User talk:Redranger241

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jack Sugden has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — Insanity Incarnate 19:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jack Sugden constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sex and the City (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Frickative 12:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Captain America and Christian Slater

Before adding any of this back in to the various articles, please provide a citable, reliable source for the information.

What you have been adding reads as a fan's pipe dream casting, nothing more.

Thanks, - J Greb (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Watchmen (film). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Alientraveller (talk) 19:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:FUTFILMS. Articles about future films should not exist until filming has begun, unless the fact it has not been made yet is notable (eg. all the shenanigans that went on to cause delays to The Hobbit or Inglorious Bastards) Iron Man 2 and two paragraphs can happily sit within the main article. Alientraveller (talk) 12:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Films considered the greatest ever

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Movingboxes (talk) 13:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of That Guy with the Glasses

A tag has been placed on That Guy with the Glasses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of That Guy with the Glasses

An article that you have been involved in editing, That Guy with the Glasses, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Guy with the Glasses (2nd nomination). Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 23:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge of the Fallen

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

And this is not the first time I've seen you add unverified information; just the first time I had to revert you solely. Alientraveller (talk) 17:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, please don't keep adding unsourced voice actors to Wikipedia. Mathewignash (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Peter Venkman. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you logging off and then making the disruptive edits under an anonymous ISP? Those are logged and recorded too you know. Mathewignash (talk) 11:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on X-Men Origins: Wolverine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mathewignash (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you better have a source or their gonna get deleted but not by me im not getting involved Baller449 (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]