User talk:Wer900: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Wer900/Archive1. (BOT) |
Ozzie10aaaa (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hi we exchanged a couple of words on this subject, I was wondering what your opinion of the Exeter incident 1965 is,there were a lot of credible witnesses?thanks--[[User:Ozzie10aaaa|Ozzie10aaaa]] ([[User talk:Ozzie10aaaa|talk]]) 21:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi we exchanged a couple of words on this subject, I was wondering what your opinion of the Exeter incident 1965 is,there were a lot of credible witnesses?thanks--[[User:Ozzie10aaaa|Ozzie10aaaa]] ([[User talk:Ozzie10aaaa|talk]]) 21:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:It was likely a military aircraft operation. I looked over the Wikipedia page on it, and even though listed as "unexplained" because of multiple credible eyewitnesses, it almost certainly (99.9%) a military operation in my mind. The eyewitnesses did not have radar, telescopes, or any other equipment that would support their premature UFO determination.<p>A word of advice - there is no need for the excessive number of commas that come with your comments usually. [[User:Wer900|Wer900]] • <small>[[User talk:Wer900|talk]]</small> 02:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
:It was likely a military aircraft operation. I looked over the Wikipedia page on it, and even though listed as "unexplained" because of multiple credible eyewitnesses, it almost certainly (99.9%) a military operation in my mind. The eyewitnesses did not have radar, telescopes, or any other equipment that would support their premature UFO determination.<p>A word of advice - there is no need for the excessive number of commas that come with your comments usually. [[User:Wer900|Wer900]] • <small>[[User talk:Wer900|talk]]</small> 02:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
do you think area 51 has any ufo debris?--[[User:Ozzie10aaaa|Ozzie10aaaa]] ([[User talk:Ozzie10aaaa|talk]]) 20:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==An invitation for you!== |
==An invitation for you!== |
Revision as of 20:37, 11 January 2013
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
![]() |
---|
4 September 2024 |
|
UFO
Hi we exchanged a couple of words on this subject, I was wondering what your opinion of the Exeter incident 1965 is,there were a lot of credible witnesses?thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- It was likely a military aircraft operation. I looked over the Wikipedia page on it, and even though listed as "unexplained" because of multiple credible eyewitnesses, it almost certainly (99.9%) a military operation in my mind. The eyewitnesses did not have radar, telescopes, or any other equipment that would support their premature UFO determination.
A word of advice - there is no need for the excessive number of commas that come with your comments usually. Wer900 • talk 02:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
do you think area 51 has any ufo debris?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
An invitation for you!
![]() |
Hello, Wer900. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's article for improvement. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members. Happy editing! Northamerica1000(talk) 00:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks for joining! Northamerica1000(talk) 01:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Given the new Main Page featuring of TAFI I am sure this project will be successful. Wer900 • talk 02:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)