Déjà les récits épistolaires sont demandeurs en attention et concentration pour venir à bout de la volonté de l’auteur de se faire lire et comprendre.Déjà les récits épistolaires sont demandeurs en attention et concentration pour venir à bout de la volonté de l’auteur de se faire lire et comprendre.
Avec Botul, qu’il existe ou pas, mais l’on sait qu’il pense… même de travers … il tente ici de panser des trous. Les trous comme objets philosophiques, disent plus sur Botul et son approche que la brève cogitation de Sartre.
L’on dirait, que le temps dépensé à lire ce volume est perdu, et c’est vrai en réalité! Si ce n’était pour une tendance (alacrity) d’apprécier l’absurde surtout pseudo-philosophique …
Deux souvenirs resurgissent celui de Hassan El Fed décrivant la culture populaire comme sœur de lait de la philosophie tant que cette dernière est mère de toutes sciences, et un autre de Raymond Devos: si moi je n’ai rien à dire et bien je veux qu’on le sache!...more
Okay, so maybe it's not famous for a reason... In the realm of maths and geometry bringing abstraction into art is in itself a retransliteration of coOkay, so maybe it's not famous for a reason... In the realm of maths and geometry bringing abstraction into art is in itself a retransliteration of complexity, however, it just is a great book to understand orthogonal projections in a fun way! The story was flat, but maybe purposefully, a sort of literary dadaïsm... I am undecided of whether this was worth it or not, but I'm sure reading it back in the days of high-school might have felt better... In any case, I liked it, at keat the genre! I loved the punny double meaning, and that gives it the depth and height lost in a 2 dimensional world!...more
Very short, yet insightful. It covered enough of Jung's thoughts about the unconscious, the dreams, Divinity, even what he thought about Jungians... IVery short, yet insightful. It covered enough of Jung's thoughts about the unconscious, the dreams, Divinity, even what he thought about Jungians... It's a perfect crash course for anyone who wants to be hooked to carry on to reading his books......more
The beginning of the book was alright, but then quality dropped, and complexity climbed... Yet the string theory is soooo complicated, whereas if you The beginning of the book was alright, but then quality dropped, and complexity climbed... Yet the string theory is soooo complicated, whereas if you can't put things simply they just might not be accurate.. so leaves one wondering......more
I'm terribly deceived... In short, it hovered above THE Question, how did the Big Bang happen and Why ? I mean that granted getting to know deep/complicI'm terribly deceived... In short, it hovered above THE Question, how did the Big Bang happen and Why ? I mean that granted getting to know deep/complicated theories about astrophysics, and the TOE was challenging, but I felt empty in the inside after finishing it, simply because the introduction promised answers, and was put in such a scientifically yet appealing way that I was broken-hearted after closing with no answers......more
I just wated my time reading this one... Full of subjective truths, although lucidly explained but amount to no science! A good Russian existentialistI just wated my time reading this one... Full of subjective truths, although lucidly explained but amount to no science! A good Russian existentialist book can replace this and far more......more
Loading...
