i) The primary seat problems at Toyota were missing parts, material flaws originating from KFS, and too many seat options.
ii) Over 80% of seat problems reported were due to material flaws and missing parts from KFS, who was unable to handle the complexity of orders.
iii) To solve the problem, KFS needs to focus on identifying and addressing the root causes of the exceptionally high volume of defects at their production site, rather than just reducing seat options or blaming other processes.
i) The primary seat problems at Toyota were missing parts, material flaws originating from KFS, and too many seat options.
ii) Over 80% of seat problems reported were due to material flaws and missing parts from KFS, who was unable to handle the complexity of orders.
iii) To solve the problem, KFS needs to focus on identifying and addressing the root causes of the exceptionally high volume of defects at their production site, rather than just reducing seat options or blaming other processes.
i) The primary seat problems at Toyota were missing parts, material flaws originating from KFS, and too many seat options.
ii) Over 80% of seat problems reported were due to material flaws and missing parts from KFS, who was unable to handle the complexity of orders.
iii) To solve the problem, KFS needs to focus on identifying and addressing the root causes of the exceptionally high volume of defects at their production site, rather than just reducing seat options or blaming other processes.
When analysing this problem, we think in Toyota Production System the
following are the primary seat problems that are there:
i) Major causes of seat defects are missing parts, material flaws with respect to production line which originate with KFS. ii) Too many seat options for the Toyota vehicles iii) Seat bolster which is not as glaring as the requirement. First, Toyota did not alter the production line to a complete (TPS) Toyota Production System where TPS is a robust system that is practically designed and failed. According to the seat problem it had to do with material flaws and missing part, which is over 80% to handle uncertainty and the complexity of customer’s wants where it did not meet the system requirements like good balance of safety, quality. According to the seat problem, problems reported had to do with material flaws and missing part, which is over 80%. Because KFS is the responsible party in this situation, it is imperative that the problem is solved at their site. KFS was using the standard TMC principle where KFS (Kentucky Framed Seat) which was unable to handle the complexity of the orders and lead to reducing the seat variety which created a serious problem. KFS is responsible for the material flaws and missing parts for the major encountered defects where the seat defects were happening more often as the demand for and variety of seats increased and in order to solve this problem, there are a few alternatives which it did not take into consideration and also additionally, they decreased the number of seat options in order to reduce the likelihood of defected parts and this decision created a large impact because it seems as though. There must also be a Lack of close examination of the two TMS areas where the first take would be to explore the reason for the difference in defect rates between the shifts and no focus on the reason for the delays in obtaining replacements parts from Kentucky Framed Seat and they even did not address the production line which should be stopped to fix a defective seat and the method of noting the defect and creating a triage to handle the problem While inspecting the manufacturing and QC process it was at the origination of the seat problem where KFS can focus on solving the problem at the heart of the issue. This course of action will most likely result in fewer problems showing up at the TTM plant that it is not evident as the TMS team deviated from the principle of Just in Time, but rather it had other problems like- either supplier issues, process issues, or the JIT information flow which was incorrect However, the company needs to discerned the root cause of the exceptionally high volume of defects and did not implement appropriate remedial measures for the defectives. Besides, subsequent to recognizing the tricky zones like material stream, seat reinforces broken and the missing part just as the seat back broken will demonstrate supportive in tending to these issues. Thusly, Doug Friesen should keep his consideration and the arrangement endeavors on the back seat establishment station when contrasted with the front seat establishment and this may likewise be connected to the planned colleagues who are turned into the space toward the beginning of April. Notwithstanding, the purpose for suggesting this methodology depends on the assurance of the main driver of the imperfection that occurred on the grounds that this will be the solitary way which will demonstrate advantageous for precisely tending to these issues so they don't happen again later on.