User talk:Mhhossein

Archives (Index)

1 s/ 1 2 3 4 5 6

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Anders Feder (talk) 07:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

عکس محرم

لطفا عکس منو بزار برای عزاداری محرم. --۝ ۝ (talk) 06:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

@Sonia Sevilla: سلام. عکس فعلی شایستگی بیشتری برای ماندن در اینفوباکس دارد. در ویکی پدیا ملاک اجماع است که فکر میکنم در اینجا اجماع بر عکس اردبیل است. اگر توانستید عکس بهتری تهیه بفرمایید، بنده از آن حمایت میکنم. Mhhossein (talk) 11:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

متشکرم --۝ ۝ (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

عکس من بمونه دیگه.--ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 22:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا:دوست من، من انتخاب نمیکنم، جامعه کاربران باید تصمیم بگیرند و توافق کنند. عکس بهتری دارید؟ Mhhossein (talk) 04:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

نمیدونم. تو همون عکسهای محرمم از نیشابور بگرد یکی که بهتر بود به نظرت بزار--ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 10:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

@Sonia Sevilla:

با کسب اجازه از صاحبخانه، واقعا دلیل این کار شما را بنده متوجه نمیشوم، اصرار بر قرار گرفتن یک عکس از عزاداری محرم از شهر نیشابور به هر قیمتی. شما 1000تا عکس از این شهر توی ویکی کامانز آپلود کردین، تماما دوست دارین توی مقالات مرتبط به کار ببرید. برای مراسم عزاداری شما اگر عکس بهتری نسبت به اردبیل میخواهید باید عکسی باشدکه ابهت، جمعیت، گستردگی، شکوه این مراسم را بهتر به دنیا نشان دهد. نه عکسی که شما میگذارید با 6 نفر آدم. قبلا نیز یادم هست که مراسم عزاداری اردبیل رابه قمه زنی شبیه می کردید، گرچه توی این عکس یک قمه دست کسی نبود، یعنی قمه‌زنی در انزار عمومی ممنوع هست

شما نیز گستردگی جمعیت عزاداران حسینی را در معدود شهرهای دنیا میتوانید بیابید، در ایران بجز زنجان، اردبیل، کرمان، یزد و فک کنم کاشان و آران و بیدگل کمتر بتوان جمعیتی با گستردگی زیاد پیدا کرد.

امسال نیز از مردتنها نزدیکی محرم درخواست خواهم کرد عکسی از عزاداران زنجان در روز عاشورا بگذارد که تمام جمعیت نیم میلیونی را پوشش دهد، بیشتر از جمعیت کل نیشابور عزادار در زنجان وجود دارد که از شهرهای مختلف ایران و دنیا می‌آیند.-Samək^Talk 13:13, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

@Sonia Sevilla: بنده هم با جناب Samək موافقم. در ضمن ویرایش اخیر شما و حذف تصویر اردبیل کار درستی نبود. لطفا این کار را تکرار نکنید. Mhhossein (talk) 13:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

اصرار من بر «نیشابور» نیست (هرچند ممکن است از نگاه کاربران ایرانی -آذری ، ایران فقط زنجان و اردبیل و مشهد باشه!). اصرار من بر این است که هیچ لزومی ندارد گستردگی و جمعیت زیاد را به رخ بکشید. این یعنی تبلیغ. محرم حج که نیست که شما بر تعداد افراد شرکت کنندش تاکید دارید. تعصب مذهبی هیچ جایی تو ویکیپدیا نداره. --ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 11:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

اصلاً هرچی شما میگید درسته. --ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 11:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

@Samak: شما هم میتونید هزاران عکس بازگذاری کنید. اگه "دید" ویژه عکاسیتون خوب میشه، حتی از یک روستا هم میتونید هزاران عکس بگیرید. ایران هم فقط بخش شمالغربی اش و تبریز و اینا نیست. --ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 11:18, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

شما یک ذره به پیشنهاد من احترام نگذاشتید اون وقت به من میگید اصرار میکنم؟ تمام سخن من این است « با توجه به دیدگاه کنونی عمومی غربیها نسبت به اسلام؛عکسی بهتر است که جمیعت عزاداران را "آرام" نشان بدهد. این دسته های عزاداری در خیابان ها فقط بخشی از مراسم عزاداری است. عکس من هم همین ویژگی را نشان می دهد بعلاوه با حضور یک نیروی امنیتی. در ضمن، اگر واقعاً میخاهید عزاداری محرم را نشان بدهید، عکس اصلی باید از کربلا باشه. چون کربلا اصل قضیه است، هرچند در شهرهای دیگه هم عزاداری باشکوه برگزار بشه، اصل رویداد برمیگرده به کربلا و اهمیتش. --ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا (talk) 11:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

@Sonia Sevilla: اتفاقا باید با انبوه جمعیت باشد تا بیگانگان با بزرگی این رخداد آشنا شوند. اگر از کربلا یا نجف عکس بهتری داشتین پیشنهاد دهید بنده استقبال می‌کنم، امسال از شهرمان کسی برای اربعین راهی کربلا شد حتما بهش می‌سپارم از جمعیت 20 میلیونی کربلا که یکی از List of largest peaceful gatherings in history تجمعات مسالمت‌آمیز جهان هست عکسی بگذارد. برای شما نیز باید پیامی که اینجا گذاشته اید باید تاسف خورد.

افراط‌گرایان شیعه؟ شما مردمی را که برای عزاداری آمده‌اند افراطی می‌نامید؟ یا شما مردم اردبیل را افراطی می‌نامید؟ واقعا از دید اهل تسنن و شما که جزوی از آن هستین این عکس نشانه افراط هست. فقط تاسف میخورم.Samək^Talk 12:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Birmingham Quran manuscript

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Birmingham Quran manuscript.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:36, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

IKA Howard

I request you to arrange the page of I. K. A. Howard Ph.D. Lecturer in Arabic and Islamic Studies at the University of Edinburgh, died in March 2013. He deserves to be included in this encyclopedia. I could not find him at EN:WP. Thanks Nannadeem (talk) 18:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

@Nannadeem: Hey, What makes him notable? Mhhossein (talk) 18:29, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Plz see this [1] and decide yourself. Nannadeem (talk) 18:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

@Nannadeem: It seems interesting to me. I'll have it into account and will create a page for it, soon or late. Thanks for informing me. Mhhossein (talk) 04:06, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

barnstar

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For excellent work at Qods Day. LavaBaron (talk) 22:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 04:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

ETA - that article is under a 1RR restriction, of which you are already in violation. VQuakr (talk) 04:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

@VQuakr: Hi and thanks for your delayed welcoming. I'm actively editing here more than a year. I had just forgot that the article is under restricted revert rules and I did not aim to violate it at all. There's no edit warring and I meant to restore the materials that needed to be discussed in the article talk page and as you see, I opened a topic there just before the reversion. Thanks for reminding me.Mhhossein (talk) 04:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Well, you are still welcome! Sorry though; I was going for the "softer" warning and forgot it was aimed at brand-new editors. No condescension intended. Why do you think it is necessary or desirable to restore those materials prior to discussion? To rephrase, why do you think it is necessary to edit war? VQuakr (talk) 04:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

VQuakr: Well, I believe that discussing them will reduce the possible tensions in such challenging articles. I don't say they must stay there, but as an editor, I'd like to know why and express my own opinions under the devised talk page topic. Was that an edit war? As far as I know, edit war is editing without trying to solve the issue by discussion, isn't it? Mhhossein (talk) 05:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

"An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions." This is an example of edit warring. It's WP:BRD, not WP:BRRD. VQuakr (talk) 05:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

VQuakr: That's it and I followed WP:BRD. In my first reversion, I undid a vandal. In fact, I did not repeatedly undo a single edit, did I? Mhhossein (talk)

No, you did not follow BRD: the B was whoever added it, R, R. You should have left the article alone and gone to the talk page. VQuakr (talk) 05:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

VQuakr: FYI, I added it for the first time. Anyway, I know the I should not have violated 1RR, but it was not intentionally done. Mhhossein (talk) 06:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Khamenei's fatwa against nuclear weapon

@Mhhossein:. I was reviewing Ali Khamenei page and noticed that you have created a separate page for the Fatwa section. I wanted to thank you for that and notify you that I made a few improvements to the article. Strivingsoul (talk) 09:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC).

Appreciate your Fatwa highlighting. Also request to reconsider the sister and daughter issue at page Fatima (A.S). Thanks. Nannadeem (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Strivingsoul: The article really needed it! Thanks. Mhhossein (talk) 09:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Nannadeem: Thanks for your appreciation. Btw, I'll try to open a topic for the issue of Fatima (A.S). Mhhossein (talk) 09:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Nuclear weapon#RfC: Section about Ali Khamenei's views. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I mentioned this before on the talk page, but maybe you missed it. Stuff like this is not acceptable. Please stop badgering other editors and dominating the discussion by replying to everyone. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)