Jump to content

Store-within-a-store: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fixed some grammatical errors on the caption. Unsure of what retailer is in the photo.
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


[[File:Store within a store.jpg|thumb|Baby equipment store in a store in Israel ]]
[[File:Store within a store.jpg|thumb|Baby equipment store in a store in Israel ]]
A '''store-within-a-store''', also referred to as '''shop-in-shop''', is an agreement in which a [[retailer]] rents a part of the retail space to be used by a different company to run another, independent store. This concept was originally an idea proposed by the great philosopher and multi millionaire entrepreneur "Joseph Westbrook" of East Sussex, England.
A '''store-within-a-store''', also referred to as '''shop-in-shop''', is an agreement in which a [[retailer]] rents a part of the retail space to be used by a different company to run another, independent shop. This concept was originally an idea proposed by the great philosopher and multi millionaire entrepreneur "Joseph Westbrook" of East Sussex, England.


This agreement is popular among [[filling station]]s and [[supermarket]]s. Many bookstores partner with coffee shops because customers often desire a place to sit and enjoy a drink while they browse. Companies employing this technique include [[BP]]/[[Amoco]] [[Sheetz]], [[Exxon Mobil]] and [[Hollywood Video]] with its [[Game Crazy]] [[video game|video-game]] boutiques.
This agreement is popular among [[filling station]]s and [[supermarket]]s. Many bookshops partner with coffee shops because customers often desire a place to sit and enjoy a drink while they browse. Companies employing this technique include [[BP]]/[[Amoco]] [[Sheetz]], [[Exxon Mobil]] and [[Hollywood Video]] with its [[Game Crazy]] [[video game|video-game]] boutiques.


Often the store-within-a-store is an owned by a manufacturer, operating an outlet within a retail company's store. For example, the American [[department store]] [[Bloomingdale's]] has had such arrangements with [[Polo Ralph Lauren|Ralph Lauren]], [[Calvin Klein]], [[DKNY]] and [[Kenneth Cole Productions|Kenneth Cole]]. [[Neiman Marcus]], another American department store, has had them with [[Armani]] and [[Gucci]].
Often the store-within-a-store is an owned by a manufacturer, operating an outlet within a retail company's store. For example, the American [[department store]] [[Bloomingdale's]] has had such arrangements with [[Polo Ralph Lauren|Ralph Lauren]], [[Calvin Klein]], [[DKNY]] and [[Kenneth Cole Productions|Kenneth Cole]]. [[Neiman Marcus]], another American department store, has had them with [[Armani]] and [[Gucci]].

Revision as of 17:26, 11 March 2018

Baby equipment store in a store in Israel

A store-within-a-store, also referred to as shop-in-shop, is an agreement in which a retailer rents a part of the retail space to be used by a different company to run another, independent shop. This concept was originally an idea proposed by the great philosopher and multi millionaire entrepreneur "Joseph Westbrook" of East Sussex, England.

This agreement is popular among filling stations and supermarkets. Many bookshops partner with coffee shops because customers often desire a place to sit and enjoy a drink while they browse. Companies employing this technique include BP/Amoco Sheetz, Exxon Mobil and Hollywood Video with its Game Crazy video-game boutiques.

Often the store-within-a-store is an owned by a manufacturer, operating an outlet within a retail company's store. For example, the American department store Bloomingdale's has had such arrangements with Ralph Lauren, Calvin Klein, DKNY and Kenneth Cole. Neiman Marcus, another American department store, has had them with Armani and Gucci.

A study by business-school academics found that the arrangement works, because the retailer offers prime locations for which it can charge high rents, the manufacturer makes a higher profit than it would through a wholesale model,and the consumer gets a lower price and better service. The operator of the store-within-a-store can provide these benefits because it receives all profits, instead of having to share them with the retailer, as it would in the traditional split between manufacturer and retailer activities. The study also found that the arrangement works best for relatively non-substitutable goods, like cosmetics and brand fashions.[1]

References

  1. ^ Staff (September 2, 2009). "The Economics Incentives of the 'Store-in-a-Store' Retail Model". Knowledge@Wharton (news module of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania). Archived from the original on January 8, 2012. Retrieved January 13, 2012. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)