Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Leadership

How Resilient Organizations Resemble Digital Networks

Leaders build resilient, adaptable teams by decentralizing decision-making.

Key points

  • Distributing decision-making prevents a single point of failure.
  • Empowered employees are more productive and better problem-solvers.
  • Supportive leadership encourages risk-taking and swift problem detection.
  • Ongoing performance management aligns and motivates decentralized teams.
geralt / Pixabay / Used with permission
The earth as a decentralized global network of connections
Source: geralt / Pixabay / Used with permission

Resilient networks, whether in technology or among people, share a common characteristic: Decentralization—the distribution of authority and decision-making across smaller, independent units—which has been gaining traction for decades. This concept is equally important in leadership and management: Hire capable, motivated people, and give them the resources and trust to function autonomously. Boosting the autonomy of individuals and teams ensures that a failure in one part of the organization doesn’t trigger a wider collapse.

In technology, decentralized systems have long been a priority for building resilient networks. The internet was originally designed with decentralization in mind, to create a worldwide information superhighway that would survive even the worst threats of the Cold War era.

Not all modern systems are built to be so resilient, but they can be.
Decentralization isn’t just a tech trend, it’s becoming embedded across various disciplines. Since the 1950s, academic references to decentralization have increased exponentially, initially fueled by shifts in governance and now by advancements in computer science (Di Bona et al., 2023). As more fields recognize its value, decentralization is transforming approaches to everything from leadership to logistics.

Leaders can’t plan for every problem the world might throw at them, but the process of planning and practicing adaptation in response to adversity is crucial. So how does decentralization lead to productive and resilient teams of people?

Organizations as networks

Highly centralized systems rely on a single point of authority, which may be more efficient when conditions are stable and predictable. Contingency plans and spare capacity are often scrapped to save money. However, when unforeseen challenges arise, central control becomes a critical vulnerability. A single point of authority inherently risks becoming a single point of failure, making decentralization essential for building resilient and adaptable teams.

The more widely distributed organizations are, across sectors, departments, and geographic areas, the more important decentralization becomes. Larger organizations need to be able to distribute decision-making power to those closest to the problems and opportunities.

Every workplace and team is an interconnected web of communication and accountability. Instead of relying on a top-down flow of instructions, a decentralized leadership model gives individuals increased autonomy, responsibility, and the capacity to make decisions. When employees understand the organization’s overall goals and their specific role, they can best apply their knowledge, experience, and judgment.

Boosting autonomy

Decentralizing leadership equips employees with greater autonomy and responsibility. This approach enables individuals to make decisions and contribute directly to the organization’s overall objectives.

Research consistently shows that increased autonomy (Cerasoli et al., 2016; Rattini, 2023) in the workplace leads to enhanced productivity, and overall well-being. Employees who have control over their tasks and decision-making processes are more innovative and better equipped to solve problems. This bolsters team resilience and strengthens the organization as a whole.

Decentralize accountability not blame

Decentralization can backfire when organizations distribute blame instead of accountability. This often happens when managers take credit but share blame. Talented employees, fearing being scapegoated for initiative, may avoid risks instead of seizing opportunities. Problems get ignored because no one wants to be blamed for spotting them early.

When leadership supports problem-solving without fear of retribution, employees are more likely to take calculated risks, raise problems early on, and take responsibility for fixing issues as they arise. Autonomy thrives in a culture where management has employees’ backs during difficult times. If workers know they won’t be thrown under the bus for honest mistakes, they will be more willing to take on challenges that match their skills. This doesn’t just make the work more interesting and engaging for employees; it helps people and teams learn from adversity and build up resilience.

Continuous performance management

In any organization, a basic level of competence and performance should be non-negotiable. Continuous performance management keeps everyone accountable by providing a flexible yet consistent framework that applies to all roles. It’s not about one-size-fits-all; it’s about giving each person a clear understanding of how their work contributes to team and organizational goals. When accountability is well-defined, people know what’s expected, and more importantly, how their efforts drive success.

To be effective, performance management needs to be more than an annual performance appraisal. Regular feedback doesn’t need to be formal but it should be part of the conversation. It must provide real-time insights, allowing individuals and teams to course-correct before small issues become big problems. Check in early, often and informally when there are problems to fix—and when there are substantial successes and achievements, record them in the annual reviews.

Continuous performance management is a dynamic system that keeps everyone aligned, motivated, and clear on their impact, ensuring that performance isn't just measured; it’s constantly optimized for success. Decentralization requires good information flow across the network so that everyone can make decisions based on shared knowledge and good information.

References

Cerasoli, C. P., Michelin, J. M., & Nassrelgrgawi, A. S. (2016). Performance, incentives, and needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness: A meta-analysis. Motivation and emotion, 40, 781-813. DOI 10.1007/s11031-016-9578-2.

Di Bona, G., Bracci, A., Perra, N., Lavora, V., & Baronchelli, A. (2023). The concept of decentralization through time and disciplines: a quantitative exploration. EPJ Data Science.

Fernández‐Pérez, V., Jesús García‐Morales, V. and Fernando Bustinza‐Sánchez, Ó. (2012), The effects of CEOs' social networks on organizational performance through knowledge and strategic flexibility, Personnel Review, 41(6), 777-812.

Freeman, L. C. (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3), 215–239.

Morgeson, F. P.., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2).

Rattini, V. (2023). Worker autonomy and performance: Evidence from a real-effort experiment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 32(2), 300-327.

MacRae, I. (2024). Web of value: Understanding blockchain and web3’s intersection of technology, psychology and business. Alexandria Books.

advertisement
More from Ian MacRae
More from Psychology Today