Norwegian nationalism (Norwegian: Norsk Nasjonalisme) is an ideology that promotes the unity of Norwegians and their culture under one nation state.[1]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d9/Flag_of_Norway.svg/220px-Flag_of_Norway.svg.png)
History
edit19th Century
editThe first organized Norwegian nationalist movement arose in Denmark. Norwegian students came together in Norwegian Society in the university city of Copenhagen. Political independence was not seen as realistic, but the desire for more internal autonomy was expressed through the desire for its own Norwegian University.
Nationalistic sentiment in Norway grew strongly in the early 19th century. This was linked to the Napoleonic Wars and the influence of the French Revolution. The sense of community was also strengthened by the conflict with Sweden. The 17th of may, which began to be celebrated in 1824, was also an important factor. When National Romanticism broke through in the 1840s a lot of old culture was brought fourth by artists, writers, and other champions of nationalism.[2][3]
In the 1870s and 1880s, the Liberal party in particular was a nationalist party during the struggle for parliamentarism, which was gradually introduced from 1884. The same applied to the Target Movement and the Norwegian Youth Association.[4] The Target Movement led by Ivar Aasen claimed there were two cultures in Norway, the upper class consisting of the nobility, civil servants and parts of the bourgeoisie who represented an elitist and foreign, mainly Danish culture, and "the Norwegian people" that had roots in peasantry and represented Norwegian popular culture. The notion of the two cultures also existed outside the target group, among others in the Liberal party and among poets such as Aasmund Olavsson Vinje and Arne Garborg.[5] The later two however interpreted the "two culture doctrine" more strictly than the rest of the supporters of this division. Garborg went so far to say that there were not only two cultures in Norway, but two nations. Garborg believed only those who embraced the national language and true Norwegian culture could be considered Norwegian and those who did not had to be considered Danes. This created conflicts among the more moderate nationalists. The conflicts surrounding the dissolution of the Swedish-Norwegian union in 1905, led to political nationalism becoming popular with the left wing, but this nationalism was mostly concerned with national independence, and less less concerned with the goal of what was true Norwegian culture.[6]
Interwar period
editWhile in the 19th century people were mostly concerned with "Ethnicity" and "Nation", throughout the 20th century people increasingly became concerned with races. The idea that human races existed had its origin in biology, which at the time had grown in prestige. National minorities such as Sami, Kven, Taters and Jews were considered to belong to a different race than Norwegians, though few had systematic racist ideologies. Such nationalism became common in the interwar period at, among others, the Norwegian Agrarian Association. With the labor movement, nationalism was less popular, for them social classes was more important than nation.[7][8]
With the victory of the Soviets against the White movement in the Russian Civil War, and the rise of other revolutionary marxist movements across Europe, nationalism among the right wing in Norway would take on a Anti-communist character. One of the largest nationalist anti-communist movements, and largest right wing mass movement in the country was the Fatherland League.[9]
Second World War
editDuring the Second World War, the event led to tremendous growth of nationalism. Both the Norwegian Resistance Movement and the National Gathering (NS) claimed to be the real custodians of the Norwegian nation. The development of the war and Germanys' military dictatorship led over 90% of the population coming to regard the resistance movement as the "good Norwegians", while the NS were regarded as traitors to the country. The historian Øystein Sørensen has shown that the NS had no unified view of nationalism, but was divided into a Norwegian-nationalist wing, and a pan-Germanic Nazi wing.[citation needed]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Elviken, Andreas (1931). "The Genesis of Norwegian Nationalism". The Journal of Modern History. 3 (3): 365–391. ISSN 0022-2801.
- ^ Thorkildsen, Dag (2014). "Norwegian National Myths and Nation Building". Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte. 27 (2): 263–276. ISSN 0932-9951.
- ^ Norgeshistorie.no, Øystein Sørensen: «Nordmennene blir norske for alvor». Hentet 28. des. 2016.
- ^ Norgeshistorie.no, Jens Johan Hyvik: «Kulturnasjonalisme 1870–1914». Hentet 28. des. 2016.
- ^ Norgeshistorie.no, Jens Johan Hyvik: «Tokulturlæra». Hentet 28. des. 2016.
- ^ Norgeshistorie.no, Bjørn Arne Steine, «Venstrenasjonalismens ulike ansikter». Hentet 28. des. 2016.
- ^ Norgeshistorie.no, Knut Kjeldstadli: «Rasisme og minoriteter». Hentet 28. des. 2016. «Tanken om at det fantes naturgitte, atskilte raser, hentet kraft fra prestisjen til den biologiske vitenskapen.
- ^ Norgeshistorie.no, Knut Kjeldstadli: «Hva var det å være norsk?». Hentet 28. des. 2016.
- ^ Sjulseth, Daniel; Sejersted, Francis (13 April 2015). "Fedrelandslaget". Store norske leksikon (in Norwegian).