Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shape comparison #42

Open
mikemag opened this issue Mar 9, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Shape comparison #42

mikemag opened this issue Mar 9, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@mikemag
Copy link
Owner

mikemag commented Mar 9, 2018

Older versions of MonkeyCAM allowed me to define two board shapes and compare them visually. This was great for tweaking nose/tail shapes, and comparing different edge geometry.

I'm considering the following:

  1. Have MonkeyCAM take two sets of board def files.
  2. Build up the overall and core shapes as usual.
  3. Run a bunch of comparison algorithms on them.
  4. Collect all the results up in a nice HTML output like the current output, but with sections focused on different comparisons of the boards.

Various comparison ideas:

  1. Nose/tail shapes. Overlay them visually. Surface area differences.
  2. Edge shapes. Overlay them, width differences at key points (bindings, waist, narrowest section vs. ee center and setback, etc.) Here I'd also like to quantify the portions of the edges with maximum difference, and relate that to the effect on edge shape of grinding during the finishing process and repeated edge tuning. (I want this specifically because I've tried some cute shapes in the past where the difference was literally erased during the first tune.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant