Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oranjblud: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎31 January 2016: Fixing style/layout errors
Marking case as closed
Line 4: Line 4:


===31 January 2016===
===31 January 2016===
{{SPI case status|}}
{{SPI case status|close}}


;Suspected sockpuppets
;Suspected sockpuppets
Line 37: Line 37:


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
*Closing. The evidence is weak and circumstantial. '''[[User:Vanjagenije|<font color="008B8B">Vanjagenije</font>]] [[User talk:Vanjagenije|<font color="F4A460">(talk)</font>]]''' 23:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 23:36, 20 February 2016

Oranjblud

Oranjblud (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected


31 January 2016

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Removal of accessdates from citations.

  • xiiophen - [1]
  • See section "Undiscussed large-scale removal of accessdate=" on talk page of prof.Haddock for which they were blocked for editwarring on St Pancras railway station.

Use of short months

Use of citation template

Use of American spellings such as center on British pages

Same accounts on Commons.

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments