Jump to content

Talk:Isaac Franklin/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Unexpectedlydian (talk | contribs) at 20:38, 13 June 2024 (Starting source check. More comments to follow.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 06:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 20:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I will be reviewing this article as part of Good review circle 3. I'll be using the table below. Comments to follow soon! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk 20:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.


1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  • References and citations are in the correct sections and well-formatted.


2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).

Source review

  • No issues found with the reliability or relevance of sources.

Spot check

  • I will start by reviewing approx. 10% of citations.

Rothman 2022

  • p.167 - Don't think this page number or source is correct.
  • p.227 checkY
  • p.249 checkY


2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.