User:Wound theology/soka: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From the late 1960s to the 1970s, Soka Gakkai and Komeito party members pressured authors, distributors, agents, and bookstores to prevent the publication of criticism against Soka Gakkai. The number of works critical of Soka Gakkai increased after the formation of the Komeito, such as Fujiwara Hirotatsu's 1969 Slashing Soka Gakkai. <ref>島田裕巳 2004, pp. 95–96.</rev> Ikeda apologized in 1970 for his actions, claiming that he had no intention of disrupting the freedom of speech or seperation of church and state as outlined in the Japanese constitution. However, he was later criticized for his recollection of the events in the New Human Revolution.{{em|[[Shūkan Shinchō]]}} and [[Tetsuzo Fuwa]] criticized his description of the events as a revision of his "deep remorse."<ref>「歴史改竄で故人藤原弘達まで鞭打つ創価学会」（『週刊新潮』 2006年4月13日号）</ref><ref>" Ask Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai: Was his 'deep remorse' 31 years ago a lie to deceive the world?" Tetsuzo Fuwa (Akahata, July 22, 2001)</ref> |
From the late 1960s to the 1970s, Soka Gakkai and Komeito party members pressured authors, distributors, agents, and bookstores to prevent the publication of criticism against Soka Gakkai. The number of works critical of Soka Gakkai increased after the formation of the Komeito, such as Fujiwara Hirotatsu's 1969 Slashing Soka Gakkai. <ref>島田裕巳 2004, pp. 95–96.</rev> Ikeda apologized in 1970 for his actions, claiming that he had no intention of disrupting the freedom of speech or seperation of church and state as outlined in the Japanese constitution. However, he was later criticized for his recollection of the events in the New Human Revolution.{{em|[[Shūkan Shinchō]]}} and [[Tetsuzo Fuwa]] criticized his description of the events as a revision of his "deep remorse."<ref>「歴史改竄で故人藤原弘達まで鞭打つ創価学会」（『週刊新潮』 2006年4月13日号）</ref><ref>" Ask Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai: Was his 'deep remorse' 31 years ago a lie to deceive the world?" Tetsuzo Fuwa (Akahata, July 22, 2001)</ref> |
||
Soka Gakkai has been found liable by Japanese courts for election violations,<ref>山崎正友著『懺悔の告発』より</ref> |
Soka Gakkai has been found liable by Japanese courts for election violations,<ref>山崎正友著『懺悔の告発』より</ref> {{interlanguage link|コーヒーカップ裁判|ja}} libel against rival groups,<ref>1998年10月7日、最高裁第3小法廷判決文参照</ref> [[ja:宮本顕治宅盗聴事件|wiretapping homes of political rivals]], and ja:手帳強奪事件 [[theft of personal items from ex-members]],<ref>2009年3月27日東京高裁判決文参照</ref><ref>週刊現代 2009年4月18日号『特集・創価学会・公明党が指令した「手帳強奪」事件の真相』 | Weekly Gendai, April 18, 2009 issue: "Special feature: The truth behind the "notebook robbery" incident ordered by the Soka Gakkai and Komeito Party"</ref> |
||
The French National Assembly and the Belgian Federal Parliment have both listed Soka Gakkai as a cult.<ref>Toshiaki Furukawa , "Soka Gakkai as a Cult = Daisaku Ikeda " ( Daisan Shokan, November 2000) ISBN 978-4807400171</ref><ref>The Parliamentary Hearing presents a policy aimed at combating illegal cult practices and the danger they pose to society and to people, especially minors. Report of the Commission under the name of MM. Duquesne and Willems. Part II. Report ( PDF ) -- bilingual report in French and Flemish, retrieved 2007-01-08 .</ref> |
The French National Assembly and the Belgian Federal Parliment have both listed Soka Gakkai as a cult.<ref>Toshiaki Furukawa , "Soka Gakkai as a Cult = Daisaku Ikeda " ( Daisan Shokan, November 2000) ISBN 978-4807400171</ref><ref>The Parliamentary Hearing presents a policy aimed at combating illegal cult practices and the danger they pose to society and to people, especially minors. Report of the Commission under the name of MM. Duquesne and Willems. Part II. Report ( PDF ) -- bilingual report in French and Flemish, retrieved 2007-01-08 .</ref> |
||
Revision as of 09:16, 27 June 2024
From the late 1960s to the 1970s, Soka Gakkai and Komeito party members pressured authors, distributors, agents, and bookstores to prevent the publication of criticism against Soka Gakkai. The number of works critical of Soka Gakkai increased after the formation of the Komeito, such as Fujiwara Hirotatsu's 1969 Slashing Soka Gakkai. Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).[1]
Soka Gakkai has been found liable by Japanese courts for election violations,[2] コーヒーカップ裁判 libel against rival groups,[3] , and ja:手帳強奪事件 theft of personal items from ex-members,[4][5]
The French National Assembly and the Belgian Federal Parliment have both listed Soka Gakkai as a cult.[6][7]
References
- ^ " Ask Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai: Was his 'deep remorse' 31 years ago a lie to deceive the world?" Tetsuzo Fuwa (Akahata, July 22, 2001)
- ^ 山崎正友著『懺悔の告発』より
- ^ 1998年10月7日、最高裁第3小法廷判決文参照
- ^ 2009年3月27日東京高裁判決文参照
- ^ 週刊現代 2009年4月18日号『特集・創価学会・公明党が指令した「手帳強奪」事件の真相』 | Weekly Gendai, April 18, 2009 issue: "Special feature: The truth behind the "notebook robbery" incident ordered by the Soka Gakkai and Komeito Party"
- ^ Toshiaki Furukawa , "Soka Gakkai as a Cult = Daisaku Ikeda " ( Daisan Shokan, November 2000) ISBN 978-4807400171
- ^ The Parliamentary Hearing presents a policy aimed at combating illegal cult practices and the danger they pose to society and to people, especially minors. Report of the Commission under the name of MM. Duquesne and Willems. Part II. Report ( PDF ) -- bilingual report in French and Flemish, retrieved 2007-01-08 .