Unusual, relevant disabilities case unfolding in Norwalk

Press release

Bus Operator with Disabilities Alleges Unlawful Termination by Norwalk Transit District Following Encounter with Unsafe and Unruly Cyclist
AFMC Union also facing criticism for allegedly abdicating its duty to defend driver in the matter

NORWALK, Conn.—August 16, 2024—The Norwalk Transit District and the AFMC Union today are facing criticism in the alleged wrongful termination of an experienced employee bus operator. Stanley Caviness, who suffers from Tourette's syndrome and dyslexia, claimed that was fired based on an incident involving an unsafe and unruly bicyclist despite being a thoroughly trained and a valued employee.

Caviness was trained in the Smith System. He was performing his usual driving duties when a nearby cyclist deliberately disobeyed traffic laws and committed several traffic violations that jeopardized the safety of the bus passengers and others on the road at the time. The cyclist violated laws such as passing on the left side, cutting a bus off at a bus stop, and obstructing a bus at a red light which had turned to green.

Along with flouting traffic laws that affected a bus conducting its usual route, the cyclist escalated the situation by making an obscene physical gesture, which put Caviness in a position of having to maneuver around the bicycle. After the initial encounter, Caviness, concerned that the bicycle might re-enter the path of the bus, spoke in an expletive at the cyclist at the next traffic light, expressing frustration. Caviness explained that his comment was a natural reaction which came from a diagnosis of Tourette's syndrome and stress caused by the incident.

Caviness alleged that he was unfairly terminated because he exercised sound professional judgement during the incident. Caviness contends that his rights were violated and asserts that he adhered to all required laws while performing his duties, unlike the cyclist who instigated the situation with his flouting of traffic laws.

Despite the facts in the matter, the AFMC Union has sided with the company, arguing that the termination was in accordance with its fair bargaining agreement. Caviness countered, “The union is not adhering to good faith in its bargaining agreement.” Additionally, Caviness alleged that he was defamed when a video of the incident was shown, presenting a false narrative of the situation.

To date, Mr. Caviness has sought representation from more than 30 attorneys. Caviness has found the legal battle challenging but has received professional and competent support from New Haven Federal Court advocates. The case is being processed in federal court, with both the Norwalk Transit District and the AFMC Union denying settlement agreements.

“The Second Circuit is also monitoring this case, because the situation puts the defendant in a position where the case may be subject to an Act of Congress due to the length of time involved,” said Caviness.