Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 354,487
Lopez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv06281
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, Waliur Rahman and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Norberto Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.B. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv07642
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
L.D. and M.B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. City of Barstow et al
as 5:2024cv01913
Defendant:
Jacob Gatti and City of Barstow
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUM v. CSOSA et al
as 1:2024cv02564
Defendant:
MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN SECURITY, CSOSA and U.S. ATTORNEY FOR DC
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hearn v. Elegant Beauty Supplies #14, Inc.
as 1:2024cv23448
Plaintiff:
Faith Hearn
Defendant:
Elegant Beauty Supplies #14, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rudisel v. Villanueva et al
as 1:2024cv23462
Plaintiff:
Roderick J Rudisel
Defendant:
Phanel Dorival, Michael Chinchilla, Jonathan Perigny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCarthy
as 2:2024cv14291
Plaintiff:
Steven M McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Principe et al v. Okeechobee County Municipality et al
as 2:2024cv14292
Defendant:
Okeechobee County Tax Collector, Okeechobee County Property Appraiser and Okeechobee County Municipality
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Principe, David A. Steen and Mary Downman Principe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Niama v. Federal Express Corporation
as 6:2024cv01632
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Niama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Reaves et al v. Hester et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Reaves and Jasmine Patrice
Defendant:
Vickie W. Hester, Carl Knowlton, Henry County Board of Edu. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
