¿Cómo se pueden establecer plazos realistas en la realidad virtual?

In today's scenario, most deals are completed over phone calls and video conferencing. There are many deals I have personally won without even meeting the client in person for a demo. But the same doesn't work when it comes to project execution. Because the sale happens at a higher level and the person is not bothered about the modalities, but the ones executing the project need to understand the difference between standalone VR, PC-VR, device limitations, graphic quality etc., This works only if the execution team tries out our previous demos to understand the interactions required based on their audience and set realistic goals. So I suggest insisting the stake holders to try demo VR applications before setting the goals of the project.

𝓤𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓥𝓡 𝓒𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓮𝓼 ᴜɴᴘʀᴇᴅɪᴄᴛᴀʙɪʟɪᴛʏ: VR is a new frontier, with emerging technologies and evolving user expectations. Be prepared for unexpected technical hurdles, platform changes, and shifting consumer preferences. ꜱᴄᴏᴘᴇ ᴄʀᴇᴇᴘ: The immersive nature of VR can inspire ambitious ideas. It's important to define a clear Minimum Viable Product (MVP) to avoid getting bogged down in an endlessly expanding project. ᴛᴇꜱᴛɪɴɢ & ɪᴛᴇʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴ: VR requires more extensive user testing and feedback cycles to ensure comfort, ease of use, and to gauge player reactions, which takes time.

Setting realistic deadlines in VR involves several steps. First, thoroughly understand the scope of the project and its requirements. Break down tasks into smaller, manageable components and estimate the time required for each. Consider potential obstacles or delays, such as technical challenges or unexpected revisions. Consult team members or stakeholders for input on feasibility and timeline constraints. Use project management tools to track progress and adjust deadlines as needed. Finally, communicate openly with all involved parties to ensure everyone understands and agrees upon the timeline.

To establish realistic deadlines in VR, leverage technical management skills by engaging stakeholders through questioning and facilitating team-stakeholder connections. Conduct meetings to gain a comprehensive understanding of analysis & development requirements from the stakeholders' perspective. Encourage ur team to actively participate in these discussions for valuable insights. Implement buffer times in ur project timeline to account for unforeseen challenges, ensuring a safety net for bug fixes and feedback collection. This strategic approach enhances the adaptability of VR technology projects. In conclusion, a meticulously planned and executed VR application emerges, attuned to stakeholder needs & fortified against potential setbacks.

Developing for VR is very different from traditional 2d mediums. We specialise in creating VR training and have created a tried and tested processes for delivering projects. First is requirements gathering. Normally we are trying to replicate real-world procedures and the best way to capture this is to video a subject matter specialist carrying out and narrating the process. Once we have captured the process we break it down in to the individual steps that the user must carry out. These steps are also used for pricing the development. Up to 50 user steps would create 1 modules and up to 5 modules equals a full scenario. We then create a user flow which shows the steps but also the different game responses which we call node steps.

Ways to Improve: Specificity for VR: It could benefit from examples relevant to the unique challenges of VR development. Flexibility: Highlight that task breakdown methods are adaptable to the project's scale and the team's preference. VR involves technical, artistic, AND experiential factors. Tasks should reflect this – some will be "code the inventory system", others might be "test 3 UI button colors for clarity in low-light environments".

VR experiences are particularly sensitive to framerate and latency. Profile often to pinpoint CPU/GPU bottlenecks, draw calls, memory leaks, and physics anomalies that disrupt player comfort. Utilize debug overlays for data relevant to the user's experience: object properties, raycasts, interaction points, performance graphs, etc. This gives immediate feedback without switching environments.