Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 35040

18:34, 23 March 2009: 77.98.248.111 (talk) triggered filter 61, performing the action "edit" on Incumbent. Actions taken: Warn; Filter description: New user removing references (examine)

Changes made in edit

{{redirect|Open seat|the tennis tournament|Open SEAT}}
{{redirect|Open seat|the tennis tournament|Open SEAT}}
mm
{{for|the ecclesiastical office|Incumbent (ecclesiastical)}}
{{Refimprove|date=July 2008}}
{{Wiktionary}}

The '''incumbent''', in [[politics]], is the holder of a [[political office]]. This term is usually used in reference to [[election]]s, in which races can often be defined as being between an incumbent and non-incumbent. For example, in the [[2004 United States presidential election]], [[George W. Bush]] was the incumbent, because he was the president in the current term while the election sought to determine the president for the following term.

==Etymology==

The word "incumbent" is derived from the [[Latin]] verb ''incumbere'', literally meaning "to lean or lie upon," with the present participle stem ''incumbent-'', "leaning or lying upon."<ref>{{cite book |editor= T. F. Hoad|others= |title= The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology|year= 1996|publisher= Oxford University Press|isbn= 0192830988}}</ref>

==In politics==


In general, incumbents have structural advantages over challengers during [[election]]s. The timing of elections may be determined by the incumbent instead of a set schedule. For most political offices, the incumbent often has greater [[name recognition]] due to their previous work in the office. Incumbents also have easier access to [[campaign finance]], as well as government resources (such as the [[franking privilege]]) that can be indirectly used to boost a campaign. An election (especially for a [[legislature]]) in which no incumbent is running is often called an '''open seat'''; because of the lack of incumbency advantage, these are often amongst the most hotly-contested races in any election.
In general, incumbents have structural advantages over challengers during [[election]]s. The timing of elections may be determined by the incumbent instead of a set schedule. For most political offices, the incumbent often has greater [[name recognition]] due to their previous work in the office. Incumbents also have easier access to [[campaign finance]], as well as government resources (such as the [[franking privilege]]) that can be indirectly used to boost a campaign. An election (especially for a [[legislature]]) in which no incumbent is running is often called an '''open seat'''; because of the lack of incumbency advantage, these are often amongst the most hotly-contested races in any election.

Action parameters

VariableValue
Name of the user account (user_name)
'77.98.248.111'
Page ID (page_id)
'364022'
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Incumbent'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Incumbent'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
''
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'{{redirect|Open seat|the tennis tournament|Open SEAT}} {{for|the ecclesiastical office|Incumbent (ecclesiastical)}} {{Refimprove|date=July 2008}} {{Wiktionary}} The '''incumbent''', in [[politics]], is the holder of a [[political office]]. This term is usually used in reference to [[election]]s, in which races can often be defined as being between an incumbent and non-incumbent. For example, in the [[2004 United States presidential election]], [[George W. Bush]] was the incumbent, because he was the president in the current term while the election sought to determine the president for the following term. ==Etymology== The word "incumbent" is derived from the [[Latin]] verb ''incumbere'', literally meaning "to lean or lie upon," with the present participle stem ''incumbent-'', "leaning or lying upon."<ref>{{cite book |editor= T. F. Hoad|others= |title= The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology|year= 1996|publisher= Oxford University Press|isbn= 0192830988}}</ref> ==In politics== In general, incumbents have structural advantages over challengers during [[election]]s. The timing of elections may be determined by the incumbent instead of a set schedule. For most political offices, the incumbent often has greater [[name recognition]] due to their previous work in the office. Incumbents also have easier access to [[campaign finance]], as well as government resources (such as the [[franking privilege]]) that can be indirectly used to boost a campaign. An election (especially for a [[legislature]]) in which no incumbent is running is often called an '''open seat'''; because of the lack of incumbency advantage, these are often amongst the most hotly-contested races in any election. In the [[United States]], incumbents traditionally win their party's nomination to run for office. Unseating an incumbent president, senator or other figure during a [[primary election]] is very difficult. In particular, barring major scandal or controversy, about 95% of [[United States Congress|congressional]] incumbents win re-election to their seats{{Fact|date=May 2008}}. However, shifts in congressional districts due to [[Apportionment (politics)|reapportionment]] or other longer-term factors may make it more or less likely for an incumbent to win re-election over time. For example, a [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] incumbent in historically [[Conservatism|conservative]] [[Texas]] would have less chance of winning than a Democratic incumbent in [[Liberalism|liberal]] [[New York, New York|New York City]], because Texas has shifted away from the Democratic Party in terms of voting (see also [[Congressional stagnation in the United States]]). However, there exist scenarios in which the incumbency factor itself leads to the downfall of the incumbent. Popularly known as the [[anti-incumbency|anti-incumbency factor]], situations of this kind occur when the incumbent has proven himself not worthy of office during his tenure and the challenger demonstrates this fact to the voters. An anti-incumbency factor can also be responsible for bringing down incumbents who have been in office for many successive terms in spite of performance indicators, simply because the voters are convinced by the challenger of a need for change. When newcomers vie to fill an open office, voters tend to compare and contrast the candidates' qualifications, issues positions and personal characteristics in a relatively straightforward way. Elections featuring an incumbent, on the other hand, are as [[Guy Molyneux]] puts it, "fundamentally a referendum on the incumbent."<ref>Guy Molyneux, [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=8694 The Big Five-Oh], ''The American Prospect'', [[1 October]] [[2004]].</ref> Voters will first grapple with the record of the incumbent. Only if they decide to "fire" the incumbent do they begin to evaluate whether the challenger is an acceptable alternative. {{Original research|section|date=February 2009}} Voters typically know incumbents well and have strong opinions about their performance. Challengers are less familiar and invariably fall short on straightforward comparisons of experience and (in the presidential arena) command of foreign policy. Some voters find themselves conflicted -- dissatisfied with the incumbent yet also wary of the challenger -- and may carry that uncertainty through the final days of the campaign and sometimes right into the voting booth. Among the perpetually conflicted, the attitudes about the incumbent are usually more predictive of these conflicted voters' final decision than their lingering doubts about the challenger. Thus, in the campaign's last hours, we generally tend to see "undecided" voters "break" for the challenger. See Incumbent Races: Closer Than They Appear http://www.pollingreport.com/incumbent.htm by Nick Panagakis, 1989. (There are some major exceptions, such as in the [[Canadian federal election, 2004|2004 Canadian federal election]] where many undecided voters went to the incumbent due to an alleged fear factor of the unknown.) ==In business== In business the term Incumbent is used for the largest company in a certain industry, for instance the traditional phone company in telecommunications. In a sales process, such as public tender, incumbent may also refer to the vendor that has the largest existing commercial relationship with the issuer of the tender. In large corporations it is the incumbent who is the holder of an office, or one that occupies a particular position. ==In media or telecommunications== In media or telecommunications, the term incumbent is used to describe existing companies often first established as regulated monopolies. These include television or radio stations who have benefited from government granted broadcast licenses and telecommunications companies who first existed at regulated utilities with exclusive rights to serve an area. Incumbents in this context typically have extensive market power for ten years. ==See also== *[[Lists of office-holders]] *[[List of current heads of state and government]] *[[Open seat (elective office)]] *[[Outgoing president]] *[[Anti-Incumbency]] ==References== <!-- ---------------------------------------------------------- See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a discussion of different citation methods and how to generate footnotes using the <ref>, </ref> and <reference /> tags ----------------------------------------------------------- --> {{reflist}} {{Portal|Politics}} [[Category:Political terms]] [[de:Amtsinhaber]] [[dv:އަދިވެސް މަޤާމުގައި]] [[ig:Incumbent]] [[it:Incumbent]] [[pt:Incumbente]] [[simple:Incumbent]] [[sh:Inkumbent]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'{{redirect|Open seat|the tennis tournament|Open SEAT}} mm In general, incumbents have structural advantages over challengers during [[election]]s. The timing of elections may be determined by the incumbent instead of a set schedule. For most political offices, the incumbent often has greater [[name recognition]] due to their previous work in the office. Incumbents also have easier access to [[campaign finance]], as well as government resources (such as the [[franking privilege]]) that can be indirectly used to boost a campaign. An election (especially for a [[legislature]]) in which no incumbent is running is often called an '''open seat'''; because of the lack of incumbency advantage, these are often amongst the most hotly-contested races in any election. In the [[United States]], incumbents traditionally win their party's nomination to run for office. Unseating an incumbent president, senator or other figure during a [[primary election]] is very difficult. In particular, barring major scandal or controversy, about 95% of [[United States Congress|congressional]] incumbents win re-election to their seats{{Fact|date=May 2008}}. However, shifts in congressional districts due to [[Apportionment (politics)|reapportionment]] or other longer-term factors may make it more or less likely for an incumbent to win re-election over time. For example, a [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] incumbent in historically [[Conservatism|conservative]] [[Texas]] would have less chance of winning than a Democratic incumbent in [[Liberalism|liberal]] [[New York, New York|New York City]], because Texas has shifted away from the Democratic Party in terms of voting (see also [[Congressional stagnation in the United States]]). However, there exist scenarios in which the incumbency factor itself leads to the downfall of the incumbent. Popularly known as the [[anti-incumbency|anti-incumbency factor]], situations of this kind occur when the incumbent has proven himself not worthy of office during his tenure and the challenger demonstrates this fact to the voters. An anti-incumbency factor can also be responsible for bringing down incumbents who have been in office for many successive terms in spite of performance indicators, simply because the voters are convinced by the challenger of a need for change. When newcomers vie to fill an open office, voters tend to compare and contrast the candidates' qualifications, issues positions and personal characteristics in a relatively straightforward way. Elections featuring an incumbent, on the other hand, are as [[Guy Molyneux]] puts it, "fundamentally a referendum on the incumbent."<ref>Guy Molyneux, [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=8694 The Big Five-Oh], ''The American Prospect'', [[1 October]] [[2004]].</ref> Voters will first grapple with the record of the incumbent. Only if they decide to "fire" the incumbent do they begin to evaluate whether the challenger is an acceptable alternative. {{Original research|section|date=February 2009}} Voters typically know incumbents well and have strong opinions about their performance. Challengers are less familiar and invariably fall short on straightforward comparisons of experience and (in the presidential arena) command of foreign policy. Some voters find themselves conflicted -- dissatisfied with the incumbent yet also wary of the challenger -- and may carry that uncertainty through the final days of the campaign and sometimes right into the voting booth. Among the perpetually conflicted, the attitudes about the incumbent are usually more predictive of these conflicted voters' final decision than their lingering doubts about the challenger. Thus, in the campaign's last hours, we generally tend to see "undecided" voters "break" for the challenger. See Incumbent Races: Closer Than They Appear http://www.pollingreport.com/incumbent.htm by Nick Panagakis, 1989. (There are some major exceptions, such as in the [[Canadian federal election, 2004|2004 Canadian federal election]] where many undecided voters went to the incumbent due to an alleged fear factor of the unknown.) ==In business== In business the term Incumbent is used for the largest company in a certain industry, for instance the traditional phone company in telecommunications. In a sales process, such as public tender, incumbent may also refer to the vendor that has the largest existing commercial relationship with the issuer of the tender. In large corporations it is the incumbent who is the holder of an office, or one that occupies a particular position. ==In media or telecommunications== In media or telecommunications, the term incumbent is used to describe existing companies often first established as regulated monopolies. These include television or radio stations who have benefited from government granted broadcast licenses and telecommunications companies who first existed at regulated utilities with exclusive rights to serve an area. Incumbents in this context typically have extensive market power for ten years. ==See also== *[[Lists of office-holders]] *[[List of current heads of state and government]] *[[Open seat (elective office)]] *[[Outgoing president]] *[[Anti-Incumbency]] ==References== <!-- ---------------------------------------------------------- See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a discussion of different citation methods and how to generate footnotes using the <ref>, </ref> and <reference /> tags ----------------------------------------------------------- --> {{reflist}} {{Portal|Politics}} [[Category:Political terms]] [[de:Amtsinhaber]] [[dv:އަދިވެސް މަޤާމުގައި]] [[ig:Incumbent]] [[it:Incumbent]] [[pt:Incumbente]] [[simple:Incumbent]] [[sh:Inkumbent]]'