Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Congress Hall in Nürnberg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
fix link |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Oppose''' per Cowtowner. --[[User:Wingtipvortex|<font color="green">'''Wingtipvorte<sup>X</sup>'''</font>]] [[User talk:Wingtipvortex|<font color="green">''PTT''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Wingtipvortex|<font color="green">∅</font>]] 18:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' per Cowtowner. --[[User:Wingtipvortex|<font color="green">'''Wingtipvorte<sup>X</sup>'''</font>]] [[User talk:Wingtipvortex|<font color="green">''PTT''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Wingtipvortex|<font color="green">∅</font>]] 18:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' As Cowtowner said, this angle doesn't give a full idea of the shape of the building. It's a good illustration and a very nice photo, but is best understood in conjunction with other sources or photographs rather than on its own. This kind of building is very difficult to get a representative picture of from ground level. The best pictures I've seen of theatres and amphitheatres are from an elevated position. [[:Commons:File:Nuremberg_Aerial_Kongresshalle.JPG|It can be done]], but that may be quite difficult. [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 15:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' As Cowtowner said, this angle doesn't give a full idea of the shape of the building. It's a good illustration and a very nice photo, but is best understood in conjunction with other sources or photographs rather than on its own. This kind of building is very difficult to get a representative picture of from ground level. The best pictures I've seen of theatres and amphitheatres are from an elevated position. [[:Commons:File:Nuremberg_Aerial_Kongresshalle.JPG|It can be done]], but that may be quite difficult. [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 15:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Withdraw''' [[User:Tomer T|Tomer T]] ([[User talk:Tomer T|talk]]) 16:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 16:36, 26 June 2013
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 13:00:57 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and high EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Nazi party rally grounds, Documentation Center Nazi Party Rally Grounds
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Taxiarchos228
- Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 13:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose, as it stands, the image is only used in a gallery in the section of the Nazi party rally grounds article discussing the Congress Hall and sits pretty uselessly in the Documentation Center article (it gives no sense of where the center is in the building). As well, looking that the picture one would easily get the impression that the building is a round Coliseum-type structure as opposed to the open-ended horseshoe that it is. As such I think it's a poor depiction. Cowtowner (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cowtowner. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 18:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose As Cowtowner said, this angle doesn't give a full idea of the shape of the building. It's a good illustration and a very nice photo, but is best understood in conjunction with other sources or photographs rather than on its own. This kind of building is very difficult to get a representative picture of from ground level. The best pictures I've seen of theatres and amphitheatres are from an elevated position. It can be done, but that may be quite difficult. Nev1 (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Withdraw Tomer T (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
