Stephanie Seymour’s estranged hubby is so angry that the supermodel repeatedly submitted “invalid” urine samples for drug and booze tests that he wants a judge to award him sole custody of their kids, The Post has learned.
In court papers filed in his increasingly ugly divorce battle with the former model, publishing mogul Peter Brant also claims that she and a moving crew last week broke into the couple’s Florida mansion and took $700,000 worth of items on a day she was supposed to be with the kids — who “remained behind in a hotel room in Connecticut.”
Seymour, 40, sued Brant, 62, for divorce in Stamford Superior Court in May after 16 years of marriage.
Brant, in an Oct. 7 court filing, alleged that Seymour in 2000 entered treatment for her addiction to Vicodin and later was prescribed the drug Subutex, which is used to treat opiate addictions.
He also noted that despite Seymour agreeing in June to drug and alcohol tests, she has “missed multiple Breathalyzer tests in September and was lax in returning the calls of a court-appointed drug and alcohol tester.”
A judge on Sept. 17 expanded testing for Seymour. But 10 days later, a screen of a urine sample she provided “did not test positive for Subutex . . . even though [she] ingests 24 mg daily,” Brant claimed in court papers.
On Oct. 3, when Seymour submitted another urine sample, the tester reported that the urine failed to register at the minimum valid temperature and also tested negative for Subutex, court filings claim. A test on another urine sample she gave the next day was also deemed “invalid” because it was too cool.
Brant asks in his court filings that a judge give him sole custody of their three kids, reduce Seymour’s time with them, order her to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings and order her not to drink booze.
Divorce lawyers for Brant and Seymour did not return calls seeking comment.