Jump to content

User:ComicsAreJustAllRight: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 1: Line 1:
Comics are just all right, but I read them anyway, and edit articles about them and other topics here on Wikipedia.
Comics are just all right, but I read them anyway, and edit articles about them and other topics here on Wikipedia.


{{Quotation|If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.|[[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]]}}


{{ivmbox
{{ivmbox

Revision as of 21:32, 9 September 2021

Comics are just all right, but I read them anyway, and edit articles about them and other topics here on Wikipedia.

If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.

On 27 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John H. Pratt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in a 1974 bench trial connected to the Watergate scandal, Judge John H. Pratt found G. Gordon Liddy guilty of contempt of Congress? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John H. Pratt. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John H. Pratt), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The Law Barnstar
Today I had occasion to look-up examining magistrate and was surprised to see a topic on civil law have such a robust and high-quality article mostly, it seems, due to your efforts. Chetsford (talk) 10:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
For your incredible work, pretty much all day, improving and expanding the 2016 Republican National Convention article. MelanieN (talk) 01:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar
is awarded to you for this outstanding answer at the Ref Desk. Congratulations and thank you. Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 20:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
You picked a good username for yourself. Thank you for your edits, which serve to increase the neutrality of the encyclopedia. Cheers, and happy editing! Safehaven86 (talk) 14:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
It was a privilege watching you edit Dennis Hastert‎ on May 28, 2015. What a tour de force! Now that Hastert is suddenly back in the news, tens of thousands of readers will turn to Wikipedia for additional background. Very few, however, will appreciate how much you improved this BLP via prodigious research and lightning-fast revisions. Kudos for a brilliant job! Kent Krupa (talk) 05:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
For your detailed work and impeccable sourcing at Dennis Hastert‎ - Cwobeel (talk) 02:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


The Editor's Barnstar
For the excellent and detailed editorial work at Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. - Cwobeel (talk) 03:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
A very belated note - but I've just been digging through the history of WP:5P, and noticed you were the first to put it together, back in 2005. Looking back, it's a really useful thing to have had around all these years, and I wanted to thank you for having thought to assemble it! Clearly written and concisely phrased, and still useful. Andrew Gray (talk) 13:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
In January 2016 you developed James A. Guest, a Wikipedia article related to my employer, Consumer Reports. Thanks for that. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:42, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
Thanks for expanding Executive Order 13767, I appreciate it! Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)