“This text is intended to serve as a college recommendation for Dinva Manolova. I have been acquainted with Divna for nine years, but came to know her well during the last three years, when we have been together at several international and local conferences in medieval philosophy. The last year we worked together as teaching assistants at the Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”. Although we taught different subjects, we often worked as team, shared information and discussed methodical issues. I have been truly impressed by her profound knowledge in the field of Byzantine philosophy, logic and rhetoric, on one hand, and, on the other hand, by her ability to arouse students’ interest and to provoke them to debate on complex philosophical subjects. Dinva is a motivated researcher, a person of great abilities and considerable self discipline. She is frank, likeable, enthusiastic and trustworthy.”
Divna Manolova
The optimistic byzantinist
Paris, Île-de-France, France
357 abonnés
346 relations
Activité
-
"Blogging the Heavens" our working group's blog has just launched! And the first entry is up! If you are interested in astral knowledge stay tuned!…
"Blogging the Heavens" our working group's blog has just launched! And the first entry is up! If you are interested in astral knowledge stay tuned!…
Aimé par Divna Manolova
-
Byzantine Science has its Oxford Bibliography: https://lnkd.in/dHBjqD6a. Updates are possible and suggestions are welcome.
Byzantine Science has its Oxford Bibliography: https://lnkd.in/dHBjqD6a. Updates are possible and suggestions are welcome.
Publié par Divna Manolova
-
Aidez les scientifiques du consortium Euclid à classer les galaxies... À compter du 1er août 2024, les membres du consortium Euclid, comprenant des…
Aidez les scientifiques du consortium Euclid à classer les galaxies... À compter du 1er août 2024, les membres du consortium Euclid, comprenant des…
Aimé par Divna Manolova
Expérience
-
-
Affiliate Member
Centre for Medieval Literature
-
University of York
-
-
-
Pontica Magna Returning Fellow
New Europe College
-
-
Postdoctoral Fellow
Institute for the Research in the Humanities, University of Bucharest
-
-
Black Sea Link Fellow
New Europe College
-
-
-
-
-
-
Formation
-
Central European University
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) Medieval Studies
-
Activités et associations :Center for Eastern Mediterranean Studies
-
-
-
-
National Lyceum for Ancient Languages and Cultures
Secondary Education Classics, History, Philosophy, and Literature
-
Expériences de bénévolat
-
Assistant
Water Tower Art Fest
- aujourd’hui 10 ans 4 mois
Arts et culture
http://watertowerartfest.com/en/archive/2014-archive/
Publications
-
A Letter to John Tornikes on the Duties of Friendship and on Constantinople’s Delights. Translation and Commentary
Sources for Byzantine Art History, vol. 3: The Visual Culture of Later Byzantium (1081-c. 1350)
Translation co-authored with Paul Magdalino. In Sources for Byzantine Art History, vol. 3: The Visual Culture of Later Byzantium (1081-c. 1350), edited by Foteini Spingou, 630–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
-
Byzantine Commentaries on Ancient Greek Texts, 12th-15th Centuries
Cambridge University Press
Volume co-edited with Baukje van den Berg and Przemysław Marciniak.
This is the first volume to explore the commentaries on ancient texts produced and circulating in Byzantium. It adopts a broad chronological perspective (from the twelfth to the fifteenth century) and examines different types of commentaries on ancient poetry and prose within the context of the study and teaching of grammar, rhetoric, philosophy and science. By discussing the exegetical literature of the Byzantines as…Volume co-edited with Baukje van den Berg and Przemysław Marciniak.
This is the first volume to explore the commentaries on ancient texts produced and circulating in Byzantium. It adopts a broad chronological perspective (from the twelfth to the fifteenth century) and examines different types of commentaries on ancient poetry and prose within the context of the study and teaching of grammar, rhetoric, philosophy and science. By discussing the exegetical literature of the Byzantines as embedded in the socio-cultural context of the Komnenian and Palaiologan periods, the book analyses the frameworks and networks of knowledge transfer, patronage and identity building that motivated the Byzantine engagement with the ancient intellectual and literary tradition. -
Introduction: Byzantine Commentaries on Ancient Greek Texts
Byzantine Commentaries on Ancient Greek Texts, 12th-15th Centuries
Co-authored with Baukje van den Berg. In Byzantine Commentaries on Ancient Greek Texts, 12th-15th Centuries, 1-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Space, Place, Diagram: Cleomedes and the Visual Program of Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Graecus 482
The Diagram as Paradigm: Cross-Cultural Approaches
Edited by Jeffrey F. Hamburger, David Roxburgh, Linda Safran. Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine Symposia and Colloquia series, 149–65. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2022. ISBN 9780884024866
-
Wondrous Knowledge and the Emotional Responses of Late Byzantine Scholars to Its Acquisition
Emotions through Time: From Antiquity to Byzantium
Edited by Douglas Cairns, Martin Hinterberger, Aglae Pizzone, and Matteo Zaccarini, 75-94. Emotions in Antiquity. Mohr Siebeck, 2022.
-
Figures and Mirrors in Demetrios Triklinios's 'Selenography'
Interfaces: A Journal of Medieval European Literatures
In Interfaces: A Journal of Medieval European Literatures 8 (2021), 54–73. Open Access publication.
This article is about the interplay between diagrammatic representation, the mediation of mirrors, and visual cognition. It centres on Demetrios Triklinios (fl. ca. 1308–25/30) and his treatise on lunar theory. The latter includes, first, a discussion of the lunar phases and of the Moon's position in relation to the Sun, and second, a narrative and a pictorial description of the lunar…In Interfaces: A Journal of Medieval European Literatures 8 (2021), 54–73. Open Access publication.
This article is about the interplay between diagrammatic representation, the mediation of mirrors, and visual cognition. It centres on Demetrios Triklinios (fl. ca. 1308–25/30) and his treatise on lunar theory. The latter includes, first, a discussion of the lunar phases and of the Moon's position in relation to the Sun, and second, a narrative and a pictorial description of the lunar surface. Demetrios Triklinios's Selenography is little-known (though edited in 1967 by Wasserstein) and not available in translation into a modern scholarly language. Therefore, one of the main goals of the present article is to introduce its context and contents and to lay down the foundations for their detailed study at a later stage. When discussing the Selenography, I refer to a bricolage consisting of the two earliest versions of the work preserved in Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, graecus 482, ff. 92r–95v (third quarter of the fourteenth century) and Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, graecus 2381, ff. 78r–79v (last quarter of the fourteenth century). I survey the available evidence concerning the role of Demetrios Triklinios (the author), John Astrapas (?) (the grapheus or scribe-painter), and Neophytos Prodromenos and Anonymus (the scribes-editors) in the production of the two manuscript copies. Next, I discuss the diagrams included in the Selenography and their functioning in relation to Triklinios's theory concerning the Moon as a mirror reflecting the geography of the Earth, on the one hand, and to the mirror experiment described by Triklinios, on the other. Finally, I demonstrate how, even though the Selenography is a work on lunar astronomy, it can also be read as a discussion focusing on the Mediterranean world and aiming at elevating its centrality and importance on a cosmic scale. -
Epistolography and Philosophy
A Companion to Byzantine Epistolography
Edited by Alexander Riehle, 255–278. Leiden: Brill.
The present contribution argues that the study of the interaction between philosophy and epistolography in Byzantium faces a number of methodological challenges. First, the study of Byzantine philosophical literature, including philosophical epistolography, depends on one’s definition of philosophy in respect to its cultural, intellectual, social, and disciplinary context in Byzantium. Second, essential for the examination of philosophical…Edited by Alexander Riehle, 255–278. Leiden: Brill.
The present contribution argues that the study of the interaction between philosophy and epistolography in Byzantium faces a number of methodological challenges. First, the study of Byzantine philosophical literature, including philosophical epistolography, depends on one’s definition of philosophy in respect to its cultural, intellectual, social, and disciplinary context in Byzantium. Second, essential for the examination of philosophical epistolography in Byzantium is the critical assessment of the category of philosophical letter and its relevance to the Byzantine material. Finally, the author argues that one possible venue for examining philosophical epistolography in Byzantium is the discussion of literary friendship and theories of friendship as developed in friendship letters. To illustrate the theoretical approach it proposes, this contribution offers a case study of two letters written by Nikephoros Gregoras (d. c.1360). -
Science Teaching and Learning Methods in Byzantium
A Companion to Byzantine Science
Co-authored with Inmaculada Pérez Martín. In "A Companion to Byzantine Science", edited by Stavros Lazaris. Leiden: Brill 2020, pp. 53-104.
-
Мануил Оловол, Максим Плануд и Боеций: Преводи на παιδεία в късната Византия
Sine arte scientia nihil est: Изследвания в чест на проф. дфн Олег Георгиев
The chapter is available open access, in Bulgarian, through Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/record/4298472#.YxW6uy0RqS4). [Manuel Holobolos, Maximos Planudes, and Boethius: Translating παιδεία in Late Byzantium] In Sine arte scientia nihil est: Изследвания в чест на проф. дфн Олег Георгиев [Sine arte scientia nihil est: Festschrift for Prof. Oleg Georgiev], edited by Georgi Kapriev, 277–91. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, 2019.
-
The Source of Nicholas Rhabdas’ Letter to Khatzykes: An Anonymous Arithmetical Treatise in Vat. Barb. gr. 4
Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik
Co-authored with Fabio Acerbi and Inmaculada Pérez Martín. In Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 68 (2018), 1-37. Open Access Publication.
-
Who Writes the History of the Romans? Agency and Causality in Nikephoros Gregoras’ "Historia Rhōmaïkē"
New Europe College Yearbook 2014–2015
Edited by Irina Vainovski-Mihai. Bucharest: New Europe College, 97-123. Bucharest: New Europe College.
-
Nikephoros Gregoras’s "Philomathes" and "Phlorentios"
In "Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzantium", edited by Averil Cameron and Niels Gaul, 203–19. London and New York: Routledge.
Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzantium offers the first overall discussion of the literary and philosophical dialogue tradition in Greek from imperial Rome to the end of the Byzantine empire and beyond. Sixteen case studies combine theoretical approaches with in-depth analysis and include comparisons with the neighbouring Syriac, Georgian, Armenian and Latin traditions. Following an introduction and a discussion of Plutarch as a writer of dialogues, other chapters consider…
Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzantium offers the first overall discussion of the literary and philosophical dialogue tradition in Greek from imperial Rome to the end of the Byzantine empire and beyond. Sixteen case studies combine theoretical approaches with in-depth analysis and include comparisons with the neighbouring Syriac, Georgian, Armenian and Latin traditions. Following an introduction and a discussion of Plutarch as a writer of dialogues, other chapters consider the Erostrophus, a philosophical dialogue in Syriac, John Chrysostom’s On Priesthood, issues of literariness and complexity in the Greek Adversus Iudaeos dialogues, the Trophies of Damascus, Maximus Confessor’s Liber Asceticus and the middle Byzantine apocryphal revelation dialogues. The volume demonstrates a new frequency in middle and late Byzantium of rhetorical, theological and literary dialogues, concomitant with the increasing rhetoricisation of Byzantine literature, and argues for a move towards new and exciting experiments. Individual chapters examine the Platonising and anti-Latin dialogues written in the context of Anselm of Havelberg’s visits to Constantinople, the theological dialogue by Soterichos Panteugenos, the dialogues of Niketas ‘of Maroneia’ and the literary dialogues by Theodore Prodromos, all from the twelfth century. The final chapters explore dialogues from the empire’s Georgian periphery and discuss late Byzantine philosophical, satirical and verse dialogues by Nikephoros Gregoras, Manuel II Palaiologos and George Scholarios, with special attention to issues of form, dramatisation and performance.
-
The Student Becomes the Teacher: Nikephoros Gregoras’ "Hortatory Letter Concerning Astronomy"
Toward a Historical Sociolinguistic Poetics of Medieval Greek
Edited by Andrea M. Cuomo and Erich Trapp. Byzantioς, 143–60. Studies in Byzantine History and Civilization 12. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. Licence: CC BY–NC 4.0; Gold Open Access publication.
-
“‘If It Looks Like a Letter, Reads Like a Letter, and Talks Like a Letter:’ The Case of Nikephoros Gregoras’ Letter-Collection
Brepols
In "Medieval Letters between Fiction and Document", edited by Christian Høgel and Elisabetta Bartoli, 317–33. Utrecht Studies in Medieval Literacy 33. Turnhout: Brepols.
-
Measuring the World: Sciences and Technologies in Byzantine Constantinople
ISAM Publications, Kültür AS
In "History of Istanbul: Educational Science and Technology," edited by Coşkun Yılmaz, 264–70. Istanbul: ISAM Publications, Kültür AS. Published in Turkish Translation.
-
Spiritual Guidance in Ninth-century Byzantium: English Translation of the Letters of Theodore the Stoudite to Eirene the Patrician
Annual of Medieval Studies at CEU 21
Co-authored with Anna Adashinskaya, Katarzyna Gara, Niels Gaul, Dora Ivanišević, András Kraft, Dimitris Minasidis, Mihail Mitrea, Alexander Riehle, Foteini Spingou, Alexey Stambolov, Paraskevi Sykopetritou, and Nikolaos Zagklas. Annual of Medieval Studies at CEU 21 (2015): 162–76.
Other authorsSee publication -
Homeric Quotations in Nikephoros Gregoras’ Correspondence: Patterns of Employment
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
-
Letters
Christian-Muslim Relations. A Bibliographical History. General Editor David Thomas. Brill Online.
Nicephorus Gregoras’ epistolary collection includes 159 letters written by Gregoras himself, and 22 letters addressed to him by 14 of his contemporaries. The letters included in the collection cover the period from the early 1320s to the mid 1350s, with letters from the 1330s and 1340s being the most numerous. Gregoras wrote to at least 62 different addressees, designated…
-
Една византийска дискусия относно приятелството в писмата на Никифор Григора. [A Byzantine discussion of friendship: The case of Nikephoros Gregoras’ letter-collection]
Archive for Medieval Philosophy and Culture / Archiv für mittelalterliche Philosophie und Kultur 18
The present article reconstructs and analyzes two rhetorical strategies of constructing epistolary friendship through the employment of specialized philosophical vocabulary and discussion. Case in point are two late Byzantine letters penned by Nikephoros Gregoras (ca. 1292/1295–1358/1361), a prominent historian, astronomer and philosopher at the Palaiologan court. The first part of the inquiry discusses letter 134, addressed to Ignatios Glabas, metropolitan of Thessaloniki from 1336 to 1341…
The present article reconstructs and analyzes two rhetorical strategies of constructing epistolary friendship through the employment of specialized philosophical vocabulary and discussion. Case in point are two late Byzantine letters penned by Nikephoros Gregoras (ca. 1292/1295–1358/1361), a prominent historian, astronomer and philosopher at the Palaiologan court. The first part of the inquiry discusses letter 134, addressed to Ignatios Glabas, metropolitan of Thessaloniki from 1336 to 1341. The second half of the article is dedicated to letter 34, addressed to Maximos Magistros, a monk and later an archimandrite of the Chortaïtes monastery. Both letters seem to be written around the same time, i.e. during the second half of the 1330s. Letter 134 employs Aristotle’s theory of friendship as found in books VIII and IX of Nicomachean Ethics, as well as in Rhetoric. Here, with a subversive maneuver, Gregoras defends the claim that even those not equal in fortune could still be joined by the bond of friendship. Letter 34 exemplifies the opposite strategy: it praises the friendship of those who are the same in nature, employing Plato’s cosmological discussion in the Timaeus, as well as the corresponding commentary by Plutarch. In conclusion, the article argues for the primacy of rhetorical function over philosophical discussion in the two epistolary strategies employed by Gregoras.
-
Astronomy as Battlefield? Nikephoros Gregoras, Barlaam of Calabria and the Calculation of the Sun Eclipse
Archive for Medieval Philosophy and Culture / Archiv für mittelalterliche Philosophie und Kultur 16
In a letter written between the solar eclipses of November 1331 and the one of May 1333 Nikephoros Gregoras (ca. 1292/1295–1358/1361) described his involvement in an on-going ‘debate’ on astronomical matters and more precisely, on the accuracy of the calculation of the solar eclipses’ date. Gregoras described the relations between him and his adversaries in the following way: Therefore, having made those people aware that there will be another eclipse of the sun, after that one, whose date and…
In a letter written between the solar eclipses of November 1331 and the one of May 1333 Nikephoros Gregoras (ca. 1292/1295–1358/1361) described his involvement in an on-going ‘debate’ on astronomical matters and more precisely, on the accuracy of the calculation of the solar eclipses’ date. Gregoras described the relations between him and his adversaries in the following way: Therefore, having made those people aware that there will be another eclipse of the sun, after that one, whose date and hour, and measure it is necessary to determine, then, I continued being dedicated to silence for a whole one year, up to the present day. By announcing such news, I seemed to those similar, as it were, to someone who had thrown a precious stone into the deep sea. Thus I imposed on them, diving into the sea, to search for the place in the abyss, at the bottom of the sea, where the thrown stone lies. But such a task is not at all similar; on the contrary it is to such extend easier as it is for a small child to take up in its hands a bundle of stalks.
-
Innovation and Self-reflection in Sophonias’ Paraphrasis of De Anima
Annual of Medieval Studies at CEU 15
-
On Essence and Action - Book Six
Archive for Medieval Philosophy and Culture / Archiv für mittelalterliche Philosophie und Kultur 14
Прохор Кидонис, “За същността и действието – шестта книга (превод Д. Манолова).”In Bulgarian, translation and a commentary.
-
"Sophonias,” “Georgios Chrysokokkes,” and “Nikephoros Gregoras”
Vienna: Akademie Verlag
In "Lexikon byzantinischer Autoren," edited by Alexander Riehle and Michael Grünbart, forthcoming.
Projets
-
DyAs – Lines and Colours: Lunisolar Diagrams in Byzantine Astronomical Manuscripts (9th–15th C)
DyAs studies how astronomical diagrams operate as vehicles for the delivery of scientific arguments in Byzantine manuscripts copied between the ninth and the fifteenth centuries. It focuses on diagrams involving and transmitting knowledge about the two luminaries, the sun and the moon (e.g., lunar and solar eclipse diagrams). Employing the geometric idiom of points, lines, intersections and circles, on the one hand, and differently coloured inks, on the other, lunisolar diagrams encode…
DyAs studies how astronomical diagrams operate as vehicles for the delivery of scientific arguments in Byzantine manuscripts copied between the ninth and the fifteenth centuries. It focuses on diagrams involving and transmitting knowledge about the two luminaries, the sun and the moon (e.g., lunar and solar eclipse diagrams). Employing the geometric idiom of points, lines, intersections and circles, on the one hand, and differently coloured inks, on the other, lunisolar diagrams encode knowledge about the structure of the universe, light and its intensity, time, distance and movement. In doing so, they rely on the aniconicity they share with the surrounding script and on the use of colour they have in common with the image (eikōn). DyAs aims at understanding the cognitive functions and graphic conventions of Byzantine astronomical diagrams and their employment of light/shadow and colours/lines in order to structure knowledge. DyAs positions the Byzantine evidence in a comparative Afro-Eurasian context and demonstrates its importance within the network of interrelated cultures of the wider medieval world. The project’s comparative, global and highly interdisciplinary perspective is guaranteed through its collaboration with the open data repository and digital humanities platform DISHAS (Digital Information System for the History of Astral Sciences). Together with DISHAS, DyAs will break new ground in the use of AI and computer vision, thus opening up novel research venues in both Digital Humanities and Manuscript Studies. It will also make the Medieval Greek diagrammatic evidence publicly accessible and integrated in a network of contemporary Latin, Arabic, Persian, Hebrew, Sanskrit and Chinese sources. Thus, DyAs will revolutionise the fields of Medieval and Byzantine Studies, History of Science, Digital Humanities and History of Art.
-
Lunar Diagrams and Representations in Byzantine and Slavonic Manuscripts (9th–15th Century)
-
The present project continues the process of decentralisation of existing history of science narratives and introduces Byzantium and the Black Sea region as important agents in the story of medieval Afro-Eurasian thought concerning the moon, its surface, its phases, its celestial movement, the nature of its light and its role in the occurrence of eclipses (both lunar and solar). The project treats lunar representations (diagrammatic and illustrative) as intrinsic drivers of the theories…
The present project continues the process of decentralisation of existing history of science narratives and introduces Byzantium and the Black Sea region as important agents in the story of medieval Afro-Eurasian thought concerning the moon, its surface, its phases, its celestial movement, the nature of its light and its role in the occurrence of eclipses (both lunar and solar). The project treats lunar representations (diagrammatic and illustrative) as intrinsic drivers of the theories expounded by the accompanying texts, and as spaces where scientific arguments are developed in ways which the linear and sequential structure of a narrative does not support. Thus, while it chooses the moon and its diagrammatic and illustrative representations as a core case study, the project also explores the role representation plays in the construction and display of cosmological and astronomical models during the Middle Ages. To this end, the project will offer the first typology of lunar representations preserved in Byzantine and South Slavonic manuscripts and will analyze the resulting dataset as embedded in a network of knowledge transfer and exchange with the wider Slavonic world and the Black Sea and Caucasus regions throughout the medieval period. Thus, Byzantine examples will not be studied in isolation, but rather as a significant node in a wider network of cosmological and astronomical thinking and manuscript production.
-
Competing Cosmological Models of the Universe in Late Byzantium
-
The present project studied models of the universe in Byzantine commentaries of ancient Greek astronomical works, works on natural philosophy and astronomy, and Greek translations of Latin cosmological texts produced between the 13th and 15th centuries. Employing both published and manuscript evidence, the project examined the nature, number, order, and movement of the heavenly spheres, their schematic representation in accompanying diagrams, and the relation between text and image in the…
The present project studied models of the universe in Byzantine commentaries of ancient Greek astronomical works, works on natural philosophy and astronomy, and Greek translations of Latin cosmological texts produced between the 13th and 15th centuries. Employing both published and manuscript evidence, the project examined the nature, number, order, and movement of the heavenly spheres, their schematic representation in accompanying diagrams, and the relation between text and image in the creation of knowledge about the universe. Having traced the prevalent theoretical models and their variants, my inquiry then proceeded by analysing the rhetorical strategies Byzantine thinkers devised in order to harmonize existing authoritative doctrines. Finally, the present project explored cosmology’s political and social function in Byzantium and the related impact of competitive Latin universal models introduced through translations into Greek.
-
Polymathy and Intellectual Curiosity in Byzantine Discourses of Science and Philosophy (13th-15th C)
-
The POLONEZ 1 project “Polymathy and Intellectual Curiosity in Byzantine Discourses of Science and Philosophy (13th-15th Centuries)” with registration number UMO-2015/19/P/HS2/02739 is supported by the National Science Centre, Poland. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 665778.
Langues
-
English
Capacité professionnelle complète
-
Spanish
Capacité professionnelle complète
-
Bulgarian
Bilingue ou langue natale
-
Latin
Capacité professionnelle complète
-
Greek, Ancient (to 1453)
Capacité professionnelle complète
Recommandations reçues
1 personne a recommandé Divna
Inscrivez-vous pour y accéderPlus d’activités de Divna
-
As a #PRfP #MSCA postdoctoral fellow I was encouraged to seek mentoring outside of academia - a perfect opportunity to reconnect with fellow former…
As a #PRfP #MSCA postdoctoral fellow I was encouraged to seek mentoring outside of academia - a perfect opportunity to reconnect with fellow former…
Publié par Divna Manolova
-
We were delighted to host the PRfP Pitch Session at the Paris Region Région Île-de-France last week. In the framework of the European project…
We were delighted to host the PRfP Pitch Session at the Paris Region Région Île-de-France last week. In the framework of the European project…
Aimé par Divna Manolova
-
I had the great pleasure and honor of recently visiting U. of Cambridge's Department of History and Philosophy of Science to give a research seminar…
I had the great pleasure and honor of recently visiting U. of Cambridge's Department of History and Philosophy of Science to give a research seminar…
Aimé par Divna Manolova
-
A little experiment and great success - thanks to Astronomy on Tap Paris, to all who came and shared our curiosity, to all who sent me their…
A little experiment and great success - thanks to Astronomy on Tap Paris, to all who came and shared our curiosity, to all who sent me their…
Partagé par Divna Manolova
-
La mission Euclid de l’ESA livre ses premiers résultats scientifiques Jeudi 23 mai 2024, le consortium Euclid, comprenant des scientifiques de…
La mission Euclid de l’ESA livre ses premiers résultats scientifiques Jeudi 23 mai 2024, le consortium Euclid, comprenant des scientifiques de…
Aimé par Divna Manolova