What do you think?
Rate this book
1066: What Fates Impose
England is in crisis. King Edward has no heir and promises never to produce one. There are no obvious successors available to replace him, but quite a few claimants are eager to take the crown. While power struggles break out between the various factions at court, enemies abroad plot to make England their own. There are raids across the borders with Wales and Scotland. Harold Godwinson, Earl of Wessex, is seen by many as the one man who can bring stability to the kingdom. He has powerful friends and two women who love him, but he has enemies who will stop at nothing to gain power. As 1066 begins, England heads for an uncertain future. It seems even the heavens are against Harold. Intelligent and courageous, can Harold forge his own destiny - or does he have to bow to what fates impose?
456 pages, Paperback
First published March 4, 2013
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 127 reviews
July 12, 2020
”Before him, unseen by the others, stands a blood-drenched warrior, tall and proud as an oak, fresh from the battlefield, his lank and sweat-soaked hair hanging down his shoulders, his once handsome face made ugly by an eyeless socket. More blood runs from a wound to his throat and another from his chest. As though to steady himself, he leans on his battle axe, resting his hands on its iron head. He stares impassively at William with his single eye, blue and deep as the ocean; a stare made all the more intense by its singularity.”
When King Edward III ( ruled 1042-1066), known as the Confessor so he will not be confused with King Edward III (1327-1377) who is really Edward VI (don’t get me started), dies in 1066, this sets off a chain of events that leads to 1066 being immortalized not only in English history but world history.
There is only really one viable candidate to take over for Edward, and that is the Earl of Wessex, Harold Godwinson. He is a virile middle aged man, a commanding figure, wily, intelligent, fertile (the Godwinson’s produced boys, lots of boys), and a tested great tactician on the battlefield.
King Harold is comparable in stature and ability to the later Richard I the Lionheart (1189-1199) or Edward Ist, who is really Edward IV, (1272-1307). He looks like a king. With Harold being supported by most of the nobles to be King, not only does England have a qualified man for the job, but they also have a man with heirs to spare, insuring decades of qualified succession.
What G. K. Holloway does in this book is take the story from 1045, showing us all the manipulations, power struggles, and uncertainty, leading up to that fateful day in 1066. You will meet the lovely Edyth Swan Neck, who wins the heart of Harold and discovers the sacrifices a woman must make to be in love with a King. You will meet Godwin, Harold’s father, who carves out an estate for his sons that makes him a rival of King Edward. There are Harold’s brothers who are numerous enough to exhibit all the characteristics of mankind from Harold’s demented older brother Sweyn, his disloyal brother Tostig, as well as a brother Gyrth who dies for him on the field of battle at Hastings. There is also, of course, William, who will be known as Conqueror. We see his manipulations and his scheming as he prepares to steal the crown of England.
Holloway will bring these fascinating people to life for you. He seizes them out of the dusty history books and puts flesh on their bones. When he writes dialogue, you will swear he has a time machine and goes beyond just research and stands among them drinking their mead, flirting with their women, and keeping a telescoped ear deployed to capture their interactions.
I enjoy history, but I enjoy historical fiction even more because of the ability of novelists to take history beyond just known events and make the people who were caught up in these relevant affairs breath air, eat food, fornicate, and speak. The reason they can do this is because they do the research, and what they write is not only probable but quite possibly exactly what happened.
Battle of Stamford Bridge
I felt a thrill of excitement when I saw the chapter heading Stamford Bridge. There is King Harald Sigurdsson of Norway, standing there, all 6’6” of him, rallying his troops while Berserkers hold the English off the bridge to buy him time to prepare for battle. King Harold Godwinson hasn’t even had time to measure the windows of his castle for drapes yet, and he finds himself defending his crown.
Then there is the quick march back to Hastings to meet the other threat from William of Normandy. Holloway’s description of the Battle of Hastings is an edge of the seat, blood splattering, sword clanging extravaganza. I know how it is going to come out, but it is as if my brain is hijacked. I am still hoping for a different outcome.
I asked G. K. if he would mind answering a few questions, and he was kind enough to do so.
Jeffrey D. Keeten: I have recently read King Harald’s Saga, which covers the time frame of your book from the Norway perspective. The Gota River Agreement is a wrinkle in an already convoluted succession. In your book, you have William of Normandy waiting and hoping that Harald Sigurdsson of Norway would attack first. Do you believe that was an astute calculation or did William get lucky? It did seem like several fortuitous events contributed to William’s victory.
G. K. HollowayI think William was a very lucky man, as well as being both politically and militarily astute. Initially, his invasion fleet left Normandy in early September, and but for a storm that blew him off course, he might have found himself in a battle with the English navy. In the unlikely event of William winning a victory at sea over the English, he would then have gone on to land on the south coast, only to be confronted by the English army. His chances of winning a second victory on land would have been minimal. So, getting caught up in a storm was, for William, not the disaster he might have first thought. This is where luck served him well.
William’s armada was blown onto the coast of Ponthieu, where he is supposed to have waited for a southerly wind which would take him to England. He even went so far as to have his army pray for the right wind to come along. At the right time, the wind did come along, and the Norman fleet set sail. However, I think this is a product of Norman propaganda. We are to believe William prays for the right wind, and it comes along just when he needs it. It must be God sent, therefore God supports William’s claim. Why else would he send a southerly? At the time of year William was in Ponthieu, the wind blows from the south most days, and so William would have had plenty of opportunity to sail. But if he discovered Harald Sigurdsson was on his way to the north of England, why not wait? Why not let Harold take his army to the other end of the country and fight a battle, leaving William to do battle with an exhausted victor? It would be the smart thing to do.
Jeffrey D. Keeten: Do you believe that William would have had a chance against Harold Godwinson if not for the Battle of Stamford Bridge that depleted King Harold’s forces?
G. K. Holloway: I think William would have faced a major defeat and been lucky to have escaped with his life if not for Stamford Bridge. How can I say that with any confidence? I’ll tell you.
Most battles at that time lasted two to three hours at most. Hastings began at around 9 o’clock in the morning and continued until just beyond sunset, which would then have been around 5 o‘clock. That’s eight hours and more. I’ll grant you they stopped for lunch, which may have taken a couple of hours, but even so, Hastings lasted a very long time by the standards of the day. This tells us, even though the English army was depleted, they still put up a formidable resistance.
But how would the battle have gone if Harold’s troops had been fresh? There’s no doubt in my mind he would have won. It’s important to remember, although the English fought on foot, they journeyed to battle on horseback. The return journey from Stamford Bridge exhausted many of Harold’s troops, as did the battle. Most of the horses used to ride up to Yorkshire and back were exhausted. Once back in London, Harold’s men had to journey on foot for three days to get to Senlac to do battle, and not everyone turned up. Added to this, and I’ve never really discovered why, Harold took very few archers to meet William. The lack of English archers, used so effectively in later battles, would also contribute to William’s victory.
JDK: I googled Stamford Bridge, and all that would come up was a football stadium. Is there anything left that gives you any perspective on the battle?
GKH: I’m happy to say there is. Naturally, the village has changed with the passing of nine-hundred-and-fifty years, but you can still walk around most of the battlefield. In fact, there are guided walks. I’m also pleased to say the Battle of Stamford Bridge Society organize a re-enactment every September, which is well worth a visit. Apart from the re-enactment of the battle, there are encampments where re-enactors demonstrate Viking and Anglo-Saxon crafts of sword manufacture, weaving, weaponry, and cooking. You can even enter a competition to win a spear pie, baked especially to celebrate Harold’s victory over the Norwegians.
Statue of King Harold on the outside of the Abbey Church at Walthamx
JDK: What kind of king do you think Harold would have turned out to be if he had won the Battle of Hastings?
GKH:The Vita Eadwardi Regis, “The life of King Edward who rests at Westminster,” describes Harold as, “A noble earl who, all the time he had loyally followed his lord’s commands with words and deeds, and neglected nothing that met the need of the people’s king.” He is also described by the Vita as “handsome, graceful, strong, wise, patient, merciful, courageous, temperate and prudent but ruthless with opponents.” He was also religious, making a pilgrimage to Rome, and generous to the church being a benefactor to numerous religious houses.
If the above is anything to go by, Harold would have made a good king. Reading through the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, and in fact any of the sources I researched, I couldn’t find anyone, other than the odd Norman, who had anything bad to say about him. The closest I could find to criticism was that he tended to dally and was too liberal. With hindsight, we can say Harold was not quite as politically astute as he should have been. I refer here to his visit to Normandy in 1064 and the situation he found himself in, swearing an oath of fealty to William, which I think we can all agree was not a good idea.
During his short reign, according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle of 1066, “Harold made some good laws.” It’s just a shame we don’t know what they were.
JDK: There have been many periods in English history where the throne has been taken by force, more so seemingly than other countries. Why do you think that the quest for the English throne has proved so bloody?
GKH: I’m not sure the quest for the English throne has proved any bloodier than anyone else’s. The Norman Conquest meant England would be connected to France and southern Europe in a way it had never been in the past. This meant an opportunity for more squabbles than might otherwise have arisen. Added to that, shortages of male claimants to the throne or claimants of the wrong religion and you have a recipe for conflict. Having said that, so far as the British succession is concerned, the last three centuries have been peaceful.
JDK: What book did you read that contributed the most to your research and perspective on 1066?
GKH: Harold the last Anglo-Saxon King, by Ian W. Walker. This book sparked my desire to write my novel, but I used many other books and sources. I also visited all the major sites in my story, hence the family holidays to Normandy, Rome, Yorkshire, Winchester, Bosham, etc., but Walker’s book was my first inspiration and, therefore, the most important.
JDK: There were a few passages where you had ominous portend moments which made me think of the Sagas I’ve been reading. Did the Sagas influence your writing?
GKH:Very much so. In fact, there are quite a few scenes in my novel that have their origins in the Sagas, including the poem Harald uttered in his dying moments. I also leaned on The Wanderer: Epics Elegies and Riddles to help develop a feeling of being in the moment.
JDK: What are you working on next? Hopefully, more history.
GKH: I’ve almost finished the sequel to 1066 What Fates Impose. This one’s called In the Shadows of Castles and tells the story of the first five years of the English Resistance, post the Battle of Hastings. It should be publish early in 2019.
Thank you Mr. Holloway for answering all my questions. I certainly look forward to learning about the post Battle of Hastings world.
If you wish to see more of my most recent book and movie reviews, visit http://www.jeffreykeeten.com
I also have a Facebook blogger page at:https://www.facebook.com/JeffreyKeeten
When King Edward III ( ruled 1042-1066), known as the Confessor so he will not be confused with King Edward III (1327-1377) who is really Edward VI (don’t get me started), dies in 1066, this sets off a chain of events that leads to 1066 being immortalized not only in English history but world history.
There is only really one viable candidate to take over for Edward, and that is the Earl of Wessex, Harold Godwinson. He is a virile middle aged man, a commanding figure, wily, intelligent, fertile (the Godwinson’s produced boys, lots of boys), and a tested great tactician on the battlefield.
King Harold is comparable in stature and ability to the later Richard I the Lionheart (1189-1199) or Edward Ist, who is really Edward IV, (1272-1307). He looks like a king. With Harold being supported by most of the nobles to be King, not only does England have a qualified man for the job, but they also have a man with heirs to spare, insuring decades of qualified succession.
What G. K. Holloway does in this book is take the story from 1045, showing us all the manipulations, power struggles, and uncertainty, leading up to that fateful day in 1066. You will meet the lovely Edyth Swan Neck, who wins the heart of Harold and discovers the sacrifices a woman must make to be in love with a King. You will meet Godwin, Harold’s father, who carves out an estate for his sons that makes him a rival of King Edward. There are Harold’s brothers who are numerous enough to exhibit all the characteristics of mankind from Harold’s demented older brother Sweyn, his disloyal brother Tostig, as well as a brother Gyrth who dies for him on the field of battle at Hastings. There is also, of course, William, who will be known as Conqueror. We see his manipulations and his scheming as he prepares to steal the crown of England.
Holloway will bring these fascinating people to life for you. He seizes them out of the dusty history books and puts flesh on their bones. When he writes dialogue, you will swear he has a time machine and goes beyond just research and stands among them drinking their mead, flirting with their women, and keeping a telescoped ear deployed to capture their interactions.
I enjoy history, but I enjoy historical fiction even more because of the ability of novelists to take history beyond just known events and make the people who were caught up in these relevant affairs breath air, eat food, fornicate, and speak. The reason they can do this is because they do the research, and what they write is not only probable but quite possibly exactly what happened.
Battle of Stamford Bridge
I felt a thrill of excitement when I saw the chapter heading Stamford Bridge. There is King Harald Sigurdsson of Norway, standing there, all 6’6” of him, rallying his troops while Berserkers hold the English off the bridge to buy him time to prepare for battle. King Harold Godwinson hasn’t even had time to measure the windows of his castle for drapes yet, and he finds himself defending his crown.
Then there is the quick march back to Hastings to meet the other threat from William of Normandy. Holloway’s description of the Battle of Hastings is an edge of the seat, blood splattering, sword clanging extravaganza. I know how it is going to come out, but it is as if my brain is hijacked. I am still hoping for a different outcome.
I asked G. K. if he would mind answering a few questions, and he was kind enough to do so.
Jeffrey D. Keeten: I have recently read King Harald’s Saga, which covers the time frame of your book from the Norway perspective. The Gota River Agreement is a wrinkle in an already convoluted succession. In your book, you have William of Normandy waiting and hoping that Harald Sigurdsson of Norway would attack first. Do you believe that was an astute calculation or did William get lucky? It did seem like several fortuitous events contributed to William’s victory.
G. K. HollowayI think William was a very lucky man, as well as being both politically and militarily astute. Initially, his invasion fleet left Normandy in early September, and but for a storm that blew him off course, he might have found himself in a battle with the English navy. In the unlikely event of William winning a victory at sea over the English, he would then have gone on to land on the south coast, only to be confronted by the English army. His chances of winning a second victory on land would have been minimal. So, getting caught up in a storm was, for William, not the disaster he might have first thought. This is where luck served him well.
William’s armada was blown onto the coast of Ponthieu, where he is supposed to have waited for a southerly wind which would take him to England. He even went so far as to have his army pray for the right wind to come along. At the right time, the wind did come along, and the Norman fleet set sail. However, I think this is a product of Norman propaganda. We are to believe William prays for the right wind, and it comes along just when he needs it. It must be God sent, therefore God supports William’s claim. Why else would he send a southerly? At the time of year William was in Ponthieu, the wind blows from the south most days, and so William would have had plenty of opportunity to sail. But if he discovered Harald Sigurdsson was on his way to the north of England, why not wait? Why not let Harold take his army to the other end of the country and fight a battle, leaving William to do battle with an exhausted victor? It would be the smart thing to do.
Jeffrey D. Keeten: Do you believe that William would have had a chance against Harold Godwinson if not for the Battle of Stamford Bridge that depleted King Harold’s forces?
G. K. Holloway: I think William would have faced a major defeat and been lucky to have escaped with his life if not for Stamford Bridge. How can I say that with any confidence? I’ll tell you.
Most battles at that time lasted two to three hours at most. Hastings began at around 9 o’clock in the morning and continued until just beyond sunset, which would then have been around 5 o‘clock. That’s eight hours and more. I’ll grant you they stopped for lunch, which may have taken a couple of hours, but even so, Hastings lasted a very long time by the standards of the day. This tells us, even though the English army was depleted, they still put up a formidable resistance.
But how would the battle have gone if Harold’s troops had been fresh? There’s no doubt in my mind he would have won. It’s important to remember, although the English fought on foot, they journeyed to battle on horseback. The return journey from Stamford Bridge exhausted many of Harold’s troops, as did the battle. Most of the horses used to ride up to Yorkshire and back were exhausted. Once back in London, Harold’s men had to journey on foot for three days to get to Senlac to do battle, and not everyone turned up. Added to this, and I’ve never really discovered why, Harold took very few archers to meet William. The lack of English archers, used so effectively in later battles, would also contribute to William’s victory.
JDK: I googled Stamford Bridge, and all that would come up was a football stadium. Is there anything left that gives you any perspective on the battle?
GKH: I’m happy to say there is. Naturally, the village has changed with the passing of nine-hundred-and-fifty years, but you can still walk around most of the battlefield. In fact, there are guided walks. I’m also pleased to say the Battle of Stamford Bridge Society organize a re-enactment every September, which is well worth a visit. Apart from the re-enactment of the battle, there are encampments where re-enactors demonstrate Viking and Anglo-Saxon crafts of sword manufacture, weaving, weaponry, and cooking. You can even enter a competition to win a spear pie, baked especially to celebrate Harold’s victory over the Norwegians.
Statue of King Harold on the outside of the Abbey Church at Walthamx
JDK: What kind of king do you think Harold would have turned out to be if he had won the Battle of Hastings?
GKH:The Vita Eadwardi Regis, “The life of King Edward who rests at Westminster,” describes Harold as, “A noble earl who, all the time he had loyally followed his lord’s commands with words and deeds, and neglected nothing that met the need of the people’s king.” He is also described by the Vita as “handsome, graceful, strong, wise, patient, merciful, courageous, temperate and prudent but ruthless with opponents.” He was also religious, making a pilgrimage to Rome, and generous to the church being a benefactor to numerous religious houses.
If the above is anything to go by, Harold would have made a good king. Reading through the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, and in fact any of the sources I researched, I couldn’t find anyone, other than the odd Norman, who had anything bad to say about him. The closest I could find to criticism was that he tended to dally and was too liberal. With hindsight, we can say Harold was not quite as politically astute as he should have been. I refer here to his visit to Normandy in 1064 and the situation he found himself in, swearing an oath of fealty to William, which I think we can all agree was not a good idea.
During his short reign, according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle of 1066, “Harold made some good laws.” It’s just a shame we don’t know what they were.
JDK: There have been many periods in English history where the throne has been taken by force, more so seemingly than other countries. Why do you think that the quest for the English throne has proved so bloody?
GKH: I’m not sure the quest for the English throne has proved any bloodier than anyone else’s. The Norman Conquest meant England would be connected to France and southern Europe in a way it had never been in the past. This meant an opportunity for more squabbles than might otherwise have arisen. Added to that, shortages of male claimants to the throne or claimants of the wrong religion and you have a recipe for conflict. Having said that, so far as the British succession is concerned, the last three centuries have been peaceful.
JDK: What book did you read that contributed the most to your research and perspective on 1066?
GKH: Harold the last Anglo-Saxon King, by Ian W. Walker. This book sparked my desire to write my novel, but I used many other books and sources. I also visited all the major sites in my story, hence the family holidays to Normandy, Rome, Yorkshire, Winchester, Bosham, etc., but Walker’s book was my first inspiration and, therefore, the most important.
JDK: There were a few passages where you had ominous portend moments which made me think of the Sagas I’ve been reading. Did the Sagas influence your writing?
GKH:Very much so. In fact, there are quite a few scenes in my novel that have their origins in the Sagas, including the poem Harald uttered in his dying moments. I also leaned on The Wanderer: Epics Elegies and Riddles to help develop a feeling of being in the moment.
JDK: What are you working on next? Hopefully, more history.
GKH: I’ve almost finished the sequel to 1066 What Fates Impose. This one’s called In the Shadows of Castles and tells the story of the first five years of the English Resistance, post the Battle of Hastings. It should be publish early in 2019.
Thank you Mr. Holloway for answering all my questions. I certainly look forward to learning about the post Battle of Hastings world.
If you wish to see more of my most recent book and movie reviews, visit http://www.jeffreykeeten.com
I also have a Facebook blogger page at:https://www.facebook.com/JeffreyKeeten
February 4, 2024
What historical fiction should be
By Charles van Buren on May 7, 2018
Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
This is what a historical novel should be, not just well written but well researched and alive. No dead, dusty history here. In addition to his obvious knowledge, Mr. Holloway seems to have a feel for the time period which he is able to impart to the reader.
There is a considerable amount of historical information and detail with a cast of thousands. Though only a few dozen are named, Mr. Holloway has a knack of bringing them all to life. Fortunately for the readers' focus and, perhaps, sanity, there are but a couple of dozen reappearing main characters. Among these are some of the great heroes and villains of British history.
A reader sympathetic towards or admiring of Duke William may not care for the picture of the brutal, violent man which appears here. It suits me just fine. Ever since reading Random House's Landmark History, WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR by Thomas B. Costain as a child, my sympathy has been with King Harold and the Saxons. Logic is not on the side of arguments that King Edward promised the English throne to William and that Harold swore a free and willing oath to support him. This novel postulates an interesting, maybe unique, explanation for Harold's actions.
Unfortunately, a historical novel can not honestly change the outcome of the story. William wins and a brutal, near genocidal, Norman regime begins. However, I was able to recover somewhat by immediately reading 1066 TURNED UPSIDE DOWN, a book of short alternate history pieces by several different authors including Mr. Holloway. I recommend both books. One exploring what was. The other, what could have been. The what ifs of history are always part of the story.
By Charles van Buren on May 7, 2018
Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
This is what a historical novel should be, not just well written but well researched and alive. No dead, dusty history here. In addition to his obvious knowledge, Mr. Holloway seems to have a feel for the time period which he is able to impart to the reader.
There is a considerable amount of historical information and detail with a cast of thousands. Though only a few dozen are named, Mr. Holloway has a knack of bringing them all to life. Fortunately for the readers' focus and, perhaps, sanity, there are but a couple of dozen reappearing main characters. Among these are some of the great heroes and villains of British history.
A reader sympathetic towards or admiring of Duke William may not care for the picture of the brutal, violent man which appears here. It suits me just fine. Ever since reading Random House's Landmark History, WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR by Thomas B. Costain as a child, my sympathy has been with King Harold and the Saxons. Logic is not on the side of arguments that King Edward promised the English throne to William and that Harold swore a free and willing oath to support him. This novel postulates an interesting, maybe unique, explanation for Harold's actions.
Unfortunately, a historical novel can not honestly change the outcome of the story. William wins and a brutal, near genocidal, Norman regime begins. However, I was able to recover somewhat by immediately reading 1066 TURNED UPSIDE DOWN, a book of short alternate history pieces by several different authors including Mr. Holloway. I recommend both books. One exploring what was. The other, what could have been. The what ifs of history are always part of the story.
February 22, 2016
This is an era of history that I am extremely interested in, and unfortunately there just aren’t enough novels about it. However, this book helps to fill the gap tremendously. I think sometimes when you read a book you can tell very early on whether it is going to be good or not. With this it was a very well written paragraph on page three that told me this was going to, with all certainty, be good; it told me to give this book my full focus. Indeed, this paragraph really drew me straight into the story, and into the history:
“With the very last of his strength he raises his head to look around the room. There are his sons, his brothers, the bishop, and …”Oh God, oh Good Almighty. No, not him! Not him!” His voice rasps in his constrictive throat, his eyes bulge as he is gripped by terror. Before him, unseen by the others, stands a blood drenched warrior, tall and proud as an oak, fresh from the battlefield, his lank and sweat soaked hair hanging down his shoulders, his once handsome face made ugly by an eyeless socket. More blood runs from a wound in his throat and another in his chest. As though to steady himself he leans on his battle axe, resting his hands on its iron head. He stared impassively at William with his single eye, blue and as deep as the ocean; a stare made all the more intense by its intense singularity.”
I absolutely love the idea of starting the story with its ending. William the Conqueror is about to die and he is haunted by his past. The Conqueror has finally been conquered himself, but not by a mere man; he has been conquered by death. He looks back on his decision to invade England, which lead to the death of his rival claimant to throne: King Harold Godwinson. He questions whether his imposing of Danish ways on the Saxons was a Christian act or one that will send him straight to the fiery depths of hell. This is manifested by him being haunted by the spectre of King Harold who represents the Conquerors biggest accomplishment and, in this case, his biggest regret. He sincerely wonders if the conquered deserved their fate.
After the prologue the novel goes back and recounts the events that led to that fateful day in 1066. Harold’s early political routes are established along with his reverence of his father Godwin. This shows us he has learnt from his mentor; it shows us how he utilizes the same political tact and careful planning of his forbear. Godwin narrowly avoided a civil war, through his politicking, and his son is the same kind of man. He would rather avoid a war if he could, but he would not surrender the Kingship England granted him because it is not his to surrender even if that meant avoiding war. England granted it to him, he didn’t just take it for himself.
Well defined history
Eventually as the years pass Edward the confessor dies with no real heir. There is only one man in England who is capable of being a King; thus, Harold is anointed as the new English King. He’s the right man for the job, but William Duke of Normandy has also been promised the crown, he too believes he is the King. He has manipulated Harold’s brother into invading England. Woe to King Harold as he now has the threat of invasion on two fronts and at the same time has to deal with the incompetence of his own Earls.
This book is very thorough. The events leading up to Harold’s fate are recounted in a way that shows you how a multitude of factors, ultimately, led to a Norman victory at Hastings. I think the author has written this quite cleverly, I think if you read between the lines you can see suggestions of how Harold could have avoided his defeat. If he could have persuaded his brother to re-join before he swore himself to another King, the battle of Stamford Bridge could have been avoided, and perhaps the Battle of Hastings would have had a different victor.
Overall, this is a book I really enjoyed. I think considering this book is independently published the author has done a remarkable job. He has managed to convey an in deep narrative of the history of the characters, and at the same time hasn’t lost their feel for being characters. What I mean is at points this read like a historical non-fiction narrative, but the characters didn’t feel like non-fiction characters. They still retained their status as individuals rather than just someone in history. This really gave the author an individual style of writing, which made me enjoy this more.
I recommend this book as much as I would any book by leading authors in the genre; thus, I gave this a strong 4 star rating.
The author sent me this book in exchange for an honest review.
“With the very last of his strength he raises his head to look around the room. There are his sons, his brothers, the bishop, and …”Oh God, oh Good Almighty. No, not him! Not him!” His voice rasps in his constrictive throat, his eyes bulge as he is gripped by terror. Before him, unseen by the others, stands a blood drenched warrior, tall and proud as an oak, fresh from the battlefield, his lank and sweat soaked hair hanging down his shoulders, his once handsome face made ugly by an eyeless socket. More blood runs from a wound in his throat and another in his chest. As though to steady himself he leans on his battle axe, resting his hands on its iron head. He stared impassively at William with his single eye, blue and as deep as the ocean; a stare made all the more intense by its intense singularity.”
I absolutely love the idea of starting the story with its ending. William the Conqueror is about to die and he is haunted by his past. The Conqueror has finally been conquered himself, but not by a mere man; he has been conquered by death. He looks back on his decision to invade England, which lead to the death of his rival claimant to throne: King Harold Godwinson. He questions whether his imposing of Danish ways on the Saxons was a Christian act or one that will send him straight to the fiery depths of hell. This is manifested by him being haunted by the spectre of King Harold who represents the Conquerors biggest accomplishment and, in this case, his biggest regret. He sincerely wonders if the conquered deserved their fate.
After the prologue the novel goes back and recounts the events that led to that fateful day in 1066. Harold’s early political routes are established along with his reverence of his father Godwin. This shows us he has learnt from his mentor; it shows us how he utilizes the same political tact and careful planning of his forbear. Godwin narrowly avoided a civil war, through his politicking, and his son is the same kind of man. He would rather avoid a war if he could, but he would not surrender the Kingship England granted him because it is not his to surrender even if that meant avoiding war. England granted it to him, he didn’t just take it for himself.
Well defined history
Eventually as the years pass Edward the confessor dies with no real heir. There is only one man in England who is capable of being a King; thus, Harold is anointed as the new English King. He’s the right man for the job, but William Duke of Normandy has also been promised the crown, he too believes he is the King. He has manipulated Harold’s brother into invading England. Woe to King Harold as he now has the threat of invasion on two fronts and at the same time has to deal with the incompetence of his own Earls.
This book is very thorough. The events leading up to Harold’s fate are recounted in a way that shows you how a multitude of factors, ultimately, led to a Norman victory at Hastings. I think the author has written this quite cleverly, I think if you read between the lines you can see suggestions of how Harold could have avoided his defeat. If he could have persuaded his brother to re-join before he swore himself to another King, the battle of Stamford Bridge could have been avoided, and perhaps the Battle of Hastings would have had a different victor.
Overall, this is a book I really enjoyed. I think considering this book is independently published the author has done a remarkable job. He has managed to convey an in deep narrative of the history of the characters, and at the same time hasn’t lost their feel for being characters. What I mean is at points this read like a historical non-fiction narrative, but the characters didn’t feel like non-fiction characters. They still retained their status as individuals rather than just someone in history. This really gave the author an individual style of writing, which made me enjoy this more.
I recommend this book as much as I would any book by leading authors in the genre; thus, I gave this a strong 4 star rating.
The author sent me this book in exchange for an honest review.
October 6, 2015
Copy provided by the author in exchange for an honest review
Edward the Confessor, King of England, lacks the ability to provide the kingdom with an heir. Nobles, clergymen and foreign rulers alike are preparing themselves for the inevitable succession crisis, manipulating their way to power and influence. An the midst of it all stand Earl Godwin of Wessex, the Kingmaker, whose plans for his country goes far beyond the petty greed of the rest of the earls.
1066 is not only one of the most interesting, but arguably one of the most important, years in the history of Europe, and the whole world for that matter. Not only because several different claimants battled for a throne, but because three wholly different cultures fought for control over what would become the most powerful nation in history. And because the eventual outcome was decided by a streak of luck and coincidence, where small changes could have made huge differences.
This was a strong historical fiction book. The writing is solid, the description of the two major battles of 1066 is great and overall there is little to complain about. I especially enjoyed two things: firstly, that the book for the most part contained very little action, but still managed to stay interesting. Up until the battle for Stamford Bridge, most of the plot was about noble families and their intrigue and political positioning. My enjoyment of this part may have been increased by the fact that I usually prefer political intrigue to battle when it comes to books, but it still was impressive how the author avoided boring the reader.
The second thing is the most important, namely the point of view. This book is centred around the House of Godwin, with Harold Godwinson being the main character. Even those who know only the tiniest bit about the events of 1066 will probably recognize the name and remember what his fate was. Knowing that beforehand actually only made the book better. This focus also taught me a few things that I did not already know (for instance the role of Harold’s brothers), so that was refreshing.
The book did have its weaknesses. With the possible exception of its description of Stamford Bridge (my favourite part by far), the book was good but not exceptional. The characters were not particularly developed, the ending felt very rushed and there were a new historical mistakes. However, the experience as a whole was very positive, and I would not hesitate to recommend this to all my fellow historical fiction fans.
Edward the Confessor, King of England, lacks the ability to provide the kingdom with an heir. Nobles, clergymen and foreign rulers alike are preparing themselves for the inevitable succession crisis, manipulating their way to power and influence. An the midst of it all stand Earl Godwin of Wessex, the Kingmaker, whose plans for his country goes far beyond the petty greed of the rest of the earls.
1066 is not only one of the most interesting, but arguably one of the most important, years in the history of Europe, and the whole world for that matter. Not only because several different claimants battled for a throne, but because three wholly different cultures fought for control over what would become the most powerful nation in history. And because the eventual outcome was decided by a streak of luck and coincidence, where small changes could have made huge differences.
This was a strong historical fiction book. The writing is solid, the description of the two major battles of 1066 is great and overall there is little to complain about. I especially enjoyed two things: firstly, that the book for the most part contained very little action, but still managed to stay interesting. Up until the battle for Stamford Bridge, most of the plot was about noble families and their intrigue and political positioning. My enjoyment of this part may have been increased by the fact that I usually prefer political intrigue to battle when it comes to books, but it still was impressive how the author avoided boring the reader.
The second thing is the most important, namely the point of view. This book is centred around the House of Godwin, with Harold Godwinson being the main character. Even those who know only the tiniest bit about the events of 1066 will probably recognize the name and remember what his fate was. Knowing that beforehand actually only made the book better. This focus also taught me a few things that I did not already know (for instance the role of Harold’s brothers), so that was refreshing.
The book did have its weaknesses. With the possible exception of its description of Stamford Bridge (my favourite part by far), the book was good but not exceptional. The characters were not particularly developed, the ending felt very rushed and there were a new historical mistakes. However, the experience as a whole was very positive, and I would not hesitate to recommend this to all my fellow historical fiction fans.
December 29, 2018
This marvellous book by, for me, this new author has been one of an amazingly high quality.
What occurs to me, is that the characters involved within this story are all thoroughly researched historically, and thus making this tale such a beautiful and gripping novel.
Wonderful storytelling makes this book of 1066 an absolute joy to read, right from the start until the end.
The book starts with a very nice touch with William the Conqueror on his deathbed in Rouen in the year AD 1087, and while knowing that his time has come for him to die, he is feeling more and more haunted by his memories of Harold Godwinson.
The book has a most wonderful storyline that starts in the year AD 1045 and that will end with the deciding Battle of Hastings in AD 1066, and the book contains warm romances and heartfelt love, as well as bloody battles and brutal treachery between King, Earls, Duke and the Church(men).
The heart of the matter of this incredible tale are in my humble opinion five major key moments and those are; one, that King Edward refuses to produce an heir by Queen Edith; two, when Earl Harold Godwinson is tricked and duped by Duke William of Normandy to swear allegiance to him, or face death; three, the definite fall-out between Harold and his brother Tostig resulting in the Battle of Stamford Bridge in the North of England and where Tostig will fall; four, the distrust between the North, Earls Morcar and Edwin, and the South, Earl Harold; and finally five, the deciding Battle of Hastings where King Harold Godwinson and his tired and depleted Saxon army have to face the Noman army of Duke William of Normandy.
The aftermath of the defeat of Harold and his Saxon army at the hands of Duke William and his Normans, will be that for years to come the Saxon population of England will have to endure to live in fear and in terrible conditions as well as to have to face hardship and starvation, in which the Saxons are being shown that they have been conquered once and for all by the Normans.
I say this as a reader and I really mean it, here's a gifted author in the making with an enormous talent, someone who really can produce wonderful tales, but also an author who deserves so much more recognition!
Finally I would like to say that I look very much forward to the author's next novel, and what this book is concerned, this book has been for me "A Most Astonishing Debut Novel"!
What occurs to me, is that the characters involved within this story are all thoroughly researched historically, and thus making this tale such a beautiful and gripping novel.
Wonderful storytelling makes this book of 1066 an absolute joy to read, right from the start until the end.
The book starts with a very nice touch with William the Conqueror on his deathbed in Rouen in the year AD 1087, and while knowing that his time has come for him to die, he is feeling more and more haunted by his memories of Harold Godwinson.
The book has a most wonderful storyline that starts in the year AD 1045 and that will end with the deciding Battle of Hastings in AD 1066, and the book contains warm romances and heartfelt love, as well as bloody battles and brutal treachery between King, Earls, Duke and the Church(men).
The heart of the matter of this incredible tale are in my humble opinion five major key moments and those are; one, that King Edward refuses to produce an heir by Queen Edith; two, when Earl Harold Godwinson is tricked and duped by Duke William of Normandy to swear allegiance to him, or face death; three, the definite fall-out between Harold and his brother Tostig resulting in the Battle of Stamford Bridge in the North of England and where Tostig will fall; four, the distrust between the North, Earls Morcar and Edwin, and the South, Earl Harold; and finally five, the deciding Battle of Hastings where King Harold Godwinson and his tired and depleted Saxon army have to face the Noman army of Duke William of Normandy.
The aftermath of the defeat of Harold and his Saxon army at the hands of Duke William and his Normans, will be that for years to come the Saxon population of England will have to endure to live in fear and in terrible conditions as well as to have to face hardship and starvation, in which the Saxons are being shown that they have been conquered once and for all by the Normans.
I say this as a reader and I really mean it, here's a gifted author in the making with an enormous talent, someone who really can produce wonderful tales, but also an author who deserves so much more recognition!
Finally I would like to say that I look very much forward to the author's next novel, and what this book is concerned, this book has been for me "A Most Astonishing Debut Novel"!
January 4, 2018
Find all my book reviews, plus fascinating author interviews, exclusive guest posts and book extracts, on my blog: https://whatcathyreadnext.wordpress.com/
The powerful opening chapter of the book places the reader by the bedside of the dying William the Conqueror, in 1087. What follows is a sort of book length flashback setting out the factional and political machinations that would lead inexorably – is the author’s suggestion based on the title – to the events of 1066 and the defeat of Harold at the Battle of Hastings.
Most students of English history will, I suspect, be familiar with the events of 1066 but like me know less about the events of the preceding 20 years. Starting in 1045 in the reign of Edward (the Confessor), the author takes the reader in detail through the rivalries, quarrels, battles for land, influence and power of the nobles close to the throne. There are a lot of characters to keep track of so a dramatis personae would have been a useful addition to the book. It’s probably the nature of the times that the female characters play a pretty shadowy role, their chief value being as diplomatic bargaining chips, marriage material or reproductive machines to provide the all-important male heirs.
I’ll be honest and say that half way through the book I was beginning to feel slightly overwhelmed with all the political machinations. Occasionally, the author’s obviously extensive research seemed a little obtrusive with sections on sword-making, dining customs, etc. feeling a little like they had been inserted from a text book. At times, the dialogue came across as rather stilted or included modern idioms that seemed out of place but you did get a sense of the characters from the way they interacted with each other. There were also a couple of nice succinct lines that drew my eye:
On the death by Count Conan by poison: ‘Brittany now had a new Count, Alan the Red, friend and ally of Duke William. Such is fate.’
On Earls Edwin and Morcar manoeuvring Harold into marrying their sister, Aldytha: ‘Harold had their sister but they had him.’
The pace really picked up for me in the final third of the book as events drew nearer to the decisive Battle of Hastings. The author does a great job of explaining all the factors that played a part in the outcome of that day; some a question of chance, the weather or a seemingly unimportant foolish decision. The battle scenes are absolutely gripping. Harold, although ruthless when needed, definitely comes out as the more likeable character and, although I feel a bit soppy for saying this since everyone knows the outcome of the battle, I couldn’t help wishing events had ended differently and he’d prevailed (if only for poor Edyth waiting under that tree).
This was a violent time in history when life was often short and death did not always come about by natural causes. In keeping with the period, there are some gruesome scenes (especially towards the end of the book where the reader encounters a particularly unpleasant character) although nothing worse I would say than you might find in Game of Thrones.
There was a lot I learnt from reading this book, such as the fact that William was able to use his influence to get the Pope to pronounce his campaign against Harold as a crusade, causing additional troops from across Europe to rally to the Norman standard. For historical fiction fans who like their history detailed and aren’t afraid of a large cast of characters, this would make a rewarding read.
I received a review copy courtesy of the author in return for an honest and unbiased review.
The powerful opening chapter of the book places the reader by the bedside of the dying William the Conqueror, in 1087. What follows is a sort of book length flashback setting out the factional and political machinations that would lead inexorably – is the author’s suggestion based on the title – to the events of 1066 and the defeat of Harold at the Battle of Hastings.
Most students of English history will, I suspect, be familiar with the events of 1066 but like me know less about the events of the preceding 20 years. Starting in 1045 in the reign of Edward (the Confessor), the author takes the reader in detail through the rivalries, quarrels, battles for land, influence and power of the nobles close to the throne. There are a lot of characters to keep track of so a dramatis personae would have been a useful addition to the book. It’s probably the nature of the times that the female characters play a pretty shadowy role, their chief value being as diplomatic bargaining chips, marriage material or reproductive machines to provide the all-important male heirs.
I’ll be honest and say that half way through the book I was beginning to feel slightly overwhelmed with all the political machinations. Occasionally, the author’s obviously extensive research seemed a little obtrusive with sections on sword-making, dining customs, etc. feeling a little like they had been inserted from a text book. At times, the dialogue came across as rather stilted or included modern idioms that seemed out of place but you did get a sense of the characters from the way they interacted with each other. There were also a couple of nice succinct lines that drew my eye:
On the death by Count Conan by poison: ‘Brittany now had a new Count, Alan the Red, friend and ally of Duke William. Such is fate.’
On Earls Edwin and Morcar manoeuvring Harold into marrying their sister, Aldytha: ‘Harold had their sister but they had him.’
The pace really picked up for me in the final third of the book as events drew nearer to the decisive Battle of Hastings. The author does a great job of explaining all the factors that played a part in the outcome of that day; some a question of chance, the weather or a seemingly unimportant foolish decision. The battle scenes are absolutely gripping. Harold, although ruthless when needed, definitely comes out as the more likeable character and, although I feel a bit soppy for saying this since everyone knows the outcome of the battle, I couldn’t help wishing events had ended differently and he’d prevailed (if only for poor Edyth waiting under that tree).
This was a violent time in history when life was often short and death did not always come about by natural causes. In keeping with the period, there are some gruesome scenes (especially towards the end of the book where the reader encounters a particularly unpleasant character) although nothing worse I would say than you might find in Game of Thrones.
There was a lot I learnt from reading this book, such as the fact that William was able to use his influence to get the Pope to pronounce his campaign against Harold as a crusade, causing additional troops from across Europe to rally to the Norman standard. For historical fiction fans who like their history detailed and aren’t afraid of a large cast of characters, this would make a rewarding read.
I received a review copy courtesy of the author in return for an honest and unbiased review.
August 28, 2015
‘Such is fate.’
Spanning the period from 1045 to 1087, Mr Holloway’s novel deals with a turbulent period in English history. In 1043 King Edward the Confessor, supported by Godwin, the powerful Earl of Wessex succeeded King Harthacnut. When Edward died in 1066, without an obvious heir, many believed that the Earl of Wessex – Godwin’s son, Harold Godwinson – was the most able person to succeed him. They hoped that Harold would bring stability to the kingdom. But King Harald Sigurdsson of Norway (Harold Hardrada) had different ideas, as did William, Duke of Normandy.
There may not have been any obvious successors, but there were a number of claimants. There are many different factions at court, and with Norway and Normandy also plotting to rule England, there’s plenty of intrigue. Who would prevail, and why? The Godwin family are central to this novel and although they are powerful, they have plenty of enemies. Mr Holloway’s novel provides a fascinating look at this period in history.
Those who know their English history will know the outcome of the battles of 1066. The history can’t be changed, but in reading this novel I found myself wondering ‘What if?’ more than once. In battles won more by chance than strategy, it is tempting to imagine a different outcome.
I enjoyed reading this novel. For me, Mr Holloway’s strength was in bringing the times to life. This novel invited me to consider – in more depth – the characters involved and to consider their motivations. If you are interested in historical fiction set in the 11th century, especially in the period around 1066, then you may enjoy this novel. I did.
Note: I received a copy of this book from the author for review purposes.
Jennifer Cameron-Smith
Spanning the period from 1045 to 1087, Mr Holloway’s novel deals with a turbulent period in English history. In 1043 King Edward the Confessor, supported by Godwin, the powerful Earl of Wessex succeeded King Harthacnut. When Edward died in 1066, without an obvious heir, many believed that the Earl of Wessex – Godwin’s son, Harold Godwinson – was the most able person to succeed him. They hoped that Harold would bring stability to the kingdom. But King Harald Sigurdsson of Norway (Harold Hardrada) had different ideas, as did William, Duke of Normandy.
There may not have been any obvious successors, but there were a number of claimants. There are many different factions at court, and with Norway and Normandy also plotting to rule England, there’s plenty of intrigue. Who would prevail, and why? The Godwin family are central to this novel and although they are powerful, they have plenty of enemies. Mr Holloway’s novel provides a fascinating look at this period in history.
Those who know their English history will know the outcome of the battles of 1066. The history can’t be changed, but in reading this novel I found myself wondering ‘What if?’ more than once. In battles won more by chance than strategy, it is tempting to imagine a different outcome.
I enjoyed reading this novel. For me, Mr Holloway’s strength was in bringing the times to life. This novel invited me to consider – in more depth – the characters involved and to consider their motivations. If you are interested in historical fiction set in the 11th century, especially in the period around 1066, then you may enjoy this novel. I did.
Note: I received a copy of this book from the author for review purposes.
Jennifer Cameron-Smith
April 21, 2014
Find this and other reviews at: http://flashlightcommentary.blogspot....
G. K. Holloway's 1066: What the Fates Impose was a difficult book for me to get into, but once I did, the volume was impossible to put down.
Holloway's interpretation of Harold Godwinson is truly magnificent. I've seen the last Anglo-Saxon King of England depicted in fiction before, but nothing I've encountered compares to the multifaceted figure seen here. Being a fictional account, one cannot take Holloway's characterization as fact, but there is something very sympathetic and profound in his portrait of this oft overlooked monarch.
Politically, some readers might find Holloway's work heavy-handed, but being familiar with the period, I actually found the story well-rounded and satisfying. His description of the years just prior to the Battle of Hastings add depth to the conflict, giving the reader a genuine sense of the era and better understanding of the campaign.
A word of warning friends, 1066: What Fates Impose isn't for the faint of heart. This isn't a historical romance in which the nastier cast members earn their comeuppance. This is hard hitting historic fiction. Bloody and unapologetic, Holloway recreates the brutal realities of the eleventh century within these pages and though I personally value the authenticity this piece, I wouldn't want to mislead anyone with my praise.
An authoritative and original fiction, 1066: What Fates Impose is a gripping tale of rivalry, ambition and deceit. Highly recommended.
G. K. Holloway's 1066: What the Fates Impose was a difficult book for me to get into, but once I did, the volume was impossible to put down.
Holloway's interpretation of Harold Godwinson is truly magnificent. I've seen the last Anglo-Saxon King of England depicted in fiction before, but nothing I've encountered compares to the multifaceted figure seen here. Being a fictional account, one cannot take Holloway's characterization as fact, but there is something very sympathetic and profound in his portrait of this oft overlooked monarch.
Politically, some readers might find Holloway's work heavy-handed, but being familiar with the period, I actually found the story well-rounded and satisfying. His description of the years just prior to the Battle of Hastings add depth to the conflict, giving the reader a genuine sense of the era and better understanding of the campaign.
A word of warning friends, 1066: What Fates Impose isn't for the faint of heart. This isn't a historical romance in which the nastier cast members earn their comeuppance. This is hard hitting historic fiction. Bloody and unapologetic, Holloway recreates the brutal realities of the eleventh century within these pages and though I personally value the authenticity this piece, I wouldn't want to mislead anyone with my praise.
An authoritative and original fiction, 1066: What Fates Impose is a gripping tale of rivalry, ambition and deceit. Highly recommended.
April 2, 2015
This book was already on my TBR list when Mr. Holloway approached me requesting a review. I was delighted to have additional motivation to read a book on a subject I am interested in, especially since I already had the eBook loaded on my Kobo prior to his request.
While I consider myself a life-long student of history, I am not an academic historian; I'm more of an enthusiast. Consequently, I've read a number of books about the Norman Conquest and the fall of Anglo-Saxon England. I've read some of the primary source chronicles, several modern histories on the matter and a number of historical novels treating the period as well, and the facts, contradictions, theories and inventions of many writers have likely informed my thinking on the subject over the years. While I'm only a layman, my reading gives me a pretty good generalized grounding about the period that may not be shared by the majority of readers approaching the book. My general familiarity with the events can impact my enjoyment considerably when I approach the subject in a work of historical fiction. I also can't be as impartial as a reader approaching the subject from a fresh perspective.
In this case, my awareness of the history only added to my enjoyment of Mr. Holloway's book.
Anyone familiar with the historical studies around the Conquest timeline will be aware of some of the difficulties challenging a writer attempting to fully reconstruct these events. While we have a surprising amount of information about the times from sources written during, shortly after and long after the events, not to mention the fortunate survival of the enigmatic embroidery we call the Bayeux Tapestry, much of the information in those chronicles and records is open to wide interpretation and many of the statements made in one source are contradicted in another source. Often we can speculate on which source is correct or incorrect, culturally or politically prejudiced, or outright lies and propaganda, but the truth is uncertain and some of the events are quite mysterious.
From outset to final paragraph, it is clear that Holloway is intimate with the established timeline and the varying sources from which historians have constructed it. Like a skilled artisan weaving a tapestry, Holloway builds his own definitive timeline by cutting off threads that do not connect his narrative, keeping patterns that are sound and discarding those that are not.
I mentioned in an update as I read the novel that I was impressed with Holloway's handling of one of the great conundrums that puzzle historians studying the events leading up to Duke William's invasion of England. In 1065, Harold Godwinson is believed to have visited Duke William in Normandy, apparently swearing on holy relics that he would support William's claim to the throne upon the death of King Edward. The chronicles contradict each other on how Harold came to visit William, whether by intent or by accident, and they argue whether Harold really swore an oath and if so, was the oath given freely or under duress. Without spoiling the history or Holloway's choices, I would say that Holloway's reconstruction of the events for his novel are as plausible as any put forward in any of the history books I've read. Holloway pulls off similar feats time and time again through the novel, ascribing logical motives to characters for events that often have left historians scratching their heads. It's an excellent reconstruction of events and 1066: What Fates Impose is one of the most plausible historical novels I have ever read.
As to the writing style, Holloway managed to capture and maintain my interest from start to finish. His atmospheric descriptions are brief but sufficient rather than long-winded and plodding, so naturally I applaud the economy of his diction. It is just as well that he is brief in such passages, because there are some lengthy portions of exposition as Holloway does justice to the history of his subject occasionally at the expense of the pace of his narrative. I would not criticize him unduly for this, but that may owe to my own biases, because I enjoy reading the history; others may approach the same exposition and condemn him for too much "tell" against too little "show". I would probably agree that the book's pace could benefit from judiciously pruning some of the exposition.
I have read in some other reviews that the characters did not seem to fully come alive in the novel. Occasionally, I might have found myself wondering at the motives of some of the characters, but overall I found the characters quite satisfying. King Edward passes through an interesting evolution as he faces off against the Godwin family only to set off the crisis of his reign, an event which Holloway skillfully demonstrates has a lasting impact on his character. Harold Godwinson rises from impetuous and slightly-spoiled nobleman through events that mold him into a warrior and a king. Harald of Norway is portrayed as the bold warrior history has remembered, but Holloway has reinstated his love of fame and poetry with interesting and (to me at least) humorous results. Earl Tostig shows qualities relating him to his unstable brother Swein as well as those of his determined father, Godwin. Duke William is determined and ruthless, but Holloway builds his character on a foundation of insecurity rather than strength with interesting and believable results. Aldytha, the Edyths and Gytha are strong, interesting female figures, each with their own strengths and perspectives; there are no simpering medieval damsels in distress in this story. I could actually go on--William Malet and Taillefer, for instance--but I think I've made my point.
Overall, I would say this is a strong, plausible, well-written historical novel and I would highly recommend it to anyone reading historical fiction, or even interested in learning more about the period. Excellent work. I give it a strong 4.5 stars; a 5-star rating would come of a few minor edits and trims. I will look forward to reading future works by Mr. Holloway, and I hope his epic and embracing approach to monumental fiction tackles additional subjects in future with the same well-considered study and consideration.
While I consider myself a life-long student of history, I am not an academic historian; I'm more of an enthusiast. Consequently, I've read a number of books about the Norman Conquest and the fall of Anglo-Saxon England. I've read some of the primary source chronicles, several modern histories on the matter and a number of historical novels treating the period as well, and the facts, contradictions, theories and inventions of many writers have likely informed my thinking on the subject over the years. While I'm only a layman, my reading gives me a pretty good generalized grounding about the period that may not be shared by the majority of readers approaching the book. My general familiarity with the events can impact my enjoyment considerably when I approach the subject in a work of historical fiction. I also can't be as impartial as a reader approaching the subject from a fresh perspective.
In this case, my awareness of the history only added to my enjoyment of Mr. Holloway's book.
Anyone familiar with the historical studies around the Conquest timeline will be aware of some of the difficulties challenging a writer attempting to fully reconstruct these events. While we have a surprising amount of information about the times from sources written during, shortly after and long after the events, not to mention the fortunate survival of the enigmatic embroidery we call the Bayeux Tapestry, much of the information in those chronicles and records is open to wide interpretation and many of the statements made in one source are contradicted in another source. Often we can speculate on which source is correct or incorrect, culturally or politically prejudiced, or outright lies and propaganda, but the truth is uncertain and some of the events are quite mysterious.
From outset to final paragraph, it is clear that Holloway is intimate with the established timeline and the varying sources from which historians have constructed it. Like a skilled artisan weaving a tapestry, Holloway builds his own definitive timeline by cutting off threads that do not connect his narrative, keeping patterns that are sound and discarding those that are not.
I mentioned in an update as I read the novel that I was impressed with Holloway's handling of one of the great conundrums that puzzle historians studying the events leading up to Duke William's invasion of England. In 1065, Harold Godwinson is believed to have visited Duke William in Normandy, apparently swearing on holy relics that he would support William's claim to the throne upon the death of King Edward. The chronicles contradict each other on how Harold came to visit William, whether by intent or by accident, and they argue whether Harold really swore an oath and if so, was the oath given freely or under duress. Without spoiling the history or Holloway's choices, I would say that Holloway's reconstruction of the events for his novel are as plausible as any put forward in any of the history books I've read. Holloway pulls off similar feats time and time again through the novel, ascribing logical motives to characters for events that often have left historians scratching their heads. It's an excellent reconstruction of events and 1066: What Fates Impose is one of the most plausible historical novels I have ever read.
As to the writing style, Holloway managed to capture and maintain my interest from start to finish. His atmospheric descriptions are brief but sufficient rather than long-winded and plodding, so naturally I applaud the economy of his diction. It is just as well that he is brief in such passages, because there are some lengthy portions of exposition as Holloway does justice to the history of his subject occasionally at the expense of the pace of his narrative. I would not criticize him unduly for this, but that may owe to my own biases, because I enjoy reading the history; others may approach the same exposition and condemn him for too much "tell" against too little "show". I would probably agree that the book's pace could benefit from judiciously pruning some of the exposition.
I have read in some other reviews that the characters did not seem to fully come alive in the novel. Occasionally, I might have found myself wondering at the motives of some of the characters, but overall I found the characters quite satisfying. King Edward passes through an interesting evolution as he faces off against the Godwin family only to set off the crisis of his reign, an event which Holloway skillfully demonstrates has a lasting impact on his character. Harold Godwinson rises from impetuous and slightly-spoiled nobleman through events that mold him into a warrior and a king. Harald of Norway is portrayed as the bold warrior history has remembered, but Holloway has reinstated his love of fame and poetry with interesting and (to me at least) humorous results. Earl Tostig shows qualities relating him to his unstable brother Swein as well as those of his determined father, Godwin. Duke William is determined and ruthless, but Holloway builds his character on a foundation of insecurity rather than strength with interesting and believable results. Aldytha, the Edyths and Gytha are strong, interesting female figures, each with their own strengths and perspectives; there are no simpering medieval damsels in distress in this story. I could actually go on--William Malet and Taillefer, for instance--but I think I've made my point.
Overall, I would say this is a strong, plausible, well-written historical novel and I would highly recommend it to anyone reading historical fiction, or even interested in learning more about the period. Excellent work. I give it a strong 4.5 stars; a 5-star rating would come of a few minor edits and trims. I will look forward to reading future works by Mr. Holloway, and I hope his epic and embracing approach to monumental fiction tackles additional subjects in future with the same well-considered study and consideration.
October 1, 2018
Absolutely superbly written. I loved the idea of of the list of main characters at the beginning. As I was hooked into this book, with 440 pages, I decided to read a few pages at a time in bed. It took me quite a few weeks to read it all, but honestly it's one of my best night time reads I've ever read. . You only have to read other readers fabulous reviews here on Goodreads to know this is a rare excellent books packed with historical information.
September 5, 2014
This was a solid 4-star novel by indie author Glynn Holloway. I had this book moving up my TBR when I was surprised by a request from the author for a review, and I am happy to offer my honest opinion in return for my copy of his book.
Comprehensive historical research is evident on each page of this work, with the complicated circumstances leading up to William the Bastard's unlikely success described in detail. 1066 is widely known as the year that changed England forever, but few understand the variety of elements that had to come together in order for events to unfold the way that they did. Holloway describes these events: Edward's death, Tostig's exile, William's all-or-nothing attack, and a laundry list of unfortunate timing and circumstances with great skill.
Even those who are familiar with the factors that led to the death of England's last Anglo-Saxon king will appreciate the way this author ties together the historical facts and personalities that made it happen. Now known as William the Conqueror, it is not commonly known just how much of an underdog the Duke of Normandy was when he headed into battle. In Holloway's characterization, he seems to be victorious through the sheer force of his iron will.
The complex family ties and feuds that plagued England, leaving Harold Godwinson vulnerable, are also unwound and explained to the reader. One learns as much as reading nonfiction while also being thoroughly entertained by the author's storytelling.
The only element missing to make this a 5-star read was the character development that would lead to an emotional attachment to Harold and his closest followers. Especially when interacting with one of his wives, I found Harold's dialog somewhat unrealistic. While Duke William frequently came across as an arrogant, petulant child. Secondary characters were not developed to the extent that they were easy to keep track of, rather I would have to remind myself who they were when they entered a scene. Being familiar with the historical figures involved, this wasn't so much a problem, but it kept me from becoming emotionally invested in the story.
Overall, a very satisfying read that is more historical than fiction. The battle of Hastings is described in great detail without becoming overwhelming. Each of the strategies - and just plain luck - that benefited Duke William are cleverly explained, so that the reader feels greater sympathy for King Harold with each strike against him that was completely out of his control.
Comprehensive historical research is evident on each page of this work, with the complicated circumstances leading up to William the Bastard's unlikely success described in detail. 1066 is widely known as the year that changed England forever, but few understand the variety of elements that had to come together in order for events to unfold the way that they did. Holloway describes these events: Edward's death, Tostig's exile, William's all-or-nothing attack, and a laundry list of unfortunate timing and circumstances with great skill.
Even those who are familiar with the factors that led to the death of England's last Anglo-Saxon king will appreciate the way this author ties together the historical facts and personalities that made it happen. Now known as William the Conqueror, it is not commonly known just how much of an underdog the Duke of Normandy was when he headed into battle. In Holloway's characterization, he seems to be victorious through the sheer force of his iron will.
The complex family ties and feuds that plagued England, leaving Harold Godwinson vulnerable, are also unwound and explained to the reader. One learns as much as reading nonfiction while also being thoroughly entertained by the author's storytelling.
The only element missing to make this a 5-star read was the character development that would lead to an emotional attachment to Harold and his closest followers. Especially when interacting with one of his wives, I found Harold's dialog somewhat unrealistic. While Duke William frequently came across as an arrogant, petulant child. Secondary characters were not developed to the extent that they were easy to keep track of, rather I would have to remind myself who they were when they entered a scene. Being familiar with the historical figures involved, this wasn't so much a problem, but it kept me from becoming emotionally invested in the story.
Overall, a very satisfying read that is more historical than fiction. The battle of Hastings is described in great detail without becoming overwhelming. Each of the strategies - and just plain luck - that benefited Duke William are cleverly explained, so that the reader feels greater sympathy for King Harold with each strike against him that was completely out of his control.
October 17, 2015
The book follows the events up to the Battle of Hastings and The Conquest. It’s told from third person narrative with huge cast of characters. Luckily for me I’ve read from the period before but there is list of characters in the beginning of the book. Which for me is useless when reading ebooks but maybe that’s just me. Anyway…
Although I found some trouble connecting with the characters, I did feel sympathy for Harold. I don’t know if William the Conqueror was as evil as portrayed here but I really hoped someone would kill him and the other Normans. Harold is likeable character who is intelligent and honorable while William is sometimes cruel, brutal and then at times like a whiny, spoiled brat. Made you root for Harold even more.
There’s politics, brutal fights and nothing is sugarcoated. I definitely wouldn’t have wanted to live in those times. The book gives good idea of the complicated political climate of the time and how it led to the Battle of Hastings.
Although I found some trouble connecting with the characters, I did feel sympathy for Harold. I don’t know if William the Conqueror was as evil as portrayed here but I really hoped someone would kill him and the other Normans. Harold is likeable character who is intelligent and honorable while William is sometimes cruel, brutal and then at times like a whiny, spoiled brat. Made you root for Harold even more.
There’s politics, brutal fights and nothing is sugarcoated. I definitely wouldn’t have wanted to live in those times. The book gives good idea of the complicated political climate of the time and how it led to the Battle of Hastings.
November 24, 2014
I have read a fair few books about the 1066 era now and I was beginning to think I’d maybe seen pretty much all there was to see in terms of how the story could be looked at. Stupid me. I was wrong. ‘1066 What Fates Impose’ has pretty much now set the Gold Standard for Norman Conquest fiction, just as Marc Morris’ ’The Norman Conquest’ has done for non-fiction of the period. In fact, I was drawn to compare the two a few times while underway, with ‘What Fates Impose’ coming out of it very well indeed. Both books have scope, sureness, readability and also a certain amount of tongue-in-cheek-ability (Face it, you got to enjoy a novel that can find place for lines (about Harald Hardrada) like “The old Viking warrior never felt comfortable in churches unless he was robbing them.”). It is also clear (to me) that G.K. has drawn many of the same conclusions as Marc Morris and also writes in a similar way that in its understatement, makes it easily understandable and accessible.
It’s hard not to take sides on the 1066 period - for an Englishman, anyway - and this book, while presenting scenarios for what happened, on both sides, doesn’t end up sitting on the fence either. Clearly its sympathies are with the English. William is a Bastard, literally and figuratively, Harold is a reasonably normal chap (in his youth, at least), thrust into history’s spotlight. He was tricked, the English were unlucky, William was ungracious while knowing he was riding his luck, he got what was coming in the end.
The book has a good, flowing style, full of understated period detail that doesn’t get all prissy, know-it-all, or ‘in your face’ and thereby obscuring the story. It is written in a calm, precise, knowledgable and authoritative way that gave me total confidence that, based on what evidence there is, it could well have happened like this, if the people behaved in this way, for these reasons. In fact, I could go as far as to say it did occur to me that it read as though you have happened upon a translation of a particularly well-kept diary from someone (somehow) close to all the action and all the participants. There were a couple of ‘bumps’ but they were very minor and absolutely nothing to get in the way of the enjoyment as a whole. I won’t pick them out as they may not be bumps for you.
The story proper starts in 1045, though there is an opening chapter that is well worth going back to, after you’ve finished. It works wonderfully well as both a scene-setter and a scene closer. Actually, is there any point in repeating the story? The bare bones you probably ‘know’ already. There are as many versions of what might have happened as there are people writing them. The story here is thusly; the relatively newly formed country of England is coming off the back of wins and defeat at the hands of Vikings and assorted other invaders, and hopefully coming into a period of calm and peace. What it actually gets is internal rivalries based on the pre-English country states - what are essentially birth-pangs and old rivalries that are hard to forget. What England really needs, is a strong king with a son ready to take over in the fullness of time. What it gets is a king they can support, but one that doesn’t, cannot, or at the very least is unable to, produce an heir who will be of age when he passes on. A vacuum of sorts is created almost by accident. There are various contenders and pretenders, with varying degrees of eligibility - depending on where you stand, of course. What is surprising to realise about this period - and I’m pretty sure it went on over here in Denmark at the time as well - is that the King was effectively elected. Of course, the son of the previous King stood the best chance, but in the case of no close heir, the vote went to the Witan, a pre-democratic periodic gathering of the good and the great. Those with the land and money and the armies to back it up, anyway. On the other side of the Channel, unable to understand how anyone but the King and his family could be King…is Duke William, head of a minor province, called Normandy. He’s not had it easy either, doubtful parentage, the constant threat of assassination while growing up and then having to hold on to power through sheer force of will. By being the biggest, baddest most ruthless of the whole pack. To say his claim to the throne of England, is doubtful, is actually to imbue it with more authority than it actually has. So, what then transpires, is the stuff of legend and has kept historians, writers and seamstresses in business pretty much ever since.
From there on - and based solely on the reading I have done - the book follows the events as they are known to us. And by ‘known’, I’d say it really should be read often as speculation, based on what is perhaps the least unlikely scenario. The ’true histories’ of the period are ’true’ to the facts as paid for by the person behind the writer of the history. It seems like a history was never written without an angle, an axe to grind, a point to make. ‘Facts’ were made to fit where they were wanted to be fitted. I get the idea that nowadays, we consider it a ‘fact’ if conclusions can be drawn from the repeated use of similar descriptions of events, that therefore they must have, most probably, happened - in some form of other. Or where archaeology, or probability based on archaeology, can maybe back them up. There you go. While ‘What Fates Impose’ is not meant to be an actual history of the period, I can imagine objections to it from any academics out there could perhaps hinge on the portrayal of how Harold came to pledge allegiance to William and thereby support William’s claim that Edward promised him the throne. You’re either going to like it or you’re not. But you cannot deny it works with the background of the characters and situations set up in the book. But I’ve no doubt that some - often self-proclaimed (I’ve come across them) - ‘experts’ will take exception and maybe overlook the book as a whole. They'd be doing themselves a great disfavour.
G.K., has created believable, realistic, human characters from some of history’s most iconic figures. It is good to have Godwin Sr., and Harold’s background filled out, for instance. Only ‘Shieldwall’ by Justin Hill (of the books I’ve read on 1066 so far) does something similar with the Godwin family. That Harold had plenty of children and two ‘wives’, for instance, was something I hadn’t realised. He’s drawn as a fairly normal young man, one we’d recognise and like, if we met him on the street today. For instance, he meets a pretty girl, falls in love, wants to spend the rest of his life with her. But because he becomes King, there are other demands, other priorities that cannot be avoided. Harold grows up and develops into a true king as the book progresses. From wild, though sensible and caring at heart, to be a proper statesman and envoy. HE has kingly qualities, that’s for sure. Oh, what we lost at Hastings…
William is very different. The way he portrayed in the book, reading between the lines, seems due to his trying to make amends, to compensate, for the feelings of inadequacy he must have felt because of the lowliness - and doubtful parentage - of his birth. He has something to prove and feels he can only do it by any means possible, fair or unfair, lawful or unlawful. He knows what he’s doing, can’t help himself and knows he’ll come to regret it.
Throughout the book, there builds a feeling of a far greater loss being imminent. Greater than ‘just’ the English warriors being beaten on that October day at Senlac Hill. Again, like Marc Morris does at the start of ’The Norman Conquest’, G.K., hits us with a couple of very telling facts. Here, they are about the situation before and after the invasion. In 1066, England had a population of about two million. One hundred years later, the population was halved. No famine, no plague. Just William and "Norman civilisation.” Many times during the reading of the book, I got the strong sense - intentional or unintentional - that he feels a way of life, a tradition, a history and a bright future, was about to be wiped out. Not just half the population, something more.
Events unfold, bridges are crossed and then burned behind them and an unstoppable historical ball is set rolling. There are times when it seems like the least worst option, for William at least, is to press on with the whole sorry mess. So we move inexorably towards 1066 and October 14th and the battle. Even though I’ve read many books now, which detail the weeks and days leading up to and including the battle, even though we wouldn’t be who we are today without having been the Normans first - I’ve never had a feeling of encroaching dread like I did while reading the final third of this book. I think it says so much about the quality of the preceding passages and the quality of the writing and presentation of those last few days and hours, that it’s like while I know what happened and it can’t (obviously) be any other way, I still hoped, I still thought ‘we’ and Harold might just do it. The victory was there. The victory was there for us to lose. And we did. Our luck just wasn’t in that day. It could have been so different. The tension, is stomach clenching. I’m reading the words and another part of my brain is shouting to the English characters “go on, GO ON!” I know it can’t be any other way, but still…might it? He dangles victory in front of Harold, it’s there for him to take, if only…And it’s gone. As it surely must have been. It really held me tight in its spell and have me hoping that THIS time Harold would win. That William would get the humiliation - and horrendously painful - death he’s got coming. Harold seems to have done everything right, except be finally lucky. I didn’t want to read on. I wanted to stop there and imagine what could have been…
'What Fates Impose’ really is Historical Fiction par excellence. It’s going take a good book, a very good book indeed, to beat this re-telling of the 1066 story. I thoroughly enjoyed reading the book and I recommend it without hesitation.
It’s hard not to take sides on the 1066 period - for an Englishman, anyway - and this book, while presenting scenarios for what happened, on both sides, doesn’t end up sitting on the fence either. Clearly its sympathies are with the English. William is a Bastard, literally and figuratively, Harold is a reasonably normal chap (in his youth, at least), thrust into history’s spotlight. He was tricked, the English were unlucky, William was ungracious while knowing he was riding his luck, he got what was coming in the end.
The book has a good, flowing style, full of understated period detail that doesn’t get all prissy, know-it-all, or ‘in your face’ and thereby obscuring the story. It is written in a calm, precise, knowledgable and authoritative way that gave me total confidence that, based on what evidence there is, it could well have happened like this, if the people behaved in this way, for these reasons. In fact, I could go as far as to say it did occur to me that it read as though you have happened upon a translation of a particularly well-kept diary from someone (somehow) close to all the action and all the participants. There were a couple of ‘bumps’ but they were very minor and absolutely nothing to get in the way of the enjoyment as a whole. I won’t pick them out as they may not be bumps for you.
The story proper starts in 1045, though there is an opening chapter that is well worth going back to, after you’ve finished. It works wonderfully well as both a scene-setter and a scene closer. Actually, is there any point in repeating the story? The bare bones you probably ‘know’ already. There are as many versions of what might have happened as there are people writing them. The story here is thusly; the relatively newly formed country of England is coming off the back of wins and defeat at the hands of Vikings and assorted other invaders, and hopefully coming into a period of calm and peace. What it actually gets is internal rivalries based on the pre-English country states - what are essentially birth-pangs and old rivalries that are hard to forget. What England really needs, is a strong king with a son ready to take over in the fullness of time. What it gets is a king they can support, but one that doesn’t, cannot, or at the very least is unable to, produce an heir who will be of age when he passes on. A vacuum of sorts is created almost by accident. There are various contenders and pretenders, with varying degrees of eligibility - depending on where you stand, of course. What is surprising to realise about this period - and I’m pretty sure it went on over here in Denmark at the time as well - is that the King was effectively elected. Of course, the son of the previous King stood the best chance, but in the case of no close heir, the vote went to the Witan, a pre-democratic periodic gathering of the good and the great. Those with the land and money and the armies to back it up, anyway. On the other side of the Channel, unable to understand how anyone but the King and his family could be King…is Duke William, head of a minor province, called Normandy. He’s not had it easy either, doubtful parentage, the constant threat of assassination while growing up and then having to hold on to power through sheer force of will. By being the biggest, baddest most ruthless of the whole pack. To say his claim to the throne of England, is doubtful, is actually to imbue it with more authority than it actually has. So, what then transpires, is the stuff of legend and has kept historians, writers and seamstresses in business pretty much ever since.
From there on - and based solely on the reading I have done - the book follows the events as they are known to us. And by ‘known’, I’d say it really should be read often as speculation, based on what is perhaps the least unlikely scenario. The ’true histories’ of the period are ’true’ to the facts as paid for by the person behind the writer of the history. It seems like a history was never written without an angle, an axe to grind, a point to make. ‘Facts’ were made to fit where they were wanted to be fitted. I get the idea that nowadays, we consider it a ‘fact’ if conclusions can be drawn from the repeated use of similar descriptions of events, that therefore they must have, most probably, happened - in some form of other. Or where archaeology, or probability based on archaeology, can maybe back them up. There you go. While ‘What Fates Impose’ is not meant to be an actual history of the period, I can imagine objections to it from any academics out there could perhaps hinge on the portrayal of how Harold came to pledge allegiance to William and thereby support William’s claim that Edward promised him the throne. You’re either going to like it or you’re not. But you cannot deny it works with the background of the characters and situations set up in the book. But I’ve no doubt that some - often self-proclaimed (I’ve come across them) - ‘experts’ will take exception and maybe overlook the book as a whole. They'd be doing themselves a great disfavour.
G.K., has created believable, realistic, human characters from some of history’s most iconic figures. It is good to have Godwin Sr., and Harold’s background filled out, for instance. Only ‘Shieldwall’ by Justin Hill (of the books I’ve read on 1066 so far) does something similar with the Godwin family. That Harold had plenty of children and two ‘wives’, for instance, was something I hadn’t realised. He’s drawn as a fairly normal young man, one we’d recognise and like, if we met him on the street today. For instance, he meets a pretty girl, falls in love, wants to spend the rest of his life with her. But because he becomes King, there are other demands, other priorities that cannot be avoided. Harold grows up and develops into a true king as the book progresses. From wild, though sensible and caring at heart, to be a proper statesman and envoy. HE has kingly qualities, that’s for sure. Oh, what we lost at Hastings…
William is very different. The way he portrayed in the book, reading between the lines, seems due to his trying to make amends, to compensate, for the feelings of inadequacy he must have felt because of the lowliness - and doubtful parentage - of his birth. He has something to prove and feels he can only do it by any means possible, fair or unfair, lawful or unlawful. He knows what he’s doing, can’t help himself and knows he’ll come to regret it.
Throughout the book, there builds a feeling of a far greater loss being imminent. Greater than ‘just’ the English warriors being beaten on that October day at Senlac Hill. Again, like Marc Morris does at the start of ’The Norman Conquest’, G.K., hits us with a couple of very telling facts. Here, they are about the situation before and after the invasion. In 1066, England had a population of about two million. One hundred years later, the population was halved. No famine, no plague. Just William and "Norman civilisation.” Many times during the reading of the book, I got the strong sense - intentional or unintentional - that he feels a way of life, a tradition, a history and a bright future, was about to be wiped out. Not just half the population, something more.
Events unfold, bridges are crossed and then burned behind them and an unstoppable historical ball is set rolling. There are times when it seems like the least worst option, for William at least, is to press on with the whole sorry mess. So we move inexorably towards 1066 and October 14th and the battle. Even though I’ve read many books now, which detail the weeks and days leading up to and including the battle, even though we wouldn’t be who we are today without having been the Normans first - I’ve never had a feeling of encroaching dread like I did while reading the final third of this book. I think it says so much about the quality of the preceding passages and the quality of the writing and presentation of those last few days and hours, that it’s like while I know what happened and it can’t (obviously) be any other way, I still hoped, I still thought ‘we’ and Harold might just do it. The victory was there. The victory was there for us to lose. And we did. Our luck just wasn’t in that day. It could have been so different. The tension, is stomach clenching. I’m reading the words and another part of my brain is shouting to the English characters “go on, GO ON!” I know it can’t be any other way, but still…might it? He dangles victory in front of Harold, it’s there for him to take, if only…And it’s gone. As it surely must have been. It really held me tight in its spell and have me hoping that THIS time Harold would win. That William would get the humiliation - and horrendously painful - death he’s got coming. Harold seems to have done everything right, except be finally lucky. I didn’t want to read on. I wanted to stop there and imagine what could have been…
'What Fates Impose’ really is Historical Fiction par excellence. It’s going take a good book, a very good book indeed, to beat this re-telling of the 1066 story. I thoroughly enjoyed reading the book and I recommend it without hesitation.
February 18, 2014
This book was clearly researched with true commitment and passion. It has been a long time since I have read an historical fiction novel that made me feel as if I were actually learning small details of the age. With so much attention paid to detail, the book is a credit to Holloway's expertise. Having said that, there is more to a good book than the research. I found the dialogue a bit clunky and distracting. It tried very hard to flow naturally, and yet it often read like a script from daytime telly. I believe this could have been made better by adding more character description throughout the dialogue passages in order to break up and support the speech.
The book's opening passage, which is set post-war in 1087, is a real gem. Holloway has crafted a perfect beginning that sucks the reader into a bygone world and compels them to read further. I get the feeling that a lot of time was spent on those first pages, and it shows. The rest of the book achieves similar greatness at times, but the superb writing of that first passage really stands out to me as the novel's highlight.
The book it well presented, with a reader-friendly font and gorgeous, thick paper. The manuscript did suffer a lack of editing expertise, however. Having worked as a proofreader, I keenly noted the many errors which should have been picked up before printing. This is not a poor reflection of the author in my mind, but does little to support his presentation.
Any history buff would greatly enjoy this novel. Holloway should be proud of this achievement and continue to hone those writing skills which seperate a mere writer from a master storyteller.
The book's opening passage, which is set post-war in 1087, is a real gem. Holloway has crafted a perfect beginning that sucks the reader into a bygone world and compels them to read further. I get the feeling that a lot of time was spent on those first pages, and it shows. The rest of the book achieves similar greatness at times, but the superb writing of that first passage really stands out to me as the novel's highlight.
The book it well presented, with a reader-friendly font and gorgeous, thick paper. The manuscript did suffer a lack of editing expertise, however. Having worked as a proofreader, I keenly noted the many errors which should have been picked up before printing. This is not a poor reflection of the author in my mind, but does little to support his presentation.
Any history buff would greatly enjoy this novel. Holloway should be proud of this achievement and continue to hone those writing skills which seperate a mere writer from a master storyteller.
December 2, 2018
William the Conqueror, on his deathbed, reflects on his past which haunts him.
Pre-Conquest, Anglo-Saxon England saw a period of factionalisation among its nobles (1045 - 1066). The raw reality of Edward the Confessor's political impotence lead to rivalry, jealousy, petty squabbles, death, alliances, political manouvering and in-fighting - not just within England but also outside.
Well researched and written, with the cast of characters fleshed out - you got a sense of a relationship between Harold and William; the realities of life are well portrayed. The characters of Harold and Edyth are the stand outs for me.
Great read for those looking for pre and post Conquest historical fiction.
Pre-Conquest, Anglo-Saxon England saw a period of factionalisation among its nobles (1045 - 1066). The raw reality of Edward the Confessor's political impotence lead to rivalry, jealousy, petty squabbles, death, alliances, political manouvering and in-fighting - not just within England but also outside.
Well researched and written, with the cast of characters fleshed out - you got a sense of a relationship between Harold and William; the realities of life are well portrayed. The characters of Harold and Edyth are the stand outs for me.
Great read for those looking for pre and post Conquest historical fiction.
February 20, 2014
I have always been fascinated by pre-conquest Britain and, living near Wilton, Shaftesbury (where King Cnut died) and Sherborne, it would be curious if the incredible history of the area had not rubbed off. Previous literary sources have been Alfred Duggan and various summaries of the times, not least the Domesday Book and the Bayeux Tapestry. What has been frustrating is the inability to picture the actual people of the time and to see them as real actors on a real stage. The huge influence of Denmark, Norway and France on our development as a country is absolutely engrossing.
King Harold Godwinson, successor to King Edward the Confessor who died without children, is the most central figure of this engrossing novel, only known to most people as the king who received an arrow in his eye at the Battle of Hastings. But Mr Holloway, after extensive research, has fleshed out Harold (and the Godwinson clan) and made him very human, especially considering his obvious abilities as a military and political leader, his extraordinary "double" marriage, his explosive and unpredictable family and his overseas connections.
Few realise how widespread was foreign travel in the 11th century and Mr Holloway brings this out very clearly, describing the comings and goings between various European countries. The depiction of William the Conqueror is quite wonderful: he is painted as a brutish, semi-literate oaf, but not without native cunning, a certain charm and forceful leadership abilities. The story of Harold's capture and treatment by Count Guy, and subsequent effective imprisonment by William, was new to me and helped to flesh out not only the territorial but also the personal antagonism of the two men.
The romance and real affection between Harold and his first "wife" Edyth Swanneschals or Edyth Swanneck is beautifully depicted although the nick-name "Swan Neck" is probably a misinterpretation. The finest part of the novel to my eyes is the "reconciliation" between Edyth and Harold after he was more or less compelled to marry Edith of Mercia - perhaps more of a political alliance than a marriage of love. Nonetheless, the author makes the point very strongly that Edith may well have been easy on the eyes and that Harold put up with the "inconvenience" very bravely!!
The Godwinson brothers are seen as an unreliable and bloodthirsty gang, with Sweyn being particularly unpleasant and probably what we would now call a psychopath. Tostig, who effectively ruled Northumbria, rebelled against Harold, persuading the Norwegian King Harald to invade the North. The result was the Battle of Stamford Bridge, which Harold won conclusively in September 1066. After a forced march back of 250 miles to the south with a depleted and exhausted force, Harold was defeated by William at the Battle of Hastings near Senlac Ridge in October 1066. As the author points out, it was a very close thing: had Harold not been killed after a full day's fighting, it is likely that he would have won. The battles are narrated really well and are truly exciting. These were bloody and violent times, the victor often being the man with the biggest stick regardless of right or wrong, and this point is driven home very forcefully.
I loved this novel and this short review does not do it justice. Some might find some of the dialogue a little too racy and modern, but I did not. As 99% of the speech is speculation, it is the author's choice to decide the words and the tone of them. We know what happened in these extraordinary days in outline form but Mr Holloway has filled in the gaps with remarkable skill.
For the first time in a very long time, I re-read certain parts of this excellent book immediately. There is a lot to take in the first time round and I missed a great deal. Full marks to Mr Holloway for shedding a light on these nation-forming years. Five stars.
King Harold Godwinson, successor to King Edward the Confessor who died without children, is the most central figure of this engrossing novel, only known to most people as the king who received an arrow in his eye at the Battle of Hastings. But Mr Holloway, after extensive research, has fleshed out Harold (and the Godwinson clan) and made him very human, especially considering his obvious abilities as a military and political leader, his extraordinary "double" marriage, his explosive and unpredictable family and his overseas connections.
Few realise how widespread was foreign travel in the 11th century and Mr Holloway brings this out very clearly, describing the comings and goings between various European countries. The depiction of William the Conqueror is quite wonderful: he is painted as a brutish, semi-literate oaf, but not without native cunning, a certain charm and forceful leadership abilities. The story of Harold's capture and treatment by Count Guy, and subsequent effective imprisonment by William, was new to me and helped to flesh out not only the territorial but also the personal antagonism of the two men.
The romance and real affection between Harold and his first "wife" Edyth Swanneschals or Edyth Swanneck is beautifully depicted although the nick-name "Swan Neck" is probably a misinterpretation. The finest part of the novel to my eyes is the "reconciliation" between Edyth and Harold after he was more or less compelled to marry Edith of Mercia - perhaps more of a political alliance than a marriage of love. Nonetheless, the author makes the point very strongly that Edith may well have been easy on the eyes and that Harold put up with the "inconvenience" very bravely!!
The Godwinson brothers are seen as an unreliable and bloodthirsty gang, with Sweyn being particularly unpleasant and probably what we would now call a psychopath. Tostig, who effectively ruled Northumbria, rebelled against Harold, persuading the Norwegian King Harald to invade the North. The result was the Battle of Stamford Bridge, which Harold won conclusively in September 1066. After a forced march back of 250 miles to the south with a depleted and exhausted force, Harold was defeated by William at the Battle of Hastings near Senlac Ridge in October 1066. As the author points out, it was a very close thing: had Harold not been killed after a full day's fighting, it is likely that he would have won. The battles are narrated really well and are truly exciting. These were bloody and violent times, the victor often being the man with the biggest stick regardless of right or wrong, and this point is driven home very forcefully.
I loved this novel and this short review does not do it justice. Some might find some of the dialogue a little too racy and modern, but I did not. As 99% of the speech is speculation, it is the author's choice to decide the words and the tone of them. We know what happened in these extraordinary days in outline form but Mr Holloway has filled in the gaps with remarkable skill.
For the first time in a very long time, I re-read certain parts of this excellent book immediately. There is a lot to take in the first time round and I missed a great deal. Full marks to Mr Holloway for shedding a light on these nation-forming years. Five stars.
July 17, 2014
If I hadn’t been sent this novel by the author, I wouldn’t have known it was indeed a novel. From the rather grim title I would have passed this by as some sort of non-fiction alternative theory about the dawn of the Medieval age.
I have to admire the author’s decision to send this book for review though, especially after I gave such a terse mauling to Berwick Coates’ book The Last Conquest. I don’t take any prisoners it is true, but like to think I am fair.
The biggest problem with this type of book, once you separate out the Ancient Rome novels which everybody except me has written, is still the sheer volume of books that have been written on this very subject.
It seems 1066 has been done to death of late. There have been new theories of late too. Documentaries featuring differing views on the site of the battle for instance. I’m sure somebody even wanted to rename it…..
The pre Norman period has been covered by Cornwell , Harrison, Aitcheson amongst others. But, as Mr Cornwell says in the notes of his Warrior sequence it seems pre Norman invasion history is largely forgotten. I find this rather surprising. Post Roman Britain is absolutely fascinating and full of conquest and war. Your average school kid (and today's kid knows even less than we did when we were kids) even thinks British History began with William the Conquerer.
This book, however, deals with the political machinations preceding the Norman Invasion. I am assuming at this juncture that G K Holloway is a debutee author as I can’t find anything else written by him, as he doesn’t seem to have acquired that seamless, almost effortless style achieved by seasoned veterans like, say, Cornwell or Napier.
No, this leans more towards the style of Sharon Penman in as much that it stays very closely to the time timeline events and deals with complex historical machinations with a deep and thorough understanding of the period. It is clear that Mr Holloway has done his research meticulously. Potentially, like some of Ms Penman’s books, this could have been dull as ditch water, but to his credit GKH makes the reader want to turn the next page.
There are a few issues though.
Firstly, I was totally unconvinced by the fall out between Harold and his brother Tostig. I don’t think the reasons for the disagreement were explored deeply enough. The siblings seem to be so close until Tostig’s banishment and then in virtually a page they become arch rivals.
Secondly, a few – admittedly minor – characters keep popping up here and there with no explanation as to who they are.
Thirdly, some of the intimate scenes between Harold and Edith don’t seem to work. I found myself cringing at some of them and pushing on to the next sequence.
Lastly, referring again to the characters appearing here and there, a more detailed list of dramatis personae would have been a good idea. Also, a map would not have been a bad idea and why were there no historical notes at the end ? You just have to have historical notes at the end.
The climax to the story of course is the Battle itself. It’s funny because I found myself thinking as I neared the end of the book how the author was going to fit it in. He did, of course, and the battle scenes were well depicted. Felt it could have been a bit longer and a little more detailed though.
All in all an excellent read.
I wonder though, where will the author go from here ? A sequel ?
The aftermath of course. It would be logical to continue the political theme within the resistance, because of course although Hastings was the watershed to the conflict it was by no means the end of hostilities. There were other engagements prior to the Christmas crowning of the Bastard, which may well merit attention.
Be warned though, James Aitcheson has added a third volume to his 1066 Bloody Aftermath series.
I have to admire the author’s decision to send this book for review though, especially after I gave such a terse mauling to Berwick Coates’ book The Last Conquest. I don’t take any prisoners it is true, but like to think I am fair.
The biggest problem with this type of book, once you separate out the Ancient Rome novels which everybody except me has written, is still the sheer volume of books that have been written on this very subject.
It seems 1066 has been done to death of late. There have been new theories of late too. Documentaries featuring differing views on the site of the battle for instance. I’m sure somebody even wanted to rename it…..
The pre Norman period has been covered by Cornwell , Harrison, Aitcheson amongst others. But, as Mr Cornwell says in the notes of his Warrior sequence it seems pre Norman invasion history is largely forgotten. I find this rather surprising. Post Roman Britain is absolutely fascinating and full of conquest and war. Your average school kid (and today's kid knows even less than we did when we were kids) even thinks British History began with William the Conquerer.
This book, however, deals with the political machinations preceding the Norman Invasion. I am assuming at this juncture that G K Holloway is a debutee author as I can’t find anything else written by him, as he doesn’t seem to have acquired that seamless, almost effortless style achieved by seasoned veterans like, say, Cornwell or Napier.
No, this leans more towards the style of Sharon Penman in as much that it stays very closely to the time timeline events and deals with complex historical machinations with a deep and thorough understanding of the period. It is clear that Mr Holloway has done his research meticulously. Potentially, like some of Ms Penman’s books, this could have been dull as ditch water, but to his credit GKH makes the reader want to turn the next page.
There are a few issues though.
Firstly, I was totally unconvinced by the fall out between Harold and his brother Tostig. I don’t think the reasons for the disagreement were explored deeply enough. The siblings seem to be so close until Tostig’s banishment and then in virtually a page they become arch rivals.
Secondly, a few – admittedly minor – characters keep popping up here and there with no explanation as to who they are.
Thirdly, some of the intimate scenes between Harold and Edith don’t seem to work. I found myself cringing at some of them and pushing on to the next sequence.
Lastly, referring again to the characters appearing here and there, a more detailed list of dramatis personae would have been a good idea. Also, a map would not have been a bad idea and why were there no historical notes at the end ? You just have to have historical notes at the end.
The climax to the story of course is the Battle itself. It’s funny because I found myself thinking as I neared the end of the book how the author was going to fit it in. He did, of course, and the battle scenes were well depicted. Felt it could have been a bit longer and a little more detailed though.
All in all an excellent read.
I wonder though, where will the author go from here ? A sequel ?
The aftermath of course. It would be logical to continue the political theme within the resistance, because of course although Hastings was the watershed to the conflict it was by no means the end of hostilities. There were other engagements prior to the Christmas crowning of the Bastard, which may well merit attention.
Be warned though, James Aitcheson has added a third volume to his 1066 Bloody Aftermath series.
February 18, 2015
A full review forthcoming..just as soon as my brain unfreezes in this ghastly winter weather.. :-)
Once again this old reader of books was asked to read and review an author's muse inspired work. Once again this old reader of books was glad he said yes. 1066 What Fates Impose is, as the title indicates, a story of the Norman invasion of England and William the Bastard's attempt to claim the throne. One of the reasons I like this book is that while William has his place in the story, it is King Harold Godwinson who is the main protagonist. The author does an excellent job in setting up Harold's eventual rise to the crown and the problems he faces in keeping it. The story is rich in the feel and flavor of the times due to the historical research done by Mr. Holloway and the main characters are all well written. While the first third of the book does run a little slow(as the author sets up the rest of the book) the remainder qualifies as page turning material. An adventurous ride awaits the reader as the action flows from place to place setting up the climatic clash at Hastings and the world changing outcome of that battle. Give yourself a treat and delve into the world of 11th century life, warfare and history in this well written tale. 4 stars.
About G K Holloway
I was born in a small anonymous little town in the north of England where I lived the first twenty five years of my life. On leaving school I worked in a variety of jobs until I decided it was time for a change. Having always liked history, I thought I’d enjoy studying the subject for a degree, so, enrolling onto evening classes at my local college to take O Level and A Level courses, seemed the obvious thing to do.
After graduating from Coventry with an honours degree in English and Politics, I spent nearly a year in Canada before returning to England to train as a Careers Advisor in Bristol; a city I like so much I’m still living here thirty five years later. Once I’d qualified, I worked in secondary education before moving onto further education, adult education and eventually higher education.
The inspiration for my novel, ‘1066: What Fates Impose’, came from reading a biography of Harold Godwinson, that my wife bought me. I found the book really opened my eyes to the late Anglo Saxon era. Once I’d finished it I wanted to know more, so I read books about William the Conqueror, the Godwin family and then more and more about Anglo Saxon England. I found the history fascinating, full of marauding Vikings, papal plots, blood feuds, court intrigues, assassinations, so much so, I couldn’t believe the story hadn’t been covered more. So, I decided to do something myself. I researched everything I could about the period, including court etiquette; sword manufacturing techniques; everything. I also visited many of the locations that appear in the book, usually on family holidays and once I’d done all that, and it took quite some time, I wove together facts and fiction to produce the novel.
When writing the book I decided to stick as close as possible to the events and be as true to the characters as possible. For me it’s important to get the research right, so the reader has confidence in the story, knowing what they’re reading is the real thing. This is why Lady Godiva doesn’t ride naked through the streets of Coventry - It never happened. Besides, there was enough going on at that time for me not to have to add any additional spice to the story. Most of the events depicted in my book really happened with perhaps, one or two exceptions or manipulations. That is, I think, why the history comes alive.
Once again this old reader of books was asked to read and review an author's muse inspired work. Once again this old reader of books was glad he said yes. 1066 What Fates Impose is, as the title indicates, a story of the Norman invasion of England and William the Bastard's attempt to claim the throne. One of the reasons I like this book is that while William has his place in the story, it is King Harold Godwinson who is the main protagonist. The author does an excellent job in setting up Harold's eventual rise to the crown and the problems he faces in keeping it. The story is rich in the feel and flavor of the times due to the historical research done by Mr. Holloway and the main characters are all well written. While the first third of the book does run a little slow(as the author sets up the rest of the book) the remainder qualifies as page turning material. An adventurous ride awaits the reader as the action flows from place to place setting up the climatic clash at Hastings and the world changing outcome of that battle. Give yourself a treat and delve into the world of 11th century life, warfare and history in this well written tale. 4 stars.
About G K Holloway
I was born in a small anonymous little town in the north of England where I lived the first twenty five years of my life. On leaving school I worked in a variety of jobs until I decided it was time for a change. Having always liked history, I thought I’d enjoy studying the subject for a degree, so, enrolling onto evening classes at my local college to take O Level and A Level courses, seemed the obvious thing to do.
After graduating from Coventry with an honours degree in English and Politics, I spent nearly a year in Canada before returning to England to train as a Careers Advisor in Bristol; a city I like so much I’m still living here thirty five years later. Once I’d qualified, I worked in secondary education before moving onto further education, adult education and eventually higher education.
The inspiration for my novel, ‘1066: What Fates Impose’, came from reading a biography of Harold Godwinson, that my wife bought me. I found the book really opened my eyes to the late Anglo Saxon era. Once I’d finished it I wanted to know more, so I read books about William the Conqueror, the Godwin family and then more and more about Anglo Saxon England. I found the history fascinating, full of marauding Vikings, papal plots, blood feuds, court intrigues, assassinations, so much so, I couldn’t believe the story hadn’t been covered more. So, I decided to do something myself. I researched everything I could about the period, including court etiquette; sword manufacturing techniques; everything. I also visited many of the locations that appear in the book, usually on family holidays and once I’d done all that, and it took quite some time, I wove together facts and fiction to produce the novel.
When writing the book I decided to stick as close as possible to the events and be as true to the characters as possible. For me it’s important to get the research right, so the reader has confidence in the story, knowing what they’re reading is the real thing. This is why Lady Godiva doesn’t ride naked through the streets of Coventry - It never happened. Besides, there was enough going on at that time for me not to have to add any additional spice to the story. Most of the events depicted in my book really happened with perhaps, one or two exceptions or manipulations. That is, I think, why the history comes alive.
April 9, 2014
Because 1066 and surrounding events are the stuff of our primary school history we tend to view them from a safe and detached distance. But read this book and you will feel close up to those dramatic and fateful events. My opinion of the novel improved as I read it. Although the opening scene was stunning - showing us William the Conqueror on his deathbed - I then found the first half fairly slow-going with all the details of Earl Godwin and his sons and a fickle and rather weak Edward the Confessor dishing out earldoms as it suits him, and a mix of rebellious sons, betrayal, poisonous royal advisers and ruthless conniving archbishops. However the book gained in power and intensity as it moved on towards the events of 1066. In particular, the battle description at the end is brilliant, with several flashes of rich detail, engaging all the senses, together with poignant and moving touches that made me feel I was there at the thick of the battle of Hastings.
The skill of the narrative is such that I couldn't help seeing the changing fate of the combatants as a metaphor for our own lives. After much detailed description of carnage, brutality and sadistic violence, the end of the book came unexpectedly with a poetic beauty that I found truly moving.
I was so immersed in the events that I even found myself thinking 'I hope Harold wins' even though I then thought 'Of course he won't. William wins'. And there is one character whose sadistic murder of a mother and child whilst pillaging along the south east coast of England is so scrupulously examined I thought 'I hope he gets his come-uppance'. But he doesn't. Instead, he wins glory, royal gratitude, a large parcel of land in Devonshire and a wife and two sons. So much for the way of the wicked perishing.
A fantastic evocation of a period of history that can seem very dry in our early school lives. We are so used to viewing the injustice, social inequality, corruption and favouritism of history from a safe distance it becomes merely amusing. But this book engages us emotionally in these events, bringing us up very close, giving us a new sense of perspective, causing us to reflect on the workings of fate in our own lives.
The skill of the narrative is such that I couldn't help seeing the changing fate of the combatants as a metaphor for our own lives. After much detailed description of carnage, brutality and sadistic violence, the end of the book came unexpectedly with a poetic beauty that I found truly moving.
I was so immersed in the events that I even found myself thinking 'I hope Harold wins' even though I then thought 'Of course he won't. William wins'. And there is one character whose sadistic murder of a mother and child whilst pillaging along the south east coast of England is so scrupulously examined I thought 'I hope he gets his come-uppance'. But he doesn't. Instead, he wins glory, royal gratitude, a large parcel of land in Devonshire and a wife and two sons. So much for the way of the wicked perishing.
A fantastic evocation of a period of history that can seem very dry in our early school lives. We are so used to viewing the injustice, social inequality, corruption and favouritism of history from a safe distance it becomes merely amusing. But this book engages us emotionally in these events, bringing us up very close, giving us a new sense of perspective, causing us to reflect on the workings of fate in our own lives.
December 18, 2016
G.K. Holloway's debut novel, 1066: What Fates Impose, transports the reader to England just prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. At the centre of this novel is Harold Godwinson, son of England's most powerful nobleman and a respected Earl in his own right, who is best known to history as the English monarch beaten by William the Conqueror at the Battle of Hastings. But, as is vividly shown in this novel, there was much more to Harold than his last battle.
Given that G.K. Holloway's novel is not the first work of historical fiction I've read about Harold Godwinson or the events leading up to the Norman invasion, much of 1066's storyline was already familiar to me. As I'm interested in time period covered by the book, however, I was curious to read Holloway's interpretation of the historical figures and events synonymous with the era. The novel's principal protagonist, Harold, is portrayed as an honourable, intelligent, and strong man. This matches the impressions I'd gleaned of Harold from the other Conquest-era novels I've read. King Edward (aka Edward the Confessor) on the other hand, comes across as a weak ruler, one who too easily puts his trust in those who seek to use him for their own ends. Aside from well developed characters, another strength of this novel is the attention it pays to the complex politics of the era, both within England and abroad. But 1066: What Fates Impose is not only a novel of politics and battles, there is also a well-drawn romantic element to the storyline.
1066: What Fates Impose is a well-written, engaging, and superbly researched work of historical fiction. Holloway has added enough historical detail to give readers a real flavour for 11th century England while ensuring that the narrative isn't bogged down in it. Whether you are new to historical fiction set in England around the time of the Conquest, or are already familiar with the period's people and politics,1066: What Fates Impose is recommended. I look forward to reading more from G.K. Holloway.
Source: I received a copy of this novel as part of G.K. Holloway's virtual book tour in exchange for a fair and honest review. This review first appeared on my blog, Confessions of an Avid Reader.
Given that G.K. Holloway's novel is not the first work of historical fiction I've read about Harold Godwinson or the events leading up to the Norman invasion, much of 1066's storyline was already familiar to me. As I'm interested in time period covered by the book, however, I was curious to read Holloway's interpretation of the historical figures and events synonymous with the era. The novel's principal protagonist, Harold, is portrayed as an honourable, intelligent, and strong man. This matches the impressions I'd gleaned of Harold from the other Conquest-era novels I've read. King Edward (aka Edward the Confessor) on the other hand, comes across as a weak ruler, one who too easily puts his trust in those who seek to use him for their own ends. Aside from well developed characters, another strength of this novel is the attention it pays to the complex politics of the era, both within England and abroad. But 1066: What Fates Impose is not only a novel of politics and battles, there is also a well-drawn romantic element to the storyline.
1066: What Fates Impose is a well-written, engaging, and superbly researched work of historical fiction. Holloway has added enough historical detail to give readers a real flavour for 11th century England while ensuring that the narrative isn't bogged down in it. Whether you are new to historical fiction set in England around the time of the Conquest, or are already familiar with the period's people and politics,1066: What Fates Impose is recommended. I look forward to reading more from G.K. Holloway.
Source: I received a copy of this novel as part of G.K. Holloway's virtual book tour in exchange for a fair and honest review. This review first appeared on my blog, Confessions of an Avid Reader.
May 22, 2017
This brilliant historical novel provides us with remarkable insights of the events in the years preceding the infamous 1066 Battle of Hastings
If you have ideas about bravery in war and heroes in conquest you should definitely read this book. If you feel working long arduous hours, having little to eat and the permanent fear of poverty hanging over you makes for ‘strong men and women’ – think again. The foreword in this book makes it abundantly clear that nobody really wins when the effects of war and lack of prosperity leave a country and its inhabitants devastated. What happened? The Battle of Hastings, the culmination of ruthless and dramatic power struggles, brought harrowing consequences in its wake.
— Introduction —
Since I first heard about 1066 and the Battle of Hastings, the year stuck in my head. History can be fascinating! So when the author of this beautiful and insightful book asked me to review, I was thrilled. The book follows the events from the year 1045. Why did the Duke of Normandy feel he had a right to the English throne? How did Henry, the Earl of Wessex, become King and why were there problems on the Northern border counties of England? What are the relationships between the noblemen of Wessex, Mercia, Northumbria and the Normans? It is fascinating to see history come alive!
— Storyline —
The book opens with the Conqueror King’s deathbed. The man who ordered the brutal slaughtering of his enemies and whom fate had prevented from falling in battle now has his greatest battle before him: death. To understand what happened, we go back 42 years to Winchester, England, the day of the royal wedding of King Edward and Lady Edith. Edith is the daughter of the influential Godwin, Earl of Wessex. Godwin’s three eldest sons are (in order) Sweyn, Harold and Tostig, Edith’s twin brother. The country is excited about the Royal wedding because the prospect of an heir to contribute to England’s stability and thus prosperity is exhilarating. However, the King has no intention of either having an heir or appointing a successor to the Throne. Regardless of an heir being born, Godwin feels triumphant, fully intending to enhance his power by utilising his closeness to the throne, despite being well aware that his (nearby) enemies envy his precarious if advantageous position. Betrayal, deceit and conspiracies: these are all part of daily life at Court.
When you come to understand the bloodlines connecting various noble English families as well as the Royal lineage, the reasons why sides are chosen when disagreements and feuds arise are also clarified. Both King Edward and Harold are descendants from Knut the Great who married Edward’s mother Emma after conquering London. Because of these existing bloodlines in Medieval England, the Mercian and Northumbrian aristocracy are wary of the growing influence of Godwin and his family. Even more so since Harold Godwinson (son of Godwin) becomes the Earl of East Anglia shortly after the Royal marriage. Things are not what they seem as King Edward bears a grudge against Godwin, whom he holds responsible for his brother’s murder. The King’s close personal friend and spiritual guide, the Norman Bishop of London, Robert de Jumieges, is only too happy to feed Edward’s suspicions against the Godwin family because of his own ambition to become England’s most powerful man of the Church. His Norman heritage causes others at Court to mistrust him: the intolerance towards anyone Norman was strong in the existing Aristocracy of the time.
We follow the life of Harold when as Earl of East Anglia and then following his father Godwin’s demise, he becomes the Earl of Wessex. A powerful and for the most part a just man, Harold forges alliances and in the main holds back from cruelty or ordering executions. However, there are his brothers to consider: Sweyn, exiled for life, and Torstig with his overdeveloped sense of entitlement who is never satisfied, always after just one thing more. Torstig and Queen Edith are as close as twins can be so is it a wonder he sees himself as the King’s heir? Torstig’s actions make it difficult for Harold to stand by his brother and, to make matters worse, to prevent a Civil War, Harold has to choose a side: the King or Torstig. Whatever choice he makes, the consequences are serious, even more so because of the constant and unremitting threats both in the North and the South of the Kingdom and a King who is more concerned with seeking Papal approval than his nation’s wellbeing. We are witness to the lives of the two adversaries in the 21 years before the year 1066, the Duke William of Normandy and, more importantly, of Harold Godwinson, Earl of Wessex, thus regaining a fascinating insight into the events leading up to the Battle of Hastings.
— My Thoughts —
What a brilliant historical novel! The outset is extraordinary and shows us the years before the infamous 1066 Battle of Hastings excellently researched and written with such imaginative descriptions that you see history happening before your eyes. We all know the bare facts, who fought against whom – but the reasons why become very clear in this book and, more importantly perhaps, the insights into the people behind the historical figures are fascinating! History is all about connections and cause-and-effect. Who was related to whom and why would anyone take sides against one’s own brother? A society in which the Pope is desperate to regain control over not only the Vatican, but the known world. We recognise Archbishop Hildebrand, later to become Pope Gregory VII, and King of the Scots Macbeth who instigated reforms in the Catholic Church, and so many others. Sometimes, the reasons why the beautiful churches were built in those times are purely superficial, related to the intricate and never ending game of power and politics.
Many characters appear in the book and the author has thoughtfully provided us with a list of the main players which is so useful when a discussion arises in the story or someone meets an adversary – just refer to the front pages and all becomes clear. Although William, Duke of Normandy, is one of the protagonists, the focus of this book lies with Duke Harold of Wessex. The second protagonist is William. Eventually, they will meet as leaders of their respective armies for the Battle of Hastings. In this book, it is Harold we come to know most and although it cannot be denied he had blood on his hands, the author portrays him such that I felt by the standards of that time Harold was a kind and righteous man at heart. I welcomed the view into life in England in those days and I am in awe of the research and work that it entailed as well as the eloquence utilised in the telling of this wonderful historical tale. I highly recommend this insightful, enjoyable, at times gruesome but most of all remarkable historical novel!
Read the review on my website: https://www.bitsaboutbooks.net/1066-w...
If you have ideas about bravery in war and heroes in conquest you should definitely read this book. If you feel working long arduous hours, having little to eat and the permanent fear of poverty hanging over you makes for ‘strong men and women’ – think again. The foreword in this book makes it abundantly clear that nobody really wins when the effects of war and lack of prosperity leave a country and its inhabitants devastated. What happened? The Battle of Hastings, the culmination of ruthless and dramatic power struggles, brought harrowing consequences in its wake.
— Introduction —
Since I first heard about 1066 and the Battle of Hastings, the year stuck in my head. History can be fascinating! So when the author of this beautiful and insightful book asked me to review, I was thrilled. The book follows the events from the year 1045. Why did the Duke of Normandy feel he had a right to the English throne? How did Henry, the Earl of Wessex, become King and why were there problems on the Northern border counties of England? What are the relationships between the noblemen of Wessex, Mercia, Northumbria and the Normans? It is fascinating to see history come alive!
— Storyline —
The book opens with the Conqueror King’s deathbed. The man who ordered the brutal slaughtering of his enemies and whom fate had prevented from falling in battle now has his greatest battle before him: death. To understand what happened, we go back 42 years to Winchester, England, the day of the royal wedding of King Edward and Lady Edith. Edith is the daughter of the influential Godwin, Earl of Wessex. Godwin’s three eldest sons are (in order) Sweyn, Harold and Tostig, Edith’s twin brother. The country is excited about the Royal wedding because the prospect of an heir to contribute to England’s stability and thus prosperity is exhilarating. However, the King has no intention of either having an heir or appointing a successor to the Throne. Regardless of an heir being born, Godwin feels triumphant, fully intending to enhance his power by utilising his closeness to the throne, despite being well aware that his (nearby) enemies envy his precarious if advantageous position. Betrayal, deceit and conspiracies: these are all part of daily life at Court.
When you come to understand the bloodlines connecting various noble English families as well as the Royal lineage, the reasons why sides are chosen when disagreements and feuds arise are also clarified. Both King Edward and Harold are descendants from Knut the Great who married Edward’s mother Emma after conquering London. Because of these existing bloodlines in Medieval England, the Mercian and Northumbrian aristocracy are wary of the growing influence of Godwin and his family. Even more so since Harold Godwinson (son of Godwin) becomes the Earl of East Anglia shortly after the Royal marriage. Things are not what they seem as King Edward bears a grudge against Godwin, whom he holds responsible for his brother’s murder. The King’s close personal friend and spiritual guide, the Norman Bishop of London, Robert de Jumieges, is only too happy to feed Edward’s suspicions against the Godwin family because of his own ambition to become England’s most powerful man of the Church. His Norman heritage causes others at Court to mistrust him: the intolerance towards anyone Norman was strong in the existing Aristocracy of the time.
We follow the life of Harold when as Earl of East Anglia and then following his father Godwin’s demise, he becomes the Earl of Wessex. A powerful and for the most part a just man, Harold forges alliances and in the main holds back from cruelty or ordering executions. However, there are his brothers to consider: Sweyn, exiled for life, and Torstig with his overdeveloped sense of entitlement who is never satisfied, always after just one thing more. Torstig and Queen Edith are as close as twins can be so is it a wonder he sees himself as the King’s heir? Torstig’s actions make it difficult for Harold to stand by his brother and, to make matters worse, to prevent a Civil War, Harold has to choose a side: the King or Torstig. Whatever choice he makes, the consequences are serious, even more so because of the constant and unremitting threats both in the North and the South of the Kingdom and a King who is more concerned with seeking Papal approval than his nation’s wellbeing. We are witness to the lives of the two adversaries in the 21 years before the year 1066, the Duke William of Normandy and, more importantly, of Harold Godwinson, Earl of Wessex, thus regaining a fascinating insight into the events leading up to the Battle of Hastings.
— My Thoughts —
What a brilliant historical novel! The outset is extraordinary and shows us the years before the infamous 1066 Battle of Hastings excellently researched and written with such imaginative descriptions that you see history happening before your eyes. We all know the bare facts, who fought against whom – but the reasons why become very clear in this book and, more importantly perhaps, the insights into the people behind the historical figures are fascinating! History is all about connections and cause-and-effect. Who was related to whom and why would anyone take sides against one’s own brother? A society in which the Pope is desperate to regain control over not only the Vatican, but the known world. We recognise Archbishop Hildebrand, later to become Pope Gregory VII, and King of the Scots Macbeth who instigated reforms in the Catholic Church, and so many others. Sometimes, the reasons why the beautiful churches were built in those times are purely superficial, related to the intricate and never ending game of power and politics.
Many characters appear in the book and the author has thoughtfully provided us with a list of the main players which is so useful when a discussion arises in the story or someone meets an adversary – just refer to the front pages and all becomes clear. Although William, Duke of Normandy, is one of the protagonists, the focus of this book lies with Duke Harold of Wessex. The second protagonist is William. Eventually, they will meet as leaders of their respective armies for the Battle of Hastings. In this book, it is Harold we come to know most and although it cannot be denied he had blood on his hands, the author portrays him such that I felt by the standards of that time Harold was a kind and righteous man at heart. I welcomed the view into life in England in those days and I am in awe of the research and work that it entailed as well as the eloquence utilised in the telling of this wonderful historical tale. I highly recommend this insightful, enjoyable, at times gruesome but most of all remarkable historical novel!
Read the review on my website: https://www.bitsaboutbooks.net/1066-w...
October 9, 2018
The title asks a question: what fates impose? Having read the book, the answer has to be that they impose a ruthless, Machiavellian Norman king on England. G.K. Holloway's excellent retelling of the many events that all came to a fateful conclusion on a muddy field outside Hastings is a brilliant exercise in imaginative history: he takes what we know and, through the writer's craft, brings the people who lived the events to life - and death, sadly. For this is the one drawback to the book, although it is also a testament to Holloway's ability as a writer: he makes of Harold such an engaging and sympathetic character that, as events drew on and I passed the mid point in the book, I found myself reading slower and slower, just one chapter rather than two or three (the chapters are generally short, so that often meant just reading two or three pages each night). The problem, of course, is that we all know what will happen in the end. This is the great strength of historical fiction but also the burden it places upon the reader: you can't say, oh, it's just a story. Holloway makes the characters, in particular that of Harold, come to life in such a way that the bloody battle of 14 October 1066 almost becomes a personal tragedy where people we know and care about are cut down. This is testament to good writing but makes for fraught reading by the end of the book, as Harold's wife and mother search for his body on the battlefield. Highly recommended (if you can bear it).
October 5, 2015
Long before the bloody defeat at Hastings, long before the Normans were unleashed on England’s Anglo-Saxon populace, the Fates were at work changing the course of English history. It’s these events author Glynn Holloway focusses his eye upon, and these that make up the fascinating bulk of this novel. To English history lovers, the year 1066 has long been familiar, as have the names William the Conqueror, and Harold Godwinson. But in 1066, What Fates Impose, Holloway attempts to bring these characters and the events leading up to the Norman conquest of England to life, and to make some sense of the madness surrounding the succession of Edward the Confessor.
A king who has no son, and who finds his bride repulsive, is never a good thing. Edward the Confessor’s horror of women and possible homosexuality (whether as embellished in the author’s vivid and disturbing wedding night scene, or entirely accurate) leaves him without an heir. (Couldn’t Edward have just closed his eyes, thought of England, and done the deed? Good grief! But, in fairness, maybe he did, and it just wasn’t in the stars for him to reproduce. We’ll never know.) Witnessing the resultant political jockeying, squabbling, betrayals and subterfuge as portrayed by the author here are almost enough to make one understand and forgive that much later King’s (Henry VIII) anxiety over the matter.
The Godwinsons, on the other hand, are fulsomely prolific. A powerful, landed family in their own right, and always hungry for more, they are of value to Edward for their very strength. But, as with any strong ally, they were also a constant threat. Charming and naturally diplomatic Harold; psycho, nun-raping Sweyn; their powerful father Godwin: these were the characters Edward had to contend with, outmaneuver, keep in his corner with favors, and chase off when they over-stepped.
The author is obviously passionate the complex times he wrote about here. We are given a taste of everything: the facts, and the rumors, feuds and calculated but ofttimes tenuous family connections. The broader political situation is delivered in small palatable slices where pertinent to our understanding of the story. Told in a floating omniscient point of view, with occasional inserts of hind-sighted wisdom via the narrator, 1066 reads like a hybrid of historical fiction and history. The narrative glides from the general to the specific in a natural way that works quite nicely, filling the reader in on historical background and spanning large stretches of time, then moving in closer for the bigger, more dramatic scenes. An energetic narrative drive carries the story forward, spiced with some skillfully-handled medieval gruesomeness—hand-loppings, eye-gougings, and infanticide.
Holloway takes time to introduce and firmly establish a huge cast of characters, which serves to capture the reader’s heart and sympathies, so that one feels exactly what’s at stake. Following Harold, coming to know him and to like and admire him, while at the same time knowing his sad fate, lends a poignancy to all that precedes and builds to Hastings. Not an easy feat to induce suspense when the historical outcome is already known, Holloway nonetheless manages it, in spades.
The language is somewhat 20th century-sounding, and uses some modern turns-of-phrase to which the purist in me mildly objected. The dialogue, oddly formal and polite, often reminded me of the black and white movies of the 1940’s – yet Holloway makes it work here. There’s plenty of conflict in each chapter, and what is happening quickly captures the attention, despite the occasional clunky stretches of dialogue.
His power as a writer lies in his descriptions, and in the most brutal parts, in what he doesn’t tell us, as much as what he does tell. It takes a deft hand to convey horror with restraint. Holloway does so admirably, allowing the medieval world to be what it no doubt was, without spending too much time rolling around in the entrails of the worst parts (as some authors tend to do). There’s just enough here to let the reader know: yes, this is war, and yes, in war there are rapists and probably an inchoate serial-killer or three.
When the end comes, the final battle is harrowing. Each setback for King Harold is keenly felt. The last scenes give a feeling of just how close the battle was, and how nearly the history of England missed being a very different story altogether.
A king who has no son, and who finds his bride repulsive, is never a good thing. Edward the Confessor’s horror of women and possible homosexuality (whether as embellished in the author’s vivid and disturbing wedding night scene, or entirely accurate) leaves him without an heir. (Couldn’t Edward have just closed his eyes, thought of England, and done the deed? Good grief! But, in fairness, maybe he did, and it just wasn’t in the stars for him to reproduce. We’ll never know.) Witnessing the resultant political jockeying, squabbling, betrayals and subterfuge as portrayed by the author here are almost enough to make one understand and forgive that much later King’s (Henry VIII) anxiety over the matter.
The Godwinsons, on the other hand, are fulsomely prolific. A powerful, landed family in their own right, and always hungry for more, they are of value to Edward for their very strength. But, as with any strong ally, they were also a constant threat. Charming and naturally diplomatic Harold; psycho, nun-raping Sweyn; their powerful father Godwin: these were the characters Edward had to contend with, outmaneuver, keep in his corner with favors, and chase off when they over-stepped.
The author is obviously passionate the complex times he wrote about here. We are given a taste of everything: the facts, and the rumors, feuds and calculated but ofttimes tenuous family connections. The broader political situation is delivered in small palatable slices where pertinent to our understanding of the story. Told in a floating omniscient point of view, with occasional inserts of hind-sighted wisdom via the narrator, 1066 reads like a hybrid of historical fiction and history. The narrative glides from the general to the specific in a natural way that works quite nicely, filling the reader in on historical background and spanning large stretches of time, then moving in closer for the bigger, more dramatic scenes. An energetic narrative drive carries the story forward, spiced with some skillfully-handled medieval gruesomeness—hand-loppings, eye-gougings, and infanticide.
Holloway takes time to introduce and firmly establish a huge cast of characters, which serves to capture the reader’s heart and sympathies, so that one feels exactly what’s at stake. Following Harold, coming to know him and to like and admire him, while at the same time knowing his sad fate, lends a poignancy to all that precedes and builds to Hastings. Not an easy feat to induce suspense when the historical outcome is already known, Holloway nonetheless manages it, in spades.
The language is somewhat 20th century-sounding, and uses some modern turns-of-phrase to which the purist in me mildly objected. The dialogue, oddly formal and polite, often reminded me of the black and white movies of the 1940’s – yet Holloway makes it work here. There’s plenty of conflict in each chapter, and what is happening quickly captures the attention, despite the occasional clunky stretches of dialogue.
His power as a writer lies in his descriptions, and in the most brutal parts, in what he doesn’t tell us, as much as what he does tell. It takes a deft hand to convey horror with restraint. Holloway does so admirably, allowing the medieval world to be what it no doubt was, without spending too much time rolling around in the entrails of the worst parts (as some authors tend to do). There’s just enough here to let the reader know: yes, this is war, and yes, in war there are rapists and probably an inchoate serial-killer or three.
When the end comes, the final battle is harrowing. Each setback for King Harold is keenly felt. The last scenes give a feeling of just how close the battle was, and how nearly the history of England missed being a very different story altogether.
July 19, 2022
Nice retelling
The book was a good imagining of the interpersonal relations of these very crazy historical characters. By the standards of the time they were probably paragons of normality and measured against the present day wealthy, probably compare favorably but they were crazy. The story lends depth to what is usually a dry recitation of claims and counterclaims, marches and the climactic battles of the book.
I had trouble finding historical fiction on Amazon, my search results were all low effort romances. My other unsettling experiences with Amazon/Goodreads are explained in my review of "Dark Horse", a good science fiction story by Diener or Powers of the Earth (A silly book) and the comments to it from a Claes Rees, Jr/cgr710 (a self-identified NeoNazi) and his friends. Avoid the science fiction corner of Goodreads/Amazon, the membership is toxic and the selection is poor.
Back to the book. It was nice to think of these figures as people but I wouldn't want to live in that society. Even a noble had a precarious existence, which I couldn't see myself surviving. The serfs must have had a life that was hell on earth.
The story was good but there seemed to be a back and forth between 21st and 11th century sensibilities. The casual cruelty and the shortsighted planning clashes with the regret displayed at the end. The inability to picture anyone not a potential rival, ally or both as fully human, doesn't lend itself to fine feelings.
Harold referring to Vikings (Danes would be more likely, I think) seemed a little off. The Normans weren't really different from the Danes and were related, so the sense that they were French glosses over their Scandinavian origins, the lack of a common culture in France and even the power of the Church. I kept thinking about reading that the church had only about fifty years prior to Hastings got the Normans to promise to limit murder to four? days of the week, and that doesn't suggest that religion had much of a meaning (maybe more a set of shared superstitions).
The background was good history. The characters are very plausible, if not as civilized as they are portrayed in parts. The darkest part of their personalities was probably the norm. I wish the book had more of a dark ages depth but it's a nice job regardless. I wonder how they got anything done. I never pictured what a mess the politics were. The Brother Caedfel series is another good source for details of medieval life.
I get my recommendations from YouTube book channels and it hosts a good community of readers enjoying reading. Some of my favorites are.
Tara Mooknee, Novara Media, Munecat Some More News, Eleanor Morton, Ship Happens, Tom Nicholas, Owen Jones, History with Cy, Invicta, Timeline, The Armchair Historian, Diane Callahan Quotidian Writer, Tulia, Karolina Zebrowska, Sabine Hossenfelder, Tiny Wee Boat, Sarah Z, Tibees, The Great War, Between the Wars, The Cold War, Cold Fusion, 2 Steps from Hell, Mala Armia Janosika, BrandonF, Told in Stone, Real Engineering, Kings and Generals, Dan Davis History, AstronautX, Kelly loves Physics and History, Swell Entertainment, Celtica, The Radical Reviewer, What Vivi did next, Casual Navigation, Chris Animations, Autumn's Boutique, Second Thought, Noah Sampson, Zoe Baker, Merphy Napier, Elena Taber, Lilly's expat life, Traveling K, A Cup of Nicole, The Shades of Orange, Neringa Rekaslute, Medieval Madness, TIKHistory, Crecganford, Avishavili, Luciana Zogbi, Answer in Progress, France 24, Alize, Alice Cappelle, Jessica Gagnon, Double Down News, Narrowboat Chef, Pentatonix, Adult Wednesday Addams, Military History Visualized, Task and Purpose, Perun, The Templin Institute, A Clockwork Reader, Brittany the Bibliophile, Enby Reads, Books with Emily Fox, With Olivia, Dr Becky, Jack in the Books, Jacobin, Jessie Gender, Prime of Midlife, Writing with Jenna Moreci, Overly Sarcastic Productions, IzzzYzzz, Jabzy, UA Courage, Lady of the Library, Hello Future Me, Odyssey, Book Odyssey.
I wish you a glorious day, a splendid evening and a wonderful night.
Hope sustains Courage and Empathy, they in turn protect one's Humanity.
Meditation of Thirteenth Route Trade Fleet
The book was a good imagining of the interpersonal relations of these very crazy historical characters. By the standards of the time they were probably paragons of normality and measured against the present day wealthy, probably compare favorably but they were crazy. The story lends depth to what is usually a dry recitation of claims and counterclaims, marches and the climactic battles of the book.
I had trouble finding historical fiction on Amazon, my search results were all low effort romances. My other unsettling experiences with Amazon/Goodreads are explained in my review of "Dark Horse", a good science fiction story by Diener or Powers of the Earth (A silly book) and the comments to it from a Claes Rees, Jr/cgr710 (a self-identified NeoNazi) and his friends. Avoid the science fiction corner of Goodreads/Amazon, the membership is toxic and the selection is poor.
Back to the book. It was nice to think of these figures as people but I wouldn't want to live in that society. Even a noble had a precarious existence, which I couldn't see myself surviving. The serfs must have had a life that was hell on earth.
The story was good but there seemed to be a back and forth between 21st and 11th century sensibilities. The casual cruelty and the shortsighted planning clashes with the regret displayed at the end. The inability to picture anyone not a potential rival, ally or both as fully human, doesn't lend itself to fine feelings.
Harold referring to Vikings (Danes would be more likely, I think) seemed a little off. The Normans weren't really different from the Danes and were related, so the sense that they were French glosses over their Scandinavian origins, the lack of a common culture in France and even the power of the Church. I kept thinking about reading that the church had only about fifty years prior to Hastings got the Normans to promise to limit murder to four? days of the week, and that doesn't suggest that religion had much of a meaning (maybe more a set of shared superstitions).
The background was good history. The characters are very plausible, if not as civilized as they are portrayed in parts. The darkest part of their personalities was probably the norm. I wish the book had more of a dark ages depth but it's a nice job regardless. I wonder how they got anything done. I never pictured what a mess the politics were. The Brother Caedfel series is another good source for details of medieval life.
I get my recommendations from YouTube book channels and it hosts a good community of readers enjoying reading. Some of my favorites are.
Tara Mooknee, Novara Media, Munecat Some More News, Eleanor Morton, Ship Happens, Tom Nicholas, Owen Jones, History with Cy, Invicta, Timeline, The Armchair Historian, Diane Callahan Quotidian Writer, Tulia, Karolina Zebrowska, Sabine Hossenfelder, Tiny Wee Boat, Sarah Z, Tibees, The Great War, Between the Wars, The Cold War, Cold Fusion, 2 Steps from Hell, Mala Armia Janosika, BrandonF, Told in Stone, Real Engineering, Kings and Generals, Dan Davis History, AstronautX, Kelly loves Physics and History, Swell Entertainment, Celtica, The Radical Reviewer, What Vivi did next, Casual Navigation, Chris Animations, Autumn's Boutique, Second Thought, Noah Sampson, Zoe Baker, Merphy Napier, Elena Taber, Lilly's expat life, Traveling K, A Cup of Nicole, The Shades of Orange, Neringa Rekaslute, Medieval Madness, TIKHistory, Crecganford, Avishavili, Luciana Zogbi, Answer in Progress, France 24, Alize, Alice Cappelle, Jessica Gagnon, Double Down News, Narrowboat Chef, Pentatonix, Adult Wednesday Addams, Military History Visualized, Task and Purpose, Perun, The Templin Institute, A Clockwork Reader, Brittany the Bibliophile, Enby Reads, Books with Emily Fox, With Olivia, Dr Becky, Jack in the Books, Jacobin, Jessie Gender, Prime of Midlife, Writing with Jenna Moreci, Overly Sarcastic Productions, IzzzYzzz, Jabzy, UA Courage, Lady of the Library, Hello Future Me, Odyssey, Book Odyssey.
I wish you a glorious day, a splendid evening and a wonderful night.
Hope sustains Courage and Empathy, they in turn protect one's Humanity.
Meditation of Thirteenth Route Trade Fleet
February 6, 2017
I have recently been adding to my knowledge base about Early Middle Ages (c. 5th–10th century) Britain, the period ranging from the time the Romans left the island until the Norman Conquest. There is a growing body of fiction set in this time period. Readers who are looking to enhance their knowledge of this remarkable period have never had so many works of historical fiction to choose from. Despite the progress I have made in my own education of this time, I had yet to read any books specifically describing the end of this period: the arrival of Duke William of Normandy (also known as William the Conqueror and William the Bastard) and the resulting Battle of Hastings in 1066.
Imagine my delight when I was approached by author G.K. Holloway to read then review his book. I admit that I didn’t have to think very long or hard over whether or not to agree. His book has been well reviewed already, and I now understand why.
Much of the story focuses on the Godwinson family, primarily Harold Godwinson. Before reading this book, I knew Harold primarily as the loser at the Battle of Hastings. I knew that the Bayeux Tapestry depicted his death, adding the text ‘Hic Harold rex interfectus est‘ meaning ‘Here King Harold has been killed’, but beyond that I knew nothing of the man. This book gives a very good broad history, with a few selected pinpoints of the most important days of Harold’s life in the years 1045-66.
Because the novel covers 21 years of history in 440 pages, there are many events that are fairly glossed over, or better, abbreviated, by necessity. Holloway does a very good job condensing the things the reader needs to know and making the complicated politics of the time accessible and understandable. I thought at first that this style of narrative might bother me. While not everyone does, I love details and richly painted description. However, the longer I read, the more I came to appreciate and accept a simpler approach. While Holloway could have easily chosen to turn this single novel into two or three novels, the part of me that enjoys a bit more instant gratification was happy he did not.
That being said, I didn’t feel shorted in the character development department in any way. The places Holloway chose to focus his scenes gave a brilliant picture of Harold, but also of the other players on the political scene of England in that day. There are some classic, bumbling and shifty characters (I’m thinking of Morcar, Earl of Northumbria and Edwin, Earl of Mercia for example), some entitled-turned-enemy characters (Tostig, Harold’s brother and Earl of Northumbria). There is also a lovely development of Harold’s love interests, first with his hand-fasted wife Edyth and the growth of their family as a result, and the later addition of his “political marriage” to Aldytha, daughter of Alfgar.
Holloway’s dialogue is straightforward and approachable, sometimes being so straightforward it took on a deadpan humor in places. I don’t know if this was what the author intended, but I rather enjoyed it, finding myself reacting out loud with delight as the characters interacted. His descriptions are present without loading down the prose, always giving me a good picture of the scene in my head without slowing down the narrative.
The only downside to this book, and this is no critique against the author or the book itself, is the ending. Holloway was true to the very sad history, and in this he did a wonderful job. Saying that though, doesn’t mean that I enjoyed the history itself. If the author could have gotten away with changing the history (and I wouldn’t have forgiven him if he had), I would have had an easier time finishing. As it was, I found that my pace of reading slowed considerably as I approached the last sixth of the book. I knew what was coming. It was like seeing the light of an oncoming train, and there was nothing I could do about it.
I welcome this book to my bookshelves, recommending it to readers interested in learning more about the Early Middle Ages and the history of Britain.
Imagine my delight when I was approached by author G.K. Holloway to read then review his book. I admit that I didn’t have to think very long or hard over whether or not to agree. His book has been well reviewed already, and I now understand why.
Much of the story focuses on the Godwinson family, primarily Harold Godwinson. Before reading this book, I knew Harold primarily as the loser at the Battle of Hastings. I knew that the Bayeux Tapestry depicted his death, adding the text ‘Hic Harold rex interfectus est‘ meaning ‘Here King Harold has been killed’, but beyond that I knew nothing of the man. This book gives a very good broad history, with a few selected pinpoints of the most important days of Harold’s life in the years 1045-66.
Because the novel covers 21 years of history in 440 pages, there are many events that are fairly glossed over, or better, abbreviated, by necessity. Holloway does a very good job condensing the things the reader needs to know and making the complicated politics of the time accessible and understandable. I thought at first that this style of narrative might bother me. While not everyone does, I love details and richly painted description. However, the longer I read, the more I came to appreciate and accept a simpler approach. While Holloway could have easily chosen to turn this single novel into two or three novels, the part of me that enjoys a bit more instant gratification was happy he did not.
That being said, I didn’t feel shorted in the character development department in any way. The places Holloway chose to focus his scenes gave a brilliant picture of Harold, but also of the other players on the political scene of England in that day. There are some classic, bumbling and shifty characters (I’m thinking of Morcar, Earl of Northumbria and Edwin, Earl of Mercia for example), some entitled-turned-enemy characters (Tostig, Harold’s brother and Earl of Northumbria). There is also a lovely development of Harold’s love interests, first with his hand-fasted wife Edyth and the growth of their family as a result, and the later addition of his “political marriage” to Aldytha, daughter of Alfgar.
Holloway’s dialogue is straightforward and approachable, sometimes being so straightforward it took on a deadpan humor in places. I don’t know if this was what the author intended, but I rather enjoyed it, finding myself reacting out loud with delight as the characters interacted. His descriptions are present without loading down the prose, always giving me a good picture of the scene in my head without slowing down the narrative.
The only downside to this book, and this is no critique against the author or the book itself, is the ending. Holloway was true to the very sad history, and in this he did a wonderful job. Saying that though, doesn’t mean that I enjoyed the history itself. If the author could have gotten away with changing the history (and I wouldn’t have forgiven him if he had), I would have had an easier time finishing. As it was, I found that my pace of reading slowed considerably as I approached the last sixth of the book. I knew what was coming. It was like seeing the light of an oncoming train, and there was nothing I could do about it.
I welcome this book to my bookshelves, recommending it to readers interested in learning more about the Early Middle Ages and the history of Britain.
April 30, 2014
While I had previously heard of William the Conqueror I did not realize the drastic actions that led to him becoming King of England before reading 1066: What Fates Impose. Who was this man who sailed from Normandy and took the crown of England for himself? What was England like before him? These questions and so many more were answered in this completely captivating novel that brought Medieval Europe to life in a way that few novels I've read have been able to do.
I absolutely loved the formatting of the novel, beginning in 1087 with King William stating on his death bed that he will declare no heir to the English throne since he did not earn it by hereditary right but took it from King Harold. This William is haunted by his heinous deeds and only hopes for some peace now that his life is ending, something that after finishing the novel I doubted he would find. The story then jumps back to King Edward on the throne in 1045 and the fate of English history begins to unfold for the reader in clear, brutal prose that ends with William defeating King Harold. While this eventuality is clear from the beginning, the connections to various characters developed throughout the story made the ending simply heartbreaking for me. You know a story is powerful when you keep hoping beyond hope that history will change itself and see your favorites rise triumphant!
This novel is absolutely saturated with historical facts and figures and it is quite easy to see that a huge amount of research went into the writing of it. When many fact driven novels seem to lack character development I was pleasantly surprised to see that 1066 was able to masterfully combine the facts with a story that humanizes these people from history so the reader is on the journey with them, feeling their joy, triumph and pain. For someone like me who loves English history but wasn't overly familiar with these particular conflicts or people, I was able to create a full bodied image - for better or worse - of each person and situation and I am now determined to read more and more about them all.
My favorite aspect of 1066, however, was the unbelievably vivid depictions of conquest, war and medieval justice that occurred during this time. While I was already aware that this was a brutal time I did not realize just how brutal it was. G.K. Holloway places the reader right in the heart of the action and doesn't let them look away. Some of it could be hard to stomach, especially a bloody scene that takes place at the mill of a town that William's men destroy, but this really helped immerse me in the time period. And the battle scenes...let me just say that the last 100 pages or so do not let up and I could not keep myself from turning the pages.
With William the Conqueror becoming the first Norman king of England the Anglo-Saxon period of English history came to a close and the political and social future of England would be forever changed. While Harold would be the last of the Anglo-Saxon kings and would reign for less than a year, 1066: What Fates Impose brought his story to life and, in doing so, expertly showcased the ever shifting world he lived in. I am now completely enamored with this period in English history and I have G.K. Holloway to thank for that.
I absolutely loved the formatting of the novel, beginning in 1087 with King William stating on his death bed that he will declare no heir to the English throne since he did not earn it by hereditary right but took it from King Harold. This William is haunted by his heinous deeds and only hopes for some peace now that his life is ending, something that after finishing the novel I doubted he would find. The story then jumps back to King Edward on the throne in 1045 and the fate of English history begins to unfold for the reader in clear, brutal prose that ends with William defeating King Harold. While this eventuality is clear from the beginning, the connections to various characters developed throughout the story made the ending simply heartbreaking for me. You know a story is powerful when you keep hoping beyond hope that history will change itself and see your favorites rise triumphant!
This novel is absolutely saturated with historical facts and figures and it is quite easy to see that a huge amount of research went into the writing of it. When many fact driven novels seem to lack character development I was pleasantly surprised to see that 1066 was able to masterfully combine the facts with a story that humanizes these people from history so the reader is on the journey with them, feeling their joy, triumph and pain. For someone like me who loves English history but wasn't overly familiar with these particular conflicts or people, I was able to create a full bodied image - for better or worse - of each person and situation and I am now determined to read more and more about them all.
My favorite aspect of 1066, however, was the unbelievably vivid depictions of conquest, war and medieval justice that occurred during this time. While I was already aware that this was a brutal time I did not realize just how brutal it was. G.K. Holloway places the reader right in the heart of the action and doesn't let them look away. Some of it could be hard to stomach, especially a bloody scene that takes place at the mill of a town that William's men destroy, but this really helped immerse me in the time period. And the battle scenes...let me just say that the last 100 pages or so do not let up and I could not keep myself from turning the pages.
With William the Conqueror becoming the first Norman king of England the Anglo-Saxon period of English history came to a close and the political and social future of England would be forever changed. While Harold would be the last of the Anglo-Saxon kings and would reign for less than a year, 1066: What Fates Impose brought his story to life and, in doing so, expertly showcased the ever shifting world he lived in. I am now completely enamored with this period in English history and I have G.K. Holloway to thank for that.
September 16, 2013
I am being haunted by this story - the historical events, that is - and once again, I am not disappointed by the artistry and work that goes into a fictional account of all that led up to the Battle of Hastings. Without falling into super hero and comic book villain stereotypes, Mr. Holloway gives a balanced portrait of William, Duke of Normandy and Harold II, Edyth Swannhaels and Aldytha of Northumbria, Lady Gytha, Edward the Confessor and Queen Edith and their motives. I particularly enjoyed Harold's trip to Normandy and the deviousness of William's method to get Harold to swear an oath to uphold William's right to the throne of England. The consequences of his actions are realistic when Harold returns home to his handfasted, or common-law, wife of twenty years after taking Aldytha of Northumbria as his Christian wife in order to secure the support of the northern earls and mend relations with them as a result of his brother Tostig's disastrous administration of the region. Let's just say that even Kings have to stand out in the rain and beg forgiveness or sleep on the sofa. Harold is shown for what he apparently was - an easy going, affable, man who was popular among the people, a tried and true warrior, and someone who could make the most unbelievably stupid mistakes and pay for them - in other words, human. William is portrayed as an egomaniac with a short fuse - think Mussolini, or any number of spoiled brats with something to prove. I also enjoyed how the author pulled events from The Bayeux Tapestry (the embroidery that either celebrates the Norman Conquest or is a subversive political statement on the unwelcome invaders of England, depending on where you sit on the political fence) and wove them into his story and owned them.
The Battle itself is depicted with vigor and excitement but without excessive gore. The Norman harrying of the southeast when they arrived, however, made me ill - I had to put down the book after reading about some of the atrocities and it gave me nightmares.
The dialogue did not disappoint. Without resorting to Middle or Early English, the conversations were natural.
1066: What Fates Impose is a well-researched, delightfully fictionalized account of one of the most defining moments in history. My only negative criticism is that this book will be the standard by which all others on the topic will be judged. If other authors can reach my emotions as Holloway did, then they will have done their job well.
Am I recommending this book? Of course I am!
The Battle itself is depicted with vigor and excitement but without excessive gore. The Norman harrying of the southeast when they arrived, however, made me ill - I had to put down the book after reading about some of the atrocities and it gave me nightmares.
The dialogue did not disappoint. Without resorting to Middle or Early English, the conversations were natural.
1066: What Fates Impose is a well-researched, delightfully fictionalized account of one of the most defining moments in history. My only negative criticism is that this book will be the standard by which all others on the topic will be judged. If other authors can reach my emotions as Holloway did, then they will have done their job well.
Am I recommending this book? Of course I am!
April 14, 2015
This book starts with the end. What I mean is that it starts with the end of William the Conqueror. In the opening scene, he lies on his death bed, apparently delirious. Why is he in such a condition? Well, you'll have to read the book, because I am not about to tell you.
The second chapter takes us back over 40 years, and the whole book, from that point onward, describes the characters and events leading up to the Battle of Hastings in 1066, and its aftermath.
I will warn you that there is a whole heap of explicit brutality in this story, but then those were very brutal times.
The author must have done a lot of research to be able to form the historical skeleton upon which he builds the flesh of the plot and many sub-plots. There is so much deception by the main characters, who all seem to have two goals in mind: power and possession.
The downside for me, and I suppose that it was necessary, is that there are two many characters and some very complex relationships. It hurt my head to try to keep up with all of these, especially as many of them had very similar names, and seemed to be related along more than one branch of their family trees. But one only has to do a little bit of online research to discover that these families were indeed very complex.
The main protagonist is Harold Godwinson, who becomes Earl of Wessex and subsequently King Harold.
Everybody who ever went to school in Britain knows what happened to Harold in the end, so it comes as no surprise. I think though, that the author describes the events as they possibly happened in such great detail, and so vividly, that one is left believing that this is PROBABLY what happened. This, to me, is the sign of good historical fiction. I have long been a fan of the genre, and often got into serious trouble with my school teachers for arguing that the fiction that I had read was probably nearer the truth than what they were telling me. After all, I reasoned, they only knew what they knew from the reports of the "journalists" of the time. In current affairs classes they would tell me not to believe the reports of today's journalists until I had checked and double-checked their stories. Such double standards!
Anyway, having read "1066: What Fates Impose", I would stubbornly hold it up in front of those teachers as solid evidence of the facts as G.K. Holloway describes them.
Recommended to all.
The second chapter takes us back over 40 years, and the whole book, from that point onward, describes the characters and events leading up to the Battle of Hastings in 1066, and its aftermath.
I will warn you that there is a whole heap of explicit brutality in this story, but then those were very brutal times.
The author must have done a lot of research to be able to form the historical skeleton upon which he builds the flesh of the plot and many sub-plots. There is so much deception by the main characters, who all seem to have two goals in mind: power and possession.
The downside for me, and I suppose that it was necessary, is that there are two many characters and some very complex relationships. It hurt my head to try to keep up with all of these, especially as many of them had very similar names, and seemed to be related along more than one branch of their family trees. But one only has to do a little bit of online research to discover that these families were indeed very complex.
The main protagonist is Harold Godwinson, who becomes Earl of Wessex and subsequently King Harold.
Everybody who ever went to school in Britain knows what happened to Harold in the end, so it comes as no surprise. I think though, that the author describes the events as they possibly happened in such great detail, and so vividly, that one is left believing that this is PROBABLY what happened. This, to me, is the sign of good historical fiction. I have long been a fan of the genre, and often got into serious trouble with my school teachers for arguing that the fiction that I had read was probably nearer the truth than what they were telling me. After all, I reasoned, they only knew what they knew from the reports of the "journalists" of the time. In current affairs classes they would tell me not to believe the reports of today's journalists until I had checked and double-checked their stories. Such double standards!
Anyway, having read "1066: What Fates Impose", I would stubbornly hold it up in front of those teachers as solid evidence of the facts as G.K. Holloway describes them.
Recommended to all.
February 9, 2017
The history of 1066 and the Norman Conquest is one of our island's grand narratives . It is beautifully transferred into fiction in What Fates Impose by GK Holloway. This is an extremely visual epic historical faction with a linear structure beginning with King Edwards marriage to Edith Godwin. It is indeed the Godwin story. It is as well Holloway uses a linear structure enabling the history underlying the novel to be better absorbed by readers. The story is meticulously researched , though as an historian, as we do, I might quibble with a few minor facts. It is a sweeping narrative with a huge cast, peopled with brilliantly depicted characters. Of particular note are Earl Godwin, Gytha his wife who is very courageous, determined, strong -hearted, Harold who is portrayed as likeable both the man and the war Lord and his beautiful Handfasted wife Edith Swan-Neck. I thought Tostig convincing and particularly liked the portrait of William the Conqueror as perhaps petulant and determined to win by fair and foul means , by hooking the reforming Church to his cause. There are some very good colourful depictions of prelates throughout the novel. Holloway gets under the characters skins and the physchology is spot on.
The author also creates convincing , interesting scenes. My personal favourite is Harold's oath- taking in Normandy, his undoing. The scenes progress through the narrative with plots and counter plots, omens, devious dealings, grasping prelates, war lords and battles, some suitably horrific but the action is tempered with feasting, weddings and romance inclusive of a superb love triangle. Dialogue is punchy and here I might have liked a little more variety in style with scene setting sentences within the dialogue more than there is.
I thoroughly enjoyed What Fates Impose and consider it an exceptionally memorable novel. If you know the history you will enjoy the drama and scene setting but if you don't you will enjoy it even more.
The author also creates convincing , interesting scenes. My personal favourite is Harold's oath- taking in Normandy, his undoing. The scenes progress through the narrative with plots and counter plots, omens, devious dealings, grasping prelates, war lords and battles, some suitably horrific but the action is tempered with feasting, weddings and romance inclusive of a superb love triangle. Dialogue is punchy and here I might have liked a little more variety in style with scene setting sentences within the dialogue more than there is.
I thoroughly enjoyed What Fates Impose and consider it an exceptionally memorable novel. If you know the history you will enjoy the drama and scene setting but if you don't you will enjoy it even more.
July 10, 2017
I loved this book from the first few pages. It begins with the death of King William in 1087 in the very fisrt chapter, then jumps back to 1045. The main focus is on the family of Godwin, Earl of Wessex, a very influential and powerful family at the time. The era of this book has so many great things working for it that kept me reading avidly.
King Edward is on the throne but he has no son or daughter that the crown can pass to. Reluctant to name a successor publically, there is a lot of speculation around the court as to who should fill the position at the time of the Kings' demise. Some believe they have a right to the crown and those that feel they deserve the crown. Also there are some who believe that Godwin's family have too much power and influence and should not have the crown. This is a period when deceit, murder, conspiracy, betrayal and lies are rife all over Europe. Alliances are made and broken, invasion is a constant threat and no-one is adverse to a little backstabbing. England is under threat of invasion from Wales, Scotland, Norway and of course from Normandy.
When Harold is made King, there are some who are against him, but he soon gains respect when he shows himself to be a real leader who was not afraid to get his hands dirty and dealing with problems head on. This is shown when Harold puts the call out for men to support him at Stamford Bridge and also at the Battle Hastings.
The author has managed, in my opinion, to show his knowledge and love for this period in English History. There are a lot of characters and a huge array of information that has been broken down into short chapters. This is a very detailed book but also very addictive reading.
I would highly recommend this book to readers of historical fiction.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the author for bringing this book to my attention. My review is my own and my honest opinion.
King Edward is on the throne but he has no son or daughter that the crown can pass to. Reluctant to name a successor publically, there is a lot of speculation around the court as to who should fill the position at the time of the Kings' demise. Some believe they have a right to the crown and those that feel they deserve the crown. Also there are some who believe that Godwin's family have too much power and influence and should not have the crown. This is a period when deceit, murder, conspiracy, betrayal and lies are rife all over Europe. Alliances are made and broken, invasion is a constant threat and no-one is adverse to a little backstabbing. England is under threat of invasion from Wales, Scotland, Norway and of course from Normandy.
When Harold is made King, there are some who are against him, but he soon gains respect when he shows himself to be a real leader who was not afraid to get his hands dirty and dealing with problems head on. This is shown when Harold puts the call out for men to support him at Stamford Bridge and also at the Battle Hastings.
The author has managed, in my opinion, to show his knowledge and love for this period in English History. There are a lot of characters and a huge array of information that has been broken down into short chapters. This is a very detailed book but also very addictive reading.
I would highly recommend this book to readers of historical fiction.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the author for bringing this book to my attention. My review is my own and my honest opinion.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 127 reviews