Jo-Jo Eumerus
Jo-Jo Eumerus is away on vacation and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This is Jo-Jo Eumerus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
FAC candidates
editThis section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- Cerro Panizos
- Socompa
- Licancabur
- Llullaillaco
- Sabancaya
- Misti
- Macauley Island, needs prose cleanup
- Aucanquilcha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Cerro Guacha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- El Laco, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Lastarria, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Purico complex, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Aguas Calientes caldera, needs a rewrite (and some mergers) with Google Scholar
- Pastos Grandes, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar or shortened.
- Mount Okmok
- Mount Aniakchak
- Candlemas Island
- Laguna Verde (Bolivia), needs expansion with talkpage sauces
Most of 'em need a root-and-branch rewrite first, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Troika Review
editHello Jojo, just thought I would reply here to your review. In regards to some of your critiques I fixed some of them and addressed others. Was a little confused by some of the pointers where you say some of the information is not in the source, I have double checked those and they do have it in some of those sources and have revised the portions that did not. In terms of sending you the pages, I don't have a proper way of doing so. I hope that doesn't affect your review. I did add a reference I founded and whatnot to the article and am still slightly confused as to how I can validate the non-free images. Paleface Jack (talk) 21:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- One way would be to upload the screenshots/pages to Google Drive and link it on the FAC. When the review's done, the Google Drive can be deleted again. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry if I seem a bit confused. I have never done that before and dont really know how. I dont have a high quality scanner or anything substantial. If i cannot do that is there any way you want me to verify the information? Also how can i ensure that non-free and even free images fit the rational of their inclusion in an FA? Paleface Jack (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, if you can't post the content of the sources I asked for anywhere, then I can't pass the spotcheck. If rewriting the rationale can fit the image issue then you can do that, but if not the images have to be removed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. I will see what I can do about the pages being sent to you. Paleface Jack (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- it will probably be tomorrow cause I am busy today. Paleface Jack (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Apparently, there is no need. It is available on Internet Archive.
- Paleface Jack (talk) 16:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. I will see what I can do about the pages being sent to you. Paleface Jack (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, if you can't post the content of the sources I asked for anywhere, then I can't pass the spotcheck. If rewriting the rationale can fit the image issue then you can do that, but if not the images have to be removed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you did not receive the requested pages, I will send them to you. Paleface Jack (talk) 16:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry if I seem a bit confused. I have never done that before and dont really know how. I dont have a high quality scanner or anything substantial. If i cannot do that is there any way you want me to verify the information? Also how can i ensure that non-free and even free images fit the rational of their inclusion in an FA? Paleface Jack (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Butting in, PJ the usual approach is to email or dropbox phone camera pics of tree sources or screenshots of subscription/ebooks. Ceoil (talk) 01:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hm. This seems complicated. Paleface Jack (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, but when it comes to spot-checks I require it. Sources that aren't online can be tricky to check, thus need more careful review at FAC stage. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- I understand. I am currently screenshotting those pages for you though they might not have the page number on them because I want to preserve the legibility but I will name the files after the page number. Paleface Jack (talk) 17:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, but when it comes to spot-checks I require it. Sources that aren't online can be tricky to check, thus need more careful review at FAC stage. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hm. This seems complicated. Paleface Jack (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Article for Callum Reynolds
editHi Jojo, I would like to build an article for English footballer Callum Reynolds, who's playing in the EFL (professional football) for the first time following Bromley's promotion. I believe it's time to create an article page for him, but it says it requires admin access to be created, can you please unprotect it so we can create the article? Thank you ChampsRT (Profile • Talk) 03:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Greetings. My impression is that the notability guidelines for football articles have been tightened over the years so "playing in the EFL (professional football) for the first time following Bromley's promotion" might no longer be sufficient. In particular, Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability is now an essay. Are there reliable sources that discuss him in detail? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I believe there are enough reliable sources for him as he played for several clubs that had articles about him. Here are some examples: Bromley, Dagenham, Barnet, Aldershot, Boreham Wood ChampsRT (Profile • Talk) 01:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mm, I don't think that these would be considered independent sources for notability purposes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- What would make sources independent for notability purposes? Does this BBC article and this count? ChampsRT (Profile • Talk) 14:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- These are better, yes. Not sure if they are enough. Probably best to ask at WP:DRV - sometimes the closing administrator isn't best placed to re-assess sourcing. Besides, with only 3 participants in the last AfD there probably isn't a high bar to re-evaluation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- What would make sources independent for notability purposes? Does this BBC article and this count? ChampsRT (Profile • Talk) 14:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mm, I don't think that these would be considered independent sources for notability purposes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I believe there are enough reliable sources for him as he played for several clubs that had articles about him. Here are some examples: Bromley, Dagenham, Barnet, Aldershot, Boreham Wood ChampsRT (Profile • Talk) 01:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
editHappy First Edit Day! Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
edit- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush