Talk:Strozzi family
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Barbara Strozzi
[edit]According to [[1]], she is born in Venice in 1619, the adopted daughter, possibly natural daughter of Giulio Strozzi, neither of whom is mentioned on the Strozzi family page. Are they related to the other Strozzis?--FeanorStar7 12:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Strozzi family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060527084139/http://home.infionline.net/~ddisse/strozzi.html to http://home.infionline.net/~ddisse/strozzi.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 26 January 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
![]() | It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
result: Links: current log • target log
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
– main article, all the other persons named in the lone disambiguation page are listed here already, no need to disambiguate. See also Italian Wiki mirror for comparison. Gryffindor (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Strozzi titles a surname page with significant content and so is ineligible to be a "new" title unless it is also proposed to be renamed. This request has been altered to reflect that fact. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 04:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose suspect that a large number of readers will be looking for the composer. Why make like difficult for them? In ictu oculi (talk) 12:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- It's likely that this family is the primary topic for the surname, but we should not implement that by moving the family article, rather by placing a redirect to the family article instead, as the family should stay at a name that includes that kind of a moniker. Both because that's separate from the surname concept and indeed actually how people refer to them (verifiable from our articles, the first few pages of a Google Books search for "Strozzi", etc). Also, there were at least a few more missing articles appropriate to list in the surname article, that I have in the meantime added (even if all these people were also descended from the medieval family, they're a few centuries removed, so they're unlikely to have a place in the medieval family article). Likewise, I see now that even for some of the members of the family, their aristocratic origin wasn't actually the primary source of their notability. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.