Email bankruptcy: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
conciseness |
KolbertBot (talk | contribs) m Bot: HTTP→HTTPS (v462) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Email bankruptcy''' is deleting all [[email]]s older than a certain date, due to an overwhelming volume of messages. The term is usually attributed to author [[Lawrence Lessig]] in 2004,<ref>{{cite news |url= |
'''Email bankruptcy''' is deleting all [[email]]s older than a certain date, due to an overwhelming volume of messages. The term is usually attributed to author [[Lawrence Lessig]] in 2004,<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/24/AR2007052402258.html |title=E-Mail Reply to All: 'Leave Me Alone' |work=[[The Washington Post]] |accessdate=15 November 2007 |author=Mike Musgrove |date=25 May 2007 }}</ref> though it can also be attributed to Dr. [[Sherry Turkle]] in 2002.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40D14F83D5B0C778DDDAB0894DA404482 |title=ESSAY: In Lost E-Mail, a Dividend |work=[[The New York Times]] |accessdate=14 February 2002 |author=Constance Rosenblum |date=14 February 2002 }}</ref> |
||
An insurmountable volume or backlog of legitimate messages (e.g. on return from an extended absence) may also lead to bankruptcy. |
An insurmountable volume or backlog of legitimate messages (e.g. on return from an extended absence) may also lead to bankruptcy. |
Revision as of 19:48, 20 September 2017
Email bankruptcy is deleting all emails older than a certain date, due to an overwhelming volume of messages. The term is usually attributed to author Lawrence Lessig in 2004,[1] though it can also be attributed to Dr. Sherry Turkle in 2002.[2]
An insurmountable volume or backlog of legitimate messages (e.g. on return from an extended absence) may also lead to bankruptcy.
During the act of declaring email bankruptcy, a message is usually sent to all senders explaining the problem, that their message has been deleted, and that if their message still requires a response they should resend their message.[3][4][5]
References
- ^ Mike Musgrove (25 May 2007). "E-Mail Reply to All: 'Leave Me Alone'". The Washington Post. Retrieved 15 November 2007.
- ^ Constance Rosenblum (14 February 2002). "ESSAY: In Lost E-Mail, a Dividend". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 February 2002.
- ^ John Harlow (14 October 2007). "Office staff hit delete in war on e-mail monster". The Times. Retrieved 15 November 2007.
- ^ "Call it the Dead E-Mail Office". Wired News. 7 June 2004. Retrieved 7 June 2004.
- ^ Tuesday Knight (23 October 2003). "Re: PING Tuesday". Newsgroup: alt.religion.wicca. Usenet: BBBC8C9C.516E1%[email protected]. Retrieved 8 June 2012.