Politics & Government

Supreme Court Denies To Hear Former Lawmakers Argument Over New Judicial Appointment Process

The case will now go back to Lewis and Clark District Court. Judge McMahon, who has already voiced skepticism about the merits of the case.

(Daily Montanan)

August 8, 2021

The Supreme Court denied Tuesday two former Democratic lawmakers’ requests to hear their lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state’s newly established judicial appointment process calling their filing inadequate.

Find out what's happening in Across Montanawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Tom Winter and Barbara Bessette turned to the Supreme Court after Lewis and Clark District Judge Mike McMahon denied their request for a temporary restraining order to block GOP Gov. Greg Gianforte from filling a Cascade County judicial vacancy in early July. The lawsuit focuses on the already once unsuccessfully challenged Senate Bill 140, which eliminated the Judicial Nominating Commission and gave the governor an expanded ability to fulfill judicial vacancies. The two lawmakers are arguing SB140 violates the “Separation of Powers” clause.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court said Winter and Bessette did not come with the proper filings and said their argument focused too much on the unconstitutionality of the law they are challenging instead of what it claimed to be about — appealing McMahon’s order to not issue the temporary restraining order. Additionally, the court said the normal appeals process is adequate.

Find out what's happening in Across Montanawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The case will now go back to Lewis and Clark District Court to be heard by McMahon, who has already voiced skepticism about the merits of the case.


The Daily Montanan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan source for trusted news, commentary and insight into statewide policy and politics beneath the Big Sky.

More from Across Montana