Jump to content

Aramaic alphabet: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Hexonite (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
(29 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}}
{{Infobox writing system
{{Infobox writing system
| sample = Stele Salm Louvre AO5009.jpg
| sample = Stele Salm Louvre AO5009.jpg
| caption = Aramaic [[Tayma stones|inscription from Tayma]], containing a dedicatory inscription to the god Salm
| caption = Aramaic [[Tayma stones|inscription from Tayma]], containing a dedicatory inscription to the god Salm
|name = Aramaic alphabet
| name = Aramaic alphabet
|type = [[Abjad]]
| type = [[Abjad]]
|languages=[[Aramaic language|Aramaic]], [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]], [[Syriac language|Syriac]], [[Mandaic language|Mandaic]], [[Edomite language|Edomite]]
| languages = [[Aramaic language|Aramaic]] ([[Syriac language|Syriac]]<ref name="WWS"/> and [[Mandaic language|Mandaic]]), [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]], [[Edomite language|Edomite]]
|time = 800 BC to AD 600
| time = 800 BC to AD 600
|direction=right-to-left
| direction = right-to-left
|fam1 = [[Egyptian hieroglyphs]]
| fam1 = [[Egyptian hieroglyphs]]
|fam2 = [[Proto-Sinaitic script|Proto-Sinaitic]]
| fam2 = [[Proto-Sinaitic script|Proto-Sinaitic]]
|fam3 = [[Phoenician alphabet|Phoenician]]
| fam3 = [[Phoenician alphabet|Phoenician]]
| children = *[[Hebrew alphabet|Hebrew]]<ref name="WWS">{{cite book | title=The World's Writing Systems | year=1996 | editor1-first=Peter T. | editor1-last=Daniels | editor1-link=Peter T. Daniels | editor2-last=Bright | editor2-first=William | editor2-link=William Bright | publisher=Oxford University Press, Inc | isbn=978-0195079937 | pages=[https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/89 89] | url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/89 }}</ref>
|children =
**[[Western Neo-Aramaic#Square Maalouli alphabet|Maalouli]]<ref>{{cite web |author1=Maissun Melhem |title=Schriftenstreit in Syrien |url=https://www.dw.com/de/schriftenstreit-in-syrien/a-5166405 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |access-date=15 November 2023 |language=German |date=21 January 2010 |quote="Several years ago, the political leadership in Syria decided to establish an institute where Aramaic could be learned. Rizkalla was tasked with writing a textbook, primarily drawing upon his native language proficiency. For the script, he chose Hebrew letters."}}</ref><ref name="Oriens Christianus">{{cite book |title=Oriens Christianus |date=2003 |page=77 |language=German |quote="As the villages are very small, located close to each other, and the three dialects are mutually intelligible, there has never been the creation of a script or a standard language. Aramaic is the unwritten village dialect..."}}</ref>
*[[Hebrew alphabet|Hebrew]]<ref name="WWS">{{cite book | title=The World's Writing Systems | year=1996 | editor1-first=Peter T. | editor1-last=Daniels | editor1-link=Peter T. Daniels | editor2-last=Bright | editor2-first=William | editor2-link=William Bright | publisher=Oxford University Press, Inc | isbn=978-0195079937 | pages=[https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/89 89] | url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/89 }}</ref>
**[[Western Neo-Aramaic#Square Maalouli alphabet|Maalouli]]<ref>{{cite web |author1=Maissun Melhem |title=Schriftenstreit in Syrien |url=https://www.dw.com/de/schriftenstreit-in-syrien/a-5166405 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |access-date=15 November 2023 |language=German |date=21 January 2010 |quote="Several years ago, the political leadership in Syria decided to establish an institute where Aramaic could be learned. Rizkalla was tasked with writing a textbook, primarily drawing upon his native language proficiency. For the script, he chose Hebrew letters."}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Oriens Christianus |date=2003 |page=77 |language=German |quote="As the villages are very small, located close to each other, and the three dialects are mutually intelligible, there has never been the creation of a script or a standard language. Aramaic is the unwritten village dialect..."}}</ref>
*[[Nabataean alphabet|Nabataean]]<ref name="WWS"/>
*[[Nabataean alphabet|Nabataean]]<ref name="WWS"/>
**[[Arabic script|Arabic]]
**[[Arabic script|Arabic]]
***[[Hanifi Rohingya script|Hanifi Script]]
***[[N'Ko]]
*[[Syriac alphabet|Syriac]]
*[[Syriac alphabet|Syriac]]
**[[Sogdian alphabet|Sogdian]]
**[[Sogdian alphabet|Sogdian]]
Line 22: Line 23:
****[[Mongolian script|Mongolian]]
****[[Mongolian script|Mongolian]]
*****[[Manchu script|Manchu]]
*****[[Manchu script|Manchu]]
**[[Christian Palestinian Aramaic]]
*[[Palmyrene alphabet|Palmyrene]]<ref name="WWS"/>
*[[Palmyrene alphabet|Palmyrene]]<ref name="WWS"/>
*[[Edessan script|Edessan]]<ref name="WWS"/>
*[[Hatran alphabet|Hatran]]<ref name="WWS"/>
*[[Hatran alphabet|Hatran]]<ref name="WWS"/>
*[[Mandaic alphabet|Mandaic]]<ref name="WWS"/>
*[[Mandaic alphabet|Mandaic]]<ref name="WWS"/>
Line 29: Line 30:
*[[Pahlavi script|Pahlavi]]
*[[Pahlavi script|Pahlavi]]
*[[Kharosthi]]
*[[Kharosthi]]
*[[Brahmi script|Brahmi]]{{efn|name=sem|The theory of the Aramaic origin of the Brahmi script is supported}}
*[[Brahmi script|Brahmi]]{{efn|name=sem|A Semitic origin for the Brāhmī script is disputed.}}
**[[Gupta script|Gupta]]
**[[Gupta script|Gupta]]
***[[Sharada script|Sharada]]
***[[Sharada script|Sharada]]
Line 43: Line 44:
**[[Sinhala script|Sinhala]]
**[[Sinhala script|Sinhala]]
**[[Tocharian script|Tocharian]]
**[[Tocharian script|Tocharian]]
|unicode = [https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U10840.pdf U+10840–U+1085F]
| unicode = [https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U10840.pdf U+10840–U+1085F]
|iso15924 = Armi
| iso15924 = Armi
| footnotes = {{notelist}}
| footnotes = {{notelist}}
| ipa-note = no
| ipa-note = no
}}

}}{{Special characters|image=Shlama.svg|alt=|link=http://www.bethmardutho.org/index.php/resources/fonts.html|special=Syriac text, written from right to left in a cursive style with some letters joined|fix=Help:Multilingual_support#Syriac/Aramaic script|characters=[[Syriac script]]|error=unjoined Syriac letters or other symbols}}{{alphabet}}
{{Special characters |image=Shlama.svg |alt= |link=http://www.bethmardutho.org/index.php/resources/fonts.html |special=Syriac text, written from right to left in a cursive style with some letters joined |characters=[[Syriac script]] |fix=Help:Multilingual_support#Syriac/Aramaic script |error=unjoined Syriac letters or other symbols}}{{alphabet}}
{{Aramaeans}}
{{Aramaeans}}
The ancient '''Aramaic alphabet''' was used to write the [[Aramaic language]]s spoken by ancient Aramean pre-Christian tribes throughout the [[Fertile Crescent]]. It was also adopted by other peoples as their own alphabet when empires and their subjects underwent linguistic Aramaization during a [[language shift]] for governing purposes—a precursor to [[Arabization]] centuries later—including among [[Assyrian people|Assyrians]] who permanently replaced their [[Akkadian language|Akkadian]] language and its [[cuneiform script]] with Aramaic and its script, and among [[Jews]] (but not [[Samaritans]]), who adopted the Aramaic language as their vernacular and started using the Aramaic alphabet even for writing [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]], displacing the former [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet]]. (The modern [[Hebrew alphabet]] derives from the Aramaic alphabet, in contrast to the modern [[Samaritan script|Samaritan alphabet]], which derives from [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet|Paleo-Hebrew).]]
The ancient '''Aramaic alphabet''' was used to write the [[Aramaic language]]s spoken by ancient [[Aramean]] pre-Christian tribes throughout the [[Fertile Crescent]]. It was also adopted by other peoples as their own alphabet when empires and their subjects underwent linguistic Aramaization during a [[language shift]] for governing purposes — a precursor to [[Arabization]] centuries later — including among the [[Neo-Assyrian Empire|Assyrians]] and [[Neo-Babylonian Empire|Babylonians]] who permanently replaced their [[Akkadian language|Akkadian]] language and its [[cuneiform script]] with Aramaic and its script, and among [[Jews]], but not [[Samaritans]], who adopted the Aramaic language as their vernacular and started using the Aramaic alphabet, which they call "[[Ktav Ashuri|Square Script]]", even for writing [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]], displacing the former [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet]]. The modern [[Hebrew alphabet]] derives from the Aramaic alphabet, in contrast to the modern [[Samaritan script|Samaritan alphabet]], which derives from [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet|Paleo-Hebrew]].


The letters in the Aramaic alphabet all represent [[consonant]]s, some of which are also used as ''[[Mater lectionis|matres lectionis]]'' to indicate long [[vowel]]s. Writing systems (like the Aramaic) that indicate consonants but do not indicate most vowels other than by means of ''matres lectionis'' or added diacritical signs, have been called [[abjad]]s by [[Peter T. Daniels]] to distinguish them from alphabets such as the [[Greek alphabet]] that represent vowels more systematically. The term was coined to avoid the notion that a writing system that represents sounds must be either a [[syllabary]] or an alphabet, which would imply that a system like Aramaic must be either a syllabary (as argued by [[Ignace Gelb]]) or an incomplete or [[defective script|deficient alphabet]] (as most other writers had said before Daniels). Rather, Daniels put forward, this is a different type of writing system, intermediate between syllabaries and 'full' alphabets.
The letters in the Aramaic alphabet all represent [[consonant]]s, some of which are also used as ''[[Mater lectionis|matres lectionis]]'' to indicate long [[vowel]]s. Writing systems, like the Aramaic, that indicate consonants but do not indicate most vowels other than by means of ''matres lectionis'' or added diacritical signs, have been called [[abjad]]s by [[Peter T. Daniels]] to distinguish them from alphabets such as the [[Greek alphabet]], that represent vowels more systematically. The term was coined to avoid the notion that a writing system that represents sounds must be either a [[syllabary]] or an alphabet, which would imply that a system like Aramaic must be either a syllabary, as argued by [[Ignace Gelb]], or an incomplete or [[defective script|deficient alphabet]], as most other writers had said before Daniels. Daniels put forward, this is a different type of writing system, intermediate between syllabaries and 'full' alphabets.


The Aramaic [[alphabet]] is historically significant since virtually all [[modern history|modern]] [[Middle East]]ern writing systems can be traced back to it. That is primarily due to the widespread usage of the Aramaic language after it was adopted as both a ''[[lingua franca]]'' and the official language of the [[Neo-Assyrian Empire|Neo-Assyrian]] and [[Neo-Babylonian Empire|Neo-Babylonian]] Empires, and their successor, the [[Achaemenid Empire]]. Among the descendant scripts in modern use, the Jewish [[Hebrew alphabet]] bears the closest relation to the Imperial Aramaic script of the 5th century BC, with an identical letter inventory and, for the most part, nearly identical letter shapes. By contrast the [[Samaritan script|Samaritan Hebrew script]] is directly descended from Proto-Hebrew/Phoenician script, which was in turn the ancestor of the Aramaic alphabet. The Aramaic alphabet was also an ancestor to the [[Nabataean alphabet]], which in turn had the [[Arabic alphabet]] as a descendant.
The Aramaic [[alphabet]] is historically significant since virtually all [[modern history|modern]] [[Middle East]]ern writing systems can be traced back to it. That is primarily due to the widespread usage of the Aramaic language after it was adopted as both a ''[[lingua franca]]'' and the official language of the [[Neo-Assyrian Empire|Neo-Assyrian]] and [[Neo-Babylonian Empire|Neo-Babylonian]] Empires, and their successor, the [[Achaemenid Empire]]. Among the descendant scripts in modern use, the Jewish [[Hebrew alphabet]] bears the closest relation to the Imperial Aramaic script of the 5th century BC, with an identical letter inventory and, for the most part, nearly identical letter shapes. By contrast the [[Samaritan script|Samaritan Hebrew script]] is directly descended from Proto-Hebrew/Phoenician script, which was the ancestor of the Aramaic alphabet. The Aramaic alphabet was also an ancestor to the [[Nabataean alphabet]], which had the [[Arabic alphabet]] as a descendant.


== History ==
== History ==
[[File:AsokaKandahar.jpg|thumb|left|The [[Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription]], a Greek and Aramaic inscription by the [[Mauryan Empire|Mauryan]] emperor [[Ashoka]] at [[Kandahar]], [[Afghanistan]], 3rd century BC]]
[[File:AsokaKandahar.jpg|thumb|left|The [[Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription]], a Greek and Aramaic inscription by the [[Mauryan Empire|Mauryan]] emperor [[Ashoka]] at [[Kandahar]], [[Afghanistan]], 3rd century BC]]
The earliest inscriptions in the [[Aramaic language]] use the [[Phoenician alphabet]].<ref>''Inland Syria and the East-of-Jordan Region in the First Millennium BCE before the Assyrian Intrusions'', Mark W. Chavalas, The Age of Solomon: Scholarship at the Turn of the Millennium, ed. Lowell K. Handy, (Brill, 1997), 169.</ref> Over time, the alphabet developed into the Aramaic alphabet by the 8th century BC. It was used to write the [[Aramaic language]]s spoken by ancient Aramean pre-Christian tribes throughout the [[Fertile Crescent]]. It was also adopted by other peoples as their own alphabet when empires and their subjects underwent linguistic Aramaization during a [[language shift]] for governing purposes—a precursor to [[Arabization]] centuries later—including among [[Assyrian people|Assyrians]] who permanently replaced their [[Akkadian language|Akkadian]] language and its [[cuneiform script]] with Aramaic and its script, and among [[Jews]] (but not [[Samaritans]]), who adopted the Aramaic language as their vernacular and started using the Aramaic alphabet even for writing [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]], displacing the former [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet]]. (The modern [[Hebrew alphabet]] derives from the Aramaic alphabet, in contrast to the modern [[Samaritan script|Samaritan alphabet]], which derives from [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet|Paleo-Hebrew).]]
The earliest inscriptions in the [[Aramaic language]] use the [[Phoenician alphabet]].<ref>''Inland Syria and the East-of-Jordan Region in the First Millennium BCE before the Assyrian Intrusions'', Mark W. Chavalas, The Age of Solomon: Scholarship at the Turn of the Millennium, ed. Lowell K. Handy, (Brill, 1997), 169.</ref> Over time, the alphabet developed into the Aramaic alphabet by the 8th century BC. It was used to write the [[Aramaic language]]s spoken by ancient Aramean pre-Christian tribes throughout the [[Fertile Crescent]]. It was also adopted by other peoples as their own alphabet when empires and their subjects underwent linguistic Aramaization during a [[language shift]] for governing purposes — a precursor to [[Arabization]] centuries later.
These include the [[Neo-Assyrian Empire|Assyrians]] and [[Neo-Babylonian Empire|Babylonians]], who permanently replaced their [[Akkadian language|Akkadian]] language and its [[cuneiform script]] with Aramaic and its script, and among [[Jews]], but not [[Samaritans]], who adopted the Aramaic language as their vernacular and started using the Aramaic alphabet even for writing [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]], displacing the former [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet]]. The modern [[Hebrew alphabet]] derives from the Aramaic alphabet, in contrast to the modern [[Samaritan script|Samaritan alphabet]], which derives from [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet|Paleo-Hebrew]].


=== Achaemenid Empire (The First Persian Empire) ===
=== Achaemenid Empire (The First Persian Empire) ===
{{further information|Imperial Aramaic}}
{{further information|Imperial Aramaic}}
[[File:Sirkap Aramaic inscription 4th century BC.jpg|thumb|[[Aramaic inscription of Taxila]], [[Pakistan]] probably by the emperor [[Ashoka]] around 260 BCE]]
[[File:Sirkap Aramaic inscription 4th century BC (2).jpg|thumb |upright|[[Aramaic inscription of Taxila]], [[Pakistan]] probably by the emperor [[Ashoka]] around 260 BCE]]
Around 500 BC, following the [[Achaemenid Empire|Achaemenid]] conquest of [[Mesopotamia]] under [[Darius I]], [[Old Aramaic]] was adopted by the Persians as the "vehicle for written communication between the different regions of the vast Persian empire with its different peoples and languages. The use of a single official language, which modern scholarship has dubbed as Official Aramaic, Imperial Aramaic or Achaemenid Aramaic, can be assumed to have greatly contributed to the astonishing success of the Achaemenid Persians in holding their far-flung empire together for as long as they did."<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica|volume=2|year=1987|title=Aramaic<!-- pp 250–261 --><!-- section:Aramaic in the Achaemenid Empire pp 251–252-->|last=Shaked|first=Saul|publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul|location=New York|pages=250–261}} p. 251</ref>
Around 500 BC, following the [[Achaemenid Empire|Achaemenid]] conquest of [[Mesopotamia]] under [[Darius I]], [[Old Aramaic]] was adopted by the Persians as the "vehicle for written communication between the different regions of the vast Persian empire with its different peoples and languages. The use of a single official language, which modern scholarship has dubbed as Official Aramaic, Imperial Aramaic or Achaemenid Aramaic, can be assumed to have greatly contributed to the astonishing success of the Achaemenid Persians in holding their far-flung empire together for as long as they did."<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica|volume=2|year=1987|title=Aramaic<!-- pp 250–261 --><!-- section:Aramaic in the Achaemenid Empire pp 251–252-->|last=Shaked|first=Saul|publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul|location=New York|pages=250–261}} p. 251</ref>


Imperial Aramaic was highly standardised; its orthography was based more on historical roots than any spoken dialect and was influenced by [[Old Persian]]. The Aramaic glyph forms of the period are often divided into two main styles, the "lapidary" form, usually inscribed on hard surfaces like stone monuments, and a cursive form whose lapidary form tended to be more conservative by remaining more visually similar to Phoenician and early Aramaic. Both were in use through the Achaemenid Persian period, but the cursive form steadily gained ground over the lapidary, which had largely disappeared by the 3rd century BC.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Greenfield|first1=J.C.|editor1-last=Gershevitch|editor1-first=I.|title=The Cambridge History of Iran: Volume 2|date=1985|publisher=Cambridge University Press|pages=709–710|chapter=Aramaic in the Achaemenid Empire}}</ref>
Imperial Aramaic was highly standardised. Its orthography was based more on historical roots than any spoken dialect and was influenced by [[Old Persian]]. The Aramaic glyph forms of the period are often divided into two main styles, the "lapidary" form, usually inscribed on hard surfaces like stone monuments, and a cursive form whose lapidary form tended to be more conservative by remaining more visually similar to Phoenician and early Aramaic. Both were in use through the Achaemenid Persian period, but the cursive form steadily gained ground over the lapidary, which had largely disappeared by the 3rd century BC.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Greenfield|first1=J.C.|editor1-last=Gershevitch|editor1-first=I.|title=The Cambridge History of Iran: Volume 2|date=1985|publisher=Cambridge University Press|pages=709–710|chapter=Aramaic in the Achaemenid Empire}}</ref>


For centuries after the fall of the Achaemenid Empire in 331 BC, Imperial Aramaic, or something near enough to it to be recognisable, would remain an influence on the various native [[Iranian languages]]. The Aramaic script would survive as the essential characteristics of the Iranian [[Pahlavi scripts|Pahlavi writing system]].<ref>{{Cite book|author1-link=Wilhelm Geiger|first1=Wilhelm|last1=Geiger|first2=Ernst|last2=Kuhn|year=2002|title=Grundriss der iranischen Philologie: Band I. Abteilung 1|location=Boston|publisher=Adamant|pages=249ff}}</ref>
For centuries after the fall of the Achaemenid Empire in 331 BC, Imperial Aramaic, or something near enough to it to be recognisable, remained an influence on the various native [[Iranian languages]]. The Aramaic script survived as the essential characteristics of the Iranian [[Pahlavi scripts|Pahlavi writing system]].<ref>{{Cite book |author1-link=Wilhelm Geiger |first1=Wilhelm |last1=Geiger |first2=Ernst |last2=Kuhn |year=2002 |title=Grundriss der iranischen Philologie: Band I. Abteilung 1 |location=Boston |publisher=Adamant |pages=249ff}}</ref>


30 Aramaic documents from [[Bactria]] have been recently discovered, an analysis of which was published in November 2006. The texts, which were rendered on leather, reflect the use of Aramaic in the 4th century BC in the Persian Achaemenid administration of [[Bactria]] and [[Sogdiana]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Ancient Aramaic Documents from Bactria|series=Studies in the Khalili Collection|last1=Naveh|first1=Joseph|last2=Shaked|first2=Shaul|isbn=978-1-874780-74-8|publisher=Khalili Collections|location=Oxford|year=2006}}</ref>
30 Aramaic documents from [[Bactria]] have been recently discovered, an analysis of which was published in November 2006. The texts, which were rendered on leather, reflect the use of Aramaic in the 4th century BC, in the Persian Achaemenid administration of [[Bactria]] and [[Sogdiana]].<ref>{{Cite book |title=Ancient Aramaic Documents from Bactria |series=Studies in the Khalili Collection |last1=Naveh |first1=Joseph |last2=Shaked |first2=Shaul |isbn=978-1-874780-74-8 |publisher=Khalili Collections |location=Oxford |year=2006}}</ref>


The widespread usage of Achaemenid Aramaic in the Middle East led to the gradual adoption of the Aramaic alphabet for writing [[Hebrew]]. Formerly, Hebrew had been written using an alphabet closer in form to that of Phoenician, the [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thamis |title=The Phoenician Alphabet & Language |url=https://www.worldhistory.org/article/17/the-phoenician-alphabet--language/ |access-date=2023-06-25 |website=World History Encyclopedia |language=en}}</ref>
The widespread usage of Achaemenid Aramaic in the Middle East led to the gradual adoption of the Aramaic alphabet for writing [[Hebrew]]. Formerly, Hebrew had been written using an alphabet closer in form to that of Phoenician, the [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thamis |title=The Phoenician Alphabet & Language |url=https://www.worldhistory.org/article/17/the-phoenician-alphabet--language/ |access-date=2023-06-25 |website=World History Encyclopedia |language=en}}</ref>
Line 75: Line 78:
===Aramaic-derived scripts===
===Aramaic-derived scripts===


Since the evolution of the Aramaic alphabet out of the Phoenician one was a gradual process, the division of the world's alphabets into the ones derived from the Phoenician one directly and the ones derived from Phoenician via Aramaic is somewhat artificial. In general, the alphabets of the Mediterranean region (Anatolia, Greece, Italy) are classified as Phoenician-derived, adapted from around the 8th century BC, and those of the East (the Levant, Persia, Central Asia, and India) are considered Aramaic-derived, adapted from around the 6th century BC from the Imperial Aramaic script of the Achaemenid Empire.{{Citation needed|reason=Reliable source needed for the whole sentence|date=May 2020}}
Since the evolution of the Aramaic alphabet out of the Phoenician one was a gradual process, the division of the world's alphabets into the ones derived from the Phoenician one directly, and the ones derived from Phoenician via Aramaic, is somewhat artificial. In general, the alphabets of the Mediterranean region (Anatolia, Greece, Italy) are classified as Phoenician-derived, adapted from around the 8th century BC. Those of the East (the Levant, Persia, Central Asia, and India) are considered Aramaic-derived, adapted from around the 6th century BC from the Imperial Aramaic script of the Achaemenid Empire.{{Citation needed|reason=Reliable source needed for the whole sentence|date=May 2020}}


After the fall of the Achaemenid Empire, the unity of the Imperial Aramaic script was lost, diversifying into a number of descendant cursives.
After the fall of the Achaemenid Empire, the unity of the Imperial Aramaic script was lost, diversifying into a number of descendant cursives.
Line 81: Line 84:
The Hebrew and [[Nabataean alphabet]]s, as they stood by the [[Roman era]], were little changed in style from the Imperial Aramaic alphabet. [[Ibn Khaldun]] (1332–1406) alleges that not only the old Nabataean writing was influenced by the "Syrian script" (i.e. Aramaic), but also the old Chaldean script.<ref>{{cite book |last=Ibn Khaldun |author-link=Ibn Khaldun |title=[[The Muqaddimah]] (K. Ta'rikh – "History") |editor=F. Rosenthal |volume=3 |date=1958 |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.|location=London |page=283 |language=en |oclc=643885643}}</ref>
The Hebrew and [[Nabataean alphabet]]s, as they stood by the [[Roman era]], were little changed in style from the Imperial Aramaic alphabet. [[Ibn Khaldun]] (1332–1406) alleges that not only the old Nabataean writing was influenced by the "Syrian script" (i.e. Aramaic), but also the old Chaldean script.<ref>{{cite book |last=Ibn Khaldun |author-link=Ibn Khaldun |title=[[The Muqaddimah]] (K. Ta'rikh – "History") |editor=F. Rosenthal |volume=3 |date=1958 |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.|location=London |page=283 |language=en |oclc=643885643}}</ref>


A [[cursive Hebrew]] variant developed from the early centuries AD, but it remained restricted to the status of a variant used alongside the noncursive. By contrast, the cursive developed out of the Nabataean alphabet in the same period soon became the standard for writing Arabic, evolving into the [[Arabic alphabet]] as it stood by the time of the early [[Early Muslim conquests|spread of Islam]].
A [[cursive Hebrew]] variant developed from the early centuries AD. It remained restricted to the status of a variant used alongside the noncursive. By contrast, the cursive developed out of the Nabataean alphabet in the same period soon became the standard for writing Arabic, evolving into the [[Arabic alphabet]] as it stood by the time of the early [[Early Muslim conquests|spread of Islam]].


The development of cursive versions of Aramaic also led to the creation of the [[Syriac alphabet|Syriac]], [[Palmyrene alphabet|Palmyrene]] and [[Mandaic alphabet]]s, which formed the basis of the historical scripts of Central Asia, such as the [[Sogdian alphabet|Sogdian]] and [[Mongolian script|Mongolian]] alphabets.<ref name="Kara1996">{{cite book|first=György|last=Kara|chapter=Aramaic Scripts for Altaic Languages|editor=Daniels, Peter T. |editor2=Bright, William|title=The World's Writing Systems|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|pages=[https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/535 535–558]|year=1996|isbn=978-0-19-507993-7|title-link=The World's Writing Systems}}</ref>
The development of cursive versions of Aramaic led to the creation of the [[Syriac alphabet|Syriac]], [[Palmyrene alphabet|Palmyrene]] and [[Mandaic alphabet]]s, which formed the basis of the historical scripts of Central Asia, such as the [[Sogdian alphabet|Sogdian]] and [[Mongolian script|Mongolian]] alphabets.<ref name="Kara1996">{{cite book|first=György|last=Kara|chapter=Aramaic Scripts for Altaic Languages|editor=Daniels, Peter T. |editor2=Bright, William|title=The World's Writing Systems|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|pages=[https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/535 535–558]|year=1996|isbn=978-0-19-507993-7|title-link=The World's Writing Systems}}</ref>


The [[Old Turkic script]] is generally considered to have its ultimate origins in Aramaic,<ref>''Babylonian beginnings: The origin of the cuneiform writing system in comparative perspective'', Jerold S. Cooper, ''The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process'', ed. Stephen D. Houston, (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 58–59.</ref><ref>Tristan James Mabry, ''Nationalism, Language, and Muslim Exceptionalism'', (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015), 109.</ref><ref name="Kara1996"/> in particular via the [[Pahlavi script|Pahlavi]] or [[Sogdian alphabet]]s,<ref>''Turks'', A. Samoylovitch, '''First Encyclopaedia of Islam: 1913–1936''', Vol. VI, (Brill, 1993), 911.</ref><ref>George L. Campbell and Christopher Moseley, ''The Routledge Handbook of Scripts and Alphabets'', (Routledge, 2012), 40.</ref> as suggested by [[Vilhelm Thomsen|V. Thomsen]], or possibly via [[Kharoṣṭhī|Kharosthi]] (''cf''., [[Issyk inscription]]).
The [[Old Turkic script]] is generally considered to have its ultimate origins in Aramaic,<ref>''Babylonian beginnings: The origin of the cuneiform writing system in comparative perspective'', Jerold S. Cooper, ''The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process'', ed. Stephen D. Houston, (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 58–59.</ref><ref>Tristan James Mabry, ''Nationalism, Language, and Muslim Exceptionalism'', (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015), 109.</ref><ref name="Kara1996"/> in particular via the [[Pahlavi script|Pahlavi]] or [[Sogdian alphabet]]s,<ref>''Turks'', A. Samoylovitch, '''First Encyclopaedia of Islam: 1913–1936''', Vol. VI, (Brill, 1993), 911.</ref><ref>George L. Campbell and Christopher Moseley, ''The Routledge Handbook of Scripts and Alphabets'', (Routledge, 2012), 40.</ref> as suggested by [[Vilhelm Thomsen|V. Thomsen]], or possibly via [[Kharoṣṭhī|Kharosthi]] (''cf''., [[Issyk inscription]]).


[[Brahmi script]] was also possibly derived or inspired by Aramaic. [[Brahmic family of scripts]] includes [[Devanagari]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Brāhmī {{!}} writing system|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Brahmi|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2020-05-29}}</ref>
[[Brahmi script]] was also possibly derived or inspired by Aramaic. [[Brahmic family of scripts]] includes [[Devanagari]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Brāhmī {{!}} writing system |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Brahmi |website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2020-05-29}}</ref>


==Languages using the alphabet==
==Languages using the alphabet==
Today, [[Biblical Aramaic]], Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects and the Aramaic language of the [[Talmud]] are written in the modern-Hebrew alphabet (distinguished from the [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet|Old Hebrew]] script). In classical [[Jewish literature]], the name given to the modern-Hebrew script was "Ashurit" (the ancient Assyrian script),<ref>{{cite book |contribution=Tractate Megillah 1:8|title=Mishnah |editor-last1=Danby|editor-first1=H. |editor-link1=Herbert Danby |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|place=London|page=202 (note 20) |year=1964|oclc=977686730 }} ([https://archive.org/details/DanbyMishnah/page/n231/mode/1up ''The Mishnah'', p. 202 (note 20)]).</ref> a script now known widely as the Aramaic script.<ref name="SteinerRC1993">{{cite journal |last=Steiner|first=R.C.|author-link=Richard C. Steiner |title=Why the Aramaic Script Was Called "Assyrian" in Hebrew, Greek, and Demotic |journal=Orientalia |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=80–82|date=1993|jstor=43076090 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Cook|first=Stanley A.|title=The Significance of the Elephantine Papyri for the History of Hebrew Religion |journal=The American Journal of Theology|publisher=[[The University of Chicago Press]] |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=348|date=1915|doi=10.1086/479556|jstor=3155577|language=en|doi-access=}}</ref> It is believed that during the period of Assyrian dominion that Aramaic script and language received official status.<ref name="SteinerRC1993" /> [[Syriac language|Syriac]] and Christian Neo-Aramaic dialects are today written in the [[Syriac alphabet]], which script has superseded the more ancient Assyrian script and now bears its name. [[Mandaic language|Mandaic]] is written in the [[Mandaic alphabet]]. The near-identical nature of the Aramaic and the classical Hebrew alphabets caused Aramaic text to be typeset mostly in the standard Hebrew script in scholarly literature.
Today, [[Biblical Aramaic]], Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects and the Aramaic language of the [[Talmud]] are written in the modern-Hebrew alphabet, distinguished from the [[Paleo-Hebrew alphabet|Old Hebrew]] script. In classical [[Jewish literature]], the name given to the modern-Hebrew script was "Ashurit", the ancient Assyrian script,<ref>{{cite book |contribution=Tractate Megillah 1:8|title=Mishnah |editor-last1=Danby|editor-first1=H. |editor-link1=Herbert Danby |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|place=London|page=202 (note 20) |year=1964|oclc=977686730 }} ([https://archive.org/details/DanbyMishnah/page/n231/mode/1up ''The Mishnah'', p. 202 (note 20)]).</ref> a script now known widely as the Aramaic script.<ref name="SteinerRC1993">{{cite journal |last=Steiner|first=R.C.|author-link=Richard C. Steiner |title=Why the Aramaic Script Was Called "Assyrian" in Hebrew, Greek, and Demotic |journal=Orientalia |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=80–82|date=1993|jstor=43076090 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Cook|first=Stanley A.|title=The Significance of the Elephantine Papyri for the History of Hebrew Religion |journal=The American Journal of Theology|publisher=[[The University of Chicago Press]] |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=348 |date=1915 |doi=10.1086/479556 |jstor=3155577 |language=en}}</ref> It is believed that during the period of Assyrian dominion, that Aramaic script and language received official status.<ref name="SteinerRC1993" />
[[Syriac language|Syriac]] and Christian Neo-Aramaic dialects are today written in the [[Syriac alphabet]], which script has superseded the more ancient Assyrian script and now bears its name. [[Mandaic language|Mandaic]] is written in the [[Mandaic alphabet]]. The near-identical nature of the Aramaic and the classical Hebrew alphabets caused Aramaic text to be typeset mostly in the standard Hebrew script in scholarly literature.


===Maaloula===
===Maaloula===
Line 96: Line 101:
In [[Maaloula]], one of few surviving communities in which a [[Western Neo-Aramaic|Western Aramaic]] dialect is still spoken, an Aramaic Language Institute was established in 2006 by [[Damascus University]] that teaches courses to keep the language alive.
In [[Maaloula]], one of few surviving communities in which a [[Western Neo-Aramaic|Western Aramaic]] dialect is still spoken, an Aramaic Language Institute was established in 2006 by [[Damascus University]] that teaches courses to keep the language alive.


Unlike Classical Syriac, which has a rich literary tradition in Syriac-Aramaic script, Western Neo-Aramaic was solely passed down orally for generations until 2006 and was not utilized in a written form.<ref>{{cite book |title=Oriens Christianus |date=2003 |page=77 |language=German |quote="As the villages are very small, located close to each other, and the three dialects are mutually intelligible, there has never been the creation of a script or a standard language. Aramaic is the unwritten village dialect..."}}</ref>
Unlike Classical Syriac, which has a rich literary tradition in Syriac-Aramaic script, Western Neo-Aramaic was solely passed down orally for generations until 2006 and was not utilized in a written form.<ref name="Oriens Christianus">{{cite book |title=Oriens Christianus |date=2003 |page=77 |language=German |quote="As the villages are very small, located close to each other, and the three dialects are mutually intelligible, there has never been the creation of a script or a standard language. Aramaic is the unwritten village dialect..."}}</ref>
Therefore, the Language Institute's chairman, George Rizkalla (Rezkallah), undertook the writing of a textbook in Western Neo-Aramaic. Being previously unwritten, Rizkalla opted for the [[Hebrew alphabet]]. However, in 2010, the institute's activities were halted due to concerns that the square Maalouli-Aramaic alphabet used in the program bore a resemblance to the square script of the Hebrew alphabet. As a result, all signs featuring the square Maalouli script were subsequently removed.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Maissun Melhem |title=Schriftenstreit in Syrien |url=https://www.dw.com/de/schriftenstreit-in-syrien/a-5166405 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |access-date=15 November 2023 |language=German |quote=Before the Islamic conquest, Aramaic was spoken throughout Syria and was a global language. There were many variants, but Aramaic did not exist as a written language everywhere, including the Ma’alula region, notes Professor Jastrow. The decision to use the Hebrew script, in his opinion, was made arbitrarily.”}}</ref> The program stated that they would instead use the more distinct [[Syriac alphabet|Syriac-Aramaic alphabet]], although use of the Maalouli alphabet has continued to some degree.<ref name="institute">{{cite news |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2010/0402/Easter-Sunday-A-Syrian-bid-to-resurrect-Aramaic-the-language-of-Jesus-Christ |title=Easter Sunday: A Syrian bid to resurrect Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ |last=Beach |first=Alastair |newspaper=[[The Christian Science Monitor]] |date=2010-04-02 |access-date=2010-04-02}}</ref> Al Jazeera Arabic also broadcast a program about Western Neo-Aramaic and the villages in which it is spoken with the square script still in use.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rbrZ1W2nAs| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211117/0rbrZ1W2nAs| archive-date=2021-11-17 | url-status=live|title=أرض تحكي لغة المسيح|last=Al Jazeera Documentary الجزيرة الوثائقية|date=11 February 2016|access-date=27 March 2018|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
Therefore, the Language Institute's chairman, George Rizkalla (Rezkallah), undertook the writing of a textbook in Western Neo-Aramaic. Being previously unwritten, Rizkalla opted for the [[Hebrew alphabet]]. In 2010, the institute's activities were halted due to concerns that the square Maalouli-Aramaic alphabet used in the program bore a resemblance to the square script of the Hebrew alphabet. As a result, all signs featuring the square Maalouli script were subsequently removed.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Maissun Melhem |title=Schriftenstreit in Syrien |url=https://www.dw.com/de/schriftenstreit-in-syrien/a-5166405 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |access-date=15 November 2023 |language=German |quote=Before the Islamic conquest, Aramaic was spoken throughout Syria and was a global language. There were many variants, but Aramaic did not exist as a written language everywhere, including the Ma’alula region, notes Professor Jastrow. The decision to use the Hebrew script, in his opinion, was made arbitrarily.”}}</ref> The program stated that they would instead use the more distinct [[Syriac alphabet|Syriac-Aramaic alphabet]], although use of the Maalouli alphabet has continued to some degree.<ref name="institute">{{cite news |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2010/0402/Easter-Sunday-A-Syrian-bid-to-resurrect-Aramaic-the-language-of-Jesus-Christ |title=Easter Sunday: A Syrian bid to resurrect Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ |last=Beach |first=Alastair |newspaper=[[The Christian Science Monitor]] |date=2010-04-02 |access-date=2010-04-02}}</ref> Al Jazeera Arabic also broadcast a program about Western Neo-Aramaic and the villages in which it is spoken with the square script still in use.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rbrZ1W2nAs| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211117/0rbrZ1W2nAs| archive-date=2021-11-17 | url-status=live|title=أرض تحكي لغة المسيح|last=Al Jazeera Documentary الجزيرة الوثائقية|date=11 February 2016|access-date=27 March 2018|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}</ref>


==Letters==
==Letters==
Line 147: Line 152:
| [[A]]a
| [[A]]a
| [[А]]а
| [[А]]а
| [[File:Brahmi a.svg|18px]]𑀅
| [[File:Brahmi a.svg|18px]][[A (Indic)|𑀅]], [[File:Brahmi aa.svg|18px]][[Ā (Indic)|𑀆]]
| [[File:Kharosthi a.svg|16px]]𐨀
| [[File:Kharosthi a.svg|16px]]𐨀
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰁
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰁
Line 170: Line 175:
| [[B]]b
| [[B]]b
| [[Б]]б, [[В]]в
| [[Б]]б, [[В]]в
| [[File:Brahmi b.svg|18px]]𑀩
| [[File:Brahmi b.svg|18px]][[Ba (Indic)|𑀩]], [[File:Brahmi bh.svg|18px]][[Bha (Indic)|𑀪]]
| [[File:Kharosthi b.svg|20px]]𐨦
| [[File:Kharosthi b.svg|20px]]𐨦
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰉 𐰋
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰉 𐰋
Line 193: Line 198:
| [[C]]c, [[G]]g
| [[C]]c, [[G]]g
| [[Г]]г, [[Ґ]]ґ
| [[Г]]г, [[Ґ]]ґ
| [[File:Brahmi g.svg|18px]]𑀕
| [[File:Brahmi g.svg|18px]][[Ga (Indic)|𑀕]]
| [[File:Kharosthi g.svg|19px]]𐨒
| [[File:Kharosthi g.svg|19px]]𐨒
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰲 𐰱
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰲 𐰱
Line 216: Line 221:
| [[D]]d
| [[D]]d
| [[Д]]д
| [[Д]]д
| [[File:Brahmi d.svg|18px]][[Da (Indic)|𑀤]], [[File:Brahmi dh.svg|18px]][[Dha (Indic)|𑀥]], [[File:Brahmi dd.svg|18px]][[Dda (Indic)|𑀟]], [[File:Brahmi ddh.svg|18px]][[Ddha (Indic)|𑀠]]
| [[File:Brahmi dh.svg|18px]]𑀥
| [[File:Kharosthi dh.svg|21px]]𐨢
| [[File:Kharosthi dh.svg|21px]]𐨢
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰓
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰓
Line 239: Line 244:
| [[E]]e
| [[E]]e
| [[Е]]е, [[Ё]]ё, [[Є]]є, [[Э]]э
| [[Е]]е, [[Ё]]ё, [[Є]]є, [[Э]]э
| [[File:Brahmi h.svg|18px]]𑀳
| [[File:Brahmi h.svg|18px]][[Ha (Indic)|𑀳]]
| [[File:Kharosthi h.svg|18px]]𐨱
| [[File:Kharosthi h.svg|18px]]𐨱
|
|
Line 262: Line 267:
| [[F]]f, [[U]]u, [[V]]v, [[W]]w, [[Y]]y
| [[F]]f, [[U]]u, [[V]]v, [[W]]w, [[Y]]y
| [[Ѵ]]ѵ, [[У]]у, [[Ў]]ў
| [[Ѵ]]ѵ, [[У]]у, [[Ў]]ў
| [[File:Brahmi v.svg|18px]][[Va (Indic)|𑀯]], [[File:Brahmi u.svg|18px]][[U (Indic)|𑀉]], [[File:Brahmi uu.svg|18px]][[Ū (Indic)|𑀊]], [[File:Brahmi au.svg|18px]][[Au (Indic)|𑀒]], [[File:Brahmi o.svg|18px]][[O (Indic)|𑀑]]
| [[File:Brahmi v.svg|18px]]𑀯
| [[File:Kharosthi v.svg|18px]]𐨬
| [[File:Kharosthi v.svg|18px]]𐨬
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰈 𐰆
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰈 𐰆
Line 285: Line 290:
| [[Z]]z
| [[Z]]z
| [[З]]з
| [[З]]з
| [[File:Brahmi j.svg|18px]]𑀚
| [[File:Brahmi j.svg|18px]][[Ja (Indic)|𑀚]]
| [[File:Kharosthi j.svg|18px]]𐨗
| [[File:Kharosthi j.svg|18px]]𐨗
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰕
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰕
Line 308: Line 313:
| [[H]]h
| [[H]]h
| [[И]]и, [[Й]]й
| [[И]]и, [[Й]]й
| [[File:Brahmi gh.svg|18px]]𑀖
| [[File:Brahmi gh.svg|18px]][[Gha (Indic)|𑀖]]
| [[File:Kharosthi gh.svg|18px]]𐨓
| [[File:Kharosthi gh.svg|18px]]𐨓
|
|
Line 331: Line 336:
|
|
| [[Ѳ]]ѳ
| [[Ѳ]]ѳ
| [[File:Brahmi th.svg|18px]]𑀣
| [[File:Brahmi th.svg|18px]][[Tha (Indic)|𑀣]], [[File:Brahmi tt.svg|18px]][[Tta (Indic)|𑀝]], [[File:Brahmi tth.svg|18px]][[Ttha (Indic)|𑀞]]
| [[File:Kharosthi th.svg|17px]]𐨠
| [[File:Kharosthi th.svg|17px]]𐨠
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐱃
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐱃
Line 354: Line 359:
| [[Ι]]i, [[J]]j
| [[Ι]]i, [[J]]j
| [[І]]і, [[Ї]]ї, [[Ј]]ј
| [[І]]і, [[Ї]]ї, [[Ј]]ј
| [[File:Brahmi y.svg|18px]]𑀬
| [[File:Brahmi y.svg|18px]][[Ya (Indic)|𑀬]]
| [[File:Kharosthi y.svg|15px]]𐨩
| [[File:Kharosthi y.svg|15px]]𐨩
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰘 𐰃 𐰖
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰘 𐰃 𐰖
Line 377: Line 382:
| [[K]]k
| [[K]]k
| [[К]]к
| [[К]]к
| [[File:Brahmi k.svg|18px]]𑀓
| [[File:Brahmi k.svg|18px]][[Ka (Indic)|𑀓]]
| [[File:Kharosthi k.svg|17px]]𐨐
| [[File:Kharosthi k.svg|17px]]𐨐
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰚 𐰜
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰚 𐰜
Line 400: Line 405:
| [[L]]l
| [[L]]l
| [[Л]]л
| [[Л]]л
| [[File:Brahmi l.svg|18px]]𑀮
| [[File:Brahmi l.svg|18px]][[La (Indic)|𑀮]]
| [[File:Kharosthi l.svg|21px]]𐨫
| [[File:Kharosthi l.svg|21px]]𐨫
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif; line-height:1em;" | 𐰞 𐰠
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif; line-height:1em;" | 𐰞 𐰠
Line 423: Line 428:
| [[M]]m
| [[M]]m
| [[М]]м
| [[М]]м
| [[File:Brahmi m.svg|18px]]𑀫
| [[File:Brahmi m.svg|18px]][[Ma (Indic)|𑀫]]
| [[File:Kharosthi m.svg|20px]]𐨨
| [[File:Kharosthi m.svg|20px]]𐨨
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰢
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰢
Line 446: Line 451:
| [[N]]n
| [[N]]n
| [[Н]]н
| [[Н]]н
| [[File:Brahmi n.svg|18px]]𑀦
| [[File:Brahmi n.svg|18px]][[Na (Indic)|𑀦]]
| [[File:Kharosthi n.svg|21px]]𐨣
| [[File:Kharosthi n.svg|21px]]𐨣
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰤 𐰣
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰤 𐰣
Line 469: Line 474:
|
|
| [[Ѯ]]ѯ
| [[Ѯ]]ѯ
| [[File:Brahmi sh.svg|18px]]𑀰
| [[File:Brahmi ss.svg|18px]][[Ssa (Indic)|𑀱]]
| [[File:Kharosthi sh.svg|17px]]𐨭
| [[File:Kharosthi sh.svg|17px]]𐨭
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰾
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰾
Line 492: Line 497:
| [[O]]o
| [[O]]o
| [[О]]о, [[Ѡ]]ѡ
| [[О]]о, [[Ѡ]]ѡ
| [[File:Brahmi e.svg|18px]][[E (Indic)|𑀏]], [[File:Brahmi ai.svg|18px]][[Ai (Indic)|𑀐]], [[File:Brahmi i.svg|18px]][[I (Indic)|𑀇]], [[File:Brahmi ii.svg|18px]][[Ī (Indic)|𑀈]]
| [[File:Brahmi e.svg|18px]]𑀏
| [[File:Kharosthi e.svg|18px]]𐨀𐨅
| [[File:Kharosthi e.svg|18px]]𐨀𐨅
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰏 𐰍
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰏 𐰍
Line 515: Line 520:
| [[P]]p
| [[P]]p
| [[П]]п
| [[П]]п
| [[File:Brahmi p.svg|18px]]𑀧
| [[File:Brahmi p.svg|18px]][[Pa (Indic)|𑀧]], [[File:Brahmi ph.svg|18px]][[Pha (Indic)|𑀨]]
| [[File:Kharosthi p.svg|18px]]𐨤
| [[File:Kharosthi p.svg|18px]]𐨤
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰯
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰯
Line 538: Line 543:
|
|
| [[Ц]]ц, [[Ч]]ч, [[Џ]]џ
| [[Ц]]ц, [[Ч]]ч, [[Џ]]џ
| [[File:Brahmi s.svg|18px]]𑀲
| [[File:Brahmi s.svg|18px]][[Sa (Indic)|𑀲]]
| [[File:Kharosthi s.svg|18px]]𐨯
| [[File:Kharosthi s.svg|18px]]𐨯
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰽
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰽
Line 561: Line 566:
| [[Q]]q
| [[Q]]q
| [[Ҁ]]ҁ, [[Ф]]ф
| [[Ҁ]]ҁ, [[Ф]]ф
| [[File:Brahmi kh.svg|18px]]𑀔
| [[File:Brahmi kh.svg|18px]][[Kha (Indic)|𑀔]]
| [[File:Kharosthi kh.svg|18px]]𐨑
| [[File:Kharosthi kh.svg|18px]]𐨑
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰴 𐰸
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰴 𐰸
Line 584: Line 589:
| [[R]]r
| [[R]]r
| [[Р]]р
| [[Р]]р
| [[File:Brahmi r.svg|18px]]𑀭
| [[File:Brahmi r.svg|18px]][[Ra (Indic)|𑀭]]
| [[File:Kharosthi r.svg|17px]]𐨪
| [[File:Kharosthi r.svg|17px]]𐨪
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰺 𐰼
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐰺 𐰼
Line 607: Line 612:
| [[S]]s
| [[S]]s
|[[С]]с, [[Ш]]ш, [[Щ]]щ
|[[С]]с, [[Ш]]ш, [[Щ]]щ
| [[File:Brahmi ss.svg|18px]]𑀱
| [[File:Brahmi sh.svg|18px]][[Sha (Indic)|𑀰]]
| [[File:Kharosthi ss.svg|15px]]𐨮
| [[File:Kharosthi ss.svg|15px]]𐨮
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐱂 𐱁
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐱂 𐱁
Line 630: Line 635:
| [[T]]t
| [[T]]t
| [[Т]]т
| [[Т]]т
| [[File:Brahmi t.svg|18px]]𑀢
| [[File:Brahmi t.svg|18px]][[Ta (Indic)|𑀢]]
| [[File:Kharosthi t.svg|17px]]𐨟
| [[File:Kharosthi t.svg|17px]]𐨟
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐱅
| style="font-size: 22px; font-family: serif;" | 𐱅
|}
|}

==={{lang|la|Matres lectionis}}===
{{Main|Mater lectionis}}

In Aramaic writing, ''[[waw (letter)|waw]]'' and ''[[yodh]]'' serve a double function. Originally, they represented only the consonants ''w'' and ''y'', but they were later adopted to indicate the long vowels ''ū'' and ''ī'' respectively as well (often also ''ō'' and ''ē'' respectively). In the latter role, they are known as {{lang|la|matres lectionis}} or 'mothers of reading'.

Ālap, likewise, has some of the characteristics of a {{lang|la|mater lectionis}} because in initial positions, it indicates a [[glottal stop]] (followed by a vowel), but otherwise, it often also stands for the long vowels ''ā'' or ''ē''. Among Jews, the influence of Hebrew often led to the use of Hē instead, at the end of a word.

The practice of using certain letters to hold vowel values spread to Aramaic-derived writing systems, such as in Arabic and Hebrew, which still follow the practice.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Aramaic Alphabet {{!}} PDF {{!}} Languages Of Asia {{!}} Writing |url=https://www.scribd.com/document/483026807/Aramaic-Alphabet |access-date=2022-12-29 |website=Scribd |language=en}}</ref>


==Unicode==
==Unicode==

Revision as of 10:21, 24 August 2024

Aramaic alphabet
Aramaic inscription from Tayma, containing a dedicatory inscription to the god Salm
Script type
Time period
800 BC to AD 600
DirectionRight-to-left
LanguagesAramaic (Syriac[1] and Mandaic), Hebrew, Edomite
Related scripts
Parent systems
Child systems
ISO 15924
ISO 15924Armi (124), ​Imperial Aramaic
Unicode
Unicode alias
Imperial Aramaic
U+10840–U+1085F
  1. ^ A Semitic origin for the Brāhmī script is disputed.

The ancient Aramaic alphabet was used to write the Aramaic languages spoken by ancient Aramean pre-Christian tribes throughout the Fertile Crescent. It was also adopted by other peoples as their own alphabet when empires and their subjects underwent linguistic Aramaization during a language shift for governing purposes — a precursor to Arabization centuries later — including among the Assyrians and Babylonians who permanently replaced their Akkadian language and its cuneiform script with Aramaic and its script, and among Jews, but not Samaritans, who adopted the Aramaic language as their vernacular and started using the Aramaic alphabet, which they call "Square Script", even for writing Hebrew, displacing the former Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. The modern Hebrew alphabet derives from the Aramaic alphabet, in contrast to the modern Samaritan alphabet, which derives from Paleo-Hebrew.

The letters in the Aramaic alphabet all represent consonants, some of which are also used as matres lectionis to indicate long vowels. Writing systems, like the Aramaic, that indicate consonants but do not indicate most vowels other than by means of matres lectionis or added diacritical signs, have been called abjads by Peter T. Daniels to distinguish them from alphabets such as the Greek alphabet, that represent vowels more systematically. The term was coined to avoid the notion that a writing system that represents sounds must be either a syllabary or an alphabet, which would imply that a system like Aramaic must be either a syllabary, as argued by Ignace Gelb, or an incomplete or deficient alphabet, as most other writers had said before Daniels. Daniels put forward, this is a different type of writing system, intermediate between syllabaries and 'full' alphabets.

The Aramaic alphabet is historically significant since virtually all modern Middle Eastern writing systems can be traced back to it. That is primarily due to the widespread usage of the Aramaic language after it was adopted as both a lingua franca and the official language of the Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian Empires, and their successor, the Achaemenid Empire. Among the descendant scripts in modern use, the Jewish Hebrew alphabet bears the closest relation to the Imperial Aramaic script of the 5th century BC, with an identical letter inventory and, for the most part, nearly identical letter shapes. By contrast the Samaritan Hebrew script is directly descended from Proto-Hebrew/Phoenician script, which was the ancestor of the Aramaic alphabet. The Aramaic alphabet was also an ancestor to the Nabataean alphabet, which had the Arabic alphabet as a descendant.

History

The Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription, a Greek and Aramaic inscription by the Mauryan emperor Ashoka at Kandahar, Afghanistan, 3rd century BC

The earliest inscriptions in the Aramaic language use the Phoenician alphabet.[4] Over time, the alphabet developed into the Aramaic alphabet by the 8th century BC. It was used to write the Aramaic languages spoken by ancient Aramean pre-Christian tribes throughout the Fertile Crescent. It was also adopted by other peoples as their own alphabet when empires and their subjects underwent linguistic Aramaization during a language shift for governing purposes — a precursor to Arabization centuries later.

These include the Assyrians and Babylonians, who permanently replaced their Akkadian language and its cuneiform script with Aramaic and its script, and among Jews, but not Samaritans, who adopted the Aramaic language as their vernacular and started using the Aramaic alphabet even for writing Hebrew, displacing the former Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. The modern Hebrew alphabet derives from the Aramaic alphabet, in contrast to the modern Samaritan alphabet, which derives from Paleo-Hebrew.

Achaemenid Empire (The First Persian Empire)

Aramaic inscription of Taxila, Pakistan probably by the emperor Ashoka around 260 BCE

Around 500 BC, following the Achaemenid conquest of Mesopotamia under Darius I, Old Aramaic was adopted by the Persians as the "vehicle for written communication between the different regions of the vast Persian empire with its different peoples and languages. The use of a single official language, which modern scholarship has dubbed as Official Aramaic, Imperial Aramaic or Achaemenid Aramaic, can be assumed to have greatly contributed to the astonishing success of the Achaemenid Persians in holding their far-flung empire together for as long as they did."[5]

Imperial Aramaic was highly standardised. Its orthography was based more on historical roots than any spoken dialect and was influenced by Old Persian. The Aramaic glyph forms of the period are often divided into two main styles, the "lapidary" form, usually inscribed on hard surfaces like stone monuments, and a cursive form whose lapidary form tended to be more conservative by remaining more visually similar to Phoenician and early Aramaic. Both were in use through the Achaemenid Persian period, but the cursive form steadily gained ground over the lapidary, which had largely disappeared by the 3rd century BC.[6]

For centuries after the fall of the Achaemenid Empire in 331 BC, Imperial Aramaic, or something near enough to it to be recognisable, remained an influence on the various native Iranian languages. The Aramaic script survived as the essential characteristics of the Iranian Pahlavi writing system.[7]

30 Aramaic documents from Bactria have been recently discovered, an analysis of which was published in November 2006. The texts, which were rendered on leather, reflect the use of Aramaic in the 4th century BC, in the Persian Achaemenid administration of Bactria and Sogdiana.[8]

The widespread usage of Achaemenid Aramaic in the Middle East led to the gradual adoption of the Aramaic alphabet for writing Hebrew. Formerly, Hebrew had been written using an alphabet closer in form to that of Phoenician, the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet.[9]

Aramaic-derived scripts

Since the evolution of the Aramaic alphabet out of the Phoenician one was a gradual process, the division of the world's alphabets into the ones derived from the Phoenician one directly, and the ones derived from Phoenician via Aramaic, is somewhat artificial. In general, the alphabets of the Mediterranean region (Anatolia, Greece, Italy) are classified as Phoenician-derived, adapted from around the 8th century BC. Those of the East (the Levant, Persia, Central Asia, and India) are considered Aramaic-derived, adapted from around the 6th century BC from the Imperial Aramaic script of the Achaemenid Empire.[citation needed]

After the fall of the Achaemenid Empire, the unity of the Imperial Aramaic script was lost, diversifying into a number of descendant cursives.

The Hebrew and Nabataean alphabets, as they stood by the Roman era, were little changed in style from the Imperial Aramaic alphabet. Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) alleges that not only the old Nabataean writing was influenced by the "Syrian script" (i.e. Aramaic), but also the old Chaldean script.[10]

A cursive Hebrew variant developed from the early centuries AD. It remained restricted to the status of a variant used alongside the noncursive. By contrast, the cursive developed out of the Nabataean alphabet in the same period soon became the standard for writing Arabic, evolving into the Arabic alphabet as it stood by the time of the early spread of Islam.

The development of cursive versions of Aramaic led to the creation of the Syriac, Palmyrene and Mandaic alphabets, which formed the basis of the historical scripts of Central Asia, such as the Sogdian and Mongolian alphabets.[11]

The Old Turkic script is generally considered to have its ultimate origins in Aramaic,[12][13][11] in particular via the Pahlavi or Sogdian alphabets,[14][15] as suggested by V. Thomsen, or possibly via Kharosthi (cf., Issyk inscription).

Brahmi script was also possibly derived or inspired by Aramaic. Brahmic family of scripts includes Devanagari.[16]

Languages using the alphabet

Today, Biblical Aramaic, Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects and the Aramaic language of the Talmud are written in the modern-Hebrew alphabet, distinguished from the Old Hebrew script. In classical Jewish literature, the name given to the modern-Hebrew script was "Ashurit", the ancient Assyrian script,[17] a script now known widely as the Aramaic script.[18][19] It is believed that during the period of Assyrian dominion, that Aramaic script and language received official status.[18]

Syriac and Christian Neo-Aramaic dialects are today written in the Syriac alphabet, which script has superseded the more ancient Assyrian script and now bears its name. Mandaic is written in the Mandaic alphabet. The near-identical nature of the Aramaic and the classical Hebrew alphabets caused Aramaic text to be typeset mostly in the standard Hebrew script in scholarly literature.

Maaloula

In Maaloula, one of few surviving communities in which a Western Aramaic dialect is still spoken, an Aramaic Language Institute was established in 2006 by Damascus University that teaches courses to keep the language alive.

Unlike Classical Syriac, which has a rich literary tradition in Syriac-Aramaic script, Western Neo-Aramaic was solely passed down orally for generations until 2006 and was not utilized in a written form.[3]

Therefore, the Language Institute's chairman, George Rizkalla (Rezkallah), undertook the writing of a textbook in Western Neo-Aramaic. Being previously unwritten, Rizkalla opted for the Hebrew alphabet. In 2010, the institute's activities were halted due to concerns that the square Maalouli-Aramaic alphabet used in the program bore a resemblance to the square script of the Hebrew alphabet. As a result, all signs featuring the square Maalouli script were subsequently removed.[20] The program stated that they would instead use the more distinct Syriac-Aramaic alphabet, although use of the Maalouli alphabet has continued to some degree.[21] Al Jazeera Arabic also broadcast a program about Western Neo-Aramaic and the villages in which it is spoken with the square script still in use.[22]

Letters

Letter name Aramaic written using IPA Phoneme Equivalent letter in
Imperial Aramaic Syriac script Hebrew Maalouli Nabataean Parthian Arabic South Arabian Ethiopic (Geez) Proto-Sinaitic Phoenician Greek Latin Cyrillic Brahmi Kharosthi Turkic
Image Text Image Text
Ālaph 𐡀 ܐ /ʔ/; /aː/, /eː/ ʾ א 𐭀 ا 𐩱 𐤀 Αα Aa Аа 𑀅, 𑀆 𐨀 𐰁
Bēth 𐡁 ܒ /b/, /v/ b ב 𐭁 ب 𐩨 𐤁 Ββ Bb Бб, Вв 𑀩, 𑀪 𐨦 𐰉 𐰋
Gāmal 𐡂 ܓ /ɡ/, /ɣ/ g ג 𐭂 ج 𐩴 𐤂 Γγ Cc, Gg Гг, Ґґ 𑀕 𐨒 𐰲 𐰱
Dālath 𐡃 ܕ /d/, /ð/ d ד 𐭃 د ذ 𐩵 𐤃 Δδ Dd Дд 𑀤, 𑀥, 𑀟, 𑀠 𐨢 𐰓
𐡄 ܗ /h/ h ה 𐭄 ه 𐩠 𐤄 Εε Ee Ее, Ёё, Єє, Ээ 𑀳 𐨱
Waw 𐡅 ܘ /w/; /oː/, /uː/ w ו 𐭅 و 𐩥 𐤅 (Ϝϝ), Υυ Ff, Uu, Vv, Ww, Yy Ѵѵ, Уу, Ўў 𑀯, 𑀉, 𑀊, 𑀒, 𑀑 𐨬 𐰈 𐰆
Zayn 𐡆 ܙ /z/ z ז 𐭆 ز 𐩸 𐤆 Ζζ Zz Зз 𑀚 𐨗 𐰕
Ḥēth 𐡇 ܚ /ħ/ ח 𐭇 ح خ 𐩢 𐤇 Ηη Hh Ии, Йй 𑀖 𐨓
Ṭēth 𐡈 ܛ /tˤ/ ט 𐭈 ط ظ 𐩷 Proto-semiticTet-01 𐤈 Θθ Ѳѳ 𑀣, 𑀝, 𑀞 𐨠 𐱃
Yodh 𐡉 ܝ /j/; /iː/, /eː/ y י 𐭉 ي 𐩺 Proto-semiticI-01 𐤉 Ιι Ιi, Jj Іі, Її, Јј 𑀬 𐨩 𐰘 𐰃 𐰖
Kāph 𐡊 ܟ /k/, /x/ k כ ך 𐭊 ك 𐩫 𐤊 Κκ Kk Кк 𑀓 𐨐 𐰚 𐰜
Lāmadh 𐡋 ܠ /l/ l ל 𐭋 ل 𐩡 𐤋 Λλ Ll Лл 𑀮 𐨫 𐰞 𐰠
Mim 𐡌 ܡ /m/ m מ ם 𐭌 م 𐩣 𐤌 Μμ Mm Мм 𑀫 𐨨 𐰢
Nun 𐡍 ܢ /n/ n נ ן 𐭍 ن 𐩬 𐤍 Νν Nn Нн 𑀦 𐨣 𐰤 𐰣
Semkath 𐡎 ܣ /s/ s ס 𐭎 𐩯 Proto-semiticX-01Proto-semiticX-02 𐤎 Ξξ Ѯѯ 𑀱 𐨭 𐰾
ʿAyn 𐡏 ܥ /ʕ/ ʿ ע 𐭏 ع غ 𐩲 Proto-semiticO-01 𐤏 Οο, Ωω Oo Оо, Ѡѡ 𑀏, 𑀐, 𑀇, 𑀈 𐨀𐨅 𐰏 𐰍
𐡐 ܦ /p/, /f/ p פ ף 𐭐 ف 𐩰 𐤐 Ππ Pp Пп 𑀧, 𑀨 𐨤 𐰯
Ṣādhē , 𐡑 ܨ /sˤ/ צ ץ 𐭑 ص ض 𐩮 Proto-semiticTsade-01Proto-semiticTsade-02 𐤑 (Ϻϻ) Цц, Чч, Џџ 𑀲 𐨯 𐰽
Qoph 𐡒 ܩ /q/ q ק 𐭒 ق 𐩤 𐤒 (Ϙϙ), Φφ Qq Ҁҁ, Фф 𑀔 𐨑 𐰴 𐰸
Rēš 𐡓 ܪ /r/ r ר 𐭓 ر 𐩧 𐤓 Ρρ Rr Рр 𑀭 𐨪 𐰺 𐰼
Šin 𐡔 ܫ /ʃ/ š ש 𐭔 س ش 𐩦 𐤔 Σσς Ss Сс, Шш, Щщ 𑀰 𐨮 𐱂 𐱁
Taw 𐡕 ܬ /t/, /θ/ t ת 𐭕 ت ث 𐩩 𐤕 Ττ Tt Тт 𑀢 𐨟 𐱅

Unicode

The Imperial Aramaic alphabet was added to the Unicode Standard in October 2009, with the release of version 5.2.

The Unicode block for Imperial Aramaic is U+10840–U+1085F:

Imperial Aramaic[1][2]
Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
U+1084x 𐡀 𐡁 𐡂 𐡃 𐡄 𐡅 𐡆 𐡇 𐡈 𐡉 𐡊 𐡋 𐡌 𐡍 𐡎 𐡏
U+1085x 𐡐 𐡑 𐡒 𐡓 𐡔 𐡕 𐡗 𐡘 𐡙 𐡚 𐡛 𐡜 𐡝 𐡞 𐡟
Notes
1.^ As of Unicode version 15.1
2.^ Grey area indicates non-assigned code point

The Syriac Aramaic alphabet was added to the Unicode Standard in September 1999, with the release of version 3.0.

The Syriac Abbreviation (a type of overline) can be represented with a special control character called the Syriac Abbreviation Mark (U+070F). The Unicode block for Syriac Aramaic is U+0700–U+074F:

Syriac[1][2]
Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
U+070x ܀ ܁ ܂ ܃ ܄ ܅ ܆ ܇ ܈ ܉ ܊ ܋ ܌ ܍ SAM
U+071x ܐ ܑ ܒ ܓ ܔ ܕ ܖ ܗ ܘ ܙ ܚ ܛ ܜ ܝ ܞ ܟ
U+072x ܠ ܡ ܢ ܣ ܤ ܥ ܦ ܧ ܨ ܩ ܪ ܫ ܬ ܭ ܮ ܯ
U+073x ܰ ܱ ܲ ܳ ܴ ܵ ܶ ܷ ܸ ܹ ܺ ܻ ܼ ܽ ܾ ܿ
U+074x ݀ ݁ ݂ ݃ ݄ ݅ ݆ ݇ ݈ ݉ ݊ ݍ ݎ ݏ
Notes
1.^ As of Unicode version 15.1
2.^ Grey areas indicate non-assigned code points

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Daniels, Peter T.; Bright, William, eds. (1996). The World's Writing Systems. Oxford University Press, Inc. pp. 89. ISBN 978-0195079937.
  2. ^ Maissun Melhem (21 January 2010). "Schriftenstreit in Syrien" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 15 November 2023. Several years ago, the political leadership in Syria decided to establish an institute where Aramaic could be learned. Rizkalla was tasked with writing a textbook, primarily drawing upon his native language proficiency. For the script, he chose Hebrew letters.
  3. ^ a b Oriens Christianus (in German). 2003. p. 77. As the villages are very small, located close to each other, and the three dialects are mutually intelligible, there has never been the creation of a script or a standard language. Aramaic is the unwritten village dialect...
  4. ^ Inland Syria and the East-of-Jordan Region in the First Millennium BCE before the Assyrian Intrusions, Mark W. Chavalas, The Age of Solomon: Scholarship at the Turn of the Millennium, ed. Lowell K. Handy, (Brill, 1997), 169.
  5. ^ Shaked, Saul (1987). "Aramaic". Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. pp. 250–261. p. 251
  6. ^ Greenfield, J.C. (1985). "Aramaic in the Achaemenid Empire". In Gershevitch, I. (ed.). The Cambridge History of Iran: Volume 2. Cambridge University Press. pp. 709–710.
  7. ^ Geiger, Wilhelm; Kuhn, Ernst (2002). Grundriss der iranischen Philologie: Band I. Abteilung 1. Boston: Adamant. pp. 249ff.
  8. ^ Naveh, Joseph; Shaked, Shaul (2006). Ancient Aramaic Documents from Bactria. Studies in the Khalili Collection. Oxford: Khalili Collections. ISBN 978-1-874780-74-8.
  9. ^ Thamis. "The Phoenician Alphabet & Language". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  10. ^ Ibn Khaldun (1958). F. Rosenthal (ed.). The Muqaddimah (K. Ta'rikh – "History"). Vol. 3. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. p. 283. OCLC 643885643.
  11. ^ a b Kara, György (1996). "Aramaic Scripts for Altaic Languages". In Daniels, Peter T.; Bright, William (eds.). The World's Writing Systems. Oxford University Press. pp. 535–558. ISBN 978-0-19-507993-7.
  12. ^ Babylonian beginnings: The origin of the cuneiform writing system in comparative perspective, Jerold S. Cooper, The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process, ed. Stephen D. Houston, (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 58–59.
  13. ^ Tristan James Mabry, Nationalism, Language, and Muslim Exceptionalism, (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015), 109.
  14. ^ Turks, A. Samoylovitch, First Encyclopaedia of Islam: 1913–1936, Vol. VI, (Brill, 1993), 911.
  15. ^ George L. Campbell and Christopher Moseley, The Routledge Handbook of Scripts and Alphabets, (Routledge, 2012), 40.
  16. ^ "Brāhmī | writing system". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 29 May 2020.
  17. ^ Danby, H., ed. (1964). "Tractate Megillah 1:8". Mishnah. London: Oxford University Press. p. 202 (note 20). OCLC 977686730. (The Mishnah, p. 202 (note 20)).
  18. ^ a b Steiner, R.C. (1993). "Why the Aramaic Script Was Called "Assyrian" in Hebrew, Greek, and Demotic". Orientalia. 62 (2): 80–82. JSTOR 43076090.
  19. ^ Cook, Stanley A. (1915). "The Significance of the Elephantine Papyri for the History of Hebrew Religion". The American Journal of Theology. 19 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 348. doi:10.1086/479556. JSTOR 3155577.
  20. ^ Maissun Melhem. "Schriftenstreit in Syrien" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 15 November 2023. Before the Islamic conquest, Aramaic was spoken throughout Syria and was a global language. There were many variants, but Aramaic did not exist as a written language everywhere, including the Ma'alula region, notes Professor Jastrow. The decision to use the Hebrew script, in his opinion, was made arbitrarily."
  21. ^ Beach, Alastair (2 April 2010). "Easter Sunday: A Syrian bid to resurrect Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2 April 2010.
  22. ^ Al Jazeera Documentary الجزيرة الوثائقية (11 February 2016). "أرض تحكي لغة المسيح". Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 27 March 2018 – via YouTube.

Sources

  • Byrne, Ryan. "Middle Aramaic Scripts". Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier. (2006)
  • Daniels, Peter T., et al. eds. The World's Writing Systems. Oxford. (1996)
  • Coulmas, Florian. The Writing Systems of the World. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford. (1989)
  • Rudder, Joshua. Learn to Write Aramaic: A Step-by-Step Approach to the Historical & Modern Scripts. n.p.: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2011. 220 pp. ISBN 978-1461021421. Includes a wide variety of Aramaic scripts.
  • Ancient Hebrew and Aramaic on Coins, reading and transliterating Proto-Hebrew, online edition (Judaea Coin Archive).