]]
[[Category:Crossbench life peers]]
[[Category:Fellows of All Souls College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Fellows of All Souls College, Oxford]]

Latest revision as of 21:58, 5 May 2024

The Right Honourable
The Lord Pannick
KC
Pannick in 2020
Member of the House of Lords
Lord Temporal
Incumbent
Assumed office
3 November 2008
Life Peerage
Personal details
Born
David Philip Pannick

(1956-03-07) 7 March 1956 (age 68)
Islington, London, England
Political partyNone (crossbencher)
Spouses
  • Denise Sloam
    ​
    ​
    (m. 1978; died 1999)​
  • Nathalie Trager-Lewis
    ​
    ​
    (m. 2003)​
Children6
EducationBancroft's School
Alma materHertford College, Oxford
OccupationBarrister, peer
WebsiteBlackstone Chambers

David Philip Pannick, Baron Pannick, KC (born 7 March 1956) is a British barrister and a crossbencher in the House of Lords. He practises mainly in the areas of public law and human rights. He has argued cases before the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords, the European Court of Justice, and the European Court of Human Rights.

Early life and education

[edit]

David Philip Pannick was born on 7 March 1956 in Islington, London, England, to Maurice and Rita Pannick.[1][2] Having won a scholarship, he was educated at Bancroft's School, a private school in Woodford Green, London.[3][4] He studied law at Hertford College, Oxford, from which he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts (BA) and a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL) degree: as per tradition, his BA was promoted to a Master of Arts (MA) degree.[5]

Career

[edit]

He was called to the Bar at Gray's Inn in 1979, and was one of the panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown (Common Law) from 1988 to 1992, when he was appointed Queen's Counsel,[6] as the title was known during the reign of Elizabeth II. He was also appointed a Recorder on the South Eastern Circuit in 1995,[7] and a deputy High Court judge in 1998. He stopped sitting as a judge in 2005.[5]

Pannick has appeared in the courts of Hong Kong, Brunei, Gibraltar, Trinidad, the British Virgin Islands, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. He appeared in 100 cases[citation needed] before the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords before its jurisdiction was transferred to the new Supreme Court in October 2009.

As an academic

[edit]

Pannick was elected as an examination fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, in 1978.[8] He became an honorary fellow of Hertford College, Oxford, in September 2004. He has written on legal matters for The Times, and was co-author with Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC of Human Rights Law and Practice (1st edition 1999; 2nd edition 2004, 3rd edition 2009).

Peerage

[edit]

On 29 September 2008, the House of Lords Appointments Commission announced that Pannick had been nominated for a life peerage as a crossbencher.[9][10] His title was gazetted as Baron Pannick, of Radlett in the county of Hertfordshire, dated 3 November 2008.[11]

Noted cases

[edit]

In the 1980s Pannick appeared for The Sunday Times in the Spycatcher case. He acted for the gay servicemen who established in the European Court of Human Rights in 1999 a finding of unlawful dismissal because of their sexual orientation; represented Camelot PLC in the High Court in 2000 and established that the National Lottery Commission had treated it unfairly in rejecting its application to renew its licence to run the National Lottery; acted for the League Against Cruel Sports in defending a challenge to the validity of the Hunting Act 2004; represented a woman who established that she was entitled to be prescribed with the breast cancer drug Herceptin; and was briefed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in its claim to state immunity against allegations of torture.[12]

In 2007, Pannick appeared for BBC director-general Mark Thompson when an attempt was made to prosecute the BBC for blasphemy for broadcasting Jerry Springer: The Opera.[13] In July 2008, he represented the British Olympic Committee in successfully resisting in the High Court the claim by athlete Dwain Chambers about the refusal to select him for the Beijing Olympics because of the earlier finding of doping.[14][15] Later that year he represented Debbie Purdy in the Appellate Committee of the Lords (the last judgement given in the House of Lords) to establish the duty of the Director of Public Prosecutions to publish guidelines on prosecuting for assisting a suicide.[16]

More recently Pannick acted for AF, a man subject to a control order, establishing that the Home Secretary had a duty to inform him of the essence of the case against him. He represented the Crown in the Supreme Court in establishing in 2010 that MPs accused of dishonestly claiming expenses were not entitled to the benefit of parliamentary privilege. In January 2011, he represented Max Mosley before the European Court of Human Rights in his claim that the right to privacy obliged the United Kingdom to impose duties on newspapers to give prior notice of a publication invading privacy so the subject could seek an injunction. He appeared for a school (JFS) in the first hearing before the new Supreme Court on 2 October 2009, about the school's admissions policy.[17] In 2011 and 2012, Pannick also represented the Government of Hong Kong in Vallejos v Commissioner of Registration, a case in which a foreign domestic helper sought judicial review to determine whether it was constitutional for the government to deny her the right of abode in the territory.[18]

In October 2016, he co-wrote a legal opinion commissioned by businessman Philip Green to challenge the conclusions of a parliamentary inquiry which criticised Green's conduct over the collapse of retailer British Home Stores.[19][20]

Also in 2016, Pannick successfully represented Gina Miller in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, an action against the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union on whether approval by Parliament was required before the Prime Minister could initiate proceedings under Article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union to take the UK out of the European Union.[21]

Pannick successfully led the team working on behalf of Gina Miller in R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent),[22] arguing against the legality of the Government's prorogation of Parliament in September 2019.[23] In the ruling on the morning of 24 September 2019, the UK supreme court unanimously judged that the Prime Minister Boris Johnson had given unlawful advice to the Queen.[24]

In November 2020, Pannick appeared on behalf of Shamima Begum in the Supreme Court in Begum v Home Secretary, judicial review proceedings brought against the then Home Secretary Sajid Javid's decision not to allow her to return to Britain for legal proceedings regarding the removal of her British citizenship.[25][26]

In March 2023, Pannick advised former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in his assessment by the House of Commons Privileges Committee of whether he knowingly misled the House in relation to his statements around the 'Partygate' scandal.[27]

Small house policy

[edit]

Pannick represented the Heung Yee Kuk village organisation in Hong Kong, in a court case to defend the small house policy.[28] The controversial policy allows male villagers, but not female villagers, the right to build their own house on government land in the New Territories.[29] Pannick challenged Martin Lee, the "Father of Democracy", who represented the plaintiffs.[28] Lee said that "Hong Kong has been waiting for so many years for someone to challenge this policy."[28] However, Pannick argued that the plaintiff, Kwok Cheuk-kin, was "simply a busybody."[28]

Publications

[edit]
  • Judicial Review of the Death Penalty (1982, Duckworth)
  • Sex Discrimination Law (1985, Oxford University Press)
  • Judges (1987, Oxford University Press)
  • Advocates (1992, Oxford University Press)
  • Human Rights Law and Practice (general editor with Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC, Butterworths, October 1999, second edition March 2004)
  • I Have to Move My Car: Tales of Unpersuasive Advocates and Injudicious Judges (2008, Hart Publishing)

Personal life

[edit]

He married Denise Sloam in 1978. The couple had two sons and one daughter. She died of cancer in 1999. Pannick married lawyer Nathalie Trager-Lewis in 2003. The couple have two daughters and a son.[1][4][30] He is Jewish.[31]

Hamlyn lecture

[edit]

In 2021, he delivered the Hamlyn lecture series on the subject of Advocacy.[32]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Pannick. A & C Black. doi:10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U29998. ISBN 978-0-19-954088-4. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
  2. ^ "England & Wales Births 1837-2006". Findmypast. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
  3. ^ Rubinstein, W.; Jolles, Michael A. (27 January 2011). The Palgrave Dictionary of Anglo-Jewish History. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 1441. ISBN 978-0-230-30466-6.
  4. ^ a b Rozenberg, Joshua (9 December 2016). "David Pannick: the lawyer who makes challenging Brexit look easy". The Jewish Chronicle.
  5. ^ a b "Pannick, Baron, (David Philip Pannick) (born 7 March 1956)". Who's Who 2022. Oxford University Press. 1 December 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
  6. ^ "No. 52909". The London Gazette. 1 May 1992. pp. 7629–7630.
  7. ^ "No. 53942". The London Gazette. 1 February 1995. p. 1439.
  8. ^ All Souls College Oxford (2023). "Lord [David] Pannick". Retrieved 29 December 2023.
  9. ^ House of Lords Appointments Commission publishes 2007–08 report and announces two new non party political peers Archived 3 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine, House of Lords Appointments Commission. Retrieved 2 October 2008.
  10. ^ "No. 58848". The London Gazette. 10 October 2008. p. 15551.
  11. ^ "No. 58875". The London Gazette. 6 November 2008. p. 17167.
  12. ^ "Jones v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia" (PDF). Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  13. ^ "News".[dead link]
  14. ^ Drugs cheat Dwain Chambers banned from Beijing Olympics
  15. ^ Gibson, Owen (13 December 2011). "BOA bylaw appeal puts David Millar and Dwain Chambers on hold to April". The Guardian.
  16. ^ "Health – MS patient's suicide aid dilemma". BBC News.
  17. ^ R (on the application of E) (Respondent) v Governing Body of JFS and the Admissions Appeal Panel of JFS (Appellants) and others (PDF), retrieved 30 September 2018.
  18. ^ Deng, Andrea; Li, Likui; Ming, Yeung (1 October 2011), "SAR govt to appeal right of abode ruling", China Daily, retrieved 21 February 2012[permanent dead link].
  19. ^ Shah, Oliver, "Philip Green hires QC to fight claim of 'plundering' BHS", The Times, retrieved 2 October 2018.
  20. ^ Vandevelde, Mark (18 October 2016). "Philip Green hits back at MPs over BHS demise". Financial Times.
  21. ^ "R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union". Archived from the original on 5 November 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2016.
  22. ^ The Supreme Court (24 September 2019). "R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) – The Supreme Court". Retrieved 29 December 2023.
  23. ^ "Supreme Court: Parliament suspended 'to stop MPs frustrating PM', judges told". BBC News. 17 September 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2019.
  24. ^ "In full: Court statement on 'unlawful' suspension". 24 September 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
  25. ^ Bowcott, Owen; Sabbagh, Dan (23 November 2020). "Shamima Begum still a national security threat, UK supreme court told". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 November 2020.
  26. ^ R (on the application of Begum) (Appellant) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Respondent) R (on the application of Begum) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) Begum (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2021] UKSC 7 26 February 2021.
  27. ^ Adu, Aletha (20 March 2023). "Who is Lord Pannick, Boris Johnson's Partygate barrister?". The Guardian.
  28. ^ a b c d "Powerful rural body defends Hong Kong small-house policy, takes aim at 'busybody'". South China Morning Post. 12 October 2021. Retrieved 10 November 2022.
  29. ^ "Hong Kong court battle over controversial small-house policy reaches end stage". South China Morning Post. 11 October 2021. Retrieved 10 November 2022.
  30. ^ Rozenberg, Joshua (29 September 2008). "Popular Pannick picked as peoples' peer". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
  31. ^ Oryszczuk, Stephen (19 July 2016). "Lawyers acting on Brexit subjected to anti-Semitic abuse". Jewish News. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
  32. ^ Pannick, David. "Why we should celebrate our tradition of oral advocacy". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
[edit]
Orders of precedence in the United Kingdom
Preceded by Gentlemen
Baron Pannick 		Followed by
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Pannick,_Baron_Pannick&oldid=1222426470"