01903643

Component

https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231207844

This paper explores user/nonuser perceptions of bus transit attributes in Melbourne, Sydney, and South East Queensland (SEQ). It aims to understand the relative importance and performance of various bus transit attributes and how the assessment varies according to city, socioeconomic cohort, and user/nonuser groups. Primary data were collected via a screening survey, enabling a very large sample (n?=?13,537) and a smaller, more representative subset collating more detailed survey data (n?=?2,420). Personal safety stood out as a key bus transit attribute of importance in all cities. Specifically, safety when traveling on the bus during the daytime and at night, and safety getting to and from the bus stop were ranked as very important bus transit attributes. Some findings differed by region: service levels, punctuality, frequency, and timetable adherence (reliability) were rated relatively high in importance but low in performance in Sydney and Melbourne compared with SEQ. This suggests that Melbourne and Sydney might require service-level improvements more immediately than SEQ. Implications for policy for each Australian metropolitan region (Sydney, Melbourne, and SEQ) are later discussed.

Mustafizur Rahman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-8040© National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2023.

English

0000-0002-1046-8040

0009-0008-2584-6447

0000-0001-7190-7548

pp 501-514

2024-7

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Digital/other

Figures; References (19) ; Tables

Bus transit; Evaluation and assessment; Public opinion; Quality of service; Transit riders; Transit safety

Melbourne (Australia); South East Queensland (Australia); Sydney (Australia)

Operations and Traffic Management; Public Transportation; Safety and Human Factors

TRIS, TRB

Dec 20 2023 3:01PM