Skip to main content

We need your support today

Independent journalism is more important than ever. Vox is here to explain this unprecedented election cycle and help you understand the larger stakes. We will break down where the candidates stand on major issues, from economic policy to immigration, foreign policy, criminal justice, and abortion. We’ll answer your biggest questions, and we’ll explain what matters — and why. This timely and essential task, however, is expensive to produce.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Support Vox

Canada’s railway lockout saga, briefly explained

Canadian railways locked out union workers Thursday after months of contract disputes.

Rail Giants Plan To Shut Down Canada Network After Union Talks Fail
Rail Giants Plan To Shut Down Canada Network After Union Talks Fail
Shipping containers on the rails outside the Canadian Pacific Railway Toronto Yard in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on August 20, 2024.
Cole Burston/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Ellen Ioanes covers breaking and general assignment news as the weekend reporter at Vox. She previously worked at Business Insider covering the military and global conflicts.

Canada’s two main rail lines locked out rail workers early Thursday morning amid tense contract negotiations between the railways and the Canada Teamsters Rail Conference, which represents nearly 10,000 rail workers. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said his government would resolve the dispute, and late Thursday, officials ordered the two sides to enter arbitration proceedings. Even if they are successful, however, the work stoppage could have a serious impact on the Canadian economy, as well as supply chains in both the US and Canada.

The rail companies, Canadian National Railway (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC), and the union have been negotiating for months, but remain far apart. Though CN ordered its 6,000 union employees back to work on Friday, the CPKC lockout continues, and CN workers have filed notice that a strike could begin Monday. The companies argued a lockout was necessary to ensure a safe and controlled drawdown of operations and that if they waited for operators to walk off the job, the companies wouldn’t have had time to secure hazardous materials or work out supply arrangements with key customers. The two rail lines facilitate the transit of people and about $740 million worth of goods across the country’s vast interior each day.

For now, the impact of the work stoppage is mainly on the Canadian economy, but because about 75 percent of Canadian exports — including coal and agricultural products — are sold to the US, there could be an impact on the US supply chain if the dispute isn’t resolved soon.

What went wrong with Canadian railways and what it means for Canada’s supply chain

The two railway systems had contracts with the Teamsters union that expired in December 2023. Since then, each side has accused the other of refusing to accept reasonable terms.

The union’s primary concerns, according to its public communications, have been over worker safety and rest periods, as well as predictable scheduling. They also claim that Canada National is issuing them unworkable relocation notices — forcing workers to move for months at a time in order to deal with staffing shortages.

The rail workers voted to authorize a strike as early as May of this year, claiming that the rail companies weren’t bargaining in good faith and were attempting to undercut progress on working conditions, proposing a shift to an hourly wage rather than a salary for some positions, and removing scheduling provisions for adequate rest.

“Across Canada, we have trains [that] are carrying goods, they are carrying energy, they are carrying chemicals,” François Laporte, national president of Teamsters Canada, told the BBC Thursday. “And we want to make sure that those [trains] are operated by people who get the proper rest, who are safe, who are not fatigued.”

Canadian railways carry goods like coal and potash — an important ingredient in fertilizer — as well as cooking oil, propane, and frozen food.

Many shipments both within Canada and between Canada and the US were already paused; by Tuesday, CPKC had already stopped shipments that started in the US and were bound for Canada. Under the work stoppage, around 2,500 US train cars bound for Canada will be halted each day.

Some organizations, like the US Chamber of Commerce, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and the National Cotton Council warned of devastating effects on the US supply chain and economy should the work stoppage persist.

The American Farm Bureau Federation and the National Cotton Council, among others, claimed in a Monday letter to President Joe Biden that the work stoppage could cause “harmful consequences for Canadian and American agricultural producers, the agricultural industry, and both domestic and global food security” if it persisted, the Washington Post reported.

Though it’s difficult to say exactly what the impact will be on the US economy, some prices on agricultural products could go up should the work stoppage stretch on, affecting consumers already struggling with high food costs. Sanitation could be affected, as the chlorine that many sanitation departments rely on to treat wastewater is shipped from Canada. The automotive industry could be impacted, too; according to June numbers from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, automobiles and auto parts made up the bulk of rail shipments from the US to Canada in June. Some US auto plants could be forced to shut down before the week is out if there’s no agreement.

Container ships unable to unload at Canadian ports will likely need to reroute to the US, potentially causing a backup at US ports, which could cause supply chain disruptions.

Supply chain problems will become more pronounced the longer the lockout continues. The Canadian government had two options to try to solve the problem: either pass return-to-work legislation or force the companies and the union into private arbitration. The companies had signaled openness to arbitration, though the union did not.

It’s possible the arbitration process will only paper over the real disputes without solving them, as the US return-to-work legislation in December 2022 did. Without a resolution and a new contract, forcing the workers to return to their trains will only kick the problem down the track.

Update, August 23, 2024, 4 pm ET: This story, first published on August 22, has been updated to reflect the Canadian government ordering the rail companies and union into arbitration and the end of CN’s lockout order.

More in Policy

Shrinking the economy won’t save the planetShrinking the economy won’t save the planet
Future Perfect

561 research papers in, the case for degrowth is still weak.

By Kelsey Piper
The impact of the Supreme Court’s reversal of affirmative action, explained in one chartThe impact of the Supreme Court’s reversal of affirmative action, explained in one chart
Policy

Preliminary data shows a negative impact on Black enrollment at some universities.

By Nicole Narea
Why Harris and Trump don’t want a Japanese company to buy US SteelWhy Harris and Trump don’t want a Japanese company to buy US Steel
Politics

US Steel is a throwback to when American steel and American unions were powerful. Now it might be sold.

By Dylan Matthews
Republicans’ racist, cat-eating conspiracy theory, briefly explainedRepublicans’ racist, cat-eating conspiracy theory, briefly explained
2024 Elections

Apparently, when you are a Republican political candidate you can say literally anything.

By Ian Millhiser
Tyreek Hill’s disturbing detention by police, explainedTyreek Hill’s disturbing detention by police, explained
Criminal Justice

Hill was subject to a violent traffic stop that put another spotlight on police brutality.

By Li Zhou
Kamala Harris’s and Donald Trump’s wildly different tax plans, explainedKamala Harris’s and Donald Trump’s wildly different tax plans, explained
Vox’s guide to Donald Trump’s 2024 policies

Both candidates say they’ll cut taxes — but for whom?

By Ellen Ioanes