Reducing energy intake and energy density for a sustainable diet: a study based on self-selected diets in French adults

Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jun;99(6):1460-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.077958. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

Abstract

Background: Studies on theoretical diets are not sufficient to implement sustainable diets in practice because of unknown cultural acceptability. In contrast, self-selected diets can be considered culturally acceptable.

Objective: The objective was to identify the most sustainable diets consumed by people in everyday life.

Design: The diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) for self-selected diets of 1918 adults participating in the cross-sectional French national dietary survey Individual and National Survey on Food Consumption (INCA2) were estimated. "Lower-Carbon," "Higher-Quality," and "More Sustainable" diets were defined as having GHGE lower than the overall median value, a probability of adequate nutrition intake (PANDiet) score (a measure of the overall nutritional adequacy of a diet) higher than the overall median value, and a combination of both criteria, respectively. Diet cost, as a proxy for affordability, and energy density were also assessed.

Results: More Sustainable diets were consumed by 23% of men and 20% of women, and their GHGE values were 19% and 17% lower than the population average (mean) value, respectively. In comparison with the average value, Lower-Carbon diets achieved a 20% GHGE reduction and lower cost, but they were not sustainable because they had a lower PANDiet score. Higher-Quality diets were not sustainable because of their above-average GHGE and cost. More Sustainable diets had an above-average PANDiet score and a below-average energy density, cost, GHGE, and energy content; the energy share of plant-based products was increased by 20% and 15% compared with the average for men and women, respectively.

Conclusions: A strength of this study was that most of the dimensions for "sustainable diets" were considered, ie, not only nutritional quality and GHGE but also affordability and cultural acceptability. A reduction in diet-related GHGE by 20% while maintaining high nutritional quality seems realistic. This goal could be achieved at no extra cost by reducing energy intake and energy density and increasing the share of plant-based products.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Caloric Restriction* / adverse effects
  • Caloric Restriction* / economics
  • Conservation of Natural Resources* / economics
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Energy Intake*
  • Female
  • Food Quality
  • Food Supply / economics
  • France
  • Greenhouse Effect / prevention & control
  • Health Promotion
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Biological*
  • Nutrition Policy
  • Nutrition Surveys
  • Nutritive Value
  • Patient Compliance
  • Young Adult