Jump to content

Talk:Intermediate distribution frame: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (Stub/Low): +Telecommunications, −banner shell (Rater)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=}}
{{WikiProject Telecommunications |class=Stub |importance=Low}}


== including, but not limited to ==
== including, but not limited to ==

Revision as of 19:01, 18 September 2023

WikiProject iconTelecommunications Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

including, but not limited to

"Including, but not limited to" is lawyer-speak and is unnecessary since "including" implies additional items already. --Unimath (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I get the impression the source document 1037C is, at least in part, a glossary for lawyers haggling over the meaning of US government contracts. So, yes, much of it should be trimmed down to leaner, sprightlier prose for our purposes. Jim.henderson (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]