Comment utilisez-vous le modèle de Fisher et Ury pour séparer les gens du problème dans les négociations stratégiques?

1) Understand Interests and Concerns : Pay attention to what each party truly wants and what worries them. 2) Address Emotions with Care : Recognize and handle emotions gently. 3) Stay on Topic, Avoid Personal Attacks : Keep discussions focused on the problem, not on blaming each other. 4) Use Respectful Language : Speak in a way that shows you value the other person's viewpoint. 5) Listen Actively : Make sure you really understand where the other party is coming from by listening closely to what they say.

The Fisher and Ury model, outlined in their book "Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In," emphasizes separating the people from the problem as a crucial aspect of effective negotiation.

Utilizing the Fisher and Ury model involves methodically addressing issues while depersonalizing conflicts. It emphasizes focusing on interests rather than positions, fostering collaboration. In strategic negotiations, this means recognizing that negotiation isn't about concessions but about employing effective methodology and strategy. By understanding this, one can navigate complex dynamics, preserve relationships, and achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.

In my experience, when I was looking to upgrade our customer service system, I sat down with a software company rep. Instead of just talking about prices and features, we delved into what we both wanted. I shared our need for a seamless system, while they opened up about wanting a happy client and a thriving business. It felt like we were both invested in the success of our partnership, beyond just signing a contract.

To achieve this separation, it's crucial to employ empathetic and constructive communication: Focus on underlying interests and concerns of both parties. Acknowledge emotions and address them sensitively. Avoid personal attacks and maintain focus on the issues at hand. Use non-confrontational language and demonstrate mutual respect. Utilize active listening techniques to fully understand the other parties' perspectives.

Despite differences in negotiating styles and priorities, both parties remind themselves to focus on finding solutions to the underlying business challenges rather than getting caught up in personal conflicts or past grievances. They maintain professionalism and mutual respect throughout the negotiation process.

In applying the Fisher and Ury model, I approach separating people from the problem with a modern and disruptive perspective. By leveraging empathetic listening and emotional intelligence, I acknowledge and address the underlying emotions shaping negotiations. Through open-ended questioning, I uncover shared values and beliefs, fostering understanding and collaboration. Utilizing positive and cooperative language, I express my needs while showing genuine interest in the other party's concerns. This approach cultivates a constructive atmosphere, driving towards innovative solutions and sustainable agreements.

I always try to frame contentions as *we* have a problem between us that *we* need to solve together. In this way, I immediately try to separate the people from the problem, recognizing the the other party's role as my teammate in this dilemma, and asking for their collaboration to resolve it. And at the end of the day, none of this should be personal. All representatives of parties involved are merely professionals doing a job. Keeping this perspective can allow you to more keenly identify why the other party/parties are responding as they are.

When proposing a revenue-sharing model for a collaborative project, both parties evaluate the proposed terms based on objective criteria such as market benchmarks, investment contributions, and expected returns. They ensure that the distribution of profits is perceived as fair and equitable by both sides.

Negotiators are people first, and separating the relationship from the substance of the negotiation can be challenging for both parties. To alter their perception, seek opportunities to act contrary to their expectations. A textbook example is the resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis. President Kennedy defied the perception of American aggressiveness by choosing a naval blockade and secret diplomatic negotiations over immediate military action. This unexpected strategy helped disentangle personal animosities from the core issues, leading to a peaceful resolution and avoiding nuclear war.

When discussing terms of a contract, both parties use clear and unambiguous language to outline their expectations and responsibilities. Instead of resorting to jargon or vague terms, they strive for transparency and clarity to avoid misunderstandings later on.