Democracy in America | The Ukraine affair

A soldier’s word against Donald Trump’s in impeachment inquiry

Testimony from Alexander Vindman, a decorated veteran, is hard to trash as partisan sniping

By M.S.R. | WASHINGTON, DC

IF THE CASE for impeaching President Donald Trump needed any further nailing down, it received it on October 29th. Lieutenant-Colonel Alexander Vindman, the senior expert on Ukraine at the National Security Council (NSC), told impeachment investigators that he was so appalled by Mr Trump’s repeated demands that Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, investigate Joe Biden, a front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, that he reported it to a lawyer at the NSC. He did so twice.

“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a US citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the US government’s support of Ukraine,” Colonel Vindman said in his opening statement, which was published beforehand. He said he believed that if Ukraine did pursue an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company on whose board Mr Biden’s son served while his father was vice-president, “it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained.”

Colonel Vindman’s testimony was given privately to three House committees—on Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight and Reform—in defiance of a White House order not to co-operate with the impeachment inquiry launched by the Democrats last month. It is important for three reasons.

More from Democracy in America

The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue

Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses

The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump

Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president


A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map

The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020


More from Democracy in America

The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue

Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses

The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump

Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president


A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map

The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020


Why Democrats are talking about Tulsi Gabbard

The low-polling presidential candidate has caused a stir

Americans’ views on impeachment mirror the president’s approval ratings

The current depths of partisanship are unprecedented

How long will the mayor of Chicago stand up to the teachers’ union?

Children in America’s third-largest school system get another day off