Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Reuven Shmerling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
The usual editors are obviously whitewashing obvious terrorist attacks.
Line 63:
*'''Keep''' it seems to be notable, simply by the amount of attention all the above have been paying; perhaps better paid contributing elsewhere, perhaps not. The fact is, if it was reported in non-Jewish media sources, it would be too obscure for many of the above to uncover, so citations would become difficult; that is not the problem, as citations exist, keep. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/126.209.23.138|126.209.23.138]] ([[User talk:126.209.23.138#top|talk]]) 22:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
<small>— [[Special:Contributions/126.209.23.138|126.209.23.138]] ([[User talk:126.209.23.138|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
*'''Keep''' The usual editors are obviously whitewashing obvious terrorist attacks. Suspected terrorist attacks are never routine [[User:Bachcell|Bachcell]] ([[User talk:Bachcell|talk]])