Colorado Amendment 77, Allow Voters in Central, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek Cities to Expand Authorized Games and Increase Maximum Bets Initiative (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Colorado Amendment 77
Flag of Colorado.png
Election date
November 3, 2020
Topic
Gambling
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Amendment
& Statute
Origin
Citizens


Colorado Amendment 77, the Allow Voters in Central City, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek to Expand Game Types and Single Bets Initiative, was on the ballot in Colorado as a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute on November 3, 2020. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported allowing voters in Central, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek Cities — the only towns where gaming is legal in Colorado — to (1) approve a maximum single bet limit of any amount and (2) expand allowable game types in addition to slot machines, blackjack, poker, roulette, and craps.

A "no" vote opposed allowing voters in Central, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek Cities to approve a maximum single bet limit of any amount, thereby retaining the current maximum single bet limit of $100, and opposes expanding allowable game types, thereby limiting games within the cities' casinos to slot machines, blackjack, poker, roulette, and craps.


Supermajority requirement: A simple majority vote was required for the approval of Amendment 77.

Election results

Colorado Amendment 77

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,854,153 60.54%
No 1,208,414 39.46%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Amendment 77 do?

Amendment 77 allowed voters in Central City, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek — the only towns where gaming is legal in Colorado — to approve a maximum single bet of any amount and approve more game types in addition to slot machines, blackjack, poker, roulette, and craps. The measure repealed language in the Colorado Constitution that limited the types of games allowed in the casinos and that sets a maximum single bet of $100. The distribution of gaming tax revenue for community colleges in state statute was amended to include distributions to programs to improve student retention and increase credential completion.[1][2]

Under the measure, each of the three towns may hold a local election to vote on whether to change betting limits and add new games. The earliest these changes could go into effect was May 1, 2021.[1][2]

What is the history of gambling in Colorado?

See also: History of gambling in Colorado

In 1990, Colorado voters approved legalized limited gaming in the cities of Black Hawk, Central City, and Cripple Creek through Initiative 4. Statewide voters approved the measure in a vote of 57.31% to 42.39%. Gaming in the cities became legal on October 1, 1991. Single bets were limited to $5 and only slot machines, blackjack, and poker games were allowed. Casinos were also required to close at 2 a.m. and remain closed until 8 a.m., and no more than 35% of a building's total space or 50% of a building floor could be dedicated to gaming. A graduated tax on casinos’ gross proceeds is set by the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission. As of 2020, the tax rates ranged from 0.25% on proceeds of $2 million or less to 20% on proceeds above $13 million. Initiative 4 allocated gaming tax revenue as follows:[3]

  • 28% to the State Historical Fund for the preservation of historical sites in gaming cities and statewide;
  • 12% to gaming counties;
  • 10% to gaming cities; and
  • remaining 50% to state programs, such as the Tourism Promotion Fund, at the discretion of the General Assembly.

Any changes to any of the limits require statewide voter approval.[4][5]

How was gambling in Colorado changed by Amendment 50 in 2008?

In 2008, Colorado voters approved Amendment 50 by a vote of 59% to 41%. This constitutional amendment allowed residents of Cripple Creek, Black Hawk, and Central City to vote on whether to extend casino hours to 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, add roulette and craps as additional games, and increase the maximum bet limit from $5 to $100. The first 80% of the new revenue attributed to the expansions and maximum bet increase under Amendment 50 was designed to go to the casinos. Of the remaining 20%, the additional tax revenue was designed to be distributed as follows:[3]

  • 78% for financial aid and classroom instruction at Colorado community, junior, and district colleges based on each school's enrollment;
  • 12% to Gilpin and Teller Counties, based on the proportion of Amendment 50 revenue raised within each county, to help address the impacts of gaming; and
  • 10% to Central City, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek, based on the proportion of the Amendment 50 revenue raised within each town, to help address the impacts of gaming.

Who is behind the campaigns supporting and opposing this measure?

See also: Campaign finance, Support, and Opposition

The initiative was sponsored by Bruce Brown, the former mayor of Cripple Creek, and former Colorado Senate president Bill Cadman (R). Bruce Brown said, "These towns have built much of their local economies around hotels, restaurants, tourism, and travelers who visit because of gaming. Voters in these communities should be allowed to decide what is best for them and their economy, including whether they want to change betting limits and add new games." Local Choice Colorado led the campaign in support of the measure. The committee reported $4.02 million in contributions and $4.02 million in expenditures. Top donors included Caesars Entertainment ($1.1 million), Penn National Gaming ($950,000), Monarch Blackhawk Casino ($750,000), and Full House Resorts ($300,000). Local Choice Colorado said, "If local voters choose to approve new games and betting limits, mountain casinos could attract higher-income Coloradans who would typically travel to other states to gamble, as well as out-of-state, high-stakes bettors visiting Aspen or Vail. This will improve economic opportunities for people living in these mountain towns by bringing in more tourists, creating good-paying jobs, and increasing tax revenues."[6]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Amendment 77 was as follows:

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution and a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes concerning voter-approved changes to limited gaming, and, in connection therewith, allowing the voters of Central City, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek, for their individual cities, to approve other games in addition to those currently allowed and increase a maximum single bet to any amount; and allowing gaming tax revenue to be used for support services to improve student retention and credential completion by students enrolled in community colleges?[7]

Summary and analysis

The summary and analysis provided for this measure in the 2020 State Ballot Information Booklet are available on page 21 at this link.

Fiscal impact statement

The fiscal impact statement was as follows:[8]

The following fiscal impacts are conditional upon voter approval in at least one of the three gaming cities and will depend on the casino bet limits and new games approved in

those cities.

State and local government revenue. Amendment 77 will likely increase state and local revenue. If bet limits go up, taxable casino revenue and state gaming tax collections are likely to increase. State gaming tax revenue is distributed in part to the municipal and county governments where casinos are allowed. The amount of any revenue increase will depend on how much any locally approved gaming changes increase the revenue on which casinos pay taxes. For reference, a previous expansion of betting limits and allowable casino games in 2008 increased gaming revenue by about $10 million per year.

State and local government spending. Amendment 77 will likely increase state, local, and community college spending if gaming revenue increases. The amount of any spending will depend on how much any locally approved gaming changes increase the revenue on which casinos pay taxes. The Division of Gaming in the Department of Revenue will need to update rules and documentation if either bet limits are increased or new games are added. This measure will also increase local government spending in the three gaming cities if they hold an election to increase bet limits or add new casino games in each city. Any additional revenue received by community colleges will be spent on programs allowed under current law and those included in this amendment.

Taxpayer impacts. Amendment 77 will likely increase taxes paid by casinos. The amount by which taxes will increase depends on future decisions made by voters in the three gaming cities. [7]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article XVIII, Colorado Constitution

The measure amended Section 9 of Article XVIII of the Colorado Constitution. The following struck-through text was deleted:[2]

Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.

Text of Section 9:

Limited Gaming Permitted. ....

(7) LOCAL ELECTIONS TO REVISE LIMITS APPLICABLE TO GAMING - STATEWIDE ELECTIONS TO INCREASE GAMING TAXES. (a) Through local elections, the voters of the cities of Central, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek are authorized to revise limits on gaming that apply to licensees operating in their city's gaming district to extend:

(I) Hours of limited gaming operation;

(II) Approved games to include roulette or craps, or both; and

(III) Single bets up to one hundred dollars.

(b) Limited gaming tax revenues attributable to the operation of this subsection (7) shall be deposited in the limited gaming fund. The commission shall annually determine the amount of such revenues generated in each city.

(c) From gaming tax revenues attributable to the operation of this subsection (7), the treasurer shall pay:

(I) Those ongoing expenses of the commission and other state agencies that are related to the administration of this subsection (7);

(II) Annual adjustments, in connection with distributions to limited gaming fund recipients listed in subsection (5)(b)(II) of this section, to reflect the lesser of six percent of, or the actual percentage of, annual growth in gaming tax revenues attributable to this subsection (7); and

(III) Of the remaining gaming tax revenues, distributions in the following proportions:

(A) Seventy-eight percent to the state's public community colleges, junior colleges, and local district colleges to supplement existing state funding for student financial aid programs and classroom instruction programs; provided that such revenue shall be distributed to institutions that were operating on and after January 1, 2008, in proportion to their respective full-time equivalent student enrollments in the previous fiscal year;

(B) Ten percent to the governing bodies of the cities of Central, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek to address local gaming impacts; provided that such revenue shall be distributed based on the proportion of gaming tax revenues, attributable to the operation of this subsection (7), that are paid by licensees operating in each city; and

(C) Twelve percent to the governing bodies of Gilpin and Teller Counties to address local gaming impacts; provided that such revenue shall be distributed based on the proportion of gaming tax revenues, attributable to the operation of this subsection (7), that are paid by licensees operating in each county.

(d) After July 1, 2009, the commission shall implement revisions to limits on gaming as approved by voters in the cities of Central, Black Hawk, or Cripple Creek. The general assembly is also authorized to enact, as necessary, legislation that will facilitate the operation of this subsection (7).

(e) If local voters in one or more cities revise any limits on gaming as provided in paragraph (a) of this subsection (7), any commission action pursuant to subsection (5) of this section that increases gaming taxes from the levels imposed as of July 1, 2008, shall be effective only if approved by voters at a statewide election held under section 20(4)(a) of article X of this constitution.

(f) Gaming tax revenues attributable to the operation of this subsection (7) shall be collected and spent as a voter-approved revenue change without regard to any limitation contained in section 20 of article X of this constitution or any other law.[7]

Full text

The full text of the measure can be read below. Struck-through text was deleted and the CAPITALIZED text was added:[2]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2020
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The Colorado Title Board wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 40, and the FRE is -37. The word count for the ballot title is 86, and the estimated reading time is 22 seconds.


Support

LocalChoiceColorado.JPG

Local Choice Colorado led the campaign in support of Amendment 77.[9] Bruce Brown, the former mayor of Cripple Creek, and former Colorado Senate president Bill Cadman (R) sponsored the initiative.[1]

Supporters

Organizations

  • Colorado Gaming Association
  • Progress Now Colorado


Arguments

  • John J. Tipton, former Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue and former creator and Director of the Colorado Division of Gaming: “Any additional revenue is critical not only to these gaming towns struggling in the wake of COVID-19 shutdowns, but the State of Colorado, which has received millions in gaming tax revenue for the general fund, community colleges, historic preservation, and state tourism promotion.”
  • Local Choice Colorado: "The measure will help boost travel and tourism jobs and increase revenues for restaurants, hotels and casinos, which are the lifeblood of these towns. This will be a particularly welcome boost during the pandemic. The measure will also increase tax revenue for students at community colleges. This funding bump won’t be a game changer, but will provide additional resources to the community college system at a time when financial resources are scarce. Betting limits are critical to the gaming industry as they compete with other gaming markets, such as Nevada, and the gaming industry is critical to the economy in these communities. Since voters in these towns are the most impacted by gaming, they should have the right to make decisions about gaming that is right for them."
  • Local Choice Colorado: "If local voters choose to approve new games and betting limits, mountain casinos could attract higher-income Coloradans who would typically travel to other states to gamble, as well as out-of-state, high-stakes bettors visiting Aspen or Vail. This will improve economic opportunities for people living in these mountain towns by bringing in more tourists, creating good-paying jobs, and increasing tax revenues."
  • Former Cripple Creek Mayor Bruce Brown: "These towns have built much of their local economies around hotels, restaurants, tourism, and travelers who visit because of gaming. Voters in these communities should be allowed to decide what is best for them and their economy, including whether they want to change betting limits and add new games."
  • Cripple Creek Mayor Milford Ashworth and Cripple Creek City Council: “The City Council believes that by allowing local control of setting gaming limits and new games by the three towns, it will allow the cities to try and regain some of the tremendous financial losses that are, and will continue, to occur. This will be an important step to rebuilding our local economies and will help the State of Colorado by contributing additional gaming taxes to the General Fund and other tax distribution beneficiaries."
  • Former Colorado Senate president Bill Cadman (R): "If [the three Colorado casino towns] choose to extend their limits and game options, the modest boost to revenue would be a win-win-win for all the businesses and employees in these small towns, the players who are asking for more gaming options, and the community colleges that receive the taxes."

Official arguments

  • Official Blue Book argument: "1) Amendment 77 allows voters in Black Hawk, Central City, and Cripple Creek to make decisions that are best for their communities. Local residents impacted by changes to gambling in Colorado are best equipped to address the needs of their communities and should be allowed to control what happens in their cities. 2) Without raising taxes on Coloradans, Amendment 77 will likely increase the amount of funding for community college financial aid, classroom instruction, workforce development, student retention, and degree completion programs. This additional revenue will help provide important educational and employment opportunities during this economic downturn and is essential when recent state and local tax revenues have decreased significantly"


Opposition

Official arguments

  • Official Blue Book argument: "1) Removing bet limits may increase the prevalence and severity of problem gambling. Problem gambling often leads to negative social impacts ranging from lower work productivity, financial problems, and higher crime rates to family neglect and abuse, substance abuse, and suicide. Amendment 77 increases the risk of gambling problems without setting aside any of the new tax revenue to help people harmed by problem gambling. 2) Expanding casino gambling may negatively impact other communities in Colorado that will no longer have a voice in changes to limits on bets and games. Other cities will not receive any of the tax revenue to help offset the burden created by additional traffic, intoxicated driving, or any problem gambling issues. All Colorado voters deserve to have a say in activities that impact the entire state"


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Colorado ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recently scheduled reports processed by Ballotpedia, which covered through November 30, 2020.


Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $4,007,050.00 $15,559.10 $4,022,609.10 $4,007,050.00 $4,022,609.10
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


Ballotpedia identified one committee registered to support the initiative: Local Choice Colorado. The committee reported $4.02 million in contributions and $4.02 million in expenditures. The top donor was Caesars Entertainment, which provided $1.1 million. Of expenditures made by the committee, $1.2 million was paid to Blitz Canvassing for signature gathering, resulting in a cost-per-required signature of $9.63.[10]

No committees registered to oppose the ballot initiative.[10]

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the initiative.[10]

Committees in support of Amendment 77
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Local Choice Colorado $4,007,050.00 $15,559.10 $4,022,609.10 $4,007,050.00 $4,022,609.10
Total $4,007,050.00 $15,559.10 $4,022,609.10 $4,007,050.00 $4,022,609.10

Donors

The following were the top five donors to the support committee, which provided 95.74% of the total contributions to the support campaign.[10]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Penn National Gaming $1,100,000.00 $0.00 $1,100,000.00
Penn National Gaming $950,000.00 $0.00 $950,000.00
Monarch Blackhawk Casino $750,000.00 $0.00 $750,000.00
Monarch Blackhawk Casino $550,000.00 $0.00 $550,000.00
Full House Resorts $300,000.00 $0.00 $300,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Media editorials

See also: 2020 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

  • Journal-Advocate Editorial Board and Fort Morgan Times Editorial Board: "Rural and mountain communities shouldn’t have to seek permission from a statewide election to pursue economic development opportunities at home."
  • Durango Herald Editorial Board: "We see no reason to stand in the way of these towns exercising their prerogatives. Yes on Amendment 77."
  • Vail Daily Editorial Board: "We also think that voters in Central City, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek should have the right to do what they think is best for their communities. We know Eagle County residents feel the same way. And dollars from gambling tax revenue have been good for Colorado, with money going to preserving historical sites and state programs to promote tourism."
  • Boulder Weekly Editorial Board: 'We think the residents of Colorado’s casino towns ought to make this decision for themselves. Vote yes."
  • Denver Post Editorial Board: "Amendment 77 is a simple change to help three of Colorado’s tourist towns recover from the pandemic’s economic fallout. ... All three of these communities rely heavily on gambling tourism not only to fill their local businesses but to fill their city and county coffers."


Opposition

  • Colorado Springs Indy Editorial Board: "Amendment 77 would take away much state oversight of gambling operations, and instead empower voters in just three Colorado communities — Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek — to do pretty much as they please, including expanding the number of casinos, raising betting limits, and adding new casino games — even digital and web-based games that are not yet invented. ... This amendment provides no funds to help people who get addicted to gambling, even though there is clear evidence that for a small but significant number of people, gambling increases their propensity for substance abuse, crime and suicide. ... Vote No on Amendment 77."
  • Steamboat Pilot & Today Editorial Board: "While we generally favor local control, we don’t see an overriding reason to amend the Constitution through a citizen-driven initiative and recommend a 'no' vote."


Background

History of gambling in Colorado

Colorado voters approved legalized gambling in the cities of Black Hawk, Central, and Cripple Creek through Initiative 4 in 1990. Statewide voters approved the measure in a vote of 57.31% to 42.39%. Gaming in the cities became legal on October 1, 1991.[4] Gambling in Colorado is a style of gambling called limited gaming, which means wagers are limited to a maximum single bet of $100; gaming types are limited to slot machines, blackjack, poker, craps, and roulette; gaming is limited to select locations, which as of 2020 included the cities of Black Hawk, Central, and Cripple Creek and on tribal reservation lands; and gaming is limited to occupying 35% of a building's total space or half of a building floor. Changes to any of the limits require statewide voter approval.[11]

Betting limits in other states

Going into the election, the maximum single bet in Colorado was $100, which was raised from $5 in 2008. The 2020 initiative was designed to allow voters in the three gaming cities to approve a maximum betting limit of any amount. The only other state with individual betting limits is South Dakota, where the maximum bet in Deadwood (also a former gold mining town turned gaming town) is $1,000. The World Casino Index noted that "the $1,000 max bet requires special surveillance and cash requirements that few casinos adopted. This means the max bet at most Deadwood casinos remains $100."[12][13]

Referendum C of 1992

Referendum C, approved by Colorado voters in 1992, amended the constitution to legalize gambling in certain localities if a question is submitted to and approved by voters through a constitutional amendment at a statewide election and subsequently approved by voters of the locality. The amendment would have applied to initiatives 3, 4, 5, and 9 on the 1992 statewide ballot, which sought to legalize gambling in certain places. All four initiatives were defeated.[14]

In accordance with Referendum C, an initiative to legalize gambling in the city of Trinidad was on the statewide ballot in 1996 and was defeated by a vote of 69% to 31%.

History of Black Hawk, Central, and Cripple Creek

As of 2020, the only cities with legalized gambling in Colorado were the cities of Black Hawk, Central, and Cripple Creek. All three are former gold mining towns with mining activity in the late 1850s during the Pike's Peak Gold Rush. According to Sports Handle, "Colorado’s gaming towns have a rich history dating to the gold rush and winding their way through the Civil War, World War I, World War II, and beyond. ... Those three towns — Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek — needed a way to survive, and after suffering the boom-and-bust gold rush era and multiple wars, they set their sights on gaming, creating unique destinations that offer a walk through history alongside table games, slot machines, and now legal sports betting."[15][16][17]

The director of Colorado’s Division of Gaming, Dan Hartman, said, "Deadwood in South Dakota was the limited gaming model that launched in the mid-late 1980s that was really the model for Colorado. ... I think seeing the success of what happened in Deadwood right off the bat, people said, ‘Hey, we’ve got these great, old mining towns that aren’t doing great. Let’s see if we can bring that here and if we can do the same thing.'"[15] Gambling was legalized within the city limits of Deadwood, South Dakota, through a citizen initiative in 1988. A portion of the gambling revenue in Deadwood is dedicated to historic restoration and preservation of the city.

Black Hawk: The city of Black Hawk is located about 35 miles west of Denver and occupies under two square miles of space. As of 2018, the population of Black Hawk was estimated to be 127. As of 2020, Black Hawk had 13 casinos. The city of Blackhawk's website states, "After years of economic decline and deteriorating infrastructure, a ballot measure [was] passed allowing limited-stakes gaming in Colorado. Two small casinos open[ed] in historic Black Hawk structures, launching a revitalization that would allow the City to eventually generate $20,000 in revenue per day."[15][18][19][20]

Central City: Central City is located about 38 miles northwest of Denver. As of 2018, the city's population was estimated to be 765. It had eight casinos as of 2020. According to LegendsofAmerica.com, "Central City recognized that they did not have the tax base to adequately maintain its infrastructure and new sources of revenue had to be found. In 1989, a group of citizens formed Central City Preservation Incorporated and began working toward the legalization of limited gambling as a way of attracting tourists back to Central City."[15][18][21]

Cripple Creek: Cripple Creek is located about 22 miles southwest of Colorado Springs (112 miles south of Denver). The city had an estimated population of 1,267 as of 2018. As of 2020, Cripple Creek had 12 casinos. According to Visit Colorado Springs, "After 1900, the area’s gold production declined, and by the early 1940’s gold production was down to less than one percent of what it once was. By 1990, the town was almost dead with only 600 residents, but in 1991 with legalized gambling, the town was revived. Many of the old town’s historic buildings were refurbished as casinos."[15][18][22]

Gaming tax

Gambling in Colorado has been taxed since it was legalized in 1991. The gaming tax is levied on a casino's adjusted gross proceeds (money that is taken in from gamblers minus the winnings paid out to gamblers). The gaming tax revenue is subject to the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) limit. TABOR limits the amount of money the state of Colorado can take in and spend. TABOR requires voter approval for all new taxes, tax rate increases, extensions of expiring taxes, mill levy increases, valuation for property assessment increases, or tax policy changes resulting in increased tax revenue. Each casino pays the gaming tax for each month on the 15th day of the next month. Gaming on Colorado Indian Reservations (Ute Mountain Ute and Southern Ute) are not subject to the state's gaming tax.[23]

Amendment 50 of 2008

See also: Colorado Limited Gaming in Central City, Black Hawk and Cripple Creek, Initiative 50 (2008)

Amendment 50, which was on the ballot in Colorado in 2008, was approved by a vote of 59% to 41%. The amendment allowed the voters of Central City, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek, to vote on extending the hours of limited gaming operations to 24 hours per day, 7 days per week; to add roulette and craps as allowed games; and to increase the maximum bet from $5 to $100. The first 80% of the new revenue attributed to the expansions and maximum bet increase was designed to go to the casinos. Of the remaining 20%, 78% was to be distributed for community college student financial aid and classroom instruction and 22% was designed to be distributed to the cities where limited gaming exists for gaming impacts. Unlike the gaming tax, revenue attributed to Amendment 50 is not subject to the state's TABOR limit.[24]

Gaming tax rates and revenue

Tax rates are reviewed annually and set by the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission, which is composed of five members that are appointed by the governor. As of 2020, casinos' adjusted gross proceeds were taxed at the following rates:[23]

  • $0 to $2,000,000: 0.25%
  • $2,000,001 to $5,000,000: 2%
  • $5,000,001 to $8,000,000: 9%
  • $8,000,001 to $10,000,000: 11%
  • $10,000,001 to $13,000,000: 16%
  • $13,000,001 and over: 20%

The following chart shows gaming tax revenue for fiscal years 1998-99 to 2018-2019 with general limited gaming tax revenue (subject to the TABOR limit) shown in light blue and extended limited gaming revenue attributed to Amendment 50 (not subject to TABOR limit) in dark blue.[23]

Over the last five fiscal years from 2014 through 2019, the average general limited gaming tax revenue was about $102.34 million each year. Over the last five fiscal years from 2014 through 2019, the average extended limited gaming tax revenue attributed to Amendment 50's extended gaming provisions was about $16.64 million per year.

Revenue distributions

The following table shows revenue distributions from gaming tax revenue. General limited gaming tax revenue is deposited in the Limited Gaming Fund and revenue attributed to Amendment 50 is deposited in the Extended Limited Gaming Fund.[23]

In the fiscal year 2018-19, general limited gaming tax revenue was $104.8 million. Of the revenue, $26.3 million was directed to the state historical fund, $16.4 million was directed to the state general fund, and $15 million was deposited to the state travel and tourism promotion fund. The remaining 45% of the revenue was directed to various other funds as shown in the table below.

In the fiscal year 2018-19, Amendment 50 revenue was about $18 million, of which, $14 million was distributed to community colleges. The remaining revenue was given to gaming cities and counties.[23]

Path to the ballot

See also: Signature requirements for ballot measures in Colorado and Laws governing the initiative process in Colorado

The state process

In Colorado, the number of signatures required to qualify an initiated constitutional amendment for the ballot is equal to 5 percent of the total number of votes cast for the office of Colorado secretary of state in the preceding general election. For initiated constitutional amendments, signature gathering must be distributed to include signatures equal to 2 percent of the registered voters who live in each of the state's 35 senate districts.

State law provides that petitioners have six months to collect signatures after the ballot language and title are finalized. State statutes require a completed signature petition to be filed three months and three weeks before the election at which the measure would appear on the ballot. The Constitution, however, states that the petition must be filed three months before the election at which the measure would appear. The secretary of state generally lists a date that is three months before the election as the filing deadline.

Constitutional amendments in Colorado require a 55% supermajority vote to be ratified and added to the state constitution. This requirement was added by Amendment 71 of 2016.

The requirements to get an initiated constitutional amendment certified for the 2020 ballot:

The secretary of state is responsible for signature verification. Verification is conducted through a review of petitions regarding correct form and then a 5 percent random sampling verification. If the sampling projects between 90 percent and 110 percent of required valid signatures, a full check of all signatures is required. If the sampling projects more than 110 percent of the required signatures, the initiative is certified. If less than 90 percent, the initiative fails.

Details about this initiative

  • Bruce Brown, the former mayor of Cripple Creek, and former Colorado Senate president Bill Cadman (R) filed the initiative on February 7, 2020. A ballot title was set for it on February 19, 2020.[1]
  • The initiative was approved to circulate on February 19, 2020.[1]
  • Proponents submitted 209,885 signatures to the Secretary of State's office on July 28, 2020. On August 27, the secretary of state announced that 138,232 were projected to be valid based on a random sample.[9][26]

Cost of signature collection:
Sponsors of the measure hired Blitz Canvassing to collect signatures for the petition to qualify this measure for the ballot. A total of $1,200,000.00 was spent to collect the 124,632 valid signatures required to put this measure before voters, resulting in a total cost per required signature (CPRS) of $9.63.

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Colorado

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Colorado.

See also

External links

Support

Opposition

Submit links to [email protected].

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Colorado Secretary of State, "2019-2020 Initiative Filings, Agendas & Results," accessed February 20, 2020
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Colorado Secretary of State, "Initiative 257 full text," accessed February 20, 2020
  3. 3.0 3.1 Colorado Legislative Council Staff, "Gaming tax," accessed August 28, 2020
  4. 4.0 4.1 Colorado State Legislative Council, "Ballot History," accessed February 20, 2014]
  5. Colorado Department of Revenue, "WHAT IS LIMITED GAMING?" accessed August 7, 2020
  6. Local Choice Colorado, "Home," accessed August 28, 2002
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  8. Colorado State Legislature, "2020 Blue Book," accessed September 21, 2020
  9. 9.0 9.1 Colorado Politics, "Proponents turn in 200k signatures to allow local control on betting limits," accessed July 29, 2020
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Colorado Secretary of State TRACER, "Campaign finance committee search," accessed March 19, 2021
  11. Colorado Department of Revenue, "WHAT IS LIMITED GAMING?" accessed August 7, 2020
  12. Westword, "Proposed initiative would allow casino towns to remove betting limit," accessed August 28, 2020
  13. World Casino Index, "Deadwood South Dakota Casinos," accessed August 28, 2020
  14. Colorado State Legislative Council, "Ballot History," accessed February 20, 2014
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 Sports Handle, "Colorado Gaming Towns History," accessed August 6, 2020
  16. Western Mining History, "The Colorado Gold Rush," accessed August 6, 2020
  17. Colorado Encyclopedia, "Colorado Gold Rush," accessed August 6, 2020
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 U.S. Census, "Population estimates," accessed August 6, 2020
  19. Colorado.com, "Black Hawk," accessed August 6, 2020
  20. City of Black Hawk, "Celebrating 155 Years of Preserving the Past and Preparing for the Future," accessed August 6, 2020
  21. Legends of America, "Central City, Colorado," accessed August 6, 2020
  22. Visit Colorado Springs, "Cripple Creek History," accessed August 6, 2020
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 Colorado Legislative Council Staff, "Gaming Tax," accessed August 6, 2020
  24. Colorado State Legislative Council, "Ballot History," accessed February 26, 2014
  25. On May 17, 2020, Colorado Governor Jared Polis (D) signed Executive Order D 2020 065, which temporarily suspended the state law requiring signatures to be submitted six months after ballot language finalization. Under the order, signatures for 2020 Colorado initiatives were due by August 3, 2020.
  26. Colorado Secretary of State, "Proposed Initiative #257 (“Local Voter Approval of Gaming Limits in Black Hawk, Central City, and Cripple Creek”) Qualifies For 2020 General Election Ballot," accessed August 28, 2020
  27. Colorado Secretary of State, "Mail-in Ballots FAQs," accessed July 16, 2024
  28. Colorado Revised Statutes, "1-7-101," accessed July 16, 2024
  29. 29.0 29.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Voter Registration FAQs," accessed July 16, 2024
  30. Colorado Secretary of State, "Go Vote Colorado," accessed July 15, 2024
  31. Colorado Secretary of State, "Acceptable Forms of Identification," accessed July 17, 2024