What do you think?
Rate this book
Deep Conviction: True Stories of Ordinary Americans Fighting for the Freedom to Live Their Beliefs
Deep Conviction features four ordinary Americans who put their reputations and livelihoods at risk as they fought to protect their first amendment right to live their personal beliefs. Though these individuals couldn't be more different, they share a similar conviction and determination, and the principles of religious freedom apply equally to all of them.
In 1813, a Catholic priest in New York City faced prison after a grand jury subpoenaed him for refusing to divulge the identity of a jewelry thief who admitted to the crime during the sacrament of confession.
In 1959, an atheist in Maryland was forced to choose between his job and his beliefs when the state required him, as part of the hiring process, to sign an oath that said he believed in God. The United States Supreme Court would decide his fate.
In 1989, a Klamath Indian man walked into the highest court of our nation to fight for the right to practice the central sacrament of the Native American Church after the state of Oregon had declared it illegal.
And, finally, in 2017, a Christian baker and a gay couple took their cases to the United States Supreme Court after the baker declined to create a custom wedding cake to celebrate the couple's same-sex marriage, fearing it would violate his duty to God.
Chosen for their universality and for the broad principles they represent, these true stories reflect the diversity of beliefs in the United States, the conflicts between religious freedom and other interests, the perils individuals face when their right to live their beliefs is threatened, and the genius of America's promise of religious liberty for all.
In 1813, a Catholic priest in New York City faced prison after a grand jury subpoenaed him for refusing to divulge the identity of a jewelry thief who admitted to the crime during the sacrament of confession.
In 1959, an atheist in Maryland was forced to choose between his job and his beliefs when the state required him, as part of the hiring process, to sign an oath that said he believed in God. The United States Supreme Court would decide his fate.
In 1989, a Klamath Indian man walked into the highest court of our nation to fight for the right to practice the central sacrament of the Native American Church after the state of Oregon had declared it illegal.
And, finally, in 2017, a Christian baker and a gay couple took their cases to the United States Supreme Court after the baker declined to create a custom wedding cake to celebrate the couple's same-sex marriage, fearing it would violate his duty to God.
Chosen for their universality and for the broad principles they represent, these true stories reflect the diversity of beliefs in the United States, the conflicts between religious freedom and other interests, the perils individuals face when their right to live their beliefs is threatened, and the genius of America's promise of religious liberty for all.
352 pages, Hardcover
Published April 23, 2019
About the author
Steven T. Collis
5 books76 followersSteven T. Collis is the author of the nonfiction books Deep Conviction and The Immortals, as well as the novel Praying with the Enemy. He is a storyteller at heart, but in his other life, he is also a law professor at the University of Texas School of Law, where he is the faculty director of the Bech-Loughlin First Amendment Center and Texas's Law & Religion Clinic.
Prior to joining the faculty at Texas, he was the Olin-Darling Research Fellow in the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School and was an equity partner at Holland & Hart LLP, where he chaired the firm's nationwide religious institutions and First Amendment practice group.
Before embarking on his legal and writing career, Steven graduated magna cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to the Order of the Coif and served as an editor on the Michigan Law Review and the Michigan Journal of Race and Law. Steven also holds an M.F.A. in creative writing from Virginia Commonwealth University, where he served as the associate editor of the literary journal Blackbird. He completed his undergraduate studies, with university honors, at Brigham Young University.
Originally from New Mexico, Steven lives in Austin with his wife and children. He is on the web at www.steventcollis.com.
Prior to joining the faculty at Texas, he was the Olin-Darling Research Fellow in the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School and was an equity partner at Holland & Hart LLP, where he chaired the firm's nationwide religious institutions and First Amendment practice group.
Before embarking on his legal and writing career, Steven graduated magna cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to the Order of the Coif and served as an editor on the Michigan Law Review and the Michigan Journal of Race and Law. Steven also holds an M.F.A. in creative writing from Virginia Commonwealth University, where he served as the associate editor of the literary journal Blackbird. He completed his undergraduate studies, with university honors, at Brigham Young University.
Originally from New Mexico, Steven lives in Austin with his wife and children. He is on the web at www.steventcollis.com.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 49 reviews
May 24, 2019
I have never read a book quite like this one! It was amazing just how much I enjoyed this one. It is well-written, interesting and informative.
The way this one is written, it discusses 4 first amendment cases that went to the Supreme Court. 3 of the four cases were before I remember being cognizant of the news. The 4th is a case that I remember hearing a bit about, but not a lot.
Reading about the Supreme Court cases was really interesting. I’ve never really known how the court worked and what exactly the judges would do with a case. This book talks about how the Supreme Court operated in these specific cases. As well as what kind of precedents they use to figure out their ruling. It also includes some of what the lawyers said during the specific trials.
Another thing that was really interesting was the aspect of religious freedom. It made me think of some of the things I’ve been reading other places. I’m grateful that we have religious freedom in our country. It’s something I know I’ve taken for granted. Hopefully after reading this, I won’t anymore.
Make sure to read this one! You won’t regret it!
The way this one is written, it discusses 4 first amendment cases that went to the Supreme Court. 3 of the four cases were before I remember being cognizant of the news. The 4th is a case that I remember hearing a bit about, but not a lot.
Reading about the Supreme Court cases was really interesting. I’ve never really known how the court worked and what exactly the judges would do with a case. This book talks about how the Supreme Court operated in these specific cases. As well as what kind of precedents they use to figure out their ruling. It also includes some of what the lawyers said during the specific trials.
Another thing that was really interesting was the aspect of religious freedom. It made me think of some of the things I’ve been reading other places. I’m grateful that we have religious freedom in our country. It’s something I know I’ve taken for granted. Hopefully after reading this, I won’t anymore.
Make sure to read this one! You won’t regret it!
January 19, 2021
This is an excellent book on the constitutional right of religious freedom that we all enjoy. Whether we choose to practice and affiliate with a traditional religion, or we feel that we cannot honestly commit to a belief in any God, the founding fathers of our country chose to allow all forms of faith to be practiced with out governmental interference or the promotion of one religion/non religion to be elevated by the government. As we know, most of the early immigrants to this country were leaving countries that oppressed religion. I have no doubt of the relief they must have felt when they could practice their faith without fear.
One thing this book reminds us of is the tendency of predominant denominations to intentionally or unintentionally hamper and limit the practices of the non dominant faiths in their communities. This is not the way the freedom was set forth in the US Constitution.
The author cites several cases of ordinary people from the past 200 years which include: A Catholic Priest who refuses to break the seal of confession when called to testify in a court case; An Atheist who refuses to swear an oath to God to become a Notary Public in Maryland; A Native American who desires to participate in his church’s religious Peyote ceremony costing him his job; a Christian baker who refuses to sell a wedding cake to gay couple because he doesn’t condone gay marriage. All of these cases make it all the way to the high court.
At the end of the book, the author explains that in regard to the ongoing culture wars in our country, the dominate cultural and religious beliefs of the day have marginalized many US citizens, causing them to remain in the background and discounted. Often they are discriminated against with little recourse.
When the inevitable balance of power shifts, those who were once marginalized now find themselves in the majority and often engage in the same oppressive behaviors that they fought so hard to challenge and change. It is classic human instinct : The oppressed often become the oppressors. We see it in the US and around the world. We must fight against this and recognize the need to treat all with respect and kindness. Just because we don’t understand another’s religious point of view doesnt justify us to be dismissive and discount the values they hold dear. This Constitutional freedom acts as a check against this universal human instinct.
One thing this book reminds us of is the tendency of predominant denominations to intentionally or unintentionally hamper and limit the practices of the non dominant faiths in their communities. This is not the way the freedom was set forth in the US Constitution.
The author cites several cases of ordinary people from the past 200 years which include: A Catholic Priest who refuses to break the seal of confession when called to testify in a court case; An Atheist who refuses to swear an oath to God to become a Notary Public in Maryland; A Native American who desires to participate in his church’s religious Peyote ceremony costing him his job; a Christian baker who refuses to sell a wedding cake to gay couple because he doesn’t condone gay marriage. All of these cases make it all the way to the high court.
At the end of the book, the author explains that in regard to the ongoing culture wars in our country, the dominate cultural and religious beliefs of the day have marginalized many US citizens, causing them to remain in the background and discounted. Often they are discriminated against with little recourse.
When the inevitable balance of power shifts, those who were once marginalized now find themselves in the majority and often engage in the same oppressive behaviors that they fought so hard to challenge and change. It is classic human instinct : The oppressed often become the oppressors. We see it in the US and around the world. We must fight against this and recognize the need to treat all with respect and kindness. Just because we don’t understand another’s religious point of view doesnt justify us to be dismissive and discount the values they hold dear. This Constitutional freedom acts as a check against this universal human instinct.
June 28, 2019
I just finished this AMAZING book! Not only is it told in a gripping story-like fashion, but it also really makes you think! It questions what religious freedom truly means as it tells in amazing detail the true stories of four individuals with deep conviction (a Catholic priest, an atheist, a Native American, and a Born-Again Christian) as they fought to protect their religious beliefs against a political system ruled by a majority that does not share their beliefs. It also tells in less detail the story of a Jehovah’s Witness in a similar situation.
It is written in a way that clearly shows that conviction cannot be forced on a person by legislation, litigation or bullying although so many have tried to do just that. Religious Freedom should protect each of us from that, not just those whose beliefs follow the majority or those in power. Unfortunately, through the history of time and certainly today, many in the world have not or do not enjoy this protection. People have always and probably forever will fight to get their beliefs in control of the government often so they can force their beliefs on others. It happens in the USA also. But, thank goodness the Constitution prohibits it and we should all work for and pray for (if that is your belief) ensuring the Constitution does its job against this very strong force of human nature! I’m so glad I read this book!
It is written in a way that clearly shows that conviction cannot be forced on a person by legislation, litigation or bullying although so many have tried to do just that. Religious Freedom should protect each of us from that, not just those whose beliefs follow the majority or those in power. Unfortunately, through the history of time and certainly today, many in the world have not or do not enjoy this protection. People have always and probably forever will fight to get their beliefs in control of the government often so they can force their beliefs on others. It happens in the USA also. But, thank goodness the Constitution prohibits it and we should all work for and pray for (if that is your belief) ensuring the Constitution does its job against this very strong force of human nature! I’m so glad I read this book!
February 24, 2022
A book on religious liberty? Reading something like this nowadays is just asking for trouble. Surely, in 4 different stories of people pleading in front of American courts to protect their religious freedom, there would be something to take offense to.
Well dang it if Steven T. Collis doesn’t go ahead and call it right down the middle. Dare I say, he was fair in describing the cases. He uses tons of footnotes. His stories cover everything from Catholicism to Atheism.
Just kidding. I am sure there are plenty of people who would yell about this or yell about that. However, if you are someone who believes in hearing the whole story, then this is a great book. Collis tells both sides of the story and looks at it with a lawyer’s eye but explains it with an author’s prose. The fourth story, about the well-publicized story of the Christian baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding was covered with the utmost fairness. I felt for both sides of the argument and could see how everyone would lose no matter what happened.
I even understood about 40% of the law stuff! Collis is that good at explaining it!
Heck, I’m Catholic and even I was pulling for the atheist by the end of it. Go team religious freedom!
Well dang it if Steven T. Collis doesn’t go ahead and call it right down the middle. Dare I say, he was fair in describing the cases. He uses tons of footnotes. His stories cover everything from Catholicism to Atheism.
Just kidding. I am sure there are plenty of people who would yell about this or yell about that. However, if you are someone who believes in hearing the whole story, then this is a great book. Collis tells both sides of the story and looks at it with a lawyer’s eye but explains it with an author’s prose. The fourth story, about the well-publicized story of the Christian baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding was covered with the utmost fairness. I felt for both sides of the argument and could see how everyone would lose no matter what happened.
I even understood about 40% of the law stuff! Collis is that good at explaining it!
Heck, I’m Catholic and even I was pulling for the atheist by the end of it. Go team religious freedom!
June 12, 2019
This was a fascinating read. It brought home and to light how important religious freedom really is, and how far people will go to keep that freedom. I was enthralled with these stories of individuals who wouldn't back down on their personal beliefs no matter what the consequence. In the end, the book caused me to reflect on my personal beliefs and how deep my conviction is. Would I be willing to stand up the way these people did? It was incredibly enlightening and I would recommend it to everyone. Everyone needs to take a look at these stories and determine what they have a deep conviction in.
December 4, 2019
This book took some time to get into - I wouldn't say the writing style was captivating, but the subject matter was and after I got started, I was hooked. This important book explores four Supreme Court cases that examined religious freedom and then explored the impact of those decisions. I'm so glad I read it as it will be a book I reflect on over and over. It helped me understand how important religious freedom is for whichever religion is in the minority. This is a universal human right worth defending for all. (Thanks for the book and suggestion, Kerri!)
May 2, 2024
Excellent book! As stated in the subtitle, the book is not about Supreme Court cases, but about the Americans that were involved. I appreciated the selection of cases and the way Collis crafted the narrative. He made you feel like you really got to know the people involved, and I couldn’t help but sympathize with them. Reading this book expanded my perspective on what religious liberty is and what it is not.
June 22, 2022
where is the bible? i want to read the bible.
February 3, 2020
This gave me a greater understanding of and appreciation for the separation of church and state. I think everyone would benefit from reading this book. We can find a way to respect others convictions and not force our own convictions on anyone else.
May 11, 2019
This is a very interesting and informative book! The author explores four specific cases where a battle involving religious freedom made it to the high court of the nation. The author does a really good job trying to be fair to all parties involved, though it is clear he is trying to make a point of how precious (and rare!) religious freedom really is. The four cases he discusses are as follows:
1. Father Anthony Kohlmann, a Catholic priest who refused to reveal the name of a man in his church who stole some goods, confessed to this priest, and returned the same goods. Father Kehlmann insisted he be exempt from testifying at the trial in the case because confessions are to be kept strictly confidential and he believed that breaking that confidence would bring upon him the punishments of God.
The court ruled in his favor.
2. Roy Torcaso, an atheist who was refused the privilege of being a notary because he refused to sign a statement saying he believed in God. This was during the Cold War and atheism was linked to Communism. Atheists were seen as immoral and untrustworthy. Torcaso thought the fact he held firm to his beliefs proved he was actually a moral, trustworthy person.
The court ruled in his favor.
3. Al Smith, a Native American, whose tribe, religion, and heritage was basically stolen and purged by the U.S. Government. He became an alcoholic and was on death's door before turning his life around by returning to his roots. Part of this included a sacred Indian ceremony involving peyote, a nausea-inducing hallucinogen. Peyote was banned under Oregon law and Smith was fired from his job for using it at one such ceremony. He fought back, saying this was a violation of his freedom of religion.
The court ruled against him, dealing a heavy blow to freedom of religion in its statement that anything can be outlawed so long as it doesn't target a specific religion. Al Smith's words to a group of graduate students was, "You're next."
4. Jack Phillips, the owner of a cake shop that refused to create cakes for events he did not believe in, such as Halloween, divorce celebrations, adult-themed parties, and same-sex marriages. The latter launched him into a six-year legal war. He was repeatedly cussed at, threatened, boycotted, targeted and belittled for his beliefs. Commissioners in Colorado compared him to Hitler and slaveholders. They forced him to close down the wedding cake part of his business as the battle waged through the courts, even while permitting other bakers to refuse to make cakes with anti-gay messages because they were deemed offensive.
The court ruled in his favor. This was mostly because of the previous ruling with Al Smith. The law was not universally applied, but Jack Phillips was singled out and belittled for his beliefs, even by the very people in his state who should have been protecting them.
This last case is very recent history, and more cases continue to this day (such as a current fight in Texas regarding Chick-Fil-A being banned from an airport because the company doesn't approve of same-sex marriages. Never mind that the company will both serve AND hire LGBT people, they are being targeted because of their belief alone). This is an issue that everybody needs to understand, and we need to work out a solution for everybody.
The author makes it very clear that the historical problem with freedom of religion is that we are inclined to extend freedom to people who believe the same as we do, but withhold freedom from those who believe differently. However, as history has shown, eventually that persecuted group will rise to power, and inflict that same treatment on the former majority, jeopardizing their own religious freedom. This is a relevant issue and it is so critical to understand history so that we can act wisely.
The truth is, EVERYBODY needs protection, and it is unjust to withhold that protection simply because someone else has different beliefs than we do.
1. Father Anthony Kohlmann, a Catholic priest who refused to reveal the name of a man in his church who stole some goods, confessed to this priest, and returned the same goods. Father Kehlmann insisted he be exempt from testifying at the trial in the case because confessions are to be kept strictly confidential and he believed that breaking that confidence would bring upon him the punishments of God.
The court ruled in his favor.
2. Roy Torcaso, an atheist who was refused the privilege of being a notary because he refused to sign a statement saying he believed in God. This was during the Cold War and atheism was linked to Communism. Atheists were seen as immoral and untrustworthy. Torcaso thought the fact he held firm to his beliefs proved he was actually a moral, trustworthy person.
The court ruled in his favor.
3. Al Smith, a Native American, whose tribe, religion, and heritage was basically stolen and purged by the U.S. Government. He became an alcoholic and was on death's door before turning his life around by returning to his roots. Part of this included a sacred Indian ceremony involving peyote, a nausea-inducing hallucinogen. Peyote was banned under Oregon law and Smith was fired from his job for using it at one such ceremony. He fought back, saying this was a violation of his freedom of religion.
The court ruled against him, dealing a heavy blow to freedom of religion in its statement that anything can be outlawed so long as it doesn't target a specific religion. Al Smith's words to a group of graduate students was, "You're next."
4. Jack Phillips, the owner of a cake shop that refused to create cakes for events he did not believe in, such as Halloween, divorce celebrations, adult-themed parties, and same-sex marriages. The latter launched him into a six-year legal war. He was repeatedly cussed at, threatened, boycotted, targeted and belittled for his beliefs. Commissioners in Colorado compared him to Hitler and slaveholders. They forced him to close down the wedding cake part of his business as the battle waged through the courts, even while permitting other bakers to refuse to make cakes with anti-gay messages because they were deemed offensive.
The court ruled in his favor. This was mostly because of the previous ruling with Al Smith. The law was not universally applied, but Jack Phillips was singled out and belittled for his beliefs, even by the very people in his state who should have been protecting them.
This last case is very recent history, and more cases continue to this day (such as a current fight in Texas regarding Chick-Fil-A being banned from an airport because the company doesn't approve of same-sex marriages. Never mind that the company will both serve AND hire LGBT people, they are being targeted because of their belief alone). This is an issue that everybody needs to understand, and we need to work out a solution for everybody.
The author makes it very clear that the historical problem with freedom of religion is that we are inclined to extend freedom to people who believe the same as we do, but withhold freedom from those who believe differently. However, as history has shown, eventually that persecuted group will rise to power, and inflict that same treatment on the former majority, jeopardizing their own religious freedom. This is a relevant issue and it is so critical to understand history so that we can act wisely.
The truth is, EVERYBODY needs protection, and it is unjust to withhold that protection simply because someone else has different beliefs than we do.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
June 3, 2021
4.5 stars This book takes four religious freedom cases to demonstrate how the United States has dealt with religious freedom during its history. I found the cases interesting and thought provoking.
August 26, 2019
Considering this book is all about the intricacies of complex legal cases, it is pretty approachable for regular, non-lawyer readers, like me. I appreciated the way the author presented the arguments on each side, so you could get an idea about what kind of decisions the judges were asked to make. I recommend it to anyone looking to understand the history of religious freedom in the USA.
September 25, 2019
If the writing was a little better, I would give this five stars. Regardless, this is a must read. This book really helped me understand what freedom of religion is and what the government's role is in maintaining freedom of religion.
August 15, 2024
Deep Conviction is like a gentle but firm hand on your shoulder, reminding you of the quiet power that lies within standing up for what you believe in. Steven T. Collis artfully intertwines the captivating stories of four ordinary Americans who, against all odds, bravely stood firm in their convictions, refusing to be subdued. Each narrative is a testament to the indomitable human spirit, demonstrating that the fight for religious freedom is not simply a thing of the past but an ongoing, real struggle that continues to shape our society today.
Collis has a unique ability to infuse his writing with warmth and empathy, creating a sense of intimacy that makes it feel like you're right there with the individuals as they open up about the most difficult moments in their lives. It's as if you're sitting across from them, sharing a cup of coffee, and listening to their personal stories unfold. His writing style is not showy or overly forceful; instead, it is consistently steady, clear, and imbued with a tranquil respect for the individuals and ideals he is depicting. You can see that Collis cares—not just about the results of these legal fights, but also about the feelings and spirits of the people involved.
What sets Deep Conviction apart is its emphasis on the everyday lives of its subjects. Even though they are not celebrities or historical figures, these individuals, just like us, faced exceptional situations because they refused to compromise on what they believed to be right. The way these ordinary heroes faced their legal challenges with bravery, honesty, and a steadfast dedication to their beliefs is both awe-inspiring and grounding.
As you close the book, you can't help but feel a deep sense of admiration – not just for the individuals who battled in these conflicts, but also for the delicate and invaluable essence of the liberties we frequently overlook. Collis prompts consideration of potential actions in a similar scenario, posing the question: What principles would one defend, and at what cost?
"Deep Conviction" transcends the traditional confines of a book; it serves as a catalyst for introspection, a tribute to unwavering resolve, and a poignant reminder that the pursuit of liberty endures indefinitely. Should you seek a thought-provoking read that both enriches and inspires, this publication undoubtedly fits the bill.
Collis has a unique ability to infuse his writing with warmth and empathy, creating a sense of intimacy that makes it feel like you're right there with the individuals as they open up about the most difficult moments in their lives. It's as if you're sitting across from them, sharing a cup of coffee, and listening to their personal stories unfold. His writing style is not showy or overly forceful; instead, it is consistently steady, clear, and imbued with a tranquil respect for the individuals and ideals he is depicting. You can see that Collis cares—not just about the results of these legal fights, but also about the feelings and spirits of the people involved.
What sets Deep Conviction apart is its emphasis on the everyday lives of its subjects. Even though they are not celebrities or historical figures, these individuals, just like us, faced exceptional situations because they refused to compromise on what they believed to be right. The way these ordinary heroes faced their legal challenges with bravery, honesty, and a steadfast dedication to their beliefs is both awe-inspiring and grounding.
As you close the book, you can't help but feel a deep sense of admiration – not just for the individuals who battled in these conflicts, but also for the delicate and invaluable essence of the liberties we frequently overlook. Collis prompts consideration of potential actions in a similar scenario, posing the question: What principles would one defend, and at what cost?
"Deep Conviction" transcends the traditional confines of a book; it serves as a catalyst for introspection, a tribute to unwavering resolve, and a poignant reminder that the pursuit of liberty endures indefinitely. Should you seek a thought-provoking read that both enriches and inspires, this publication undoubtedly fits the bill.
July 15, 2019
It was easy to assign five stars to this book. I wouldn't have predicted giving it that high of a rating going in. The book highlights the first amendment, religious liberty, by presenting four different individuals from four different time periods each of whose first amendment rights were threatened. Because Collis (the author) is an attorney, I presumed the focus would be on the law rather than the individuals involved in each case. I also thought I would be guided through each case from his personal political viewpoint. I was wrong on both counts. Don't get me wrong. The law was the ballast point in each story (and the whole book) but Collis took the time to give each case all the elements of good storytelling. Without making any one of the individuals who persevered with their beliefs bigger or better than they were, he also didn't hide his respect for the toll it took on their lives. Collis chose cases from four different time periods and made sure each time period had its own personality. I think that helped me to understand the the constant aspect the law is suppose to provide its citizenry. I came away with greater knowledge about how a case gets all the way to the Supreme Court and deep respect for what it does to a person, their family, community and even country to stand with conviction over a way longer period of time than any could have anticipated for no other reason that one's own "Deep Conviction". Regardless of the outcome of any of the cases he portrayed, every person involved spent years of anxiety on behalf of their beliefs and/or profession. I was reminded that one hundred and forty characters or ten a twenty minute read cannot possible include all the pertinent facts in any given legal situation so complex as to make it all the way to the Supreme Court. News cycles are cycles. The ruling of the court becomes steadfast. As much as I enjoyed reading the book and appreciate that Collis made me not want to put it down, the larger implications of how the law impacts me as a citizen lingers. I should probably be able to give it an extra star for that alone. Since the algorithm sets five stars as the maximum I will too. So far its my favorite read of 2019.
February 13, 2023
Very well written and meticulously researched. Written in excruciating, but interesting detail. Religious liberty is not a black/ white (not racial) issue. It’s so much more nuanced and difficult to interpret.
Historically, people fled Europe and other places “to escape religious test oaths and declarations that a great many of the early colonists left Europe and came here hoping to worship in their own way. It soon developed, however, that many of those who had fled to escape religious test oaths turned out to be perfectly willing, when they had the power to do so, to force dissenters from their faith to take test oaths in conformity with that faith.”
As regarding law makers and the Supreme Court, “Unable to to find any direct support in the text of the Constitution and believing that they could never get a constitutional amendment passed, they asked the Supremes to expand the meaning of already existing terms. In other words, they sought rights that the Constitution never specifically mentioned. The justices obliged. The courts created so many new rights that Americans began to feel as if there were no rights at all. After all, if every human desire rises to the level of being a constitutional right, then nothing does-they all cancel each other out.”
Historically, people fled Europe and other places “to escape religious test oaths and declarations that a great many of the early colonists left Europe and came here hoping to worship in their own way. It soon developed, however, that many of those who had fled to escape religious test oaths turned out to be perfectly willing, when they had the power to do so, to force dissenters from their faith to take test oaths in conformity with that faith.”
As regarding law makers and the Supreme Court, “Unable to to find any direct support in the text of the Constitution and believing that they could never get a constitutional amendment passed, they asked the Supremes to expand the meaning of already existing terms. In other words, they sought rights that the Constitution never specifically mentioned. The justices obliged. The courts created so many new rights that Americans began to feel as if there were no rights at all. After all, if every human desire rises to the level of being a constitutional right, then nothing does-they all cancel each other out.”
March 2, 2020
This was an excellently framed overview of religious freedom in America. I’d probably give it a 3.5 instead of 4 stars if goodreads allowed ½ stars. Only because of its melodramatic prose at times. The author’s clunky use of similes throughout was distracting from the substance. I think he was trying to liven up the stories, but I don’t think that was necessary. The stories are fascinating on their own merit.
The great value of this book is reading the well-researched details and backstory of each religious freedom story/case he highlights. I LOVED learning more about the perspective of a Klamath Indian and his sacred beliefs in using peyote as part of his religious sacrament; or how early American religious freedom was tested against the backdrop of early American catholic prejudice (I had no idea); or how atheistic beliefs fit in the constellation of religious freedom; or more insight and understanding into contentious rub of the Christian Right with the LGBT left, and the sincerity found on each side.
Would recommend if interested in learning more about religious freedom. Also nice that this is written by a lawyer but not for lawyers.
The great value of this book is reading the well-researched details and backstory of each religious freedom story/case he highlights. I LOVED learning more about the perspective of a Klamath Indian and his sacred beliefs in using peyote as part of his religious sacrament; or how early American religious freedom was tested against the backdrop of early American catholic prejudice (I had no idea); or how atheistic beliefs fit in the constellation of religious freedom; or more insight and understanding into contentious rub of the Christian Right with the LGBT left, and the sincerity found on each side.
Would recommend if interested in learning more about religious freedom. Also nice that this is written by a lawyer but not for lawyers.
February 19, 2020
I won this through the Goodreads giveaway.
This is an extremely interesting book that gives an overview of four landmark Supreme Court cases regarding freedom of religion and the concept of "compelling interest" when it comes to laws that affect religious beliefs. It also explores how the Al Smith case in the 80s (regarding the religious use of peyote) has affected the current view of freedom of religion. The book is well-organized and well-written, and I appreciated that the author kept a neutral tone throughout. In each case, Collis depicts both sides without demonizing them and with an attempt to accurately portray their beliefs and motivations. At the same time, he examines how even the most sympathetic of motivations does not necessarily lead to a legally or constitutionally sound conclusion. It's a good book for anyone interested in how the concept of freedom of religion has played out during our country's history.
This is an extremely interesting book that gives an overview of four landmark Supreme Court cases regarding freedom of religion and the concept of "compelling interest" when it comes to laws that affect religious beliefs. It also explores how the Al Smith case in the 80s (regarding the religious use of peyote) has affected the current view of freedom of religion. The book is well-organized and well-written, and I appreciated that the author kept a neutral tone throughout. In each case, Collis depicts both sides without demonizing them and with an attempt to accurately portray their beliefs and motivations. At the same time, he examines how even the most sympathetic of motivations does not necessarily lead to a legally or constitutionally sound conclusion. It's a good book for anyone interested in how the concept of freedom of religion has played out during our country's history.
September 19, 2020
This is a collection of a few ordinary American lives fighting for their First Amendment rights. Collis chooses a peculiar mix: Roman Catholic priest; Maryland atheist; Klannath Indian; and a Christian baker. Many of these were quite controversial for their time. Also, you may or may not agree with the individual's choice; however, the constitutional argument case followed by Collis is captivating to say the least. I found it captivating to peek behind the curtain at the judicial process leading up to and even decided upon by our Supreme Court Justices. Much of the thinking behind the decisions were more than either bargained for.
Recommended for anyone interested in our judicial process
**This was a review copy from NetGalley for an honest review**
Recommended for anyone interested in our judicial process
**This was a review copy from NetGalley for an honest review**
April 13, 2021
In another life I would be an attorney. In this life I am a fan of non-fiction and history. Since this book hits on both, it's a solid 4.5 stars. Steven Collis did a great job of telling the stories of the people who faced situations that demanded a firm stance for their faith or lack of faith. These normal people being dragged into battles that reached the supreme court were presented in a very relatable way. I appreciated that the author still stayed relatively neutral while sifting out the facts from the fiction and spin cast by society and the media in each case. This book takes an important look at how well our lawmakers and judges actually protect our constitutional rights.
August 18, 2021
This is an eye-opening book about religious freedom and the way it's been interpreted over the years. I heard the author speak about a month ago and he touched on a couple of these stories, but I really enjoyed learning more and understanding the whole process leading up to the rulings a little better. It's sad how the accusations against the people in the book ended up consuming their lives as they waited out the final judgment. It's given me a new perspective about what freedom of religion is and how we can all do better to help others enjoy that freedom, even (or especially) when we don't agree with them.
March 31, 2022
Important issues. Well chosen cases to review. Mostly very interesting, but also so detailed and scholarly that I'm not sure who to recommend it to. It would make a good documentary series, trimmed down to the most pertinent details. Went into a lot of personal details about the defendants too, so there was a good human angle, and much to admire in these peoples' determination and convictions. The book definitely is promoting religious freedoms. I think it may have a conservative bias, though I think it's trying to be neither left nor right politically. I was fairly devastated by the one case that the defendant didn't win his case. I learned a lot.
March 31, 2019
#Deep Conviction. #NetGalley
Four engaging true stories, about legal situations, concerning religious preferences. Steven Collis, knows just how to keep the wrds flowing, I really liked his writing style. Each story is unique and told in such a way, that it kept me capdivated.
. I realy liked this quote: The rule regarding religious freedom should be a constant fixture in our constitutional stars. Instead, it is as unpredictable as the next election. And those who cherish religious liberty only when they need it may well find it isn’t there when that time comes.
Four engaging true stories, about legal situations, concerning religious preferences. Steven Collis, knows just how to keep the wrds flowing, I really liked his writing style. Each story is unique and told in such a way, that it kept me capdivated.
. I realy liked this quote: The rule regarding religious freedom should be a constant fixture in our constitutional stars. Instead, it is as unpredictable as the next election. And those who cherish religious liberty only when they need it may well find it isn’t there when that time comes.
December 28, 2020
Who knew a book on religious freedom would be so hard to put down? Religious freedom is for all Americans--religious and not. While I am deeply committed to my religion, I rooted for the Catholic priest, the atheist, the Klamath Indian, and the Christian baker. Reading the lives of ordinary Americans was an extraordinary experience.
My only critique is that the end promises photos and illustrations on a website, but I did not find that to be true.
4.5
My only critique is that the end promises photos and illustrations on a website, but I did not find that to be true.
4.5
August 11, 2021
Written by a professor of law, I felt this book gave a fair and interesting look at religious freedom in our country, what religious freedom means to individuals of differing viewpoints, how the law examines it, and why that freedom should matter to all of us. I think having read this I've gained more compassion towards religious minorities and a better understanding of the pivotal Supreme Court cases the author highlights.
April 5, 2023
Interesting presentation of 4 religious freedom cases. Does a decent job at presenting all perspectives and sides in each of the cases and explaining the stakes and implications of each decision.
The author states that religious liberty affects ALL citizens in the US, whether you’re religious or not. The Roy Torasco case is a good example of this.
The one thing is that the writing was immature at times. Unnecessary and out of place descriptors throughout the chapters.
The author states that religious liberty affects ALL citizens in the US, whether you’re religious or not. The Roy Torasco case is a good example of this.
The one thing is that the writing was immature at times. Unnecessary and out of place descriptors throughout the chapters.
October 17, 2019
One of the best books I have ever read! It is fascinating to listen to each of these court cases and the author does a marvelous job at honoring both sides of each argument. I wish more Americans understood tolerance and the importance of cooperation. The extreme positions being taken by many is causing so much harm. I sure wish this book could be required reading. I highly recommend it!
February 21, 2020
Well researched book about several court cases that happened throughout the years that helped to change the future of religious freedoms in the USA.
While they didn't seem like they would fit together at the onset because of the time when they happened and the details, when really looking into it, they all fit and make a difficult case to argue together.
While they didn't seem like they would fit together at the onset because of the time when they happened and the details, when really looking into it, they all fit and make a difficult case to argue together.
January 7, 2021
Would recommend to people curious about religious freedom or to those who are studying law as there's understandably a lot of legal language in the book.
I feel like a better, more informed citizen after reading this book. I know a lot more about the 4 main events described and the first amendment.
I feel like a better, more informed citizen after reading this book. I know a lot more about the 4 main events described and the first amendment.
August 18, 2021
This book was extremely interesting to me. The writing isn't riveting but the subject matter is and makes one think. As each case is discussed, I appreciated the author's writing style in presenting both sides of the argument. I could see how both sides felt that they were right. In the cause for religious freedom, I can see just how complicated this issue is. Very well written.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 49 reviews