User:84user
|
Watchlists: 1 d Article . 2 d Talk . 3 d User talk . 2 d Wikipedia . 2 d Wikipedia talk . 28 d File . 28 d Template . 28 d Help talk . 28 d Category . 28 d Category talk . my aviation list. My subpages.
My SUL accounts ; commons . mediawiki . meta . strategy . wikibooks . wiktionary
(in the last month only here):
Torquato Accetto . Selda Bagcan (stub) . Black Joke (stub) . Carl Berg (airship builder)
Alexandre Dubuque . Davenport Lyons
Alfred Maul . Forlanini airships . Goroumo . Groß-Basenach . Hans Georg Friedrich Groß
Parseval airships . Parseval PL25 . August Riedinger . Russian airships . Albert Sammt
David Schwarz (aviation inventor) rewrite . Separate Reality translation . Spy basket
Templates: CollapsibleLargeCategoryTOC . Category tree all . Search box
Wilhelm T. Unge . Verein zur Förderung der Luftschifffahrt . Friedrich Hermann Wölfert . Zeppelin LZ13
Wikipedia:Books: Tycho Brahe . Zeppelin
I used to edit with these IP numbers.
Wikipedia:Nationality of people from the United Kingdom; British nationality 2007-2008 talk
- Agree with User:Matt Lewis and User:Breadandcheese that no guideline is wanted.
- Prefer no nationality adjective to appear in lead or infobox at all.
- Show legal citizenship(s), when sourced, in the infobox's "Nationality" field.
- Prefer no ethnicity description to appear in the lead or infobox at all.
- When sourced and notable, discuss nationalities and ethnicities (note plural) in a relevant section.
- Accept a nationality adjective that is well-sourced, not synthesized. Good sources would be printed dictionaries, biographies and encyclopedia.
- Walk away despairingly at attempts to force ethnicity labels in the lead, infobox and categories.
No original biographies
Sighted versions
A fool's guide to writing a featured article
On civility
References don't increase Wikipedia's reliability
User:Piotrus/Morsels of wikiwisdom
My half-baked opinions on the RFC "In principle, do you think that WP:NOT should include a section on plot summaries?"
- such RFCs need actual examples
- question is badly framed
- agree that some form of plot guideline is needed
- agree that reliably sourced plot-only articles can meet WP:V, and are acceptable, and could also be usefully merged (or remain as "grow-me" stubs, I'm on the fence here)
- not necessary for an article on fiction to contain a plot summary! See real encyclopedia
- not necessary for an article on fiction to contain only analysis! See real encyclopedia again
| Multi-licensed with all versions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0, version 2.0, version 2.5, version 3.0, version 4.0 and all future versions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||
| All rights released to all minor edits | ||
| I agree to release all rights, unless otherwise stated, to all my English Wikipedia text contributions marked as minor edits, enabling anyone to use them for any purpose. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to freely use my minor edit contributions, please check the multi-licensing guide. | ||