Jump to content

Steven E. Jones: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Added author link.
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Whoop whoop pull up - 21145
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2014}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2014}}
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[File:StevenEJones.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Steven E. Jones]] -->
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[File:StevenEJones.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Steven E. Jones]] -->
'''Steven Earl Jones''' (born March 25, 1949)<ref name="Jones BYU CV"/> is an American [[physicist]]. Among scientists, Jones became known for his research into [[muon-catalyzed fusion]] and geo-fusion.<ref>Steven E Jones & [[Johann Rafelski]], ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=QNp4AAAAIAAJ&q=Muon-catalyzed+fusion+Steven+Jones AIP Conference Proceedings, 181: Muon-catalyzed Fusion: Sanibel Island, FL 1988]'' (New York: American Institute of Physics, 1989).</ref><ref>George L Trigg, ed, ''Encyclopedia of Applied Physics'', Volume 14: ''Physical Geology to Polymer Dynamics'' (New York: VCH Publishers, 1996), [https://books.google.com/books?ei=uPcjU5DpKdSrkQegl4CgAQ&id=6EZaAAAAYAAJ&dq=Steven+Jones p 112]: "Dr. Steven Jones of Brigham Young University, who had long studied muon-catalyzed fusion...".</ref><ref>Thomas F Gieryn, ''Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), [https://books.google.com/books?id=GljD3CHbDx0C&pg=PA199&dq=Muon-catalyzed+fusion+Steven+Jones#v=fivepage pp 198–99, 214-215, 223].</ref> Jones is also known for his association with [[9/11 conspiracy theories]].<ref name=Atkins2011Scholars>Stephen E Atkins, "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice" [https://books.google.com/books?id=c06pxjS6z3AC&pg=PA385&dq=Scholars#v=twopage pp 385–87], in S E Atkins, ed, ''The 9/11 Encyclopedia'', 2nd edn (Santa Barbara CA: ABC-CLIO, 2011).</ref><ref name=SummersSwan2011p99>Anthony Summers & Robbyn Swan, ''The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11'' (New York: Ballantine Books, 2011), [https://books.google.com/books?id=_3Khbl9ODkEC&pg=PA99&dq=Jones p 99].</ref> Jones has claimed that mere airplane crashes and fires could not have resulted in so rapid and complete a [[Collapse of the World Trade Center|fall of the World Trade Center Towers]] and [[7 World Trade Center]], suggesting [[World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories|controlled demolition]] instead.<ref name=SummersSwan2011p99/><ref>Peter Phillips & Mickey Huff w/ Project Censored, eds, ''Media Democracy in Action: Censored 2010: The Top 25 Censored Stories of 2008-09'' (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2009), "Censored 2007 #18", [https://books.google.com/books?id=_Y_tjPvJ9nAC&pg=PA140&dq=Steven+Jones#v=twopage pp 140–41].</ref> In late 2006, some time after [[Brigham Young University]] (BYU) officials placed him on paid leave, he elected to retire in an agreement with BYU.<ref name="DN_Retire">{{cite news |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650200587,00.html |title=BYU professor in dispute over 9/11 will retire: Jones had been placed on leave 6 weeks ago |last=Walch |first=Tad |date=October 21, 2006 |publisher=Deseret Morning News |accessdate=September 4, 2007}}</ref> Jones continued research and writing following his early retirement from BYU, including a paper published in Europhysics News in August 2016.<ref name="Europhysicsnews2016"/>
'''Steven Earl Jones''' (born March 25, 1949)<ref name="Jones BYU CV"/> is an American [[physicist]]. Among scientists, Jones became known for his research into [[muon-catalyzed fusion]] and geo-fusion.<ref>Steven E Jones & [[Johann Rafelski]], ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=QNp4AAAAIAAJ&q=Muon-catalyzed+fusion+Steven+Jones AIP Conference Proceedings, 181: Muon-catalyzed Fusion: Sanibel Island, FL 1988]'' (New York: American Institute of Physics, 1989).</ref><ref>George L Trigg, ed, ''Encyclopedia of Applied Physics'', Volume 14: ''Physical Geology to Polymer Dynamics'' (New York: VCH Publishers, 1996), [https://books.google.com/books?ei=uPcjU5DpKdSrkQegl4CgAQ&id=6EZaAAAAYAAJ&dq=Steven+Jones p 112]: "Dr. Steven Jones of Brigham Young University, who had long studied muon-catalyzed fusion...".</ref><ref>Thomas F Gieryn, ''Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), [https://books.google.com/books?id=GljD3CHbDx0C&pg=PA199&dq=Muon-catalyzed+fusion+Steven+Jones#v=fivepage pp 198–99, 214-215, 223].</ref> Jones is also known for his association with [[9/11 conspiracy theories]].<ref name=Atkins2011Scholars>Stephen E Atkins, "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice" [https://books.google.com/books?id=c06pxjS6z3AC&pg=PA385&dq=Scholars#v=twopage pp 385–87], in S E Atkins, ed, ''The 9/11 Encyclopedia'', 2nd edn (Santa Barbara CA: ABC-CLIO, 2011).</ref><ref name=SummersSwan2011p99>Anthony Summers & Robbyn Swan, ''The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11'' (New York: Ballantine Books, 2011), [https://books.google.com/books?id=_3Khbl9ODkEC&pg=PA99&dq=Jones p 99].</ref> Jones has claimed that mere airplane crashes and fires could not have resulted in so rapid and complete a [[Collapse of the World Trade Center|fall of the World Trade Center Towers]] and [[7 World Trade Center (1987–2001)|7 World Trade Center]], suggesting [[World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories|controlled demolition]] instead.<ref name=SummersSwan2011p99/><ref>Peter Phillips & Mickey Huff w/ Project Censored, eds, ''Media Democracy in Action: Censored 2010: The Top 25 Censored Stories of 2008-09'' (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2009), "Censored 2007 #18", [https://books.google.com/books?id=_Y_tjPvJ9nAC&pg=PA140&dq=Steven+Jones#v=twopage pp 140–41].</ref> In late 2006, some time after [[Brigham Young University]] (BYU) officials placed him on paid leave, he elected to retire in an agreement with BYU.<ref name="DN_Retire">{{cite news |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650200587,00.html |title=BYU professor in dispute over 9/11 will retire: Jones had been placed on leave 6 weeks ago |last=Walch |first=Tad |date=October 21, 2006 |publisher=Deseret Morning News |access-date=September 4, 2007}}</ref> Jones continued research and writing following his early retirement from BYU, including a paper published in Europhysics News in August 2016.<ref name="Europhysicsnews2016"/>


==Education==
==Education==
Jones earned his bachelor's degree in physics, [[magna cum laude]], from Brigham Young University in 1973, and his Ph.D. in [[physics]] from [[Vanderbilt University]] in 1978. From 1974 to 1977, Jones conducted his PhD research at the [[Stanford Linear Accelerator]] Center (SLAC), and post-doctoral research at [[Cornell University]] and the [[Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility]].<ref name="Jones BYU CV">{{cite web|url=http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic/physics1/atomic/jones_cv.htm|title=CURRICULUM VITAE|author=|date=|website=www.physics.byu.edu|accessdate=April 16, 2018}}</ref>
Jones earned his bachelor's degree in physics, [[magna cum laude]], from Brigham Young University in 1973, and his Ph.D. in [[physics]] from [[Vanderbilt University]] in 1978. From 1974 to 1977, Jones conducted his PhD research at the [[Stanford Linear Accelerator]] Center (SLAC), and post-doctoral research at [[Cornell University]] and the [[Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility]].<ref name="Jones BYU CV">{{cite web|url=http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic/physics1/atomic/jones_cv.htm|title=CURRICULUM VITAE|website=www.physics.byu.edu|access-date=April 16, 2018|archive-date=April 5, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130405235635/http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic/physics1/atomic/jones_cv.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>


==Research interests==
==Research interests==
Jones conducted research at the [[Idaho National Laboratory]], in Idaho Falls[[Arco, Idaho|, Idaho]] where, from 1979 to 1985, he was a senior engineering specialist. He was [[principal investigator]] for experimental [[muon-catalyzed fusion]] from 1982 to 1991 for the [[United States Department of Energy]] (DOE), Division of Advanced Energy Projects. From 1985 to 1993, Jones studied [[deuterium]]-based fusion in the context of [[condensed matter physics]] under DOE and Electric Power Research Institute sponsorship. Jones also collaborated in experiments at other physics laboratories, including [[TRIUMF]] ([[Vancouver, British Columbia]]), [[LANL]] ([[Los Alamos, NM]]), [[KEK]] ([[Tsukuba, Japan]]), and the [[Rutherford Appleton Laboratory]] near [[Oxford University]].<ref name="Jones BYU CV"/>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}}
Jones conducted research at the [[Idaho National Laboratory]], in Idaho Falls, [[Arco, Idaho|Idaho]] where, from 1979 to 1985, he was a senior engineering specialist. He was [[principal investigator]] for experimental [[muon-catalyzed fusion]] from 1982 to 1991 for the [[United States Department of Energy]] (DOE), Division of Advanced Energy Projects. From 1985 to 1993, Jones studied [[deuterium]]-based fusion in the context of [[condensed matter physics]] under DOE and Electric Power Research Institute sponsorship. Jones also collaborated in experiments at other physics laboratories, including [[TRIUMF]] ([[Vancouver, British Columbia]]), [[LANL]] ([[Los Alamos, NM]]), [[KEK]] ([[Tsukuba, Japan]]), and the [[Rutherford Appleton Laboratory]] near [[Oxford University]].<ref name="Jones BYU CV"/>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}}


Around 1985, Jones became interested in anomalous concentrations of [[helium-3]] and Tritium found in gases escaping from [[volcano]]es. He hypothesized that metals and high pressures in the Earth's interior might make fusion more likely, and began a series of experiments on what he referred to as geo-fusion, or ''piezofusion,'' high-pressure fusion. To characterize the reactions, Jones designed and constructed a [[neutron]] counter that was capable of accurately measuring minuscule numbers of neutrons produced in his experiments. The counter indicated that a small amount of fusion was occurring. Jones claimed that the results indicate that fusion is at least possible, although the process was unlikely to be useful as an energy source.{{citation needed|date = August 2018}}
Around 1985, Jones became interested in anomalous concentrations of [[helium-3]] and [[tritium]] found in gases escaping from [[volcano]]es. He hypothesized that metals and high pressures in the Earth's interior might make fusion more likely, and began a series of experiments on what he referred to as geo-fusion, or ''piezofusion,'' high-pressure fusion. To characterize the reactions, Jones designed and constructed a [[neutron]] counter that was capable of accurately measuring minuscule numbers of neutrons produced in his experiments. The counter indicated that a small amount of fusion was occurring. Jones claimed that the results indicate that fusion is at least possible, although the process was unlikely to be useful as an energy source.{{citation needed|date = August 2018}}


Jones' interests extend to [[archaeometry]], [[solar energy]],<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy |title = Steven E. Jones' biography at BYU | accessdate = August 3, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://solarcooking.org/plans/funnel.htm |title=The Solar Funnel Cooker |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070111211701/http://solarcooking.org:80/plans/funnel.htm |archivedate=January 11, 2007 |df=mdy }}</ref>
Jones' interests extend to [[archaeometry]], [[solar energy]],<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy |title = Steven E. Jones' biography at BYU | access-date = August 3, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://solarcooking.org/plans/funnel.htm |title=The Solar Funnel Cooker |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070111211701/http://solarcooking.org/plans/funnel.htm |archive-date=January 11, 2007 |df=mdy |access-date=November 28, 2006 }}</ref>
and, like numerous professors at BYU, [[archaeology and the Book of Mormon]].<ref>For the relationship between [[BYU]] and [[Mormon apologetics]] scholarship see generally John-Charles Duffy. "Defending the Kingdom, Rethinking the Faith: How Apologetics Is Reshaping Mormon Orthodoxy." ''[[Sunstone (magazine)|Sunstone]]'', May 2004, 22-55.</ref> He has interpreted archaeological evidence from the [[Maya civilization|ancient Mayans]] as supporting his faith's belief that [[Jesus Christ]] (when resurrected) visited America.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/rel491/handstext+and+figures.htm |archive-url=http://web.archive.bibalex.org:80/web/20060104120108/http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/rel491/handstext+and+figures.htm |archive-date=January 4, 2006 |title=''Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America,'' by Steven Jones |url-status=dead |accessdate=June 1, 2016}}, article claiming evidence that Jesus Christ visited the Americas (also [http://www.bastison.net/RESSOURCES/Farce/57_Jones_Jesus.pdf here])</ref> Jones is a member of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] and has been described as "a devout Mormon."<ref name="Chronicle"/> In 2016-17, he and his wife served as full-time Senior Missionaries in the New Jersey Morristown Mission of the Church.<ref>https://www.facebook.com/NewJerseyMorristownMission/reviews</ref>
and, like numerous professors at BYU, [[archaeology and the Book of Mormon]].<ref>For the relationship between [[BYU]] and [[Mormon apologetics]] scholarship see generally John-Charles Duffy. "Defending the Kingdom, Rethinking the Faith: How Apologetics Is Reshaping Mormon Orthodoxy." ''[[Sunstone (magazine)|Sunstone]]'', May 2004, 22-55.</ref> He has interpreted archaeological evidence from the [[Maya civilization|ancient Mayans]] as supporting his faith's belief that [[Jesus Christ]] (when resurrected) visited America.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/rel491/handstext+and+figures.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170510201139/http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/rel491/handstext+and+figures.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 10, 2017 |title=''Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America,'' by Steven Jones |access-date=June 1, 2016 }}, article claiming evidence that Jesus Christ visited the Americas (also [http://www.bastison.net/RESSOURCES/Farce/57_Jones_Jesus.pdf here])</ref> Jones is a member of [[the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] and has been described as "a devout Mormon."<ref name="Chronicle"/> In 2016-17, he and his wife served as full-time Senior Missionaries in the New Jersey Morristown Mission of the Church.<ref>https://www.facebook.com/NewJerseyMorristownMission/reviews {{User-generated source|certain=yes|date=March 2022}}</ref>


===Muon-catalyzed fusion===
===Muon-catalyzed fusion===
In the mid-1980s, Jones and other [[BYU]] scientists worked on what he referred to as ''Cold Nuclear Fusion'' in a ''[[Scientific American]]'' article (the process is currently known as [[muon-catalyzed fusion]] to avoid confusion with the [[cold fusion]] concept proposed by the [[University of Utah]]'s [[Stanley Pons]] and [[Martin Fleischmann]]). Muon-catalyzed fusion was a field of some interest during the 1980s as a potential energy source; however, its low energy output appears to be unavoidable (because of alpha-muon sticking losses). Jones led a research team that, in 1986, achieved 150 fusions per muon (average), releasing over 2,600 MeV of fusion energy per [[muon]], a record which still stands.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jones|first=Steven Earl|date=1986|title=Muon-catalysed fusion revisited|journal=Nature|language=En|volume=321|issue=6066|pages=127–133|doi=10.1038/321127a0|issn=0028-0836|bibcode=1986Natur.321..127J}}</ref>
In the mid-1980s, Jones and other [[BYU]] scientists worked on what he referred to as ''Cold Nuclear Fusion'' in a ''[[Scientific American]]'' article (the process is currently known as [[muon-catalyzed fusion]] to avoid confusion with the [[cold fusion]] concept proposed by the [[University of Utah]]'s [[Stanley Pons]] and [[Martin Fleischmann]]). Muon-catalyzed fusion was a field of some interest during the 1980s as a potential energy source; however, its low energy output appears to be unavoidable (because of alpha-muon sticking losses). Jones led a research team that, in 1986, achieved 150 fusions per muon (average), releasing over 2,600 MeV of fusion energy per [[muon]], a record which still stands.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jones|first=Steven Earl|date=1986|title=Muon-catalysed fusion revisited|journal=Nature|language=En|volume=321|issue=6066|pages=127–133|doi=10.1038/321127a0|issn=0028-0836|bibcode=1986Natur.321..127J|s2cid=39819102}}</ref>


Pons and Fleischmann commenced their work at approximately the same time. Jones became aware of their work when they applied for research funding from the DOE, after which the DOE forwarded their proposal to Jones for [[peer review]]. When Jones realized that their work was similar, he and Pons and Fleischmann agreed to release their papers to [[Nature (journal)|''Nature'']] on the same day (March 24, 1989). However, Pons and Fleischmann announced their results at a press event the day before Jones faxed his paper to ''Nature''.<ref>[http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/131history.html Jones’ manuscript on history of cold fusion at BYU, Ludwik Kowalski, March 5, 2004] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060828113846/http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/131history.html |date=August 28, 2006 }}</ref>
Pons and Fleischmann commenced their work at approximately the same time. Jones became aware of their work when they applied for research funding from the DOE, after which the DOE forwarded their proposal to Jones for [[peer review]]. When Jones realized that their work was similar, he and Pons and Fleischmann agreed to release their papers to [[Nature (journal)|''Nature'']] on the same day (March 24, 1989). However, Pons and Fleischmann announced their results at a press event the day before Jones faxed his paper to ''Nature''.<ref>[http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/131history.html Jones’ manuscript on history of cold fusion at BYU, Ludwik Kowalski, March 5, 2004] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060828113846/http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/131history.html |date=August 28, 2006 }}</ref>


According to a ''[[The New York Times|New York Times]]'' report, although peer reviewers were harshly critical of Pons' and Fleischmann's research, they did not apply such criticism to Jones' significantly more modest, theoretically supported findings. Critics insisted that Jones' results were probably caused by experimental error,<ref>{{cite news |last = Browne |first = Malcolm W. |year = 1989 |url = http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/050399sci-cold-fusion.html |title = Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion |work = Science |publisher = The New York Times
According to a ''[[The New York Times|New York Times]]'' report, although peer reviewers were harshly critical of Pons' and Fleischmann's research, they did not apply such criticism to Jones' significantly more modest, theoretically supported findings. Critics insisted that Jones' results were probably caused by experimental error;<ref>{{cite news |last = Browne |first = Malcolm W. |year = 1989 |url = http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/050399sci-cold-fusion.html |title = Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion |work = Science |publisher = The New York Times
|accessdate = July 14, 2006}}</ref> the majority of the reviewing physicists claimed that he was a careful scientist. Later research and experiments have supported Jones' metallic "[[cold fusion]]" (geo-fusion) reports.<ref>{{cite journal |year = 2001 |title = Enhancement of the electron screening effect for d+ d fusion reactions in metallic environments | pages=449–455| volume= 54| number= 4| quote=...the observed enhancement of the electron screening in metal targets can, in tendency, explain the small neutron production rates observed in the cold-fusion experiment of Jones [reference 1989 Nature paper]. |bibcode = 2001EL.....54..449C
|access-date = July 14, 2006}}</ref> the majority of the reviewing physicists claimed that he was a careful scientist. Later research and experiments have supported Jones' metallic "[[cold fusion]]" (geo-fusion) reports.<ref>{{cite journal |year = 2001 |title = Enhancement of the electron screening effect for d+ d fusion reactions in metallic environments | pages=449–455| volume= 54| number= 4| quote=...the observed enhancement of the electron screening in metal targets can, in tendency, explain the small neutron production rates observed in the cold-fusion experiment of Jones [reference 1989 Nature paper]. |bibcode = 2001EL.....54..449C
|author1 = Czerski, K.
|author1 = Czerski, K.
|author2 = Huke, A.
|author2 = Huke, A.
Line 30: Line 30:
|author6 = Ruprecht, G.
|author6 = Ruprecht, G.
|journal = Europhysics Letters
|journal = Europhysics Letters
|doi = 10.1209/epl/i2001-00265-7|citeseerx = 10.1.1.380.6953 }}</ref>
|doi = 10.1209/epl/i2001-00265-7|citeseerx = 10.1.1.380.6953 |s2cid = 250756853 }}</ref>


In July 2013, Jones gave a poster talk at the [[International Conference on Cold Fusion|18th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science]] at the [[University of Missouri]], titled, "Empirical Evidence for Two Distinct Effects: Low-level d-d Fusion in Metals and Anomalous Excess Heat."<ref>{{Cite journal |last = Jones |first = Steven Earl |year = 2013 |url = https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/36502 |title = Empirical Evidence for Two Distinct Effects: Low-level d-d Fusion in Metals and Anomalous Excess Heat |website = Posters (18th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science) |publisher = University of Missouri |accessdate = December 24, 2014}}</ref>
In July 2013, Jones gave a poster talk at the [[International Conference on Cold Fusion|18th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science]] at the [[University of Missouri]], titled, "Empirical Evidence for Two Distinct Effects: Low-level d-d Fusion in Metals and Anomalous Excess Heat."<ref>{{Cite journal |last = Jones |first = Steven Earl |year = 2013 |url = https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/36502 |title = Empirical Evidence for Two Distinct Effects: Low-level d-d Fusion in Metals and Anomalous Excess Heat |website = Posters (18th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science) |publisher = University of Missouri |access-date = December 24, 2014}}</ref>


==9/11 conspiracy theories==
==9/11 conspiracy theories==
===World Trade Center destruction===
===World Trade Center destruction===
On September 22, 2005, Jones presented his views on the [[collapse of the World Trade Center]] towers and [[World Trade Center 7]] during the [[September 11 attacks]] in 2001 at a BYU seminar attended by around 60 people. Jones claimed that a variety of evidence defies the mainstream collapse theory and favors [[World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories|controlled demolition]], using [[thermite]]. The evidence Jones cited included the speed and symmetry of the collapses, and characteristics of dust jets. Later, Jones said he had identified grey/red flakes found in the dust as nanothermite traces and that the thermite reaction products ([[aluminium oxide]] and iron-rich microspheres) were also found in the dust.<ref name="benthamscience.com">[http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120304145947/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ%2F2009%2F00000002%2F00000001%2F7TOCPJ.SGM |date=March 4, 2012 }}. By Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen. {{ISSN|1874-4125}} {{doi|10.2174/1874412500902010007}}. ''The Open Chemical Physics Journal.'' pp 7-31</ref> He called for further scientific investigation to test the controlled demolition theory and the release of all relevant data by the government.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wtc7.net/articles/stevenjones_b7_051122.html |title=Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? |accessdate=September 9, 2008 |last=Jones |first=Steven E. |quote=I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at BYU on September 22, 2005, to about 60 people. I also showed evidence and scientific arguments for the explosive demolition theory.}}</ref> Shortly after the seminar, Jones placed a research paper entitled "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" on his page in the Physics department Web site, commenting that BYU had no responsibility for the paper.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html |title=Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? |accessdate=April 10, 2010 |last=Jones |first=Steven E. |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20051124011753/http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html |archivedate = November 24, 2005}}</ref>
On September 22, 2005, while speaking at a BYU seminar attended by around 60 people, Jones publicly presented his views regarding the 2001 [[collapse of the World Trade Center]] towers and [[World Trade Center 7]] during the [[September 11 attacks]]. Jones claimed a variety of evidence defies the mainstream collapse theory, and also noted he believed it was more likely a [[World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories|controlled demolition]], using [[thermite]]. The evidence Jones cited included the speed and symmetry of the collapses, and characteristics of dust jets. Later, Jones said he had identified grey-red flakes found in the dust as nanothermite traces and that the thermite reaction products ([[aluminium oxide]] and iron-rich microspheres) were also found in the dust.<ref name="benthamscience.com">[http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120304145947/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ%2F2009%2F00000002%2F00000001%2F7TOCPJ.SGM |date=March 4, 2012 }}. By Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen. {{ISSN|1874-4125}} {{doi|10.2174/1874412500902010007}}. ''The Open Chemical Physics Journal.'' pp 7-31</ref> He called for further scientific investigation to test the controlled demolition theory and the release of all relevant data by the government.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wtc7.net/articles/stevenjones_b7_051122.html |title=Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? |access-date=September 9, 2008 |last=Jones |first=Steven E. |quote=I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at BYU on September 22, 2005, to about 60 people. I also showed evidence and scientific arguments for the explosive demolition theory.}}</ref> Shortly after the seminar, Jones placed a research paper entitled "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" on his page in the Physics department Web site, commenting that BYU had no responsibility for the paper.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html |title=Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? |access-date=April 10, 2010 |last=Jones |first=Steven E. |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20051124011753/http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html |archive-date = November 24, 2005}}</ref>


Jones subsequently presented the WTC research in lectures at [[Idaho State University]], [[Utah Valley University|Utah Valley State College]], University of Colorado at Boulder and University of Denver, the Utah Academy of Science, Sonoma State University, University of California at Berkeley, and the University of Texas at Austin.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/DrJonesTalksatISUPhysicsDepartment |title=What Caused Not Two but Three World Trade Center Skyscrapers to COMPLETELY Collapse on 9/11/2001? |accessdate=September 4, 2007 |format=pdf |last=Jones |first=Steven E |date=September 22, 2006 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210441/http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/DrJonesTalksatISUPhysicsDepartment |archivedate=September 27, 2007 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Jones |first=Steven E |url=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586 |accessdate=September 4, 2007 |title=9/11 Revisited: Scientific and Ethical Questions |date=February 1, 2006 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070826183748/http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586 |archivedate=August 26, 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Riley |first=Michael |url=http://www.denverpost.com/newsheadlines/ci_4572518 |title=Backers hail 9/11 theorist's speech |date=October 29, 2006 |accessdate=September 4, 2007 |publisher=Denver Post |work=Denver & The West}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Physicist says heat substance felled WTC |last=Dean |first=Suzanne |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635198488,00.html |date=April 10, 2006 |accessdate=September 4, 2007 |publisher=Deseret Morning News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sonoma.edu/pubs/newsrelease/archives/000865.html |date=October 26, 2006 |accessdate=September 4, 2007 |title=Scholars For Truth Founder Is Keynote Speaker for Media Accountability Conference, Nov. 3 And 4}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://liftingthefog.org/program.html |date=November 11, 2006 |accessdate=September 4, 2007 | title=Analysis of the World Trade Center Destruction |website=Lifting the Fog: The Scientific Method Applied to the World Trade Center Disaster}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pnacitizen.org/41407event.php |title=The Twin Towers in scientific detail |website=Project for a New American Citizen: Rebuilding America's Senses |date=April 14, 2007 |accessdate=September 4, 2007 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070901063540/http://www.pnacitizen.org/41407event.php |archivedate=September 1, 2007 }}</ref>
Jones subsequently presented his WTC research in lectures at [[Idaho State University]], [[Utah Valley University|Utah Valley State College]], University of Colorado at Boulder and University of Denver, the Utah Academy of Science, Sonoma State University, University of California at Berkeley and Davis, and the University of Texas at Austin.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/DrJonesTalksatISUPhysicsDepartment |title=What Caused Not Two but Three World Trade Center Skyscrapers to COMPLETELY Collapse on 9/11/2001? |access-date=September 4, 2007 |format=pdf |last=Jones |first=Steven E |date=September 22, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210441/http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/DrJonesTalksatISUPhysicsDepartment |archive-date=September 27, 2007 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Jones |first=Steven E |url=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586 |access-date=September 4, 2007 |title=9/11 Revisited: Scientific and Ethical Questions |date=February 1, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070826183748/http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586 |archive-date=August 26, 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Riley |first=Michael |url=http://www.denverpost.com/newsheadlines/ci_4572518 |title=Backers hail 9/11 theorist's speech |date=October 29, 2006 |access-date=September 4, 2007 |publisher=Denver Post |work=Denver & The West}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Physicist says heat substance felled WTC |last=Dean |first=Suzanne |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635198488,00.html |date=April 10, 2006 |access-date=September 4, 2007 |publisher=Deseret Morning News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sonoma.edu/pubs/newsrelease/archives/000865.html |date=October 26, 2006 |access-date=September 4, 2007 |title=Scholars For Truth Founder Is Keynote Speaker for Media Accountability Conference, Nov. 3 And 4}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://liftingthefog.org/program.html |date=November 11, 2006 |access-date=September 4, 2007 | title=Analysis of the World Trade Center Destruction |website=Lifting the Fog: The Scientific Method Applied to the World Trade Center Disaster}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pnacitizen.org/41407event.php |title=The Twin Towers in scientific detail |website=Project for a New American Citizen: Rebuilding America's Senses |date=April 14, 2007 |access-date=September 4, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070901063540/http://www.pnacitizen.org/41407event.php |archive-date=September 1, 2007 }}</ref>


On September 7, 2006, Jones removed his paper from BYU's website at the request of administrators and was placed on paid leave.<ref name="Deseret Morning News">{{cite web |last=Walch |first=Tad |date=September 14, 2006 |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645201360,00.html|title=BYU's Jones Denies Bias| publisher=Deseret News | accessdate=October 9, 2007}}</ref> The university cited its concern about the "increasingly speculative and accusatory nature" of Jones' work and that perhaps Jones' research had "not been published in appropriate scientific venues" as reasons for putting him under review. The review was to have been conducted at three levels: BYU administration, the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and the Physics Department.<ref>{{cite news |last=McFarland |first=Sheena |date=September 8, 2006 |publisher=Salt Lake Tribune |title=BYU prof on paid leave for 9/11 theory }}</ref> However, BYU discontinued the review.<ref name="DN_Retire"/> Some of Jones' colleagues also defended Jones' 9/11 work to varying degrees,<ref name="Deseretnews">{{cite web |last=Walch |first=Tad |date=September 18, 2006 |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650191550,00.html |title=Three at BYU praise Jones | publisher=Deseret News | accessdate=September 3, 2007}}</ref> and Project Censored lists his 9/11 research among the top mainstream media censored stories of 2007.<ref name="Project Censored">{{cite web |last=Kramer |first=John |author2=David Abbott |author3=Courtney Wilcox |year=2007 | url=http://projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#18 |title=Physicist Challenges Official 9-11 Story |website=Project Censored |accessdate=September 3, 2007 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070902044813/http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#18 <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = September 2, 2007}}</ref>
On September 7, 2006, Jones removed his paper from BYU's website at the request of administrators and was placed on paid leave.<ref name="Deseret Morning News">{{cite web |last=Walch |first=Tad |date=September 14, 2006 |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645201360,00.html|title=BYU's Jones Denies Bias| publisher=Deseret News | access-date=October 9, 2007}}</ref> The university cited its concern about the "increasingly speculative and accusatory nature" of Jones' work and that perhaps Jones' research had "not been published in appropriate scientific venues" as reasons for putting him under review. The review was to have been conducted at three levels: BYU administration, the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and the Physics Department.<ref>{{cite news |last=McFarland |first=Sheena |date=September 8, 2006 |publisher=Salt Lake Tribune |title=BYU prof on paid leave for 9/11 theory }}</ref> However, BYU discontinued the review.<ref name="DN_Retire"/> Some of Jones' colleagues also defended Jones' 9/11 work,<ref name="Deseretnews">{{cite web |last=Walch |first=Tad |date=September 18, 2006 |url=https://www.deseret.com/2006/9/18/19974713/three-at-byu-praise-jones |title=Three at BYU praise Jones | access-date=September 3, 2007 |work=Deseret News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210210225159if_/https://www.deseret.com/2006/9/18/19974713/three-at-byu-praise-jones |archive-date=10 February 2021 |url-status=live |language=en}}</ref> and Project Censored lists his 9/11 research among the top mainstream media censored stories of 2007.<ref name="Project Censored">{{cite web |last=Kramer |first=John |author2=David Abbott |author3=Courtney Wilcox |year=2007 | url=http://projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#18 |title=Physicist Challenges Official 9-11 Story |website=Project Censored |access-date=September 3, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070902044813/http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#18 <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = September 2, 2007}}</ref>


Jones' placement on paid leave drew criticism from the [[American Association of University Professors]] and the [[Foundation for Individual Rights in Education]]. Both organizations have long been critics of BYU's record on academic freedom.<ref>{{cite news |title=BYU action on Jones lamented |url=http://www.deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645200780,00.html |last = Walch |first=Tad |publisher=Deseret Morning News |date=September 14, 2006 |accessdate=September 3, 2007}}</ref> Jones "welcomed the review" because he hoped it would "encourage people to read his paper for themselves," however the school abandoned the review and Jones elected to retire, effective January 1, 2007.<ref name="DN_Retire"/>
Jones' placement on paid leave drew criticism from the [[American Association of University Professors]] and the [[Foundation for Individual Rights in Education]]. Both organizations have long been critics of BYU's record on academic freedom.<ref>{{cite news |title=BYU action on Jones lamented |url=http://www.deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645200780,00.html |last = Walch |first=Tad |publisher=Deseret Morning News |date=September 14, 2006 |access-date=September 3, 2007}}</ref> Jones "welcomed the review" because he hoped it would "encourage people to read his paper for themselves," however the school abandoned the review and Jones elected to retire, effective January 1, 2007.<ref name="DN_Retire"/>


Jones has been interviewed by mainstream news sources and has made a number of public appearances. Jones has urged caution in drawing conclusions.<ref name="AnsQJones">{{cite web |last = Jones |first = Steven E| date=July 18, 2006 |url=http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/JonesAnswersQuestionsWorldTradeCenter.pdf |title=Answers to Objections and Questions |accessdate=September 4, 2007}}</ref> In one interview, Jones directly called into question the government's theory regarding the attacks and subsequent uncharacteristic total destruction of the buildings, stating that "we don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone".<ref>{{cite news |title=Who really blew up the twin towers? |publisher = The Guardian |work=Education Guardian Weekly |date=September 5, 2006 |url=http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1864524,00.html| accessdate = September 4, 2007 | location=London | first=Christina | last=Asquith}}</ref> His name is often mentioned in reporting about [[9/11 conspiracy theories]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Dwyer |first=Jim |title =U.S. Reports Seek to Counter Conspiracy Theories About 9/11 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/02/nyregion/02conspiracy.html |work = [[The New York Times]] |date=September 2, 2006 |accessdate=April 8, 2008}}</ref>
Jones has been interviewed by mainstream news sources and has made a number of public appearances. Jones has urged caution in drawing conclusions.<ref name="AnsQJones">{{cite web |last = Jones |first = Steven E| date=July 18, 2006 |url=http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/JonesAnswersQuestionsWorldTradeCenter.pdf |title=Answers to Objections and Questions |access-date=September 4, 2007}}</ref> In one interview, Jones directly called into question the government's theory regarding the attacks and subsequent uncharacteristic total destruction of the buildings, stating that "we don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone".<ref>{{cite news |title=Who really blew up the twin towers? |publisher = The Guardian |work=Education Guardian Weekly |date=September 5, 2006 |url=http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1864524,00.html| access-date = September 4, 2007 | location=London | first=Christina | last=Asquith}}</ref> His name is often mentioned in reporting about [[9/11 conspiracy theories]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Dwyer |first=Jim |title =U.S. Reports Seek to Counter Conspiracy Theories About 9/11 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/02/nyregion/02conspiracy.html |work = [[The New York Times]] |date=September 2, 2006 |access-date=April 8, 2008}}</ref>


Jones has published several papers suggesting that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, but his 2005 paper, "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" was his first paper on the topic and was considered controversial both for its content and its claims to scientific rigor.<ref name="Chronicle">{{cite news |first=John |last=Gravois |title=Professors of Paranoia? |work=The Chronicle of Higher Education |volume=52 |issue=42 |page=A.10 |date=June 23, 2006 |url=http://www.chronicle.com/article/Professors-of-Paranoia-/9095 |accessdate=September 14, 2016 |quote=Soon after Mr. Jones posted his paper online, the physics department at Brigham Young moved to distance itself from his work. The department released a statement saying that it was 'not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.'}}</ref> Jones' early critics included members of BYU's engineering faculty;<ref>{{cite web |last=Firmage |first=D. Allan |date=April 9, 2006 |url=http://www.netxnews.net/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/04/09/443801bdadd6e |title=Refuting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory |website=Letter to the Editor |publisher=NetXNews (online edition of College Times, the Utah Valley State College student newspaper) |accessdate=September 4, 2007 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120418153431/http://www.netxnews.net/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/04/09/443801bdadd6e |archivedate=April 18, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> shortly after he made his views public, the BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and the faculty of structural engineering issued statements in which they distanced themselves from Jones' work. They noted that Jones' "hypotheses and interpretations of evidence were being questioned by scholars and practitioners," and expressed doubts on whether they had been "submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."<ref>{{cite news |last = McIlvain |first = Ryan |date = December 5, 2005 |url = http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724 |title = Censor rumors quelled |accessdate = September 4, 2007 |publisher = BYU NewsNet |quote = Professor Jones's department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones. |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20090507180506/http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724 |archivedate = May 7, 2009 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Jones further presented and defended his research before peers at the Utah Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters on 7 April 2006 at nearby Snow College.<ref>{{cite news |title=Physicist says heat substance felled WTC |last=Dean |first=Suzanne |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635198488,00.html |date=April 10, 2006 |accessdate=August 24, 2016 |publisher=Deseret Morning News}}</ref>
Jones has published several papers suggesting that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, but his 2005 paper, "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" was his first paper on the topic and was considered controversial both for its content and its claims to scientific rigor.<ref name="Chronicle">{{cite news |first=John |last=Gravois |title=Professors of Paranoia? |work=The Chronicle of Higher Education |volume=52 |issue=42 |page=A.10 |date=June 23, 2006 |url=http://www.chronicle.com/article/Professors-of-Paranoia-/9095 |access-date=September 14, 2016 |quote=Soon after Mr. Jones posted his paper online, the physics department at Brigham Young moved to distance itself from his work. The department released a statement saying that it was 'not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.'}}</ref> Jones' early critics included members of BYU's engineering faculty;<ref>{{cite web |last=Firmage |first=D. Allan |date=April 9, 2006 |url=http://www.netxnews.net/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/04/09/443801bdadd6e |title=Refuting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory |website=Letter to the Editor |publisher=NetXNews (online edition of College Times, the Utah Valley State College student newspaper) |access-date=September 4, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120418153431/http://www.netxnews.net/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/04/09/443801bdadd6e |archive-date=April 18, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> shortly after he made his views public, the BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and the faculty of structural engineering issued statements in which they distanced themselves from Jones' work. They noted that Jones' "hypotheses and interpretations of evidence were being questioned by scholars and practitioners," and expressed doubts on whether they had been "submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."<ref>{{cite news |last = McIlvain |first = Ryan |date = December 5, 2005 |url = http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724 |title = Censor rumors quelled |access-date = September 4, 2007 |publisher = BYU NewsNet |quote = Professor Jones's department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones. |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090507180506/http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724 |archive-date = May 7, 2009 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Jones further presented and defended his research before peers at the Utah Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters on 7 April 2006 at nearby Snow College.<ref>{{cite news |title=Physicist says heat substance felled WTC |last=Dean |first=Suzanne |url=http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635198488,00.html |date=April 10, 2006 |access-date=August 24, 2016 |publisher=Deseret Morning News}}</ref>
Jones maintained that the paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication within a book "9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out" by D.R. Griffin.<ref>{{cite news |author=Tad Walch |title=BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave |newspaper=Deseret News |date=November 8, 2006 |accessdate=June 1, 2008|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html}}</ref> The paper was published in the online "Journal of 9/11 Studies", a journal co-founded and co-edited by Jones for the purpose of "covering the whole of research related to 9/11/2001." The paper also appeared in a volume of essays edited by [[conspiracy theorist]]s [[David Ray Griffin]] and [[Peter Dale Scott]].<ref>{{cite book |editor-last=Griffin |editor-first=David Ray |editor2=Peter Dale Scott |title=9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol 1| publisher=Olive Branch Press |date=August 23, 2006 |isbn= 978-1-56656-659-9 |page=247 pages}}</ref> Skepticism arose as to the efficacy of the peer-review process, and conspiracy theorists responded to refutations by positing still more ostensible cover-ups.<ref>[http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/trutherism/2011/09/the_theory_vs_the_facts.html The Theory vs. the Facts], ''[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]'', Jeremy Stahl, September 7, 2011. Retrieved August 20, 2018.</ref>
Jones maintained that the paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication.<ref>{{cite news |author=Tad Walch |title=BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave |newspaper=Deseret News |date=November 8, 2006 |access-date=June 1, 2008|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html}}</ref> The paper was published in the online ''Journal of 9/11 Studies'', a journal co-founded and co-edited by Jones for the purpose of "covering the whole of research related to 9/11/2001." The paper also appeared in a volume of essays, ''9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out'', edited by [[David Ray Griffin]] and [[Peter Dale Scott]].<ref>{{cite book |editor-last=Griffin |editor-first=David Ray |editor2=Peter Dale Scott |title=9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol 1| publisher=Olive Branch Press |date=August 23, 2006 |isbn= 978-1-56656-659-9 |page=247 pages}}</ref>


In April 2008, Jones, along with four other authors, published a letter in ''The Bentham Open Civil Engineering Journal'', titled, 'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM |title=Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction |accessdate=April 23, 2008 |last=Jones |first=Steven E |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080610080428/http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ%2F2008%2F00000002%2F00000001%2F35TOCIEJ.SGM |archivedate=June 10, 2008 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref> In August 2008, Jones, along with Kevin Ryan and James Gourley, published a peer-reviewed article in ''The Environmentalist'', titled, 'Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for energetic materials'.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials |journal=The Environmentalist |volume=29 |pages=56–63 |last=Jones |first=Steven E|doi=10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4 |year=2008 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
In April 2008, Jones, along with four other authors, published a letter in ''The Bentham Open Civil Engineering Journal'', titled, 'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM |title=Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction |access-date=April 23, 2008 |last=Jones |first=Steven E |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080610080428/http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ%2F2008%2F00000002%2F00000001%2F35TOCIEJ.SGM |archive-date=June 10, 2008 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref> In August 2008, Jones, along with Kevin Ryan and James Gourley, published a peer-reviewed article in ''The Environmentalist'', titled, 'Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for energetic materials'.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials |journal=The Environmentalist |volume=29 |pages=56–63 |last=Jones |first=Steven E|doi=10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4 |year=2008 |doi-access=free }}</ref>


In April 2009, Jones, along with [[Niels H. Harrit]] and 7 other authors published a paper in ''The Open Chemical Physics Journal'', titled, 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'.<ref>{{Cite journal |url=http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf |title=Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe |journal=The Open Chemical Physics Journal |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=7–31 |accessdate=October 11, 2010 |last=Harrit |first=Niels H |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110202230446/http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf |archivedate=February 2, 2011 |df=mdy-all |bibcode=2009OCPJ....2....7H |year=2009 |doi=10.2174/1874412500902010007 }}</ref> The editor of the journal, Professor [[Marie-Paule Pileni]], an expert in explosives and nano-technology,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/cv-pileni.htm |title=Professor Marie-Paule Pileni |accessdate=September 14, 2009 |website=Laboratoire des Matériaux Mésoscopiques et Nanométriques |publisher=[[Pierre and Marie Curie University|Université Pierre et Marie Curie]] |quote=1990–1994: Société Nationale des Poudres et Explosifs, SNPE, France. |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090501150348/http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/cv-pileni.htm |archivedate=May 1, 2009 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/faculty/Pileni/ |title=Marie-Paule Pileni |accessdate=September 14, 2009 |website=Georgia Institute of Technology }}</ref> resigned. She received an e-mail from the Danish science journal ''Videnskab'' asking for her professional assessment of the article's content.<ref name=Chefredaktor>{{cite journal|last=Hoffmann|first=Thomas|title=Chefredaktør skrider efter kontroversiel artikel om 9/11|journal=Videnskab|date=April 28, 2009|url=http://videnskab.dk/content/dk/naturvidenskab/chefredaktor_skrider_efter_kontroversiel_artikel_om_911|accessdate=November 15, 2009|quote=Mailen får hende til med det samme at smække med døren til tidsskriftet.|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091201114804/http://videnskab.dk/content/dk/naturvidenskab/chefredaktor_skrider_efter_kontroversiel_artikel_om_911|archivedate=December 1, 2009|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name=Pileni >{{cite web |url=http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com.br/2009/04/bentham-editor-resigns-over-steven.html |title=Bentham Editor Resigns over Steven Jones' Paper |accessdate=May 17, 2014 |last= |first= |date=April 28, 2009}}</ref> According to Pileni, the article was published without her authorization. Subsequently, numerous concerns arose regarding the reliability of the publisher, [[Bentham Science Publishers]]. This included the publishing an allegedly peer reviewed article generated by [[SCIgen]] <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-journal.html#.VKNxBvldUrU |title=CRAP paper accepted by journal}}</ref> (although this program has also successfully submitted papers to [[IEEE]] and [[Springer Publishing|Springer]] <ref>{{cite web|last1=Van Noorden|first1=Richard|title=How three MIT students fooled the world of scientific journals|url=https://news.mit.edu/2015/how-three-mit-students-fooled-scientific-journals-0414|website=Nature.com|accessdate=11 August 2016}}</ref>), the resignation of multiple people at the administrative level,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/27461/title/Editors-quit-after-fake-paper-flap/ |title=Editors Quit After Fake Paper Flap}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2010/11/editor-in-chief-resigned-over-harrit-et.html#links |title=Editor in Chief resigned over Harrit et al. nanothermite paper |date=2010-11-11 }}</ref> and soliciting article submissions from researchers in unrelated fields through spam.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/04/some-background-on-bentham-open-but.html |title=Some background on Bentham Open, but just some}}</ref> With regard to the peer review process of the research conducted by Jones in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, David Griscom identified himself as one of the reviewers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/2010/09/911-truth-evidence-of-energetic.html |title=A 9/11 Truth: Evidence of Energetic Materials in the Debris of the Collapsed World Trade Center Towers|date=2010-09-11}}</ref> The paper which Jones co-authored referenced Griscom, and multiple scientists studying 9/11, in the acknowledgements for "elucidating discussions and encouragements".<ref name="benthamscience.com"/> Almost four years prior to identifying himself as a reviewer and the welcome he received from Jones for speaking out boldly,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://911blogger.com/news/2010-12-02/peer-reviewer-active-thermitic-materials-paper-identifies-himself-great|title=A peer-reviewer of the &quot;Active Thermitic Materials&quot; paper identifies himself... Great!|author=|date=|website=911blogger.com|accessdate=April 16, 2018}}</ref> Griscom published a letter in defense of evidence-based 9/11 studies;<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/e/hand-waving-the%20physics-of-911-by-david-griscom.pdf |title="Hand Waving" the Physics of 9/11}}</ref> of which Jones was an editor.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://stj911.org/journal.html |title=The Journal of 9/11 Studies}}</ref>
In April 2009, Jones, along with [[Niels H. Harrit]] and 7 other authors published a paper in ''The Open Chemical Physics Journal'', titled, 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe |journal=The Open Chemical Physics Journal |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=7–31 |last=Harrit |first=Niels H |df=mdy-all |bibcode=2009OCPJ....2....7H |year=2009 |doi=10.2174/1874412500902010007 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The editor of the journal, Professor [[Marie-Paule Pileni]], an expert in explosives and nano-technology,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/cv-pileni.htm |title=Professor Marie-Paule Pileni |access-date=September 14, 2009 |website=Laboratoire des Matériaux Mésoscopiques et Nanométriques |publisher=[[Pierre and Marie Curie University|Université Pierre et Marie Curie]] |quote=1990–1994: Société Nationale des Poudres et Explosifs, SNPE, France. |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090501150348/http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/cv-pileni.htm |archive-date=May 1, 2009 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/faculty/Pileni/ |title=Marie-Paule Pileni |access-date=September 14, 2009 |website=Georgia Institute of Technology }}</ref> resigned. She received an e-mail from the Danish science journal ''Videnskab'' asking for her professional assessment of the article's content.<ref name=Chefredaktor>{{cite journal|last=Hoffmann|first=Thomas|title=Chefredaktør skrider efter kontroversiel artikel om 9/11|journal=Videnskab|date=April 28, 2009|url=http://videnskab.dk/content/dk/naturvidenskab/chefredaktor_skrider_efter_kontroversiel_artikel_om_911|access-date=November 15, 2009|quote=Mailen får hende til med det samme at smække med døren til tidsskriftet.|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091201114804/http://videnskab.dk/content/dk/naturvidenskab/chefredaktor_skrider_efter_kontroversiel_artikel_om_911|archive-date=December 1, 2009|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name=Pileni >{{cite web |url=http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com.br/2009/04/bentham-editor-resigns-over-steven.html |title=Bentham Editor Resigns over Steven Jones' Paper |access-date=May 17, 2014 |date=April 28, 2009}}</ref> According to Pileni, the article was published without her authorization. Subsequently, numerous concerns arose regarding the reliability of the publisher, [[Bentham Science Publishers]]. This included the publishing an allegedly peer reviewed article generated by [[SCIgen]]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-journal.html#.VKNxBvldUrU |title=CRAP paper accepted by journal}}</ref> (although this program has also successfully submitted papers to [[IEEE]] and [[Springer Publishing|Springer]]<ref>{{cite web|last1=Van Noorden|first1=Richard|title=How three MIT students fooled the world of scientific journals|url=https://news.mit.edu/2015/how-three-mit-students-fooled-scientific-journals-0414|website=Nature.com|date=April 14, 2015 |access-date=11 August 2016}}</ref>), the resignation of multiple people at the administrative level,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/27461/title/Editors-quit-after-fake-paper-flap/ |title=Editors Quit After Fake Paper Flap}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2010/11/editor-in-chief-resigned-over-harrit-et.html#links |title=Editor in Chief resigned over Harrit et al. nanothermite paper |date=2010-11-11 }}</ref> and soliciting article submissions from researchers in unrelated fields through spam.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/04/some-background-on-bentham-open-but.html |title=Some background on Bentham Open, but just some}}</ref> With regard to the peer review process of the research conducted by Jones in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, David Griscom identified himself as one of the reviewers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/2010/09/911-truth-evidence-of-energetic.html |title=A 9/11 Truth: Evidence of Energetic Materials in the Debris of the Collapsed World Trade Center Towers|date=2010-09-11}}</ref> The paper which Jones co-authored referenced Griscom, and multiple scientists studying 9/11, in the acknowledgements for "elucidating discussions and encouragements".<ref name="benthamscience.com"/> Almost four years prior to identifying himself as a reviewer and the welcome he received from Jones for speaking out boldly,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://911blogger.com/news/2010-12-02/peer-reviewer-active-thermitic-materials-paper-identifies-himself-great|title=A peer-reviewer of the &quot;Active Thermitic Materials&quot; paper identifies himself... Great!|website=911blogger.com|access-date=April 16, 2018}}</ref> Griscom published a letter in defense of evidence-based 9/11 studies;<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/e/hand-waving-the%20physics-of-911-by-david-griscom.pdf |title="Hand Waving" the Physics of 9/11}}</ref> of which Jones was an editor.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://stj911.org/journal.html |title=The Journal of 9/11 Studies}}</ref>


''Europhysics News'', in August 2016, published a feature "15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-rise Building Collapses," which strongly challenges the official U.S. Government ([[NIST]]) narrative of the collapse of WTC7 and the WTC Towers, including a disclaimer about the speculative and not peer reviewed status of the article.<ref name="Europhysicsnews2016">{{Cite journal|last=Jones|first=Steven|date=24 August 2016|title=15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses|url=http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf|journal=Europhysics News|volume=47|issue=4|pages=21–26|bibcode=2016ENews..47d..21J|doi=10.1051/epn/2016402|access-date=16 September 2016|via=}}</ref> The paper was authored by Steven Jones, Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti and Ted Walter.
''Europhysics News'', in August 2016, published a feature "15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-rise Building Collapses," which strongly challenges the official U.S. Government ([[NIST]]) narrative of the collapse of WTC7 and the WTC Towers, including a disclaimer about the speculative and not peer reviewed status of the article.<ref name="Europhysicsnews2016">{{Cite journal|last=Jones|first=Steven|date=24 August 2016|title=15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses|url=http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf|journal=Europhysics News|volume=47|issue=4|pages=21–26|bibcode=2016ENews..47d..21J|doi=10.1051/epn/2016402|access-date=16 September 2016|doi-access=free}}</ref> The paper was authored by Steven Jones, Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti and Ted Walter.


===Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice===
===Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice===
Jones was a founding member of [[9/11 Truth movement#Scholars for 9/11 Truth|Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] for approximately one year as co-chair with [[James H. Fetzer]]. From mid-November 2006 until the end of that year, Jones, Fetzer and a series of other researchers and individuals engaged in a dispute about the direction of the organization. Jones and others examined the claims of James Fetzer and Judy Wood&nbsp;— i.e., that directed energy weapons or mini-nukes destroyed the WTC Towers — and delineated empirical reasons for rejecting them.<ref>{{cite web| first=Steven E. |last=Jones|date=September 28, 2006|url=http://journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf|title=Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers|accessdate=April 15, 2009}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}}
Jones was a founding member of [[9/11 Truth movement#Scholars for 9/11 Truth|Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] for approximately one year as co-chair with [[James H. Fetzer]]. From mid-November 2006 until the end of that year, Jones, Fetzer and a series of other researchers and individuals engaged in a dispute about the direction of the organization. Jones and others examined the claims of James Fetzer and Judy Wood&nbsp;— i.e., that directed energy weapons or mini-nukes destroyed the WTC Towers — and delineated empirical reasons for rejecting them.<ref>{{cite web| first=Steven E. |last=Jones|date=September 28, 2006|url=http://journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf|title=Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers|access-date=April 15, 2009}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}}


Jones was co-chair of [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] until December 5, 2006, when he resigned his membership. In December 2006, Steven Jones and about 4/5ths of the members voted to leave the Scholars for 9/11 Truth organization<ref>{{cite web|url=http://stj911.org/faq.html|title=Scholars for 9/11 Truth 7 Justice: FAQ|accessdate=April 15, 2009}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}} to establish [[9/11 Truth movement#Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice|Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.stj911.org|title=Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice|author=|date=|website=www.stj911.org|accessdate=April 16, 2018}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}} Also in 2006, Jones became a founding member of [[Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth]].
Jones was co-chair of [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] until December 5, 2006, when he resigned his membership. In December 2006, Steven Jones and about 4/5ths of the members voted to leave the Scholars for 9/11 Truth organization<ref>{{cite web|url=http://stj911.org/faq.html|title=Scholars for 9/11 Truth 7 Justice: FAQ|access-date=April 15, 2009}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}} to establish [[9/11 Truth movement#Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice|Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.stj911.org/|title=Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice|website=www.stj911.org|access-date=April 16, 2018|archive-date=September 27, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927204029/http://stj911.org/|url-status=dead}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}} Also in 2006, Jones became a founding member of [[Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth]].


While Jones is not a committee member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, his work is supported and documented by the group. By April 2010, that organization had grown to over 800 members.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://stj911.org/members/index.html|title=Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice|author=|date=|website=stj911.org|accessdate=April 16, 2018}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}} He is co-editor of ''Journal of 9/11 Studies''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://journalof911studies.org/|title=Journal of 9/11 Studies - Truth Matters|author=|date=|website=journalof911studies.org|accessdate=April 16, 2018}}</ref>
While Jones is not a committee member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, his work is supported and documented by the group. By April 2010, that organization had grown to over 800 members.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://stj911.org/members/index.html|title=Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice|website=stj911.org|access-date=April 16, 2018}}</ref>{{citation needed|date = August 2018}} He is co-editor of ''Journal of 9/11 Studies''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://journalof911studies.org/|title=Journal of 9/11 Studies - Truth Matters|website=journalof911studies.org|access-date=April 16, 2018}}</ref>


==Recognition and awards==
==Recognition and awards==
Line 73: Line 73:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/ BYU energy research]
* [http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/ BYU energy research] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100610062849/http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/ |date=June 10, 2010 }}
* [http://www.bookrags.com/sciences/physics/cold-fusion-wop.html Brookings.com] - 'Cold Fusion'
* [http://www.bookrags.com/sciences/physics/cold-fusion-wop.html Brookings.com] - 'Cold Fusion'
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070111211701/http://solarcooking.org/plans/funnel.htm The BYU Solar Funnel Cooker/Cooler] and [[:gutenberg:5889|Solar Cooker on Project Gutenberg]]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070111211701/http://solarcooking.org/plans/funnel.htm The BYU Solar Funnel Cooker/Cooler] and [[:gutenberg:5889|Solar Cooker on Project Gutenberg]]
Line 88: Line 88:
* [http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf 'Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?'] by Steven E. Jones
* [http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf 'Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?'] by Steven E. Jones
* [http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/JonesAnswersQuestionsWorldTradeCenter.pdf 'Answers to Objections and Questions'] PDF presentation by Steven E. Jones
* [http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/JonesAnswersQuestionsWorldTradeCenter.pdf 'Answers to Objections and Questions'] PDF presentation by Steven E. Jones
* {{cite web|last=Gravois |first=John |year=2006 |url=http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=2bcf9f07-6407-4b2c-9f4e-7d4a15afcb98&k=46273 |title=A theory that just won't die |website=News |publisher=CanWest Interactive |accessdate=August 21, 2006 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120212210153/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=2bcf9f07-6407-4b2c-9f4e-7d4a15afcb98&k=46273 |archivedate=February 12, 2012 |df=mdy }}
* {{cite web|last=Gravois |first=John |year=2006 |url=http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=2bcf9f07-6407-4b2c-9f4e-7d4a15afcb98&k=46273 |title=A theory that just won't die |website=News |publisher=CanWest Interactive |access-date=August 21, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120212210153/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=2bcf9f07-6407-4b2c-9f4e-7d4a15afcb98&k=46273 |archive-date=February 12, 2012 |df=mdy }}
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120114223828/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tociej/articles/V002/35TOCIEJ.pdf 'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'], by Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, & James R. Gourley. ''The Open Civil Engineering Journal,'' Volume 2, Issue 1, pp.&nbsp;35–40.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120114223828/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tociej/articles/V002/35TOCIEJ.pdf 'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'], by Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, & James R. Gourley. ''The Open Civil Engineering Journal,'' Volume 2, Issue 1, pp.&nbsp;35–40.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130828124553/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'], by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen. ''The Open Chemical Physics Journal,'' Volume 2, pp.&nbsp;7–31.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130828124553/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'], by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen. ''The Open Chemical Physics Journal,'' Volume 2, pp.&nbsp;7–31.

Latest revision as of 23:23, 2 September 2024

Steven Earl Jones (born March 25, 1949)[1] is an American physicist. Among scientists, Jones became known for his research into muon-catalyzed fusion and geo-fusion.[2][3][4] Jones is also known for his association with 9/11 conspiracy theories.[5][6] Jones has claimed that mere airplane crashes and fires could not have resulted in so rapid and complete a fall of the World Trade Center Towers and 7 World Trade Center, suggesting controlled demolition instead.[6][7] In late 2006, some time after Brigham Young University (BYU) officials placed him on paid leave, he elected to retire in an agreement with BYU.[8] Jones continued research and writing following his early retirement from BYU, including a paper published in Europhysics News in August 2016.[9]

Education

[edit]

Jones earned his bachelor's degree in physics, magna cum laude, from Brigham Young University in 1973, and his Ph.D. in physics from Vanderbilt University in 1978. From 1974 to 1977, Jones conducted his PhD research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility.[1]

Research interests

[edit]

Jones conducted research at the Idaho National Laboratory, in Idaho Falls, Idaho where, from 1979 to 1985, he was a senior engineering specialist. He was principal investigator for experimental muon-catalyzed fusion from 1982 to 1991 for the United States Department of Energy (DOE), Division of Advanced Energy Projects. From 1985 to 1993, Jones studied deuterium-based fusion in the context of condensed matter physics under DOE and Electric Power Research Institute sponsorship. Jones also collaborated in experiments at other physics laboratories, including TRIUMF (Vancouver, British Columbia), LANL (Los Alamos, NM), KEK (Tsukuba, Japan), and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory near Oxford University.[1][citation needed]

Around 1985, Jones became interested in anomalous concentrations of helium-3 and tritium found in gases escaping from volcanoes. He hypothesized that metals and high pressures in the Earth's interior might make fusion more likely, and began a series of experiments on what he referred to as geo-fusion, or piezofusion, high-pressure fusion. To characterize the reactions, Jones designed and constructed a neutron counter that was capable of accurately measuring minuscule numbers of neutrons produced in his experiments. The counter indicated that a small amount of fusion was occurring. Jones claimed that the results indicate that fusion is at least possible, although the process was unlikely to be useful as an energy source.[citation needed]

Jones' interests extend to archaeometry, solar energy,[10][11] and, like numerous professors at BYU, archaeology and the Book of Mormon.[12] He has interpreted archaeological evidence from the ancient Mayans as supporting his faith's belief that Jesus Christ (when resurrected) visited America.[13] Jones is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and has been described as "a devout Mormon."[14] In 2016-17, he and his wife served as full-time Senior Missionaries in the New Jersey Morristown Mission of the Church.[15]

Muon-catalyzed fusion

[edit]

In the mid-1980s, Jones and other BYU scientists worked on what he referred to as Cold Nuclear Fusion in a Scientific American article (the process is currently known as muon-catalyzed fusion to avoid confusion with the cold fusion concept proposed by the University of Utah's Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann). Muon-catalyzed fusion was a field of some interest during the 1980s as a potential energy source; however, its low energy output appears to be unavoidable (because of alpha-muon sticking losses). Jones led a research team that, in 1986, achieved 150 fusions per muon (average), releasing over 2,600 MeV of fusion energy per muon, a record which still stands.[16]

Pons and Fleischmann commenced their work at approximately the same time. Jones became aware of their work when they applied for research funding from the DOE, after which the DOE forwarded their proposal to Jones for peer review. When Jones realized that their work was similar, he and Pons and Fleischmann agreed to release their papers to Nature on the same day (March 24, 1989). However, Pons and Fleischmann announced their results at a press event the day before Jones faxed his paper to Nature.[17]

According to a New York Times report, although peer reviewers were harshly critical of Pons' and Fleischmann's research, they did not apply such criticism to Jones' significantly more modest, theoretically supported findings. Critics insisted that Jones' results were probably caused by experimental error;[18] the majority of the reviewing physicists claimed that he was a careful scientist. Later research and experiments have supported Jones' metallic "cold fusion" (geo-fusion) reports.[19]

In July 2013, Jones gave a poster talk at the 18th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science at the University of Missouri, titled, "Empirical Evidence for Two Distinct Effects: Low-level d-d Fusion in Metals and Anomalous Excess Heat."[20]

9/11 conspiracy theories

[edit]

World Trade Center destruction

[edit]

On September 22, 2005, while speaking at a BYU seminar attended by around 60 people, Jones publicly presented his views regarding the 2001 collapse of the World Trade Center towers and World Trade Center 7 during the September 11 attacks. Jones claimed a variety of evidence defies the mainstream collapse theory, and also noted he believed it was more likely a controlled demolition, using thermite. The evidence Jones cited included the speed and symmetry of the collapses, and characteristics of dust jets. Later, Jones said he had identified grey-red flakes found in the dust as nanothermite traces and that the thermite reaction products (aluminium oxide and iron-rich microspheres) were also found in the dust.[21] He called for further scientific investigation to test the controlled demolition theory and the release of all relevant data by the government.[22] Shortly after the seminar, Jones placed a research paper entitled "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" on his page in the Physics department Web site, commenting that BYU had no responsibility for the paper.[23]

Jones subsequently presented his WTC research in lectures at Idaho State University, Utah Valley State College, University of Colorado at Boulder and University of Denver, the Utah Academy of Science, Sonoma State University, University of California at Berkeley and Davis, and the University of Texas at Austin.[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]

On September 7, 2006, Jones removed his paper from BYU's website at the request of administrators and was placed on paid leave.[31] The university cited its concern about the "increasingly speculative and accusatory nature" of Jones' work and that perhaps Jones' research had "not been published in appropriate scientific venues" as reasons for putting him under review. The review was to have been conducted at three levels: BYU administration, the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and the Physics Department.[32] However, BYU discontinued the review.[8] Some of Jones' colleagues also defended Jones' 9/11 work,[33] and Project Censored lists his 9/11 research among the top mainstream media censored stories of 2007.[34]

Jones' placement on paid leave drew criticism from the American Association of University Professors and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. Both organizations have long been critics of BYU's record on academic freedom.[35] Jones "welcomed the review" because he hoped it would "encourage people to read his paper for themselves," however the school abandoned the review and Jones elected to retire, effective January 1, 2007.[8]

Jones has been interviewed by mainstream news sources and has made a number of public appearances. Jones has urged caution in drawing conclusions.[36] In one interview, Jones directly called into question the government's theory regarding the attacks and subsequent uncharacteristic total destruction of the buildings, stating that "we don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone".[37] His name is often mentioned in reporting about 9/11 conspiracy theories.[38]

Jones has published several papers suggesting that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, but his 2005 paper, "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" was his first paper on the topic and was considered controversial both for its content and its claims to scientific rigor.[14] Jones' early critics included members of BYU's engineering faculty;[39] shortly after he made his views public, the BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and the faculty of structural engineering issued statements in which they distanced themselves from Jones' work. They noted that Jones' "hypotheses and interpretations of evidence were being questioned by scholars and practitioners," and expressed doubts on whether they had been "submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."[40] Jones further presented and defended his research before peers at the Utah Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters on 7 April 2006 at nearby Snow College.[41] Jones maintained that the paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication.[42] The paper was published in the online Journal of 9/11 Studies, a journal co-founded and co-edited by Jones for the purpose of "covering the whole of research related to 9/11/2001." The paper also appeared in a volume of essays, 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott.[43]

In April 2008, Jones, along with four other authors, published a letter in The Bentham Open Civil Engineering Journal, titled, 'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'.[44] In August 2008, Jones, along with Kevin Ryan and James Gourley, published a peer-reviewed article in The Environmentalist, titled, 'Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for energetic materials'.[45]

In April 2009, Jones, along with Niels H. Harrit and 7 other authors published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, titled, 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'.[46] The editor of the journal, Professor Marie-Paule Pileni, an expert in explosives and nano-technology,[47][48] resigned. She received an e-mail from the Danish science journal Videnskab asking for her professional assessment of the article's content.[49][50] According to Pileni, the article was published without her authorization. Subsequently, numerous concerns arose regarding the reliability of the publisher, Bentham Science Publishers. This included the publishing an allegedly peer reviewed article generated by SCIgen[51] (although this program has also successfully submitted papers to IEEE and Springer[52]), the resignation of multiple people at the administrative level,[53][54] and soliciting article submissions from researchers in unrelated fields through spam.[55] With regard to the peer review process of the research conducted by Jones in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, David Griscom identified himself as one of the reviewers.[56] The paper which Jones co-authored referenced Griscom, and multiple scientists studying 9/11, in the acknowledgements for "elucidating discussions and encouragements".[21] Almost four years prior to identifying himself as a reviewer and the welcome he received from Jones for speaking out boldly,[57] Griscom published a letter in defense of evidence-based 9/11 studies;[58] of which Jones was an editor.[59]

Europhysics News, in August 2016, published a feature "15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-rise Building Collapses," which strongly challenges the official U.S. Government (NIST) narrative of the collapse of WTC7 and the WTC Towers, including a disclaimer about the speculative and not peer reviewed status of the article.[9] The paper was authored by Steven Jones, Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti and Ted Walter.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice

[edit]

Jones was a founding member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth for approximately one year as co-chair with James H. Fetzer. From mid-November 2006 until the end of that year, Jones, Fetzer and a series of other researchers and individuals engaged in a dispute about the direction of the organization. Jones and others examined the claims of James Fetzer and Judy Wood — i.e., that directed energy weapons or mini-nukes destroyed the WTC Towers — and delineated empirical reasons for rejecting them.[60][citation needed]

Jones was co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth until December 5, 2006, when he resigned his membership. In December 2006, Steven Jones and about 4/5ths of the members voted to leave the Scholars for 9/11 Truth organization[61][citation needed] to establish Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice.[62][citation needed] Also in 2006, Jones became a founding member of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

While Jones is not a committee member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, his work is supported and documented by the group. By April 2010, that organization had grown to over 800 members.[63][citation needed] He is co-editor of Journal of 9/11 Studies.[64]

Recognition and awards

[edit]
  • 1968, David O. McKay Scholarship at BYU; National Merit Scholar[1]
  • 1973–1978 Tuition Scholarship and Research Fellowship at Vanderbilt University
  • 1989 Outstanding Young Scholar Award (BYU); Best of What's New for 1989 (Popular Science); Creativity Prize (Japanese Creativity Society)
  • 1990 BYU Young Scholar Award; Annual Lecturer, BYU Chapter of Sigma Xi
  • 2005 BYU Alcuin Award and Fellowship, for excellence in teaching

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d "CURRICULUM VITAE". www.physics.byu.edu. Archived from the original on April 5, 2013. Retrieved April 16, 2018.
  2. ^ Steven E Jones & Johann Rafelski, AIP Conference Proceedings, 181: Muon-catalyzed Fusion: Sanibel Island, FL 1988 (New York: American Institute of Physics, 1989).
  3. ^ George L Trigg, ed, Encyclopedia of Applied Physics, Volume 14: Physical Geology to Polymer Dynamics (New York: VCH Publishers, 1996), p 112: "Dr. Steven Jones of Brigham Young University, who had long studied muon-catalyzed fusion...".
  4. ^ Thomas F Gieryn, Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), pp 198–99, 214-215, 223.
  5. ^ Stephen E Atkins, "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice" pp 385–87, in S E Atkins, ed, The 9/11 Encyclopedia, 2nd edn (Santa Barbara CA: ABC-CLIO, 2011).
  6. ^ a b Anthony Summers & Robbyn Swan, The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11 (New York: Ballantine Books, 2011), p 99.
  7. ^ Peter Phillips & Mickey Huff w/ Project Censored, eds, Media Democracy in Action: Censored 2010: The Top 25 Censored Stories of 2008-09 (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2009), "Censored 2007 #18", pp 140–41.
  8. ^ a b c Walch, Tad (October 21, 2006). "BYU professor in dispute over 9/11 will retire: Jones had been placed on leave 6 weeks ago". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  9. ^ a b Jones, Steven (August 24, 2016). "15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses" (PDF). Europhysics News. 47 (4): 21–26. Bibcode:2016ENews..47d..21J. doi:10.1051/epn/2016402. Retrieved September 16, 2016.
  10. ^ "Steven E. Jones' biography at BYU". Retrieved August 3, 2006.
  11. ^ "The Solar Funnel Cooker". Archived from the original on January 11, 2007. Retrieved November 28, 2006.
  12. ^ For the relationship between BYU and Mormon apologetics scholarship see generally John-Charles Duffy. "Defending the Kingdom, Rethinking the Faith: How Apologetics Is Reshaping Mormon Orthodoxy." Sunstone, May 2004, 22-55.
  13. ^ "Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America, by Steven Jones". Archived from the original on May 10, 2017. Retrieved June 1, 2016., article claiming evidence that Jesus Christ visited the Americas (also here)
  14. ^ a b Gravois, John (June 23, 2006). "Professors of Paranoia?". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Vol. 52, no. 42. p. A.10. Retrieved September 14, 2016. Soon after Mr. Jones posted his paper online, the physics department at Brigham Young moved to distance itself from his work. The department released a statement saying that it was 'not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.'
  15. ^ https://www.facebook.com/NewJerseyMorristownMission/reviews [user-generated source]
  16. ^ Jones, Steven Earl (1986). "Muon-catalysed fusion revisited". Nature. 321 (6066): 127–133. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..127J. doi:10.1038/321127a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 39819102.
  17. ^ Jones’ manuscript on history of cold fusion at BYU, Ludwik Kowalski, March 5, 2004 Archived August 28, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  18. ^ Browne, Malcolm W. (1989). "Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion". Science. The New York Times. Retrieved July 14, 2006.
  19. ^ Czerski, K.; Huke, A.; Biller, A.; Heide, P.; Hoeft, M.; Ruprecht, G. (2001). "Enhancement of the electron screening effect for d+ d fusion reactions in metallic environments". Europhysics Letters. 54 (4): 449–455. Bibcode:2001EL.....54..449C. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.380.6953. doi:10.1209/epl/i2001-00265-7. S2CID 250756853. ...the observed enhancement of the electron screening in metal targets can, in tendency, explain the small neutron production rates observed in the cold-fusion experiment of Jones [reference 1989 Nature paper].
  20. ^ Jones, Steven Earl (2013). "Empirical Evidence for Two Distinct Effects: Low-level d-d Fusion in Metals and Anomalous Excess Heat". Posters (18th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science). University of Missouri. Retrieved December 24, 2014.
  21. ^ a b Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe Archived March 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. By Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen. ISSN 1874-4125 doi:10.2174/1874412500902010007. The Open Chemical Physics Journal. pp 7-31
  22. ^ Jones, Steven E. "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?". Retrieved September 9, 2008. I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at BYU on September 22, 2005, to about 60 people. I also showed evidence and scientific arguments for the explosive demolition theory.
  23. ^ Jones, Steven E. "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?". Archived from the original on November 24, 2005. Retrieved April 10, 2010.
  24. ^ Jones, Steven E (September 22, 2006). "What Caused Not Two but Three World Trade Center Skyscrapers to COMPLETELY Collapse on 9/11/2001?". Archived from the original (pdf) on September 27, 2007. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  25. ^ Jones, Steven E (February 1, 2006). "9/11 Revisited: Scientific and Ethical Questions". Archived from the original on August 26, 2007. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  26. ^ Riley, Michael (October 29, 2006). "Backers hail 9/11 theorist's speech". Denver & The West. Denver Post. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  27. ^ Dean, Suzanne (April 10, 2006). "Physicist says heat substance felled WTC". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  28. ^ "Scholars For Truth Founder Is Keynote Speaker for Media Accountability Conference, Nov. 3 And 4". October 26, 2006. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  29. ^ "Analysis of the World Trade Center Destruction". Lifting the Fog: The Scientific Method Applied to the World Trade Center Disaster. November 11, 2006. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  30. ^ "The Twin Towers in scientific detail". Project for a New American Citizen: Rebuilding America's Senses. April 14, 2007. Archived from the original on September 1, 2007. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  31. ^ Walch, Tad (September 14, 2006). "BYU's Jones Denies Bias". Deseret News. Retrieved October 9, 2007.
  32. ^ McFarland, Sheena (September 8, 2006). "BYU prof on paid leave for 9/11 theory". Salt Lake Tribune.
  33. ^ Walch, Tad (September 18, 2006). "Three at BYU praise Jones". Deseret News. Archived from the original on February 10, 2021. Retrieved September 3, 2007.
  34. ^ Kramer, John; David Abbott; Courtney Wilcox (2007). "Physicist Challenges Official 9-11 Story". Project Censored. Archived from the original on September 2, 2007. Retrieved September 3, 2007.
  35. ^ Walch, Tad (September 14, 2006). "BYU action on Jones lamented". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved September 3, 2007.
  36. ^ Jones, Steven E (July 18, 2006). "Answers to Objections and Questions" (PDF). Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  37. ^ Asquith, Christina (September 5, 2006). "Who really blew up the twin towers?". Education Guardian Weekly. London: The Guardian. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  38. ^ Dwyer, Jim (September 2, 2006). "U.S. Reports Seek to Counter Conspiracy Theories About 9/11". The New York Times. Retrieved April 8, 2008.
  39. ^ Firmage, D. Allan (April 9, 2006). "Refuting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory". Letter to the Editor. NetXNews (online edition of College Times, the Utah Valley State College student newspaper). Archived from the original on April 18, 2012. Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  40. ^ McIlvain, Ryan (December 5, 2005). "Censor rumors quelled". BYU NewsNet. Archived from the original on May 7, 2009. Retrieved September 4, 2007. Professor Jones's department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones.
  41. ^ Dean, Suzanne (April 10, 2006). "Physicist says heat substance felled WTC". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved August 24, 2016.
  42. ^ Tad Walch (November 8, 2006). "BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave". Deseret News. Retrieved June 1, 2008.
  43. ^ Griffin, David Ray; Peter Dale Scott, eds. (August 23, 2006). 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol 1. Olive Branch Press. p. 247 pages. ISBN 978-1-56656-659-9.
  44. ^ Jones, Steven E. "Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction". Archived from the original on June 10, 2008. Retrieved April 23, 2008.
  45. ^ Jones, Steven E (2008). "Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials". The Environmentalist. 29: 56–63. doi:10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4.
  46. ^ Harrit, Niels H (2009). "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe". The Open Chemical Physics Journal. 2 (1): 7–31. Bibcode:2009OCPJ....2....7H. doi:10.2174/1874412500902010007.
  47. ^ "Professor Marie-Paule Pileni". Laboratoire des Matériaux Mésoscopiques et Nanométriques. Université Pierre et Marie Curie. Archived from the original on May 1, 2009. Retrieved September 14, 2009. 1990–1994: Société Nationale des Poudres et Explosifs, SNPE, France.
  48. ^ "Marie-Paule Pileni". Georgia Institute of Technology. Retrieved September 14, 2009.
  49. ^ Hoffmann, Thomas (April 28, 2009). "Chefredaktør skrider efter kontroversiel artikel om 9/11". Videnskab. Archived from the original on December 1, 2009. Retrieved November 15, 2009. Mailen får hende til med det samme at smække med døren til tidsskriftet.
  50. ^ "Bentham Editor Resigns over Steven Jones' Paper". April 28, 2009. Retrieved May 17, 2014.
  51. ^ "CRAP paper accepted by journal".
  52. ^ Van Noorden, Richard (April 14, 2015). "How three MIT students fooled the world of scientific journals". Nature.com. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  53. ^ "Editors Quit After Fake Paper Flap".
  54. ^ "Editor in Chief resigned over Harrit et al. nanothermite paper". November 11, 2010.
  55. ^ "Some background on Bentham Open, but just some".
  56. ^ "A 9/11 Truth: Evidence of Energetic Materials in the Debris of the Collapsed World Trade Center Towers". September 11, 2010.
  57. ^ "A peer-reviewer of the "Active Thermitic Materials" paper identifies himself... Great!". 911blogger.com. Retrieved April 16, 2018.
  58. ^ ""Hand Waving" the Physics of 9/11" (PDF).
  59. ^ "The Journal of 9/11 Studies".
  60. ^ Jones, Steven E. (September 28, 2006). "Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers" (PDF). Retrieved April 15, 2009.
  61. ^ "Scholars for 9/11 Truth 7 Justice: FAQ". Retrieved April 15, 2009.
  62. ^ "Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice". www.stj911.org. Archived from the original on September 27, 2013. Retrieved April 16, 2018.
  63. ^ "Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice". stj911.org. Retrieved April 16, 2018.
  64. ^ "Journal of 9/11 Studies - Truth Matters". journalof911studies.org. Retrieved April 16, 2018.
[edit]
[edit]
[edit]