User talk:Wer900: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:37, 11 January 2013

Archives

0
1
1

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by .

UFO

Hi we exchanged a couple of words on this subject, I was wondering what your opinion of the Exeter incident 1965 is,there were a lot of credible witnesses?thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was likely a military aircraft operation. I looked over the Wikipedia page on it, and even though listed as "unexplained" because of multiple credible eyewitnesses, it almost certainly (99.9%) a military operation in my mind. The eyewitnesses did not have radar, telescopes, or any other equipment that would support their premature UFO determination.

A word of advice - there is no need for the excessive number of commas that come with your comments usually. Wer900 • talk 02:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

do you think area 51 has any ufo debris?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation for you!


	Hello, Wer900. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's article for improvement. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members. Happy editing! Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining! Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Given the new Main Page featuring of TAFI I am sure this project will be successful. Wer900 • talk 02:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Hi we exchanged a couple of words on this subject, I was wondering what your opinion of the Exeter incident 1965 is,there were a lot of credible witnesses?thanks--[[User:Ozzie10aaaa|Ozzie10aaaa]] ([[User talk:Ozzie10aaaa|talk]]) 21:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 :It was likely a military aircraft operation. I looked over the Wikipedia page on it, and even though listed as "unexplained" because of multiple credible eyewitnesses, it almost certainly (99.9%) a military operation in my mind. The eyewitnesses did not have radar, telescopes, or any other equipment that would support their premature UFO determination.<p>A word of advice - there is no need for the excessive number of commas that come with your comments usually. [[User:Wer900|Wer900]] • <small>[[User talk:Wer900|talk]]</small> 02:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
+do you think area 51 has any ufo debris?--[[User:Ozzie10aaaa|Ozzie10aaaa]] ([[User talk:Ozzie10aaaa|talk]]) 20:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 ==An invitation for you!==