Jump to content

Equal Opportunities Commission (Hong Kong): Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Squirist (talk | contribs)
362 edits
Squirist (talk | contribs)
362 edits
m ce
Line 65: Line 65:
== History ==
== History ==
=== Background ===
=== Background ===
In 1994, the median wage of women in Hong Kong were about a third lower than that of men, and classified advertisements often limited senior positions in the private sector to men and low-paying jobs only sought for female applicants.<ref name="dorosario1994">{{cite news |last1=do Rosario |first1=Louise |last2=Harnischfeger |first2=Uta |title=Double Standards: Activists say colony has far to go on women's rights |work=[[Far Eastern Economic Review]] |date=1994-07-07 |location=Hong Kong |page=27}}</ref>
In 1994, the median wage of women in Hong Kong was about a third lower than that of men, and classified advertisements often limited senior positions in the private sector to men and low-paying jobs only sought female applicants.<ref name="dorosario1994">{{cite news |last1=do Rosario |first1=Louise |last2=Harnischfeger |first2=Uta |title=Double Standards: Activists say colony has far to go on women's rights |work=[[Far Eastern Economic Review]] |date=1994-07-07 |location=Hong Kong |page=27}}</ref>


The [[Government of Hong Kong|Hong Kong government]] has had a history of opposing anti-discrimination legislation.<ref name="Petersen1996">{{cite journal |last1=Petersen |first1=Carole J. |title=Equality as a Human Right: The Development of Anti-Discrimination Law in Hong Kong |journal=Columbia Journal of Transnational Law |date=1996 |volume=34 |pages=335–388|url=https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/35225/1/Petersen_34ColumJTransnatlL335.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|337}} When the [[United Kingdom]] ratified the [[Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women]] (CEDAW) in 1986, the treaty also applied to other [[British Overseas Territories|British dependent territories]].<ref name="Petersen&Samuels2002">{{cite journal |last1=Petersen |first1=Carole J. |last2=Samuels |first2=Harriet |title=The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women: A Comparison of Its Implementation and the Role of Non-Governmental Organisations in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong |journal=Hastings International and Comparative Law Review |date=2002 |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=1–50 |url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1572&context=hastings_international_comparative_law_review}}</ref>{{rp|22}} However, the Hong Kong government asked that CEDAW to not be extended to the city until it could assess its effect.<ref name="Petersen1994">{{cite journal |last1=Petersen |first1=Carole J. |title=The Green Paper on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men: An Exercise in Consultation or Evasion? |journal=Hong Kong Law Journal |date=1994 |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=8–16 |url=https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/132841/2/content.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|9}} It said that ratifying CEDAW might cause "significant economic and social consequences",<ref name="hansard19920624">{{cite hansard |jurisdiction=Hong Kong |title=Discrimination Against Women |url=https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr91-92/english/lc_sitg/hansard/h920624.pdf|date= 1992-06-24|house=Legislative Council |speaker= [[Peter Lai Hing-ling|Peter Lai]]|position=Secretary for Constitutional Affairs}}</ref> and specifically, that CEDAW and anti-discrimination laws would harm Hong Kong's [[laissez-faire]] market and traditional Chinese customs that treat men and women differently.<ref name="Petersen&Samuels2002"/>{{rp|22–23}}
The [[Government of Hong Kong|Hong Kong government]] has had a history of opposing anti-discrimination legislation.<ref name="Petersen1996">{{cite journal |last1=Petersen |first1=Carole J. |title=Equality as a Human Right: The Development of Anti-Discrimination Law in Hong Kong |journal=Columbia Journal of Transnational Law |date=1996 |volume=34 |pages=335–388|url=https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/35225/1/Petersen_34ColumJTransnatlL335.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|337}} When the [[United Kingdom]] ratified the [[Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women]] (CEDAW) in 1986, the treaty also applied to other [[British Overseas Territories|British dependent territories]].<ref name="Petersen&Samuels2002">{{cite journal |last1=Petersen |first1=Carole J. |last2=Samuels |first2=Harriet |title=The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women: A Comparison of Its Implementation and the Role of Non-Governmental Organisations in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong |journal=Hastings International and Comparative Law Review |date=2002 |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=1–50 |url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1572&context=hastings_international_comparative_law_review}}</ref>{{rp|22}} However, the Hong Kong government requested CEDAW to not be extended to the city until it could assess its effect.<ref name="Petersen1994">{{cite journal |last1=Petersen |first1=Carole J. |title=The Green Paper on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men: An Exercise in Consultation or Evasion? |journal=Hong Kong Law Journal |date=1994 |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=8–16 |url=https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/132841/2/content.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|9}} It said that ratifying CEDAW might cause "significant economic and social consequences",<ref name="hansard19920624">{{cite hansard |jurisdiction=Hong Kong |title=Discrimination Against Women |url=https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr91-92/english/lc_sitg/hansard/h920624.pdf|date= 1992-06-24|house=Legislative Council |speaker= [[Peter Lai Hing-ling|Peter Lai]]|position=Secretary for Constitutional Affairs}}</ref> and specifically, that CEDAW and anti-discrimination laws would harm Hong Kong's [[laissez-faire]] market and traditional Chinese customs that treat men and women differently.<ref name="Petersen&Samuels2002"/>{{rp|22–23}}


In the 1990s, the Hong Kong government was increasingly pressured to address equality and human rights. During the [[1991 Hong Kong legislative election|1991 legislative election]], which produced Hong Kong's first directly elected lawmakers, women's groups pressed candidates into acknowledging discrimination against women.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|363}} As a result, the 1991 Legislative Council asserted more pressure on the executive than its predecessors.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|362}} In November 1991, Legislative Councillor [[Emily Lau]] helped form an ad-hoc group in the legislature to study women's issues.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|363}} In March 1992, an inter-departmental working group on sex discrimination was created to advise the government on whether to extend CEDAW to Hong Kong.<ref name="hansard19920624"/> On 16 December 1992, Lau introduced a bill that urged the Hong Kong government to support the application of CEDAW.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|363–364}} The government opposed the bill, but it was nonetheless passed after all but the three ex-officio members voted in its favour.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|365}}
In the 1990s, the Hong Kong government was increasingly pressured to address equality and human rights. During the [[1991 Hong Kong legislative election|1991 legislative election]], which produced Hong Kong's first directly elected lawmakers, women's groups pressed candidates into acknowledging discrimination against women.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|363}} As a result, the 1991 Legislative Council asserted more pressure on the executive than its predecessors.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|362}} In November 1991, Legislative Councillor [[Emily Lau]] helped form an ad-hoc group in the legislature to study women's issues.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|363}} In March 1992, an inter-departmental working group on sex discrimination was created to advise the government on whether to extend CEDAW to Hong Kong.<ref name="hansard19920624"/> On 16 December 1992, Lau introduced a bill that urged the Hong Kong government to support the application of CEDAW.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|363–364}} The government opposed the bill, but it was nonetheless passed after all but the three ex-officio members voted in its favour.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|365}}
Line 76: Line 76:


=== Founding ===
=== Founding ===
[[Anna Wu]], then an appointed Legislative Councillor, tabled the Equal Opportunities Bill 1994,<ref name="Kapai2009">{{cite journal |last1=Kapai |first1=Puja |title=The Hong Kong Equal Opportunities Commission: Calling for a New Avatar |journal=Hong Kong Law Journal |date=2009 |volume=39 |issue=2 |pages=339–359|url=https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/124224/3/content.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|345}} a few years before to the [[handover of Hong Kong]], which Wu believed was a window of opportunity to expand equality rights.<ref name="Ngo2016">{{cite news |last1=Ngo |first1=Jennifer |title=Twenty years on: Victories and setbacks for Hong Kong's Equal Opportunities Commission |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1955712/twenty-years-victories-and-setbacks-hong-kongs-equal |access-date=2019-04-16 |work=South China Morning Post |date=2016-05-26 }}</ref> The bill sought to outlaw discrimination on grounds including sex, marital status, pregnancy, [[Sexual orientation|sexuality]], race, age, disability, and political and religious conviction.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|372}} If passed, it would also prohibit employers from placing advertisements that specify the sex and age of jobseekers.<ref name="So1994"/> As a [[private member's bill]] that did not affect government revenue, the Equal Opportunities Bill was tabled without government consent.<ref name="Ngo2016"/>
[[Anna Wu]], an appointed Legislative Councillor, tabled the Equal Opportunities Bill in 1994.<ref name="Kapai2009">{{cite journal |last1=Kapai |first1=Puja |title=The Hong Kong Equal Opportunities Commission: Calling for a New Avatar |journal=Hong Kong Law Journal |date=2009 |volume=39 |issue=2 |pages=339–359|url=https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/124224/3/content.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|345}} She believed that tabling the bill three years before the [[handover of Hong Kong]] was a window of opportunity to expand equality rights.<ref name="Ngo2016">{{cite news |last1=Ngo |first1=Jennifer |title=Twenty years on: Victories and setbacks for Hong Kong's Equal Opportunities Commission |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1955712/twenty-years-victories-and-setbacks-hong-kongs-equal |access-date=2019-04-16 |work=South China Morning Post |date=2016-05-26 }}</ref> The bill sought to outlaw discrimination on grounds including sex, marital status, pregnancy, [[Sexual orientation|sexuality]], race, age, disability, and political and religious conviction.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|372}} If passed, it would also prohibit employers from placing advertisements that specify the sex and age of jobseekers.<ref name="So1994"/> As a [[private member's bill]] that did not affect government revenue, the Equal Opportunities Bill was tabled without government consent.<ref name="Ngo2016"/>


Wu also put forth the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission Bill, which would create a [[statutory body]] for equality and a [[tribunal]] to adjudicate claims under the Equal Opportunities Bill.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|372}} The Equal Opportunities Tribunal could cost 800 million [[Hong Kong dollars]] to set up.<ref name="So1994">{{cite news |last1=So |first1=Lai-fun |title=Stalling tactics hit rights bills|work=South China Morning Post |date=1994-03-28}}</ref>
Wu also put forth the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission Bill, which would create a [[statutory body]] for equality and a [[tribunal]] to adjudicate claims under the Equal Opportunities Bill.<ref name="Petersen1996"/>{{rp|372}} The Equal Opportunities Tribunal could cost 800 million [[Hong Kong dollars]] to set up.<ref name="So1994">{{cite news |last1=So |first1=Lai-fun |title=Stalling tactics hit rights bills|work=South China Morning Post |date=1994-03-28}}</ref>


The proposed equality institutions were also opposed by China. Legal scholar Wu Jianfan of [[Peking University]] and Hong Kong pro-Beijing politician [[Raymond Wu (politician)|Raymond Wu]] said the bill would violate the [[Hong Kong Basic Law|Basic Law]], which was to become Hong Kong's mini-constitution following the United Kingdom's transfer of the city's sovereignty to China in 1997.<ref name="Chan1994">{{cite news |last1=Chan |first1=Quinton |title=Human rights bill 'breaches Basic Law' |work=South China Morning Post |date=1994-02-20|page=2}}</ref> Wu Jianfan said the tribunal was not mentioned in the Basic Law and therefore could not exist in Hong Kong under Chinese rule.<ref name="Chan1994"/>
The proposed equality institutions were also opposed by China. Legal scholar Wu Jianfan of [[Peking University]] and Hong Kong pro-Beijing politician [[Raymond Wu (politician)|Raymond Wu]] said the bill would violate the [[Hong Kong Basic Law|Basic Law]], which was to become Hong Kong's mini-constitution after the city's sovereignty is transferred to China in 1997.<ref name="Chan1994">{{cite news |last1=Chan |first1=Quinton |title=Human rights bill 'breaches Basic Law' |work=South China Morning Post |date=1994-02-20|page=2}}</ref> Wu Jianfan said the tribunal was not mentioned in the Basic Law and therefore could not exist in Hong Kong under Chinese rule.<ref name="Chan1994"/>


The Hong Kong government rejected the bills in June 1994 and instead tabled two other bills with a narrower scope that separately banned sex and disability discrimination.<ref name="SCMP19940602">{{cite news |title=Human rights verdict lashed |work=South China Morning Post |date=1994-06-02|page=6}}</ref> The bill on sex discrimination also sought to set up an equal opportunities commission instead of the independent human rights commission Anna Wu had proposed.<ref name="SCMP19940602"/> Wu and equality groups criticised the decision, saying that the equal opportunities commission, unlike the human rights commission, could only monitor and settle discrimination complaints, and did not have the legal power to prosecute people who violated anti-discrimination laws.<ref name="dorosario1994"/>
The Hong Kong government rejected the bills in June 1994 and instead tabled two other bills with a narrower scope that separately banned sex and disability discrimination.<ref name="SCMP19940602">{{cite news |title=Human rights verdict lashed |work=South China Morning Post |date=1994-06-02|page=6}}</ref> The bill on sex discrimination also sought to set up an equal opportunities commission instead of the independent human rights commission Anna Wu had proposed.<ref name="SCMP19940602"/> Wu and equality groups criticised the decision, saying that an equal opportunities commission, unlike a human rights commission, could only monitor and settle discrimination complaints and lacked the legal power to prosecute people who violated anti-discrimination laws.<ref name="dorosario1994"/>


Despite government opposition, Wu's Equal Opportunities Bill proceeded to different stages at the Legislative Council. Public hearings on the bill were held in 1995. In April 1995, Wu decided to break the bill into three, each addressing different areas of discrimination to ensure that some parts of it could pass before the legislative session ends.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wong |first1=Lok |title=Equal rights bill split up to meet Legco timetable |work=South China Morning Post |date=1995-04-22|page=4}}</ref>
Despite government opposition, Wu's Equal Opportunities Bill proceeded to different stages at the Legislative Council. Public hearings on the bill were held in 1995. In April 1995, Wu decided to break the bill into three, each addressing different areas of discrimination to ensure that some parts of it could pass before the legislative session ended.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wong |first1=Lok |title=Equal rights bill split up to meet Legco timetable |work=South China Morning Post |date=1995-04-22|page=4}}</ref>


On the other hand, the government on 27 May 1995 pushed to resume [[second reading]] of its Sex Discrimination Bill against the wishes of the bills committee and before amendments were finalised.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wong |first1=Lok |title=Rushed bill meets protests |work=South China Morning Post |date=1995-05-27|page=4}}</ref> The Sex Discrimination Bill was passed at 1:25{{nbsp}}am on 29 June 1995 after a nine-hour debate, during which the government and pro-business legislators stopped attempts by liberal lawmakers to expand the bill's scope by removing the [[Small House Policy]] exemption and shortening the grace period for small businesses.<ref name="SCMP19950629">{{cite news |title=Equality bill passed as changes founder |work=South China Morning Post |date=1995-06-29|page=7}}</ref>
On the other hand, the government on 27 May 1995 pushed to resume [[second reading]] of its Sex Discrimination Bill against the wishes of the bills committee and before amendments were finalised.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wong |first1=Lok |title=Rushed bill meets protests |work=South China Morning Post |date=1995-05-27|page=4}}</ref> The Sex Discrimination Bill was passed at 1:25{{nbsp}}am on 29 June 1995 after a nine-hour debate, during which the government and pro-business legislators stopped attempts by liberal lawmakers to expand the bill's scope by removing the [[Small House Policy]] exemption and shortening the grace period for small businesses.<ref name="SCMP19950629">{{cite news |title=Equality bill passed as changes founder |work=South China Morning Post |date=1995-06-29|page=7}}</ref>
Line 96: Line 96:


=== Later years ===
=== Later years ===
Michael Wong, a former judge in the Court of Appeals, replaced Wu from 1 August 2003. Supporters of Wu said her contract was not renewed because she had criticised the government as EOC chairperson.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lord |first1=Paris |title=Equality body chief 'silenced by Tung' |work=The Standard |date=2003-07-03}}</ref>
Michael Wong, a former judge in the Court of Appeals, replaced Wu on 1 August 2003. Supporters of Wu said her contract was not renewed because she had criticised the government as EOC chairperson.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lord |first1=Paris |title=Equality body chief 'silenced by Tung' |work=The Standard |date=2003-07-03}}</ref>


During his three-month tenure, Wong dismissed Patrick Yu before he took up the post as the commission's director of operations because Yu had written in the ''South China Morning Post'' that Hong Kong should enact a race discrimination law. Wong had said that making those comments were inappropriate.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shamdasani |first1=Ravina |title=EOC finally settles up with sacked employee |url=https://www.scmp.com/article/457299/eoc-finally-settles-sacked-employee |access-date=2021-04-01 |work=South China Morning Post |date= 2004-05-28 |language=en}}</ref> Before being appointed to the post by Anna Wu, Yu was the executive director of the Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities.
During his three-month tenure, Wong dismissed Patrick Yu before he took up the post as the commission's director of operations because Yu had written in the ''South China Morning Post'' that Hong Kong should enact a race discrimination law. Wong had said that making those comments were inappropriate.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shamdasani |first1=Ravina |title=EOC finally settles up with sacked employee |url=https://www.scmp.com/article/457299/eoc-finally-settles-sacked-employee |access-date=2021-04-01 |work=South China Morning Post |date= 2004-05-28 |language=en}}</ref> Before being appointed to the post by Anna Wu, Yu was the executive director of the Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities.


Yu's dismissal and allegations that he had accepted free air tickets as a judge caused 60 civil and human rights NGOs to public ask Wong to resign.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shamdasani |first1=Ravina |title=60 NGOs unite to demand EOC chairman's head |url=https://www.scmp.com/article/433021/60-ngos-unite-demand-eoc-chairmans-head |access-date=2023-08-04 |work=South China Morning Post |date=2003-11-01 |language=en}}</ref> Wong decided to resign on 6 November, because of media attacks against his family and an unsupportive government during the scandals.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lee |first1=Klaudia |last2=Shamdasani |first2=Ravina |title='Persecuted' EOC chairman resigns |url=https://www.scmp.com/article/433843/persecuted-eoc-chairman-resigns |access-date=4 August 2023 |work=South China Morning Post |date=2003-11-07 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=H.K. equal rights commission chief quits amid scandal |agency=Kyodo News |date=2003-11-06}}</ref>
Yu's dismissal and allegations that he had accepted free air tickets as a judge caused 60 civil and human rights NGOs to publicly ask Wong to resign.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shamdasani |first1=Ravina |title=60 NGOs unite to demand EOC chairman's head |url=https://www.scmp.com/article/433021/60-ngos-unite-demand-eoc-chairmans-head |access-date=2023-08-04 |work=South China Morning Post |date=2003-11-01 |language=en}}</ref> Wong decided to resign on 6 November, because of media attacks against his family and an unsupportive government during the scandals.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lee |first1=Klaudia |last2=Shamdasani |first2=Ravina |title='Persecuted' EOC chairman resigns |url=https://www.scmp.com/article/433843/persecuted-eoc-chairman-resigns |access-date=4 August 2023 |work=South China Morning Post |date=2003-11-07 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=H.K. equal rights commission chief quits amid scandal |agency=Kyodo News |date=2003-11-06}}</ref>


The [[Independent Commission Against Corruption (Hong Kong)|Independent Commission Against Corruption]] investigated Wong on suspicion of bribery after complaints were filed that he had used false documents to apply for government reimbursement of air tickets valued at {{HKD|171,666}} for him and his family.<ref>{{cite press release |last= |first= |date= 2006-01-25|title= Statement by the Director of Public Prosecutions on the case of Mr Michael Wong Kin-chow |url= http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200601/25/P200601250089.htm|location= |publisher= Hong Kong Government|access-date=2017-12-06}}</ref> The prosecutor decided not to file charges against Wong due to insufficient evidence.<ref>{{cite report|date=2006-10-20|access-date=2017-12-06|author=Legislative Council Secretariat|publisher=Legislative Council of Hong Kong|title=Background brief for the meeting on 23 October 2006: The case of Mr Michael WONG Kin-chow|url=http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06-07/english/panels/ajls/papers/aj1023cb2-141-1e.pdf}}</ref>
The [[Independent Commission Against Corruption (Hong Kong)|Independent Commission Against Corruption]] investigated Wong on suspicion of bribery after complaints were filed that he had used false documents to apply for government reimbursement of air tickets valued at {{HKD|171,666}} for him and his family.<ref>{{cite press release |last= |first= |date= 2006-01-25|title= Statement by the Director of Public Prosecutions on the case of Mr Michael Wong Kin-chow |url= http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200601/25/P200601250089.htm|location= |publisher= Hong Kong Government|access-date=2017-12-06}}</ref> The prosecutor decided not to file charges against Wong due to insufficient evidence.<ref>{{cite report|date=2006-10-20|access-date=2017-12-06|author=Legislative Council Secretariat|publisher=Legislative Council of Hong Kong|title=Background brief for the meeting on 23 October 2006: The case of Mr Michael WONG Kin-chow|url=http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06-07/english/panels/ajls/papers/aj1023cb2-141-1e.pdf}}</ref>


Alfred Chan replaced [[York Chow]] as chairperson on 11 April 2016. Less than two months after Chan's appointment, some legislators raised concerns over Chan's comments that a law to protect [[sexual minorities]] from discrimination and his conflation of [[gender identity]] and [[sexual orientation]].<ref>{{cite press release |last= |first= |date= 2016-06-01|title=LCQ2: Appointment of Chairperson of Equal Opportunities Commission|url= http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201606/01/P201606010389.htm|location=Hong Kong |publisher= Hong Kong Government|access-date=2017-12-06}}</ref> Women groups also called Chan to resign after he said women were not concerned about [[equal pay]] and women were driven to [[elderly care]] because they are more attentive than men. The EOC said Chan's remarks intended to highlight inequality but did not communicate the point clearly.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Ellie |title=Equality chief faces calls to resign after making 'sexist' remarks on International Women's Day |url=https://hongkongfp.com/2017/03/14/equality-chief-faces-calls-resign-making-sexist-remarks-international-womens-day/ |access-date=2023-08-04 |work=Hong Kong Free Press |date=2017-03-14}}</ref>
Alfred Chan replaced [[York Chow]] as chairperson on 11 April 2016. Less than two months after Chan's appointment, some legislators raised concerns over Chan's comments that a law to protect [[sexual minorities]] from discrimination and his conflation of [[gender identity]] and [[sexual orientation]].<ref>{{cite press release |last= |first= |date= 2016-06-01|title=LCQ2: Appointment of Chairperson of Equal Opportunities Commission|url= http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201606/01/P201606010389.htm|location=Hong Kong |publisher= Hong Kong Government|access-date=2017-12-06}}</ref> Women groups also called for Chan to resign after he said women were not concerned about [[equal pay]] and women were driven to [[elderly care]] because they are more attentive than men. The EOC said Chan's remarks intended to highlight inequality but did not communicate the point clearly.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Ellie |title=Equality chief faces calls to resign after making 'sexist' remarks on International Women's Day |url=https://hongkongfp.com/2017/03/14/equality-chief-faces-calls-resign-making-sexist-remarks-international-womens-day/ |access-date=2023-08-04 |work=Hong Kong Free Press |date=2017-03-14}}</ref>


Ricky Chu became the EOC's eighth chairperson on 11 April 2019.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kang-chung |title=New chief of Hong Kong's Equal Opportunities Commission warns against 'hastily made law' to protect sexual minority rights |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3005784/new-chief-hong-kongs-equal-opportunities-commission-warns |access-date=16 April 2019 |work=South China Morning Post |date=12 April 2019}}</ref>
Ricky Chu became the EOC's eighth chairperson on 11 April 2019.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kang-chung |title=New chief of Hong Kong's Equal Opportunities Commission warns against 'hastily made law' to protect sexual minority rights |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3005784/new-chief-hong-kongs-equal-opportunities-commission-warns |access-date=16 April 2019 |work=South China Morning Post |date=12 April 2019}}</ref>

Revision as of 09:13, 19 November 2023

Equal Opportunities Commission
平等機會委員會
AbbreviationEOC
Formation20 May 1996; 28 years ago (1996-05-20)[1]
TypeStatutory body
Legal statusActive
Headquarters16/F, 41 Heung Yip Road, Wong Chuk Hang
Location
ServicesInvestigation
Advocacy
Advisory
FieldsHuman rights
Chairperson
Ricky Chu Man-kin
Cecilia Chan Lai-wan

Andy Chiu Man-chung
Susanne Choi Yuk-ping
Holden Chow Ho-ding
Mohan Datwani
Maisy Ho Chiu-ha
Maggie Koong May-kay
Elizabeth Law
Trisha Leahy
Joseph Lee Kok-long
Juan Leung Chung-yan
Shirley Marie Therese Loo
Henry Shie Wai-hung
Rizwan Ullah

Yu Chui-yee
Expenses (2018)HK$125,967,377[2]
WebsiteOfficial website
Equal Opportunities Commission
Traditional Chinese平等機會委員會
Transcriptions
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationPìhng dáng gēi wuih wái yùhn wuih
JyutpingPing4 dang2 gei1 wui6 wai2 jyun4 wui6*2

The Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) is a public body in Hong Kong that enforces anti-discrimination laws and promotes equality. It was created in 1996 as the city's first semi-governmental body focused on anti-discrimination.

History

Background

In 1994, the median wage of women in Hong Kong was about a third lower than that of men, and classified advertisements often limited senior positions in the private sector to men and low-paying jobs only sought female applicants.[3]

The Hong Kong government has had a history of opposing anti-discrimination legislation.[4]: 337  When the United Kingdom ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) in 1986, the treaty also applied to other British dependent territories.[5]: 22  However, the Hong Kong government requested CEDAW to not be extended to the city until it could assess its effect.[6]: 9  It said that ratifying CEDAW might cause "significant economic and social consequences",[7] and specifically, that CEDAW and anti-discrimination laws would harm Hong Kong's laissez-faire market and traditional Chinese customs that treat men and women differently.[5]: 22–23 

In the 1990s, the Hong Kong government was increasingly pressured to address equality and human rights. During the 1991 legislative election, which produced Hong Kong's first directly elected lawmakers, women's groups pressed candidates into acknowledging discrimination against women.[4]: 363  As a result, the 1991 Legislative Council asserted more pressure on the executive than its predecessors.[4]: 362  In November 1991, Legislative Councillor Emily Lau helped form an ad-hoc group in the legislature to study women's issues.[4]: 363  In March 1992, an inter-departmental working group on sex discrimination was created to advise the government on whether to extend CEDAW to Hong Kong.[7] On 16 December 1992, Lau introduced a bill that urged the Hong Kong government to support the application of CEDAW.[4]: 363–364  The government opposed the bill, but it was nonetheless passed after all but the three ex-officio members voted in its favour.[4]: 365 

Emily Lau at a demonstration in 2014.

The Hong Kong government did not act on the bill immediately and maintained that the public must be consulted first.[6]: 9  After nine months of preparation, it issued the Green Paper on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men in August 1993.[4]: 366  Legal scholar Carole Petersen said the government had understated discrimination against women in the green paper.[4]: 366–368  By the end of the public consultation, Secretary for Home Affairs Michael Suen said that "[it] would be difficult for [the government] to come up with credible arguments not to extend CEDAW".[8]

Founding

Anna Wu, an appointed Legislative Councillor, tabled the Equal Opportunities Bill in 1994.[9]: 345  She believed that tabling the bill three years before the handover of Hong Kong was a window of opportunity to expand equality rights.[1] The bill sought to outlaw discrimination on grounds including sex, marital status, pregnancy, sexuality, race, age, disability, and political and religious conviction.[4]: 372  If passed, it would also prohibit employers from placing advertisements that specify the sex and age of jobseekers.[10] As a private member's bill that did not affect government revenue, the Equal Opportunities Bill was tabled without government consent.[1]

Wu also put forth the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission Bill, which would create a statutory body for equality and a tribunal to adjudicate claims under the Equal Opportunities Bill.[4]: 372  The Equal Opportunities Tribunal could cost 800 million Hong Kong dollars to set up.[10]

The proposed equality institutions were also opposed by China. Legal scholar Wu Jianfan of Peking University and Hong Kong pro-Beijing politician Raymond Wu said the bill would violate the Basic Law, which was to become Hong Kong's mini-constitution after the city's sovereignty is transferred to China in 1997.[11] Wu Jianfan said the tribunal was not mentioned in the Basic Law and therefore could not exist in Hong Kong under Chinese rule.[11]

The Hong Kong government rejected the bills in June 1994 and instead tabled two other bills with a narrower scope that separately banned sex and disability discrimination.[12] The bill on sex discrimination also sought to set up an equal opportunities commission instead of the independent human rights commission Anna Wu had proposed.[12] Wu and equality groups criticised the decision, saying that an equal opportunities commission, unlike a human rights commission, could only monitor and settle discrimination complaints and lacked the legal power to prosecute people who violated anti-discrimination laws.[3]

Despite government opposition, Wu's Equal Opportunities Bill proceeded to different stages at the Legislative Council. Public hearings on the bill were held in 1995. In April 1995, Wu decided to break the bill into three, each addressing different areas of discrimination to ensure that some parts of it could pass before the legislative session ended.[13]

On the other hand, the government on 27 May 1995 pushed to resume second reading of its Sex Discrimination Bill against the wishes of the bills committee and before amendments were finalised.[14] The Sex Discrimination Bill was passed at 1:25 am on 29 June 1995 after a nine-hour debate, during which the government and pro-business legislators stopped attempts by liberal lawmakers to expand the bill's scope by removing the Small House Policy exemption and shortening the grace period for small businesses.[15]

The EOC was established on 20 May 1996 with Fanny M. Cheung as its first chairperson,[16][17] after candidates such as Elsie Leung turned down the offer that included a salary of $157,250 and a monthly cash bonus of $70,320.[18]

Early history

The EOC brought its first sex discrimination case to court in 1997. It sued Apple Daily, which placed an advertisement for "pretty female reporters" to report on balls and social events.[19] The District Court judge ruled in favour of Apple Daily because the language used in the advertisement in the newspaper's celebrity section was vague and therefore did not violate the Sex Discrimination Ordinance.[19] The Court of Appeal overturned the decision, saying that allowing the ambiguous language would permit employers to advertise freely for only one gender.[20] The court did not impose penalties, and the EOC said it was more important to clarify the law than to punish the newspaper.[20]

On 1 August 1999, Cheung was replaced as chairperson by Anna Wu, who had been a member of the commission since its founding.[21]

Later years

Michael Wong, a former judge in the Court of Appeals, replaced Wu on 1 August 2003. Supporters of Wu said her contract was not renewed because she had criticised the government as EOC chairperson.[22]

During his three-month tenure, Wong dismissed Patrick Yu before he took up the post as the commission's director of operations because Yu had written in the South China Morning Post that Hong Kong should enact a race discrimination law. Wong had said that making those comments were inappropriate.[23] Before being appointed to the post by Anna Wu, Yu was the executive director of the Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities.

Yu's dismissal and allegations that he had accepted free air tickets as a judge caused 60 civil and human rights NGOs to publicly ask Wong to resign.[24] Wong decided to resign on 6 November, because of media attacks against his family and an unsupportive government during the scandals.[25][26]

The Independent Commission Against Corruption investigated Wong on suspicion of bribery after complaints were filed that he had used false documents to apply for government reimbursement of air tickets valued at HK$171,666 for him and his family.[27] The prosecutor decided not to file charges against Wong due to insufficient evidence.[28]

Alfred Chan replaced York Chow as chairperson on 11 April 2016. Less than two months after Chan's appointment, some legislators raised concerns over Chan's comments that a law to protect sexual minorities from discrimination and his conflation of gender identity and sexual orientation.[29] Women groups also called for Chan to resign after he said women were not concerned about equal pay and women were driven to elderly care because they are more attentive than men. The EOC said Chan's remarks intended to highlight inequality but did not communicate the point clearly.[30]

Ricky Chu became the EOC's eighth chairperson on 11 April 2019.[31]

List of chairpersons

Name Photo Tenure Notes
Fanny M. Cheung

張妙清

1996 - 1999 Founding chairperson.[32]
Anna Wu
胡紅玉 		1 August 1999 - 31 July 2003
Michael Wong Kin-chow
王見秋 		1 August 2003 - 6 November 2003
Patricia Chu Yeung Pak-yu
朱楊珀瑜 		15 December 2003 - 15 December 2004
Raymond Tang Yee-Bong
鄧爾邦 		12 January 2005 – 28 February 2010
Lam Woon-kwong
林煥光 		1 February 2010 – 31 March 2013
Dr. York Chow Yat-Ngok
周一嶽 		1 April 2013 – 31 March 2016
Alfred Chan Cheung-ming
陳章明 		11 April 2016 – 10 April 2019
Ricky Chu Man-kin
朱敏健 		11 April 2019 – Present

Powers and functions

The EOC's main function is to implement the four anti-discrimination ordinances in Hong Kong, namely the Sex Discrimination Ordinance, the Disability Discrimination Ordinance, the Family Status Discrimination Ordinance and the Race Discrimination Ordinance. It aims to promote equal opportunities by receiving complaints and investigating alleged cases of discrimination.[9]: 341  If potential discrimination is found in cases, the EOC can provide legal assistance, including representation in court, to the person making the complaint.[33] It also conducts research and offers public educational programmes to promote equal opportunities.[9]: 341–342 

An advertisement of the EOC on a tram

The EOC also has the power to review whether the anti-discrimination ordinances are effective and propose changes.[9]: 342  The EOC started its first anti-discrimination law review in 2014 and published its final report in 2016.[1]


See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Ngo, Jennifer (26 May 2016). "Twenty years on: Victories and setbacks for Hong Kong's Equal Opportunities Commission". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  2. ^ Equal Opportunities Commission (2018). Transformation for a Better Future: 2017/18 Annual Report (PDF) (Report). Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  3. ^ a b do Rosario, Louise; Harnischfeger, Uta (7 July 1994). "Double Standards: Activists say colony has far to go on women's rights". Far Eastern Economic Review. Hong Kong. p. 27.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Petersen, Carole J. (1996). "Equality as a Human Right: The Development of Anti-Discrimination Law in Hong Kong" (PDF). Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 34: 335–388.
  5. ^ a b Petersen, Carole J.; Samuels, Harriet (2002). "The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women: A Comparison of Its Implementation and the Role of Non-Governmental Organisations in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong". Hastings International and Comparative Law Review. 26 (1): 1–50.
  6. ^ a b Petersen, Carole J. (1994). "The Green Paper on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men: An Exercise in Consultation or Evasion?" (PDF). Hong Kong Law Journal. 24 (1): 8–16.
  7. ^ a b Peter Lai, Secretary for Constitutional Affairs (24 June 1992). "Discrimination Against Women" (PDF). Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Hong Kong: Legislative Council.
  8. ^ Yue, S. Y. (31 December 1993). "UN Convention to Be Adopted". South China Morning Post. p. 2.
  9. ^ a b c d Kapai, Puja (2009). "The Hong Kong Equal Opportunities Commission: Calling for a New Avatar" (PDF). Hong Kong Law Journal. 39 (2): 339–359.
  10. ^ a b So, Lai-fun (28 March 1994). "Stalling tactics hit rights bills". South China Morning Post.
  11. ^ a b Chan, Quinton (20 February 1994). "Human rights bill 'breaches Basic Law'". South China Morning Post. p. 2.
  12. ^ a b "Human rights verdict lashed". South China Morning Post. 2 June 1994. p. 6.
  13. ^ Wong, Lok (22 April 1995). "Equal rights bill split up to meet Legco timetable". South China Morning Post. p. 4.
  14. ^ Wong, Lok (27 May 1995). "Rushed bill meets protests". South China Morning Post. p. 4.
  15. ^ "Equality bill passed as changes founder". South China Morning Post. 29 June 1995. p. 7.
  16. ^ Moir, Jane (21 May 1996). "Equality chief pressed to take up trousers case". South China Morning Post.
  17. ^ "Fanny M. Cheung: Award for Distinguished Contributions to the International Advancement of Psychology". American Psychologist. 67 (8): 719–721. 2012. doi:10.1037/a0030605. ISSN 1935-990X. PMID 23163472.
  18. ^ Moir, Jane (9 February 1996). "$225,000 for equal rights job". South China Morning Post. p. 3.
  19. ^ a b Ho, Lydia (1 April 1998). "Judge dismisses sex discrimination case". Hongkong Standard. Hong Kong.
  20. ^ a b Parsons, Charlotte (28 November 1998). "Beautiful reporters ad broke bias law". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
  21. ^ So, Sanna (23 July 1999). "Harder equality probes vowed". Hongkong Standard.
  22. ^ Lord, Paris (3 July 2003). "Equality body chief 'silenced by Tung'". The Standard.
  23. ^ Shamdasani, Ravina (28 May 2004). "EOC finally settles up with sacked employee". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
  24. ^ Shamdasani, Ravina (1 November 2003). "60 NGOs unite to demand EOC chairman's head". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
  25. ^ Lee, Klaudia; Shamdasani, Ravina (7 November 2003). "'Persecuted' EOC chairman resigns". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
  26. ^ "H.K. equal rights commission chief quits amid scandal". Kyodo News. 6 November 2003.
  27. ^ "Statement by the Director of Public Prosecutions on the case of Mr Michael Wong Kin-chow" (Press release). Hong Kong Government. 25 January 2006. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  28. ^ Legislative Council Secretariat (20 October 2006). Background brief for the meeting on 23 October 2006: The case of Mr Michael WONG Kin-chow (PDF) (Report). Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  29. ^ "LCQ2: Appointment of Chairperson of Equal Opportunities Commission" (Press release). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government. 1 June 2016. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  30. ^ Ng, Ellie (14 March 2017). "Equality chief faces calls to resign after making 'sexist' remarks on International Women's Day". Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
  31. ^ Ng, Kang-chung (12 April 2019). "New chief of Hong Kong's Equal Opportunities Commission warns against 'hastily made law' to protect sexual minority rights". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  32. ^ "THE PIONEERS – BLAZING THE TRAIL: Past Chairpersons of EOC". Equal Opportunities Commission. Retrieved 27 November 2019.
  33. ^ "Guide to Discrimination Law in Hong Kong" (PDF). Mayer Brown. June 2016. p. 16.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Equal_Opportunities_Commission_(Hong_Kong)&oldid=1185841192"