Jump to content

Daniel Epps: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): Notability
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Multiple issues|
{{Orphan|date=October 2019}}
{{Orphan|date=October 2019}}
{{Notability|date=August 2019}}
{{Notability|date=August 2019}}
}}


{{Infobox person
{{Infobox person

Revision as of 10:31, 31 May 2020

Daniel Epps
Alma materDuke University (AB)
Harvard Law School (JD)
EmployerWashington University in St. Louis
Notable work“How to Save the Supreme Court”

Daniel Epps is an associate professor of law at Washington University in St. Louis. Epps teaches first-year criminal law, upper-level courses in criminal procedure, and a seminar on public law theory. His scholarship has appeared in the Harvard Law Review,[1] the Yale Law Journal,[2] the Michigan Law Review,[3] and the NYU Law Review,[4] and his writing for popular audiences has appeared in the New York Times Magazine,[5] the Washington Post,[6] Vox,[7] and The Atlantic.[8] He is currently working on projects about the role of the jury, the Supreme Court’s case-selection process and the harmless-error doctrine.[9]

Supreme Court Experience

Epps is a nationally recognized expert on the Supreme Court. An experienced Supreme Court litigator, he most recently served as co-counsel for the defendant in Ocasio v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1423 (2016), which addressed the scope of criminal conspiracy liability for public-sector extortion. His other notable prior work includes the successful petition for certiorari and merits briefing in Walden v. Fiore, 133 S. Ct. 1493 (2014); a brief for the Court-appointed amicus curiae in Millbrook v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 1441 (2013); and an amicus brief for criminal law and procedure scholars in United States v. Davila, 133 S. Ct. 2139 (2013). He also served as co-counsel on the brief of Prof. Stephen E. Sachs as amicus curiae in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. U.S. District Court, 134 S. Ct. 568 (2013) (with Jeffrey S. Bucholtz & Stephen E. Sachs), which The Green Bag Almanac & Reader included on its list of “Exemplary Legal Writing” for 2013.[8]

Publications

Articles & Essays

  • "How to Save the Supreme Court," 129 Yale Law Journal _ (forthcoming 2019) (with Ganesh Sitaraman)[2]
  • "Harmless Errors and Substantial Rights," 131 Harvard Law Review 2117 (2018)[1]
  • "The Lottery Docket," 116 Michigan Law Review 705 (2018) (with William Ortman)[3]
  • "Adversarial Asymmetry in the Criminal Process," 91 New York University Law Review 762 (2016)
  • "One Last Word on the Blackstone Principle," 101 Virginia Law Review Online 34 (2016)
  • "The Consequences of Error in Criminal Justice," 128 Harvard Law Review 1065 (2015)[1]
  • Note, "Mechanisms of Secrecy," 121 Harvard Law Review 1556 (2008)[1]

Selected Commentary

  • "How to Save the Supreme Court," Vox (Oct. 10, 2018) (with Ganesh Sitaraman)[10]
  • "Police Officers Are Bypassing Juries to Face Judges," Washington Post (Sept. 21, 2017)
  • Contributor, “An Annotated Constitution," New York Times Magazine (July 2, 2017)
  • "In Health Care Ruling, Roberts Steals a Move from John Marshall’s Playbook," The Atlantic (June 28, 2012)[8]

Awards and Honors

  • Honorable Mention, Scholarly Papers Competition, American Association of Law Schools (2018) (for The Lottery Docket)
  • Finalist, Junior Scholars Paper Competition, Criminal Justice Section, American Association of Law Schools (2016) (for Adversarial Asymmetry in the Criminal Process)
  • Exemplary Legal Writing, The Green Bag Almanac & Reader (2013) (for Brief of Professor Stephen E. Sachs as Amicus Curiae, Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. U.S. District Court, 134 S. Ct. 568 (2013) (as co-counsel with Jeffrey S. Bucholtz & Stephen E. Sachs)[11]

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Harvard Law - Daniel Epps".
  2. ^ a b Entman, Liz. "Depoliticizing the Supreme Court may mean radically overhauling it: Law professor". Vanderbilt University. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  3. ^ a b Epps, Daniel; Ortman, William (2018-03-01). "The Lottery Docket". Michigan Law Review. 116 (5): 705–757. ISSN 0026-2234.
  4. ^ "Daniel Epps | Take Care". takecareblog.com. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  5. ^ Bouie, Jamelle (2019-06-06). "Opinion | Why Pete Buttigieg Is Wrong About the Supreme Court". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  6. ^ "'If it wasn't the Roberts court already, it is the Roberts court now'".
  7. ^ Epps, Daniel (2018-09-06). "How to save the Supreme Court". Vox. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  8. ^ a b c "Daniel Epps". WashULaw. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  9. ^ "Daniel Epps | The Source | Washington University in St. Louis". The Source. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  10. ^ "How to Save the Supreme Court" (Document). {{cite document}}: Cite document requires |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |ssrn= ignored (help)
  11. ^ "Daniel Epps CV" (PDF).